1
|
Motoo I, Ando T, Mihara H, Tanaka S, Nanjo S, Kajiura S, Fujinami H, Takahashi K, Yasuda I. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration for the Diagnosis of Duodenal Stenosis Due to Urothelial Carcinoma. Intern Med 2021; 60:719-724. [PMID: 32963164 PMCID: PMC7990641 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.5685-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) initially presents with hematuria and hydronephrosis. We report a case of UTUC presenting with initial findings of duodenal stenosis before the appearance of hydronephrosis. A 59-year-old man presented with upper abdominal symptoms on his initial visit. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) revealed circumferential stenosis at the descending part of the duodenum. However, the underlying cause of duodenal stenosis was unknown as repeated histopathological examinations of endoscopic biopsy specimens showed no specific findings. We then performed endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of the thickened duodenal wall, and successfully diagnosed duodenal metastasis of UTUC. EUS-FNA is an effective diagnostic method in cases in which the cause of duodenal stenosis is unknown.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iori Motoo
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Japan
| | - Takayuki Ando
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Mihara
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Japan
| | | | - Sohachi Nanjo
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Japan
| | - Shinya Kajiura
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Japan
| | - Haruka Fujinami
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Japan
| | - Kosuke Takahashi
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Japan
| | - Ichiro Yasuda
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
D'Andrea D, Matin S, Black PC, Petros FG, Zargar H, Dinney CP, Cookson MS, Kassouf W, Dall'Era MA, McGrath JS, Wright JL, Thorpe AC, Morgan TM, Holzbeierlein JM, Bivalacqua TJ, Sridhar SS, North S, Barocas DA, Lotan Y, Stephenson AJ, van Rhijn BW, Spiess PE, Daneshmand S, Shariat SF. Comparative effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in bladder and upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. BJU Int 2020; 127:528-537. [PMID: 32981193 PMCID: PMC8246716 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Objective To assess the differential response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) compared to upper tract urothelial carcioma (UTUC) treated with radical surgery. Patients and Methods Data from 1299 patients with UCB and 276 with UTUC were obtained from multicentric collaborations. The association of disease location (UCB vs UTUC) with pathological complete response (pCR, defined as a post‐treatment pathological stage ypT0N0) and pathological objective response (pOR, defined as ypT0‐Ta‐Tis‐T1N0) after NAC was evaluated using logistic regression analyses. The association with overall (OS) and cancer‐specific survival (CSS) was evaluated using Cox regression analyses. Results A pCR was found in 250 (19.2%) patients with UCB and in 23 (8.3%) with UTUC (P < 0.01). A pOR was found in 523 (40.3%) patients with UCB and in 133 (48.2%) with UTUC (P = 0.02). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, patients with UTUC were less likely to have a pCR (odds ratio [OR] 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27–0.70; P < 0.01) and more likely to have a pOR (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.89–2.08; P < 0.01). On univariable Cox regression analyses, UTUC was associated with better OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80, 95% CI 0.64–0.99, P = 0.04) and CSS (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.49–0.83; P < 0.01). On multivariable Cox regression analyses, UTUC remained associated with CSS (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45–0.82; P < 0.01), but not with OS. Conclusions Our present findings suggest that the benefit of NAC in UTUC is similar to that found in UCB. These data can be used as a benchmark to contextualise survival outcomes and plan future trial design with NAC in urothelial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Surena Matin
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Firas G Petros
- Department of Urology and Kidney Transplant, Eleanor N. Dana Cancer Center, The University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Homayoun Zargar
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Urology, Western Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Colin P Dinney
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael S Cookson
- Department of Urology, Center and The Stephenson Cancer Center, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Marc A Dall'Era
- Department of Urology, Davis Medical Center, University of California at Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - John S McGrath
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Andrew C Thorpe
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Todd M Morgan
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Trinity J Bivalacqua
- Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Srikala S Sridhar
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Scott North
- Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Daniel A Barocas
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Andrew J Stephenson
