1
|
Sarofim M, Wijayawardana R, Ahmadi N, Morris DL. Repeat cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases: a systematic review. World J Surg Oncol 2024; 22:99. [PMID: 38627808 PMCID: PMC11022433 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03386-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) are present in 10-20% of patients at the time of their initial cancer diagnosis, and affects over 20% of those who develop colorectal cancer recurrence. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with HIPEC is firmly established as the optimal surgical treatment, but there is very little known about the benefit of repeat or iterative CRS. The aim of this review is to provide a systematic evaluation of the perioperative complications, survival outcomes and quality of life in patients undergoing repeat CRS with HIPEC for CRPM. METHODS A systematic review of PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane databases was performed to identify all studies that reported outcomes for repeat CRS with or without HIPEC for CRPM. RESULTS Four hundred and ninety-three manuscripts were screened, and 15 retrospective studies were suitable for inclusion. Sample sizes ranged from 2 to 30 participants and comprised a total of 229 patients. HIPEC was used in all studies, but exact rates were not consistently stated. Perioperative morbidity was reported in four studies, between 16.7% and 37.5%. Nine studies reported mortality rate which was consistently 0%. The median overall survival after repeat CRS ranged from 20 to 62.6 months. No studies provided quality of life metrics. CONCLUSION Repeat CRS for CRPM has perioperative morbidity and mortality rates comparable to initial CRS, and offers a potential survival benefit in selected patients. There is however limited high-quality data in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Sarofim
- Liver and Peritonectomy Unit, St George Hospital, Gray St, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia.
- School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Ruwanthi Wijayawardana
- Liver and Peritonectomy Unit, St George Hospital, Gray St, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nima Ahmadi
- Liver and Peritonectomy Unit, St George Hospital, Gray St, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - David L Morris
- Liver and Peritonectomy Unit, St George Hospital, Gray St, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bhutiani N, Grotz TE, Concors SJ, White MG, Helmink BA, Raghav KP, Taggart MW, Beaty KA, Royal RE, Overman MJ, Matamoros A, Scally CP, Rafeeq S, Mansfield PF, Fournier KF. Repeat Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Recurrent Mucinous Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma: A Viable Treatment Strategy with Demonstrable Benefit. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:614-621. [PMID: 37872456 PMCID: PMC10695875 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14422-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many patients with mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma experience peritoneal recurrence despite complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Prior work has demonstrated that repeat CRS/HIPEC can prolong survival in select patients. We sought to validate these findings using outcomes from a high-volume center. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma who underwent CRS/HIPEC at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2004 and 2021 were stratified by whether they underwent CRS/HIPEC for recurrent disease or as part of initial treatment. Only patients who underwent complete CRS/HIPEC were included. Initial and recurrent groups were compared. RESULTS Of 437 CRS/HIPECs performed for mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma, 50 (11.4%) were for recurrent disease. Patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC for recurrent disease were more often treated with an oxaliplatin or cisplatin perfusion (35%/44% recurrent vs. 4%/1% initial, p < 0.001), had a longer operative time (median 629 min recurrent vs. 511 min initial, p = 0.002), and had a lower median length of stay (10 days repeat vs. 13 days initial, p < 0.001). Thirty-day complication and 90-day mortality rates did not differ between groups. Both cohorts enjoyed comparable recurrence free survival (p = 0.82). Compared with patients with recurrence treated with systemic chemotherapy alone, this select cohort of patients undergoing repeat CRS/HIPEC enjoyed better overall survival (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In appropriately selected patients with recurrent appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma, CRS/HIPEC can provide survival benefit equivalent to primary CRS/HIPEC and that may be superior to that conferred by systemic therapy alone in select patients. These patients should receive care at a high-volume center in the context of a multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal Bhutiani
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Travis E Grotz
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Seth J Concors
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael G White
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Beth A Helmink
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kanwal P Raghav
- Department of Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Melissa W Taggart
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Karen A Beaty
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Richard E Royal
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA
| | - Michael J Overman
- Department of Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aurelio Matamoros
- Department of Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher P Scally
