Refractive surgery as a treatment tool for strabismus: systematic review

The impact refractive surgery has on preoperative horizontal strabismus is rapidly evolving, and this knowledge can provide valuable clinical context when considering refractive surgery as a treatment for strabismus. 515 studies were identified, of which 26 met the inclusion criteria. Analysis indicated that refractive surgery resulted in an overall decrease in the mean uncorrected postoperative angle of deviation caused partially or fully due to refractive error and highlighted the varied outcome of refractive surgery on nonaccommodative horizontal strabismus with limited evidence to suggest refractive surgery for this type of strabismus. Efficacy of refractive surgery in reducing concomitant horizontal strabismus depends on several factors: type of horizontal ocular deviation, patient age, and extent of refractive error. Refractive surgery can be an effective treatment for refractive accommodative horizontal strabismus in patients with stable, mild to moderate myopia or hyperopia and should be considered with careful patient selection for optimum outcome.

Binocular vision alterations after refractive and cataract surgery: a review

To review binocular and accommodative disorders documented after corneal or intraocular refractive surgery, in normal healthy prepresbyopic patients. A bibliographic revision was performed; it included works published before 1st July 2017 where accommodation and/or binocularity was assessed following any type of refractive surgical procedure. The search in Pubmed yielded 1273 papers, 95 of which fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Few publications reporting binocular vision and/or accommodative changes after refractive surgery in normal subjects were found. The reduction in fusional vergence is the most frequently reported alteration. Anisometropia is an important risk factor for postoperative binocular vision-related complaints. Most diplopia-related visual complaints, irrespective of the surgical procedure, were in fact misdiagnosed preoperative disorders. The preoperative evaluation of patients seeking spectacle/contact lens independence should include a complete binocular and accommodation assessment where parameters such as the phoric posture, accommodative amplitude and facility, near point of convergence, fusional reserves and accommodative convergence/accommodation coefficient are measured. This would allow the identification of risk factors that could compromise the success of the refractive surgery and cause clinical symptoms.

Impact of laser refractive surgery on ocular alignment in myopic patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of myopic keratorefractive surgery on ocular alignment.

METHODS

This prospective study included 194 eyes of 97 myopic patients undergoing laser refractive surgery. All patients received a complete ophthalmic examination with particular attention to ocular alignment before and 3 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Patients with a mean age of 26.6 years and a mean refractive error of -4.83 diopters (D) myopia were treated. Asymptomatic ocular misalignment was present preoperatively in 46 (47%) patients: a small-angle heterophoria (1-8 prism diopters, PD) in 36%; and a large-angle heterophoria (>8 PD)/heterotropia in 11%. Postoperatively, the change in angles of 10 PD or greater occurred in 3% for distance and 6% for near fixation: in 7% of the patients with orthophoria, in 3% of those with a small-angle heterophoria, and in 18% of those with a large-angle heterophoria/heterotropia. No patient developed diplopia. The preoperative magnitude of myopia or postoperative refractive status was not related to the change in ocular alignment. The higher anisometropia was associated with a decrease in deviation (P=0.041 for distance and P=0.002 for near fixation), whereas the further near point of convergence tended to be related with an increase in near deviation (P=0.055).

CONCLUSIONS

Myopic refractive surgery may cause a change in ocular alignment, especially in cases with a large-angle heterophoria/heterotropia. There is also a chance of improvement of misalignment in patients with anisometropia.

Changes in fusional vergence amplitudes after laser refractive surgery for moderate myopia

PURPOSE

To analyze the effect of bilateral laser refractive surgery on fusional vergence amplitude and near point convergence in normal orthotropic myopic patients.