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Bas W van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.,Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prag, Czech Republic.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.,Department of Urology, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.,European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schuettfort VM, Pradere B, Quhal F, Mostafaei H, Laukhtina E, Mori K, Motlagh RS, Rink M, D'Andrea D, Abufaraj M, Karakiewicz PI, Shariat SF. Diagnostic challenges and treatment strategies in the management of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. Turk J Urol 2020; 47:S33-S44. [PMID: 33052841 DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare disease, posing many challenges for the treating physician due to the lack of strong evidence-based recommendations. However, novel molecular discoveries and a better understanding of the clinical behavior of the disease lead to a continuous evolution of therapeutic landscape in UTUC. The aim of the review is to provide a comprehensive update of the current diagnostic modalities and treatment strategies in UTUC with a special focus on recent developments and challenges. A comprehensive literature search including relevant articles up to August 2020 was performed using the MEDLINE/PubMed database. Despite several technological improvements, accurate staging and outcome prediction remain major challenges and hamper appropriate risk stratification. Kidney-sparing surgery can be offered in low risk UTUC; however, physician and patient must be aware of the high rate of recurrence and risk of progression due to tumor biology and understaging. The value and efficacy of intracavitary therapy in patients with UTUC remains unclear due to the lack of high-quality data. In high-risk diseases, radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision and template lymph node dissection is the standard of care. Perioperative systemic chemotherapy is today accepted as a novel standard for advanced cancers. In metastatic or unresectable disease, the therapeutic landscape is rapidly changing due to several novel agents, such as checkpoint inhibitors. While several diagnostic and treatment challenges remain, progress in endoscopic technology and molecular knowledge have ushered a new age in personalized management of UTUC. Novel accurate molecular and imaging biomarkers are, however, still needed to guide decision making as tissue acquisition remains suboptimal. Next generation sequencing and novel agents are promising to rapidly improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.,European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, Netherlands.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rouvière O, Cornelis F, Brunelle S, Roy C, André M, Bellin MF, Boulay I, Eiss D, Girouin N, Grenier N, Hélénon O, Lapray JF, Lefèvre A, Matillon X, Ménager JM, Millet I, Ronze S, Sanzalone T, Tourniaire J, Rocher L, Renard-Penna R. Imaging protocols for renal multiparametric MRI and MR urography: results of a consensus conference from the French Society of Genitourinary Imaging. Eur Radiol 2020; 30:2103-2114. [PMID: 31900706 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06530-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2019] [Revised: 09/19/2019] [Accepted: 10/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop technical guidelines for magnetic resonance imaging aimed at characterising renal masses (multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, mpMRI) and at imaging the bladder and upper urinary tract (magnetic resonance urography, MRU). METHODS The French Society of Genitourinary Imaging organised a Delphi consensus conference with a two-round Delphi survey followed by a face-to-face meeting. Two separate questionnaires were issued for renal mpMRI and for MRU. Consensus was strictly defined using a priori criteria. RESULTS Forty-two expert uroradiologists completed both survey rounds with no attrition between the rounds. Fifty-six of 84 (67%) statements of the mpMRI questionnaire and 44/71 (62%) statements of the MRU questionnaire reached final consensus. For mpMRI, there was consensus that no injection of furosemide was needed and that the imaging protocol should include T2-weighted imaging, dual chemical shift imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging (use of multiple b-values; maximal b-value, 1000 s/mm2) and fat-saturated single-bolus multiphase (unenhanced, corticomedullary, nephrographic) contrast-enhanced imaging; late imaging (more than 10 min after injection) was judged optional. For MRU, the patients should void their bladder before the examination. The protocol must include T2-weighted imaging, anatomical fast T1/T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging (use of multiple b-values; maximal b-value, 1000 s/mm2) and fat-saturated single-bolus multiphase (unenhanced, corticomedullary, nephrographic, excretory) contrast-enhanced imaging. An intravenous injection of furosemide is mandatory before the injection of contrast medium. Heavily T2-weighted cholangiopancreatography-like imaging was judged optional. CONCLUSION This expert-based consensus conference provides recommendations to standardise magnetic resonance imaging of kidneys, ureter and bladder. KEY POINTS • Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) aims at characterising renal masses; magnetic resonance urography (MRU) aims at imaging the urinary bladder and the collecting systems. • For mpMRI, no injection of furosemide is needed. • For MRU, an intravenous injection of furosemide is mandatory before the injection of contrast medium; heavily T2-weighted cholangiopancreatography-like imaging is optional.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Rouvière
- Department of Urinary and Vascular Imaging, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 5, place d'Arsonval, 69347, Lyon, France.