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Safia Rafeeq
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paul F Mansfield
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Keith F Fournier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Votanopoulos KI. Repeat CRS/HIPEC: It Comes Down to Tumor Biology and Ability to Achieve a Complete CRS. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:3366-3368. [PMID: 35181813 PMCID: PMC9115043 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11429-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos I Votanopoulos
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Medical Center Boulevard, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yamanaka K, Iizuka N, Kitai T. A case of pancreaticoduodenectomy and partial hepatic resection as repeat cytoreductive surgery for recurrent pseudomyxoma peritonei. Surg Case Rep 2021; 7:251. [PMID: 34862939 PMCID: PMC8643391 DOI: 10.1186/s40792-021-01332-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background For recurrent pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP), repeat cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can provide survival benefits if patients are carefully selected. We describe a case of pancreaticoduodenectomy and partial liver resection (HPD) as the repeat CRS for a recurrent tumor that infiltrated the pancreatic head around the hepatic hilum. This is the first report of HPD for recurrent PMP. Case presentation The patient was a 58-year-old male without comorbidities. In 2001, he was diagnosed with PMP at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In 2004, CRS, including total peritoneal resection, pyloric gastrectomy, splenectomy, and right hemicolectomy with HIPEC was performed (peritoneal cancer index (PCI) = 28). In 2008, the first repeat CRS with HIPEC was performed (PCI = 14). In 2016, fourth repeat CRS, including partial hepatectomy with HIPEC for recurrence of the round ligament of the liver, was performed. In 2017, a tumor of 5 cm in size was observed from the hepatic hilum to the pancreatic head, which infiltrated the main pancreatic duct. Other tumors 2 cm in size were observed (PCI = 7). We performed the fifth repeat CRS, including HPD. The adhesions of the small intestine from around the liver to the lower abdomen were detached for the reconstruction of pancreatojejunostomy and cholangiojejunostomy. The uncinate approach was applied for the pancreatic head resection because it was difficult to identify the cranial part of the pancreas due to adhesions in the hepatoduodenal ligament and the omental bursa. We approached to the origin of the extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle by resecting a part of the liver around the hepatic hilum using transhepatic hilar approach. A complete cytoreduction was achieved. The postoperative pathological diagnosis was a recurrence of PMP, which is equivalent to peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis. He was discharged on the 22nd postoperative day without major postoperative complications. The patient survived without recurrence four years after HPD. Conclusions Even for recurrence around the hepatic hilum and the pancreatic head, repeat CRS can be safely performed by applying the techniques of hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenya Yamanaka
- Department of Surgery, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center, 2-17-77, Higashinaniwa, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan.
| | - Norishige Iizuka
- Department of Pathology, Kishiwada City Hospital, Kishiwada, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Kitai
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment Center, Department of Surgery, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Kishiwada, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sun T, Zhang G, Ning T, Chen Q, Chu Y, Luo Y, You H, Su B, Li C, Guo Q, Jiang C. A Versatile Theranostic Platform for Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Metastases: Real-Time Tumor-Tracking and Photothermal-Enhanced Chemotherapy. ADVANCED SCIENCE (WEINHEIM, BADEN-WURTTEMBERG, GERMANY) 2021; 8:e2102256. [PMID: 34398516 PMCID: PMC8529449 DOI: 10.1002/advs.202102256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
A versatile tumor-targeting stimuli-responsive theranostic platform for peritoneal metastases of colorectal cancer is proposed in this work for tumor tracking and photothermal-enhanced chemotherapy. A quenched photosensitizer ("off" state) is developed and escorted into a tumor-targeting oxaliplatin-embedded micelle. Once reaching the tumor cell, the micelle is clasped to release free oxaliplatin, as well as the "off" photosensitizer, which is further activated ("turned-on") in the tumor reducing microenvironment to provide optical imaging and photothermal effect. The combined results from hyperthermia-enhanced chemotherapy, deep penetration, perfused O2 , and the leveraged GSH-ROS imbalance in tumor cells are achieved for improved antitumor efficacy and reduced systematic toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Sun
- Key Laboratory of Smart Drug Delivery (Ministry of Education)Minhang HospitalState Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain ScienceInstitutes of Brain ScienceDepartment of PharmaceuticsSchool of PharmacyFudan University826 Zhangheng RoadShanghai201203China
| | - Guangping Zhang
- Shandong Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Image Processing TechnologySchool of Physics and Electronics and Institute of Materials and Clean EnergyShandong Normal University1 University RoadJinan250358P. R. China
| | - Tingting Ning