SETTING

Cornea and refractive private practice, Seoul, South Korea.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

METHODS

Moderately myopic patients (2.0 to 6.0 diopters [D]) had bilateral laser refractive surgery with postoperative follow-ups at 1 week and 1 and 3 months. Patients with manifest strabismus, previous strabismus surgery, amblyopia, absent or impaired binocularity, or planned monovision were excluded. The preoperative and postoperative examinations included uncorrected and corrected visual acuities; a prism cover test; evaluation of the convergence, divergence, and vertical fusion amplitude using a rotary prism; and near point convergence.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 30 patients was 29 years ± 4 (SD). The mean preoperative refractive error was -4.10 ± 1.32 D in right eyes and -4.14 ± 1.37 D in left eyes. The convergence amplitude at near decreased 1 week and 1 month postoperatively, after which it progressively stabilized to near preoperative values. The convergence amplitude at far (break point) was not changed postoperatively; however, the convergence amplitude at far (recovery point) was increased at 1 month and 3 months (P=.008 and P=.003, respectively). There was a slight increase in near point convergence at 3 months (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although fusional vergence amplitudes at near and near point convergence changed after laser refractive surgery, the changes observed were small or transient. However, patients with latent phoria or strabismus should be warned before having refractive surgery.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Diplopia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in a patient with a history of strabismus

In patients with a history of strabismus, refractive surgery can result in decompensation of ocular alignment, with subsequent diplopia. Refractive surgery in the management of strabismus has been described, although it remains controversial. We present a young adult with past history of strabismus surgery and new-onset diplopia after refractive surgery. Binocular diplopia was treated surgically with laser in situ keratomileusis.

Refractive surgery in children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To evaluate recent literature regarding indications and outcomes for refractive surgery in children, including laser in-situ keratomileusis, laser epithelial keratomileusis, photorefractive keratectomy, and refractive intraocular lens placement.

RECENT FINDINGS

Refractive surgery in children is controversial. Recent publications have reported refractive surgery to treat strabismus and both ametropic and anisometropic amblyopia. Questions remain as to the age at which to perform the surgery, and which specific procedure to perform. Choice of technique depends on the clinical situation.

SUMMARY

Refractive surgery is an option for children with amblyopia and strabismus who fail treatment with spectacles or contact lenses. Prospective controlled studies are needed, and longer follow-up will answer questions about the utility and safety of refractive surgery in children.

Diplopia and strabismus following ocular surgeries

Postoperative diplopia and strabismus may result from a variety of ocular surgical procedures. Common underlying mechanisms include sensory disturbance, scarring, direct extraocular muscle injury, myotoxicity from injections of local anesthesia or antibiotics, and malpositioning of extraocular muscles by implant materials. The most common patterns are vertical and horizontal motility disturbance. Treatment options include prisms, botulinum, occlusion, or surgery.

Refractive laser surgery in children with coexisting medical and ocular pathology

PURPOSE

To report the visual, refractive, and functional outcomes of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy in a group of children with significant refractive error and underlying medical conditions or ocular pathology who were noncompliant with traditional management.

SETTING

Nonhospital surgical facility and a hospital clinic.

METHODS

This case series comprised 5 individual cases of anisometropic amblyopia and/or high myopia. Underlying medical and ocular conditions were as follows: upper eyelid hemangioma with oblique myopic astigmatism, Pelizaeus-Merzbacher leukodystrophy with nystagmus, Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber syndrome with glaucoma, incontinentia pigmenti with unilateral optic nerve atrophy, and Goldenhar syndrome with unilateral optic nerve hypoplasia. Photorefractive keratectomy or LASEK was performed in 6 eyes of 5 patients. Age range at the time of surgery was 1.0 to 7.0 years. All procedures were performed under general anesthesia.

RESULTS

Best corrected visual acuity improved by 2 lines in 2 patients and 1 line in 2 patients by 6 months after surgery. Stereopsis and/or fusional status improved in 3 patients. Amblyopia treatment compliance improved in 1 patient. Alignment improved without strabismus surgery in 2 cases. A functional vision survey demonstrated a positive effect on the ability of all 5 children to function in their environment.

CONCLUSION

During the period of visual cortical plasticity, refractive surgery, by eliminating the refractive component of amblyopia and by promoting fusional ability, provides considerable improvement in children, even those with underlying medical conditions associated with ocular pathology.

Unexpected outcomes associated with laser in situ keratomileusis: ptosis, anisocoria, and "curing" of exotropia

Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is a common and popular procedure that is generally associated with excellent results and few complications. We present 3 cases of unusual LASIK-related complications. In the first case, the patient developed anisocoria after otherwise unremarkable surgery. In the second case, the patient developed mild eyelid ptosis. In the third case, the patient's exotropia resolved after mild refractive overcorrection. In each case, the visual outcome was excellent and no further intervention was necessary.