- Faculté de médecine Lyon Est, Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
| | - François Cornelis
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Serge Brunelle
- Department of Radiology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Catherine Roy
- Department of Radiology B, CHU de Strasbourg, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France
| | - Marc André
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Européen, Marseille, France
| | - Marie-France Bellin
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Sud, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
- Université Paris Sud, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
- IR4M, UMR 8081, Service hospitalier Joliot Curie, Orsay, France
| | - Isabelle Boulay
- Department of Radiology, Fondation Hôpital Saint Joseph, Paris, France
| | - David Eiss
- Department of Adult Radiology, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | | | - Nicolas Grenier
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Adult Imaging, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
- Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Olivier Hélénon
- Department of Adult Radiology, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | | | - Arnaud Lefèvre
- Centre d'Imagerie Médicale Tourville, Paris, France
- Department of Radiology, American Hospital of Paris, Neuilly, France
| | - Xavier Matillon
- Faculté de médecine Lyon Est, Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Department of Urology and Transplantation, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
- CarMeN Laboratory, INSERM U1060, Lyon, France
| | | | - Ingrid Millet
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France
- Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Sébastien Ronze
- Imagerie médicale Val d'Ouest Charcot (IMVOC), Ecully, France
| | - Thomas Sanzalone
- Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de Valence, Valence, France
| | - Jean Tourniaire
- Department of Radiology, Clinique Rhône Durance, Avignon, France
| | - Laurence Rocher
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Sud, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
- Université Paris Sud, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
- IR4M, UMR 8081, Service hospitalier Joliot Curie, Orsay, France
| | - Raphaële Renard-Penna
- Academic Department of Radiology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière and Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Universités, GRC no 5, ONCOTYPE-URO, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kim SH, Song MK, Joung JY, Chung J, Lee KH, Seo HK. Significant clinicopathologic prognostic factors for bladder recurrence, progression, and cancer-specific survival after surgery among patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Investig Clin Urol 2019; 60:432-442. [PMID: 31692890 PMCID: PMC6821986 DOI: 10.4111/icu.2019.60.6.432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2019] [Accepted: 06/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to identify prognostic factors for outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy among patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed 184 nonmetastatic cases of UTUC after radical nephroureterectomy, bladder cuffing, and/or partial cystectomy (2004-2016). Bladder recurrence-free survival (BRFS), disease progression-free survival (DPFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated. The prognostic values of clinicopathologic parameters were evaluated by using Cox logistic regression analysis. Results The median BRFS, DPFS, and CSS values were 19.0 months, 38.5 months, and 67.0 months, respectively. We identified cases of bladder recurrence (64 cases, 34.8%), disease progression (54 cases, 29.3%), and cancer-specific death (23 cases, 12.5%). BRFS was independently associated with lymphovascular invasion (hazard ratio [HR], 0.421); DPFS was associated with intravesical instillation (HR, 0.290), active smoking (HR, 0.367), synchronous bladder lesions (HR, 2.355), and pT2 (HR, 5.199) and pT3 and pT4 (HR, 13.281) stages; and CSS was associated with alkaline phosphatase levels (HR, 0.966). Among 123 cases without previous bladder cancer, DPFS was associated with intravesical instillation (HR, 0.264), multifocal ureteral tumors (HR, 4.823), and pT3 and pT4 stages (HR, 10.899), whereas CSS was associated with pTis (HR, 32.071). Conclusions Patients with the factors we identified should receive adjuvant intravesical/systemic chemotherapy and intensive surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Han Kim
- Department of Urology, Center for Urologic Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Mi Kyung Song
- Biometrics Research Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Research Institute and Hospital of National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jae Young Joung
- Department of Urology, Center for Urologic Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jinsoo Chung
- Department of Urology, Center for Urologic Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Kang Hyun Lee
- Department of Urology, Center for Urologic Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Ho Kyung Seo