- Key Laboratory of Smart Drug Delivery (Ministry of Education)Minhang HospitalState Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain ScienceInstitutes of Brain ScienceDepartment of PharmaceuticsSchool of PharmacyFudan University826 Zhangheng RoadShanghai201203China
| | - Qinjun Chen
- Key Laboratory of Smart Drug Delivery (Ministry of Education)Minhang HospitalState Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain ScienceInstitutes of Brain ScienceDepartment of PharmaceuticsSchool of PharmacyFudan University826 Zhangheng RoadShanghai201203China
| | - Yongchao Chu
- Key Laboratory of Smart Drug Delivery (Ministry of Education)Minhang HospitalState Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain ScienceInstitutes of Brain ScienceDepartment of PharmaceuticsSchool of PharmacyFudan University826 Zhangheng RoadShanghai201203China
| | - Yifan Luo
- Key Laboratory of Smart Drug Delivery (Ministry of Education)Minhang HospitalState Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain ScienceInstitutes of Brain ScienceDepartment of PharmaceuticsSchool of PharmacyFudan University826 Zhangheng RoadShanghai201203China
| | - Haoyu You
- Key Laboratory of Smart Drug Delivery (Ministry of Education)Minhang HospitalState Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain ScienceInstitutes of Brain ScienceDepartment of PharmaceuticsSchool of PharmacyFudan University826 Zhangheng RoadShanghai201203China
| | - Boyu Su
- Key Laboratory of Smart Drug Delivery (Ministry of Education)Minhang HospitalState Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain ScienceInstitutes of Brain ScienceDepartment of PharmaceuticsSchool of PharmacyFudan University826 Zhangheng RoadShanghai201203China
| | - Chao Li
- Key Laboratory of Smart Drug Delivery (Ministry of Education)Minhang HospitalState Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain ScienceInstitutes of Brain ScienceDepartment of PharmaceuticsSchool of PharmacyFudan University826 Zhangheng RoadShanghai201203China
| | - Qin Guo
- Key Laboratory of Smart Drug Delivery (Ministry of Education)Minhang HospitalState Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain ScienceInstitutes of Brain ScienceDepartment of PharmaceuticsSchool of PharmacyFudan University826 Zhangheng RoadShanghai201203China
| | - Chen Jiang
- Key Laboratory of Smart Drug Delivery (Ministry of Education)Minhang HospitalState Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain ScienceInstitutes of Brain ScienceDepartment of PharmaceuticsSchool of PharmacyFudan University826 Zhangheng RoadShanghai201203China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mangieri CW, Valenzuela CD, Erali RA, Votanopoulos KI, Shen P, Levine EA. Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes from Conversion of Low-Grade to High-Grade Appendiceal Neoplasms for Patients Undergoing Multiple Cytoreductive Surgeries with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:205-211. [PMID: 34455511 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10660-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Conversion from low-grade to high-grade disease is known to occur following repeat cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC); however, the incidence rate, risk factors, and outcomes have not been studied. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of multiple CRS/HIPEC cases for patients originally diagnosed with low-grade appendiceal neoplasms, and compared converted cases with non-converters. Primary outcomes were the incidence rate and risk factors for conversion, while secondary outcomes were effect on cytoreduction, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS Overall, 65 patients undergoing 134 cases of repeat CRS/HIPEC were identified; 11 patients converted to high-grade disease, an incidence rate of 16.92%. Converted cases averaged 4.4 years between CRS/HIPEC, versus 3.7 years for non-converters. Elevated baseline carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, splenectomy at index CRS/HIPEC, and adjuvant chemotherapy utilization were statistically significant with conversion. Conversion had no impact on specific cytoreductive scores at repeat CRS/HIPEC (p = 0.435). Evaluating the effect on OS from the index CRS/HIPEC conversion had no impact. Mean OS was 9.5 and 8.8 years for cases that remained low-grade compared with those that converted, respectively (p = 0.668); however, when comparing OS from the time of conversion at repeat CRS/HIPEC, patients who progressed to high-grade disease had decreased survival at 4.4 versus 5.8 years (p = 0.0317). There was no difference in DFS between non-converters and converters at 4.1 and 3.6 years, respectively (p = 0.671). CONCLUSION Conversion had no impact on OS from the index CRS/HIPEC but resulted in inferior survival from repeat surgery. Conversion was insignificant in regard to DFS, and should not be considered a contraindication to repeat CRS/HIPEC. Adjuvant chemotherapy should be avoided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher W Mangieri
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Health Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
| | - Cristian D Valenzuela
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Health Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Richard A Erali
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Health Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | | | - Perry Shen
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Health Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Edward A Levine
