Underestimation of the calculated area under the concentration-time curve based on serum creatinine for vancomycin dosing

Vancomycin therapeutic monitoring by measured trough concentration versus Bayesian-derived area under the curve in critically ill patients with cancer

The updated vancomycin guideline and recent studies suggested that trough concentrations may result in underestimation of the actual area under the curve (AUC), leading to excessive dosing and nephrotoxicity. With limited data available on critically ill cancer patients, this study aimed to compare the two methods in this patient population. This was a 5‐year retrospective study on patients treated with vancomycin in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a comprehensive cancer center. The measured trough concentration was compared to Bayesian‐derived AUC/minimum‐inhibitory‐concentration (MIC), considering MIC as 1. Trough concentrations of 15–20 mg/L and AUC of 400–600 mg h/L were considered the targeted goal. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with an AUC below the targeted goal. During the study period, 316 patients were included. The mean age was 54 years ±16 (SD); most patients had solid tumors (75%), and 11% had neutropenia. A targeted goal AUC and trough were recorded in 128 (41%) patients and in 64 (20%) patients, respectively. Of the 128 patients with targeted goal AUC, 31 (24%) had targeted goal trough concentrations and 91 (71%) had trough concentrations below 15 mg/L. Furthermore, among the patients with targeted goal trough concentration (n = 64), 33 (52%) had higher than targeted goal AUC. Augmented renal clearance (ARC), defined as a calculated creatinine‐clearance ≥130 ml/min, was associated with an AUC below the targeted goal. In a cohort of critically ill patients with cancer, over two‐thirds of the patients with a targeted goal Bayesian AUC/MIC had trough concentrations below the targeted goal. ARC was associated with AUC below the targeted goal.

Target serum concentration of vancomycin may be reached earlier with a loading dose

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin treatment failure against vancomycin-susceptible gram-positive cocci is not rare in the intensive care unit (ICU). One of the reasons for this is the substandard drug trough concentration. We aimed to examine the hypothesis that the target serum concentration could be reached earlier with a loading dose of vancomycin.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at our ICU between June 2018 and June 2020 and involved patients who were suspected of having, or confirmed to have, gram-positive cocci infection and treated with vancomycin. One group of the patients was administered a loading dose of vancomycin (loading group) and compared with the group that did not receive a loading dose (control group). The baseline characteristics, vancomycin serum concentrations, and clinical outcomes were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients were finally included, of which 29 received a loading dose of vancomycin. The serum concentration of vancomycin before the second dose was significantly higher for the loading group than for the control group (10.3 ± 6.1 mg/L vs. 5.7 ± 4.4 mg/L, P = 0.002). The results for both groups were similar before the fifth dose (12.4 ± 7.3 mg/L vs. 10.3 ± 6.3 mg/L in the loading and the control groups, respectively; P = 0.251). The 28-day mortality was lower for the loading group than for the control group (6.7% vs. 34.6% in the loading and control groups, respectively; P = 0.026). No significant differences were observed in serum creatinine (Cr) concentrations of the two groups.

CONCLUSION

With the loading dose of vancomycin, the target serum concentration of vancomycin may be reached earlier without increasing the risk of acute kidney injury.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://www.chictr.org.cn; ChiCTR2000035369.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Vancomycin in Adult Patients with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia or Pneumonia

Background

Vancomycin remains widely used for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections; however, treatment failure rates up to 50% have been reported. At the authors' institution, monitoring of trough concentration is the standard of care for therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin. New guidelines support use of the ratio of 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC₂₄/MIC) as the pharmacodynamic index most likely to predict outcomes in patients with MRSA-associated infections.