- Department of Urology, Center for Urologic Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Goldberg H, Cheung DC, Chandrasekar T, Klaassen Z, Wallis CJD, Kulkarni GS, Sayyid R, Evans A, Masoomian M, Bapat B, van der Kwast T, Hamilton RJ, Zlotta A, Fleshner N. Are there differences between de novo and secondary upper tract urothelial carcinoma tumours? Can Urol Assoc J 2019; 13:E292-E299. [PMID: 30763230 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.5595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) accounts for <5% of all urothelial cancers. We aimed to ascertain the clinical differences between UTUC tumours presenting de novo (DnUTUC) and those presenting secondary (SUTUC) following a bladder cancer diagnosis. METHODS Our institutional database was queried for all UTUC patients who were surgically treated with radical nephroureterectomy or ureterectomy between 2003 and 2017. Bladder recurrence and cancer-specific mortality were compared. To reduce the possible bias due to confounding variables obtained from a simple comparison of outcomes, DnUTUC patients were matched (for age, gender, tumour location, type of surgery, grade, TNM staging, presence of carcinoma in situ, and lymphovascular invasion) with propensity score to SUTUC patients. Bladder recurrence and cancer-specific mortality were assessed with Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS A total of 117 UTUC patients were identified: 80 with DnUTUC (68.4%) and 37 with SUTUC (31.6%). A greater proportion of males with SUTUC was demonstrated (89.2% vs. 68.8; p=0.02). In both groups, 67.5% of patients had high-grade disease, but SUTUC demonstrated a higher carcinoma in situ rate (43.2% vs. 25%; p=0.047). Univariate analysis demonstrated that the five-year bladder recurrence rate was trending to be higher in SUTUC (65.3% vs. 20.5%; p=0.099). In the Cox model, however, it was associated with increased bladder recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 3.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.68-8.09; p=0.001). Although univariate analysis demonstrated that SUTUC patients were more likely to die of their disease (30.6% vs. 9%; p=0.009), the multivariable Cox model did not demonstrate this association. The limitations of this study include its retrospective, single-centre design and relatively small cohort of patients. CONCLUSIONS In this hypothesis-generating study, some evidence suggests that further research is needed to delineate differences between SUTUC and DnUTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanan Goldberg
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Douglas C Cheung
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Thenappan Chandrasekar
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Zachary Klaassen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Christopher J D Wallis
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Girish S Kulkarni
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rashid Sayyid
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew Evans
- Pathology Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mehdi Masoomian
- Pathology Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bharati Bapat
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, and Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Theodorus van der Kwast
- Pathology Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert J Hamilton
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alexandre Zlotta
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Neil Fleshner
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sanguedolce F, Cormio L. The complex relationship between upper urinary tract and bladder cancer: clinical and predictive issues. Transl Androl Urol 2018; 7:S248-S251. [PMID: 29928626 PMCID: PMC5989118 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2018.05.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Luigi Cormio
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Momota M, Hatakeyama S, Yamamoto H, Iwamura H, Tobisawa Y, Yoneyama T, Yoneyama T, Hashimoto Y, Koie T, Iwabuchi I, Ogasawara M, Kawaguchi T, Ohyama C. Risk-stratified surveillance protocol improves cost-effectiveness after radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Oncotarget 2018; 9:23047-23057. [PMID: 29796171 PMCID: PMC5955429 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.25198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2017] [Accepted: 04/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To develop a surveillance protocol with improved cost-effectiveness after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), as the cost-effectiveness of oncological surveillance after RNU remains unclear. Results Of 426 patients, 109 (26%) and 113 (27%) experienced visceral and intravesical recurrences, respectively. The pathology-based protocol found significant differences in recurrence-free survival in the visceral recurrence but not in the intravesical recurrence. The medical costs per visceral recurrence detected were high, especially in normal-risk (≤ pT2N0, LVI-, SM-) patients. We developed a risk score associated with visceral recurrence using Cox regression analysis. The risk score-based protocol was significantly more cost-effective than the pathology-based protocol. Estimated cost differences