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Health Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lam AR, Bazzi K, Valle SJ, Morris DL. Novel Use of Bromelain and Acetylcysteine (BromAc®) for Pleural Involvement in Pseudomyxoma Peritonei. Case Rep Oncol 2021; 14:628-633. [PMID: 33976645 PMCID: PMC8077436 DOI: 10.1159/000514273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare mucinous disease most commonly arising from the appendix. Pleural involvement arising from established PMP is seen in a small number of cases. Combined cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy is the treatment of choice when managing intra-thoracic PMP. In cases of recurrence, surgical intervention may be technically challenging and carry higher rates of complications, morbidity, and mortality. Bromelain and acetylcysteine (BromAc<sup>®</sup>) is a novel treatment modality that has demonstrated mucolytic properties. When injected directly into mucinous disease, it facilitates tumour dissolution and allows it to be aspirated. It has recently been tested in the treatment of inoperable peritoneal mucinous disease, with an acceptable safety profile and positive objective response. Here we describe the first two cases of BromAc<sup>®</sup> administered directly into pleural adenomucinosis, with striking differences in response between the two patients likely due to differences in tumour hardness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony R Lam
- Department of Surgery, Peritonectomy Unit, St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Khalil Bazzi
- Department of Surgery, Peritonectomy Unit, St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sarah J Valle
- Department of Surgery, Peritonectomy Unit, St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David L Morris
- Department of Surgery, Peritonectomy Unit, St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia.,University of New South Wales, St George Hospital Clinical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Powers BD, Felder S, Veerapong J, Baumgartner JM, Clarke C, Mogal H, Staley CA, Maithel SK, Patel S, Dhar V, Lambert L, Hendrix RJ, Abbott DE, Pokrzywa C, Raoof M, Lee B, Johnston FM, Greer J, Cloyd JM, Kimbrough C, Grotz T, Leiting J, Fournier K, Lee AJ, Imanirad I, Dessureault S, Dineen SP. Repeat Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Is Not Associated with Prohibitive Complications: Results of a Multiinstitutional Retrospective Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:4883-4891. [PMID: 32318945 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08482-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is offered to select patients with peritoneal metastases. In instances of recurrence/progression, a repeat CRS/HIPEC may be considered. The perioperative morbidity and the potential oncologic benefits are not well described. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of a multiinstitutional database to assess the perioperative outcomes following repeat CRS/HIPEC (repeat). Kaplan-Meier and Cox estimates were used to assess survival. RESULTS In the entire cohort, 2157 patients were analyzed, with 158 (7.3%) in the repeat cohort. The rate of complete cytoreduction was 89.8% versus 83.0% in initial versus repeat groups. The overall incidence of major complications was similar (26.3% vs. 30.7%); however, reoperation was more common in the repeat group. Perioperative outcomes such as length of stay and nonhome discharge were not significantly different. For the entire cohort, 5-year overall survival (OS) was 56.0% in the initial group and 59.5% in the repeat group. In patients with only appendiceal cancer, we observed a 5-year OS of 64.0% in the initial group compared with 67.3% in the repeat cohort. For patients with appendiceal cancer who developed a recurrence/progression, median OS was 36 months in the no repeat operation group compared with 73 months for those that did. Multivariable regression demonstrated that completeness of cytoreduction and tumor grade were associated with OS, but repeat operation was not. CONCLUSIONS Repeat CRS/HIPEC is not associated with prohibitive risk. Survival is possibly improved, and therefore, repeat operation should be considered in selected patients with recurrent or progressive disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin D Powers
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.,Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Seth Felder
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.,Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jula Veerapong
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Joel M Baumgartner
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Callisia Clarke
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Harveshp Mogal
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Charles A Staley
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Shishir K Maithel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sameer Patel
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Vikrom Dhar
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Laura Lambert
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Ryan J Hendrix
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Daniel E Abbott
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Courtney Pokrzywa
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Mustafa Raoof
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Byrne Lee
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | | | - Jonathan Greer
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Charles Kimbrough
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Travis Grotz
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jennifer Leiting
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Keith Fournier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew J Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Iman Imanirad
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.,Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Sophie Dessureault