Objectives

To determine the discordance rate between trough levels and AUC₂₄/MIC values and how treatment failure and nephrotoxicity outcomes compare between those achieving and not achieving their pharmacodynamic targets.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study involved patients with MRSA bacteremia or pneumonia admitted to the study hospital between March 1, 2014, and December 31, 2018, and treated with vancomycin. Data for trough concentrations were collected, and minimum concentrations (C _min) were extrapolated. The AUC₂₄/MIC values were determined using validated population pharmacokinetic models. The C _min and AUC₂₄/MIC values were characterized as below, within, or above pharmacodynamic targets (15-20 mg/L and 400-600, respectively). Discordance was defined as any instance where a patient's paired C _min and AUC₂₄/MIC values fell in different ranges (i.e., below, within, or above) relative to the target ranges. Predictors of treatment failure and nephrotoxicity were determined using logistic regression.

Results

A total of 128 patients were included in the analyses. Of these, 73 (57%) received an initial vancomycin dose less than 15 mg/kg. The discordance rate between C _min and AUC₂₄/MIC values was 21% (27/128). Rates of treatment failure and nephrotoxicity were 34% (43/128) and 18% (23/128), respectively. No clinical variables were found to predict discordance. Logistic regression identified initiation of vancomycin after a positive culture result (odds ratio [OR] 4.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36-14.3) and achievement of target AUC₂₄/MIC after 4 days (OR 3.48, 95% CI 1.39-8.70) as modifiable predictors of treatment failure.

Conclusions

The relationship between vancomycin monitoring and outcome is likely confounded by inadequate empiric or initial dosing. Before any modification of practice with respect to vancomycin monitoring, empiric vancomycin dosing should be optimized.

Should Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Based on the Vancomycin Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve Be Standard for Serious Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections?-No

In this counterpoint we critically appraise the evidence supporting therapeutic drug monitoring based on the vancomycin 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC24) for serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. We reveal methodologically weaknesses and inconsistencies in the data and suggest that, in the absence of clear and convincing evidence of benefit compared with modestly reducing trough targets, alternative strategies are more likely to result in superior safety and efficacy. These include focusing on fundamental antibiotic stewardship to limit vancomycin exposure overall, achieving earlier and more complete source control, and establishing alternative therapeutic options to vancomycin. Implementation of AUC24-based therapeutic drug monitoring will take resources away from these more promising, alternative solutions.

A Canadian perspective on the revised 2020 ASHP-IDSA-PIDS-SIDP guidelines for vancomycin AUC-based therapeutic drug monitoring for serious MRSA infections

BACKGROUND

A revised consensus guideline on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of vancomycin for serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections was recently published with endorsement of numerous American pharmacy and medical societies. Changing practice from trough TDM to area-under-the-curve-(AUC)-guided dosing was suggested.

METHODS

Recent literature was critically appraised to determine whether AUC TDM is appropriate for Canadian hospital practice.

RESULTS

Previous 2009 vancomycin consensus guidelines recommended trough levels of 15-20 mg/L for serious MRSA infections, based on relatively poor evidence for efficacy or safety. In the past decade, aggressive trough targets have led to unnecessary toxicity. Adoption of a TDM strategy using an alternative parameter (AUC) has been suggested, although the evidence for any outcome benefits is low quality. In addition, implementation would require greater resources at health care institutions in the forms of more frequent serum levels or acquisition of costly Bayesian software programs. Most studies on this subject have been observational and retrospective; therefore, relationships between TDM parameters and outcomes have not been convincingly and consistently demonstrated to be causal in nature. Despite claims to the contrary, based on few in silico experiments, available clinical data suggest correlation of trough levels and AUC is high. TDM with lower target trough levels is a simpler solution to reduce risk of toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

There are serious concerns with adoption of AUC TDM of vancomycin into routine practice in Canada. Trough-based monitoring with modest reduction in target levels remains the most evidence-informed practice at this time.