reached $747,929 per recurrence detected, a suggested 55% reduction. Materials and Methods We retrospectively evaluated 426 patients with RNU for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) without distant metastasis at 4 hospitals. Patients with routine oncological follow-up were stratified into normal-, high- and very high-risk groups according to a pathology-based protocol utilizing pathological stage, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and surgical margin (SM). Cost-effectiveness of the pathology-based protocol was evaluated, and a risk score-based protocol was developed to optimize cost-effectiveness. Risk scores were calculated by summing up risk factors independently associated with recurrence-free survival. Patients were stratified by low-, intermediate- and high-risk score. Estimated cost per recurrence detected by pathology-based and risk score-based protocols was compared. Conclusions A risk score-stratified surveillance protocol has the potential to reduce over investigation during follow-up, making surveillance more cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masaki Momota
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Shingo Hatakeyama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Hayato Yamamoto
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Hiromichi Iwamura
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.,Department of Urology, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yuki Tobisawa
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Tohru Yoneyama
- Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Takahiro Yoneyama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Hashimoto
- Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Takuya Koie
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Ikuya Iwabuchi
- Department of Urology, Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital, Aomori, Japan
| | - Masaru Ogasawara
- Department of Urology, Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital, Aomori, Japan
| | - Toshiaki Kawaguchi
- Department of Urology, Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital, Aomori, Japan
| | - Chikara Ohyama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.,Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
van Doeveren T, van Leeuwen PJ, Aben KKH, van der Aa M, Barendrecht M, Boevé ER, Cornel EB, van der Heijden AG, Hendricksen K, Hirdes W, Kooistra A, Kroon B, Leliveld AM, Meijer RP, van Melick H, Merks B, de Reijke TM, de Vries P, Wymenga LFA, Wijsman B, Boormans JL. Reduce bladder cancer recurrence in patients treated for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: The REBACARE-trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2018; 9:121-129. [PMID: 29696234 PMCID: PMC5898538 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2017] [Revised: 01/15/2018] [Accepted: 01/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Following radical nephro-ureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UUT), the reported bladder recurrence rate of urothelial carcinoma is 22–47%. A single intravesical instillation of chemotherapy within 10 days following nephro-ureterectomy has the potential to decrease the risk of a bladder recurrence significantly. Despite recommendation by the European Association of Urology guideline to administer a single instillation postoperatively, the compliance rate is low because the risk of extravasation of chemotherapy. Aim To reduce the risk of bladder cancer recurrence by a single intravesical instillation of Mitomycin immediately (within 3 h) before radical nephro-ureterectomy or partial ureterectomy. Methods Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with a (suspicion of a) urothelial carcinoma of the UUT undergoing radical nephro-ureterectomy or partial ureterectomy will be eligible and will receive a single intravesical instillation of Mitomycin within 3 h before surgery. In total, 170 patients will be included in this prospective, observational study. Follow-up will be according to current guidelines. Results The primary endpoint is the bladder cancer recurrence rate up to two years after surgery. Secondary endpoints are: a) the compliance rate; b) oncological outcome; c) possible side-effects; d) the quality of life; e) the calculation of costs of a single neoadjuvant instillation with Mitomycin and f) molecular characterization of UUT tumors and intravesical recurrences. Conclusions A single intravesical instillation of Mitomycin before radical nephro-ureterectomy or partial ureterectomy may reduce the risk of a bladder recurrence in patients treated for UUT urothelial carcinoma and will circumvent the disadvantages of current therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T van Doeveren
- Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P J van Leeuwen
- Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K K H Aben
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, The Netherlands.,Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M van der Aa
- Spaarne Medical Center, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | | | - E R Boevé
- Fransiscus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E B Cornel
- Ziekenhuis Groep Twente, Almelo and Hengelo, The Netherlands
| | | | - K Hendricksen