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.,Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Sean P Dineen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA. .,Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sánchez-Hidalgo JM, Rodríguez-Ortiz L, Arjona-Sánchez Á, Rufián-Peña S, Casado-Adam Á, Cosano-Álvarez A, Briceño-Delgado J. Colorectal peritoneal metastases: Optimal management review. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25:3484-3502. [PMID: 31367152 PMCID: PMC6658395 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i27.3484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Revised: 05/20/2019] [Accepted: 06/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The peritoneum is a common site of dissemination for colorrectal cancer, with a poorer prognosis than other sites of metastases. In the last two decades, it has been considered as a locoregional disease progression and treated as such with curative intention treatments. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the actual reference treatment for these patients as better survival results have been reached as compared to systemic chemotherapy alone, but its therapeutic efficacy is still under debate. Actual guidelines recommend that the management of colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases should be led by a multidisciplinary team carried out in experienced centers and consider CRS + HIPEC for selected patients. Accumulative evidence in the last three years suggests that this is a curative treatment that may improve patients disease-free survival, decrease the risk of recurrence, and does not increase the risk of treatment-related mortality. In this review we aim to gather the latest results from referral centers and opinions from experts about the effectiveness and feasibility of CRS + HIPEC for treating peritoneal disease from colorectal malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lidia Rodríguez-Ortiz
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
| | - Álvaro Arjona-Sánchez
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
| | - Sebastián Rufián-Peña
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
| | - Ángela Casado-Adam
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
| | - Antonio Cosano-Álvarez
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
| | - Javier Briceño-Delgado
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Choudry HA, Bednar F, Shuai Y, Jones HL, Pai RK, Pingpank JF, Ahrendt SS, Holtzman MP, Zeh HJ, Bartlett DL. Repeat Cytoreductive Surgery-Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemoperfusion is Feasible and Offers Survival Benefit in Select Patients with Peritoneal Metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:1445-1453. [PMID: 30825033 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07218-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We hypothesized that repeat cytoreductive surgery-hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (CRS-HIPEC) for peritoneal metastases (PM) may be associated with suboptimal resection, more frequent postoperative complications, and worse oncologic outcomes. METHODS Using a prospectively maintained database, we compared clinicopathologic, perioperative, and oncologic outcome data in patients undergoing single or repeat CRS-HIPEC procedures. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival. Multivariate analyses identified associations with perioperative and oncologic outcomes. RESULTS Of the 1294 patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC procedures at our institution, only one CRS-HIPEC procedure (single HIPEC cohort) was performed in 1169 patients (90.3%), whereas 125 patients (9.7%) underwent repeat CRS-HIPEC procedures (repeat HIPEC cohort). Of the 1440 CRS-HIPEC procedures at our institution, a first CRS-HIPEC procedure was performed in 1294 patients (89.9%), whereas subsequent second, third, and fourth CRS-HIPEC procedures were performed in 125 patients (8.7%), 18 patients (1.3%), and 3 patients (0.2%), respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) following the second CRS-HIPEC procedure was negatively impacted by shorter PFS following the first CRS-HIPEC procedure, independent of other significant variables related to the second procedure, including completeness of cytoreduction and postoperative complications. Patients undergoing multiple CRS-HIPEC procedures were not at higher risk for suboptimal resection or postoperative complications and demonstrated equivalent PFS following each successive procedure compared to the first procedure. CONCLUSIONS Repeat CRS-HIPEC procedures for PM were not associated with suboptimal perioperative and oncologic outcomes. Our data confirmed our ability to select patients appropriately for repeat CRS-HIPEC procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haroon A Choudry
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Filip Bednar
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Yongli Shuai
- The University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute Biostatistics Facility, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Heather L Jones
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Reetesh K Pai
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - James F Pingpank
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Steven S Ahrendt
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Matthew P Holtzman
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Herbert J Zeh
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David L Bartlett