AUCs and 123s: a critical appraisal of vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring in paediatrics

The revised vancomycin guidelines recommend implementing AUC24-based therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) using Bayesian methods in both adults and paediatrics. The motivation for this change was accumulating evidence showing aggressive dosing to achieve high troughs, as recommended in the first guidelines for adults and extrapolated to paediatrics, is associated with increased nephrotoxicity without improving clinical outcomes. AUC24-based TDM requires substantial resources that may need to be diverted from other valuable interventions. It can therefore be justified only after certain assumptions are shown to be true: (i) there is a clear relationship between vancomycin efficacy and/or toxicity and the proposed therapeutic range; and (ii) maintaining exposure within the target range with AUC24-based TDM improves clinical outcomes and/or decreases toxicity. In this review, we critically appraise the scientific basis for these assumptions. We find studies evaluating the relationship between vancomycin AUC24/MIC and efficacy in adults and children do not offer strong support for the recommended lower limit of the proposed therapeutic range (i.e. AUC24/MIC ≥400). Nephrotoxicity in children increases in a stepwise manner along the vancomycin exposure continuum but it is unclear if one parameter (AUC24 versus trough) is a superior predictor. Overall, evidence in children suggests good-to-excellent correlation between AUC24 and trough. Most importantly, there is no convincing evidence that the method of vancomycin TDM has a causal role in improving efficacy or reducing toxicity. These findings question the need to transition to resource-intensive AUC24-based TDM over retaining trough-based TDM with lower targets to minimize nephrotoxicity in paediatrics.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin by AUCτ-MIC ratio in patients with chronic kidney disease

In this study which was conducted in Alzahra University Hospital (Isfahan, I.R. Iran), the therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin focused on determining area under the concentration-time curve at dosing interval (τ) at steady state/minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC_τ/MIC) was carried out in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. The study population was selected from patients with the history of CKD (stages 3 or 4) treated by intravenous vancomycin. To determine vancomycin AUC_τ, blood samples were taken at four different occasions (trough-1, peak, random, trough-2) between the fourth and fifth doses of vancomycin. Drug concentration was determined by fluorescence polarization technique, and the E-TEST technique was used to determine the MIC. Nineteen patients were included. For 8 (42%), 7 (37%), and 4 (21%) patients, trough concentration levels were found to be less than 10 mg/L, 10-20 mg/L, and more than 20 mg/L, respectively. The mean value of AUC_τ for studied patients was 470.7 ± 228.3 mg.h/L and the mean MIC values was 1.04 ± 0.43 mg/L. Ten patients (53%) and 9 patients (47%) had the AUC_τ/MIC ratios above 400 and below 400, respectively, with the average of 519.4 ± 391.3 h. Vancomycin dosing based on patient glomerular filtration rate (GFR), as a traditional method, is not accurate enough to gain the most desired vancomycin concentration in patients with decreased or changing kidney function. Measuring drug concentration and observing its therapeutic effects accordingly is inevitable in susceptible populations receiving vital drugs such as vancomycin.

Impact of area under the concentration-time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio on vancomycin treatment outcomes in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia

There have been few clinical studies on the association between the vancomycin 24-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC24) to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio and vancomycin treatment outcomes in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. To examine this association and to establish a suitable cut-off value for AUC24/MIC, a multicentre prospective observational study was conducted in patients with MRSA bacteraemia. Data were collected on all patients aged ≥18 years with MRSA bacteraemia treated with vancomycin for ≥72 h without dialysis. The MIC was determined by broth microdilution (BMD) and Etest. Treatment failure was defined as (i) 30-day mortality, (ii) persistent bacteraemia (≥7 days) and (iii) recurrence (≤30 days after completion of therapy). AUC24 was estimated by a Bayesian approach based on individual vancomycin concentrations. The AUC24/MIC cut-off value for differentiating treatment success and failure was calculated by Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis. In total, 117 patients were enrolled, among which vancomycin treatment failure occurred in 38 (32.5%). In univariate analysis, high vancomycin MIC and low trough levels were unrelated to treatment outcomes. In the CART analysis, low vancomycin AUC24/MIC [<392.7 (BMD) and <397.2 (Etest)] was associated with treatment failure. In multivariate analysis, low AUC24/MIC was a risk factor for treatment failure [adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=3.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.39-8.82 by BMD; aOR=5.61, 95% CI 2.07-15.24 by Etest]. AUC24/MIC is associated with vancomycin treatment outcomes in MRSA bacteraemia, and seeking individualised AUC24/MIC ratios above target (>400) may improve treatment outcomes.