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W Hirdes
- Isala Medical Center, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - A Kooistra
- Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - B Kroon
- Rijnstate Medical Center, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - A M Leliveld
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - R P Meijer
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - H van Melick
- Sint Antonius Medical Center, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - B Merks
- Haaglanden Medical Center, Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | | | - P de Vries
- Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | | | - B Wijsman
- Elisabeth-TweeSteden Medical Center, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - J L Boormans
- Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Is neutrophil-to-lymphocytes ratio a clinical relevant preoperative biomarker in upper tract urothelial carcinoma? A meta-analysis of 4385 patients. World J Urol 2018; 36:1019-1029. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2235-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2017] [Accepted: 02/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
|
11
|
Kodama H, Hatakeyama S, Fujita N, Iwamura H, Anan G, Fukushi K, Narita T, Tanaka T, Kubota Y, Horiguchi H, Momota M, Kido K, Matsumoto T, Soma O, Hamano I, Yamamoto H, Tobisawa Y, Yoneyama T, Yoneyama T, Hashimoto Y, Koie T, Ito H, Yoshikawa K, Sasaki A, Kawaguchi T, Sato M, Ohyama C. Preoperative chronic kidney disease predicts poor oncological outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Oncotarget 2017; 8:83183-83194. [PMID: 29137333 PMCID: PMC5669959 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.20554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2017] [Accepted: 07/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the impact of preoperative chronic kidney disease (CKD) on oncological outcomes in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma who underwent radical nephroureterectomy. Methods A total of 426 patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy at five medical centers between February 1995 and February 2017 were retrospectively examined. Oncological outcomes, including intravesical recurrence-free, visceral recurrence-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival rates (intravesical RFS, visceral RFS, CSS, and OS, respectively) stratified by preoperative CKD status (CKD vs. non-CKD) were investigated. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to evaluate the impact of preoperative CKD on prognosis and a prognostic factor-based risk stratification nomogram was developed. Results Of the 426 patients, 250 (59%) were diagnosed with CKD before radical nephroureterectomy. Before the background adjustment, intravesical RFS, visceral RFS, CSS, and OS after radical nephroureterectomy were significantly shorter in the CKD group than in the non-CKD group. Background-adjusted IPTW analysis demonstrated that preoperative CKD was significantly associated with poor visceral RFS, CSS, and OS after radical nephroureterectomy. Intravesical RFS was not significantly associated with preoperative CKD. The nomogram for predicting 5-year visceral RFS and CSS probability demonstrated a significant correlation with actual visceral RFS and CSS (c-index = 0.85 and 0.83, respectively). Conclusions Upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients with preoperative CKD had a significantly lower survival probability than those without CKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hirotake Kodama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Shingo Hatakeyama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Naoki Fujita
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Hiromichi Iwamura
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.,Department of Urology, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan
| | - Go Anan
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.,Department of Urology, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan
| | - Ken Fukushi
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Takuma Narita
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Toshikazu Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Yuka Kubota
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Hirotaka Horiguchi
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Masaki Momota
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Koichi Kido
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Teppei Matsumoto
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Osamu Soma
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Itsuto Hamano
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Hayato Yamamoto
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Yuki Tobisawa
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Tohru Yoneyama
- Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Takahiro Yoneyama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Hashimoto
- Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Takuya Koie
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Ito
- Department of Urology, Aomori Rosai Hospital, Hachinohe, Japan
| | | | - Atsushi Sasaki