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dumont F, Senellart H, Pein F, Campion L, Glehen O, Goere D, Pocard M, Thibaudeau E. Phase I/II study of oxaliplatin dose escalation via a laparoscopic approach using pressurized aerosol intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIPOX trial) for nonresectable peritoneal metastases of digestive cancers (stomach, small bowel and colorectal): Rationale and design. Pleura Peritoneum 2018; 3:20180120. [PMID: 30911664 PMCID: PMC6404986 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2018-0120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2018] [Accepted: 08/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The annual incidence of gastrointestinal carcinomas (stomach, small bowel, colon and rectum) is increasing in Western countries, reaching 50,000 new cases each year in France. Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is diagnosed in 15% of these patients. Complete cytoreductive surgery (CCS) plus Hyperthermic IntraPeritoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the only therapy that can offer patients with PC a chance for long-term survival with a 5 year overall survival (OS) rate of 30–60% versus 0–5% with systemic chemotherapy alone. However, CCS plus HIPEC still presents serious limitations and very few patients (10%) are candidates for these radical treatments. PC remains a palliative setting for 90% of patients with a median survival ranging from 15 to 25 months. Innovative surgical therapies such as Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) therefore need to be developed to improve the prognosis. Potential benefits were obtained after intraperitoneal nebulization of oxaliplatin in patients with advanced PC from colorectal cancer. Innovative surgical therapies such as pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) have been proposed as palliative locoregional treatment with some promising results. The dose of oxaliplatin currently established by nebulization (PIPAC) is really low at 92 mg/m2. However, the peritoneum acts as a barrier limiting the systemic passage of intraperitoneal drug. Oxaliplatin used at higher doses during PIPAC procedures could be a safe option and allow better intratumoral penetration of chemotherapy. Method and design The proposed study is a multicenter phase I/II trial of oxaliplatin dose escalation during PIPAC. The aim is to determine the maximum tolerated dose of pressurized oxaliplatin administered by the intraperitoneal route (PIPAC) during two consecutive procedures at a 4–6 week interval for patients with extended peritoneal carcinomatosis from the gastrointestinal tract. Dose started at 90 mg/m2 and escalation was in 50 mg/m2 steps up to a maximum of 300 mg/m2. Discussion Oxaliplatin is an effective drug in gastrointestinal cancer and high doses given by the intraperitoneal route during HIPEC are well tolerated. In this phase I trial, we hypothesized that high-dose oxaliplatin during PIPAC is feasible and safe. The repeated local administration of high doses of oxaliplatin could improve tumor response and prognosis. Trial registration Prospective study. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03294252. EudraCT: 2016-003666-49
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frédéric Dumont
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Cancérologique de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Hélène Senellart
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Cancérologique de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Francois Pein
- Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Institut Cancérologique de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Loic Campion
- Department of Biostatistics and Methodology, Institut Cancérologique de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Bénite, France
| | - Diane Goere
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - Marc Pocard
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Lariboisière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris 7-Diderot University, Paris, France
| | - Emilie Thibaudeau
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Cancérologique de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Repeat cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for recurrent peritoneal carcinomatosis of appendiceal origin. Int J Clin Oncol 2017; 23:298-304. [PMID: 29181652 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-017-1217-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2017] [Accepted: 11/11/2017] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to clarify the role of repeat cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) in the management of recurrent peritoneal carcinomatosis of appendiceal origin. METHODS Data were retrieved on 42 patients who underwent CRS + HIPEC; 29 repeat surgical procedures were performed in 13 patients. RESULTS Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 12 of 13 patients by the second CRS. Repeat recurrence was detected in 11 patients, eight of whom underwent a third CRS. The peritoneal cancer index decreased from initial CRS to repeat CRS but was still higher than 18 in nine patients at the second CRS. Preoperative chemotherapy was given to three patients with early recurrence. Grade 3-5 morbidity and 90-day mortality were not significantly different between initial and repeat CRS. Five-year survival rates after first and second CRS were 75.5 and 67.7%, respectively. Complete cytoreduction at second CRS was a significant prognostic factor. Among patients with recurrence after the second CRS, patients who underwent a third CRS showed a better prognosis than those who did not. CONCLUSIONS Repeat CRS is oncologically beneficial, and the morbidity rate was as high as that of initial CRS. Complete cytoreduction was the key to successful long-term results. Although further recurrence was common, aggressive resection was useful, even in cases of diffuse recurrence.
Collapse
|