Yearly Treatment Patterns for Patients with Recently Diagnosed Diabetic Macular Edema

PURPOSE

To describe the treatment patterns and the predictors of different treatment standards in recently diagnosed diabetic macular edema (DME) patients in a nationally representative sample.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study using administrative claims data from January 1, 2007, through March 31, 2015. Patients were grouped into yearly cohorts.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 96 316 patients were included.

METHODS

Patients with a diagnosis of DME were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition, Clinical Modification, codes. Predictors of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) use and number of anti-VEGF injections per patient were assessed using generalized linear regression (logistic and negative binomial, respectively), and yearly trends in different treatments were analyzed with Mann-Kendall tests.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Predictors of anti-VEGF treatment and of anti-VEGF injections per patient and the changes in relative use of DME therapies per cohort.

RESULTS

Among those with any treatment, the odds of being prescribed anti-VEGF therapy increased by 700% from 2009 to 2014 and by 154% for those seen by a retina specialist. Those in the cohort of year 2014 received 3.5 times more injections than those in 2009, whereas those covered by Managed Medicare, Medicaid, and Medicare received 31%, 24%, and 11% less injections. Anti-VEGF were 11.6% of all DME treatments in 2009 increasing to 61.9% in 2014, while corticosteroids and focal laser procedures dropped from 6.1% to 3% and 75% to 24%, respectively. Procedures per patient (PPP) were much lower than those observed in clinical trials of anti-VEGF. Procedures per patient increased in the cases of aflibercept (from 1 in 2011 to 2.20 in 2014), bevacizumab (from 1.84 in 2009 to 3.40 in 2014), and ranibizumab (from 3.11 in 2009 to 4.48 in 2014), whereas applications of laser procedures and corticosteroids per patient remained roughly stable.

CONCLUSIONS

Year of diagnosis and being seen by a retina specialist were important predictors of receiving anti-VEGF therapy, and after one received such therapy, the number of additional injections was smaller for those with government-provided insurance. Anti-VEGF therapy has become a mainstay in DME treatment, with PPP, although relatively low, also increasing.

PASCAL laser platform produces less pain responses compared to conventional laser system during the panretinal photocoagulation: a randomized clinical trial

Background

Most of patients experience pain during the panretinal photocoagulation(PRP). Laser photocoagulation delivery has advanced with the introduction of pattern-scanning laser systems (PASCAL). Shorter pulse duration and less choroidal penetration believed to reduce pain during the laser treatment.

Objectives

To compare the severity of expressed pain scores in patients with PDR who underwent PRP either with PASCAL laser or conventional laser.

Methods

A total of 28 patients with a diagnosis of PDR who were scheduled for bilateral PRP therapy were enrolled into the prospective study. Both eyes were treated within the same session and while one eye was treated with PASCAL the other was treated with conventional laser randomly. Pulse duration was adjusted to 100-ms in conventional laser and 30 ms in PASCAL. The severity of pain was graded using a verbal scale and a visual analog scale (VAS).

Results

Mean age was 61.36±9.10 years. Mean verbal and VAS scores were 1.32±0.47 and 2.86±1.21 in the PASCAL laser and 2.39±0.49 and 5.75±1.35 in the conventional laser group, respectively. Differences between expressed pain scores obtained by both two scales were statistically significant (p<0.001).

Conclusion

PASCAL laser significantly alleviates pain levels possibly due to the shorter laser pulse duration and lower intensity.