- Department of Urology, Tsugaru General Hospital, Goshogawara, Japan
| | - Toshiaki Kawaguchi
- Department of Urology, Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital, Aomori, Japan
| | - Makoto Sato
- Department of Urology, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan
| | - Chikara Ohyama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.,Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ding T, Zheng Z, Xu R, Zhou C. Prognostic factors and outcomes of primary transitional cell carcinoma of the ureter: a population-based study. Oncotarget 2017; 8:65983-65996. [PMID: 29029487 PMCID: PMC5630387 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2017] [Accepted: 06/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This study investigated the prognostic factors and outcomes of a large observational cohort of patients with primary transitional cell carcinoma of the ureter, which was obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Methods We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program to identify 1910 patients who had available clinical and follow-up information and were diagnosed for primary transitional cell carcinoma of the ureter between 2004 and 2013. Descriptive statistics were used to explore the epidemiology, treatment practices, and tumor characteristics of the patients. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression models were used to analyze the patient data. Results The median overall survival (OS) was 46 months, and the 5-year OS rate was 41.8%. The median CSS was 78 months, and the 5-year CSS rate was 54.3%. Multivariate analysis identified tumor grade, tumor size, AJCC stage, M stage, cancer-directed surgical procedure and radiation as independent factors of primary transitional cell carcinoma of the ureter. For early stage patients, the surgical procedure was associated with fairly longer survival and additional radiation may cause more harm than benefit. Meanwhile, for advanced stage patients, the impact of surgery on OS and CSS greatly decreased. Radiation exerted a very limited impact on clinical outcomes. Patients with bad tumor differentiation or a large tumor size were more likely to have advanced stage disease. Conclusion Durable cancer control can be expected in patients treated with surgery for early stage UTUC. The presence of advanced stage disease exerts a profound detrimental effect on the survival of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Ding
- Department of Urology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Zhuojun Zheng
- Department of Hematology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Renfang Xu
- Department of Urology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Cuixing Zhou
- Department of Urology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Shariat SF, Mathieu R. Contemporary concepts and controversies in the diagnosis and management of urothelial carcinoma. Transl Androl Urol 2016; 5:633-635. [PMID: 27785419 PMCID: PMC5071187 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2016.08.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Romain Mathieu
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Szarvas T, Módos O, Horváth A, Nyirády P. Why are upper tract urothelial carcinoma two different diseases? Transl Androl Urol 2016; 5:636-647. [PMID: 27785420 PMCID: PMC5071198 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2016.03.23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
In the last few years growing evidence highlighted the differences between upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and urothelial bladder carcinoma (UBC) which cannot be explained solely by their different anatomical location. The aim of this review was to summarize current progress in UTUC research and to underline the differences and similarities between UTUC and UBC by focusing on epidemiology, etiology, staging and risk factors as well as on surgical and medical management. UBC and UTUC sharing common risk factors such as smoking and aromatic amines, while aristolochic acid exposure or familiar Lynch syndrome are rather specific for UTUC. The grading of UBC and UTUC are identical, but inherent from their different anatomical locations, there are some differences between their stage classifications. As an example, in contrast to UBC where a clear recommendation for pT3 subclassification exists, in UTUC current research aims to define an adequate subclassification for pelvic pT3 cases aiming to provide a better risk stratification. The primary treatment for both UBC and UTUC is surgery. Similarly to UBC, UTUC patients at high risk of disease progression are treated by radical surgery. However, because of the inaccurate preoperative or transurethral staging of UTUC, many radical nephroureterectomies are performed unnecessarily. Preoperative prediction of pathological stage or patients' prognosis may reduce this overtreatment by selecting patients for nephron-sparing surgery. To this end, predictive models combining histological and molecular features together with imaging data may be used. The antegrade or retrograde instillation of BCG or mitomycin C, as topical agents is feasible after conservative treatment of UTUC or for the treatment of CIS. However, the prognostic significance of lymph node positivity in UTUC seems to be similar to that of UBC, the therapeutic benefit of lymph node dissection (LND) in UTUC has not been firmly established yet. In addition, the number of lymph nodes to be removed and the sequence of lymphadenectomy also remain to be defined. Systemic neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapies appear to have beneficial effect on UTUC survival, however, this has to be confirmed by large prospective studies. Due to the intensive research of the last few years, our knowledge on UTUC has been largely improved, but many questions remained to be answered. Further research on the molecular background of UTUC holds the potential to identify prognostic or predictive markers which, together with imaging and histologic data, may help to overcome the inaccuracy of ureteroscopic endoscopy and may therefore help to improve therapeutic decision-making. Further, prospective studies should confirm the benefit of LND and adjuvant chemotherapy. Considering the low incidence of UTUC, conduction of such studies is difficult and may only be performed in a multicenter setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tibor Szarvas
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; ; Department of Urology, University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Orsolya Módos
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - András Horváth
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Péter Nyirády
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Promising role of preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy. World J Urol 2016; 35:121-130. [PMID: 27209168 PMCID: PMC5233730 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1848-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2015] [Accepted: 05/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Several retrospective studies with small cohorts reported neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a prognostic marker in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) following radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). We aimed at validating the predictive and prognostic role of NLR in a large multi-institutional cohort. Methods Preoperative NLR was assessed in a multi-institutional cohort of 2477 patients with UTUC treated with RNU. Altered NLR was defined by a ratio >2.7. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between NLR and lymph node metastasis, muscle-invasive and non-organ-confined disease. The association of altered NLR with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results Altered NLR was observed in 1428 (62.8 %) patients and associated with more advanced pathological tumor stage, lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular invasion, tumor necrosis and sessile tumor architecture. In a preoperative model that included age, gender, tumor location and architecture, NLR was an independent predictive factor for the presence of lymph node metastasis, muscle-invasive and non-organ-confined disease (p < 0.001). Within a median follow-up of 40 months (IQR 20–76 months), 548 (24.1 %) patients experienced disease recurrence and 453 patients (19.9 %) died from their cancer. Compared to patients with normal NLR, those with altered NLR had worse RFS (0.003) and CSS (p = 0.002). In multivariable analyses that adjusted for the effects of standard clinicopathologic features, altered NLR did not retain an independent value. In the subgroup of patients treated with lymphadenectomy in addition to RNU, NLR was independently associated with CSS (p = 0.03). Conclusion In UTUC, preoperative NLR is associated with adverse clinicopathologic features and independently predicts features of biologically and clinically aggressive UTUC such as lymph node metastasis, muscle-invasive or non-organ-confined status. NLR may help better risk stratify patients with regard to lymphadenectomy and conservative therapy.
Collapse
|
16
|
Teo XL, Lim SK. Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy: current perspectives. ROBOTIC SURGERY (AUCKLAND) 2016; 3:37-48. [PMID: 30697554 PMCID: PMC6193422 DOI: 10.2147/rsrr.s106792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
Robot-assisted surgery was just a medical curiosity until the development of the da Vinci robotic system, and since then, it has become a widely accepted surgical treatment for many urological conditions such as prostate carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma. With the increase in the number of urologists using the robot and the improvement in surgeon experience, the use of the robot has been expanded to include performing radical nephroureterectomy (NU) for the treatment of primary upper tract urothelial carcinoma. We performed a literature review on robot-assisted laparoscopic NU with the aim of providing a current perspective on robot-assisted laparoscopic NU for the management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Surgical technique, perioperative outcomes, and oncological outcomes are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Ling Teo
- Department of Urology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore,
| | - Sey Kiat Lim
- Department of Urology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore,
| |
Collapse
|