Enamel margins resealing by low-viscosity resin infiltration

Methylene Blue Penetration of Resin Infiltration and Resin Sealant in Artificial White-Spot Lesions

OBJECTIVE

 This study determined the potency of resin infiltrations and resin sealant in impeding microleakage on artificial white-spot lesions (AWL) by methylene blue penetration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 Eighty AWL specimens were randomly separated into two groups for water storage for 24 hours (groups 1-4) and 20,000 cycles of thermocycling (TC) (groups 5-8). Each group was then separated into four subgroups (n = 10) based on the AWL surface treatments: (1) no Tx, (2) treated with resin infiltration (ICON, DMG, Hamburg, Germany), (3) treated with resin infiltration (Surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer (S-PRG) barrier coat, SHOFU, Kyoto, Japan), (4) treated with resin sealant (Clinpro sealant, 3M ESPE, Minnesota, United States). Nail varnish was covered to all samples, with the exception of a 4 × 4 mm2 patch on the buccal measurement region, which was subsequently submerged in a 2% methylene blue solution and cut into buccolingual sections. Stereomicroscope measurements were used to calculate methylene blue penetration scores.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

 The Kruskal-Wallis test and the Bonferroni post-hoc correction were performed to evaluate the data.

RESULTS

 Application of resin infiltrants and resin sealant reduced microleakage in AWL by methylene penetration both before and after thermal cycling. In addition, group 6 (ICON + TC) and group 7 (S-PRG + TC) had a significantly different value from group 8 (sealant + TC).

CONCLUSION

 Both the resin infiltration approach and the resin sealant seem to help seal AWL and might perhaps offer long-term defense against microleakage in AWL caused by methylene blue penetration. The greatest sealing and defense for microleakage in AWL were demonstrated by the resin infiltrations.

Simulating the shrinkage-induced interfacial damage around Class I composite resin restorations with damage mechanics

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the shrinkage-induced damage at the composite-tooth interface by finite element analysis (FEA) using the cohesive zone model (CZM).

METHODS

Axisymmetric models of Class I restorations were created to illustrate the interfacial damage around composite resin restorations of different dimensions, with polymerization shrinkage modeled analogously to thermal shrinkage. The damage to the adhesive interface was determined using a CZM based on the fracture strength and fracture energy. To show the effects of damage, conventional models with perfectly bonded composite resin restorations were created as controls.

RESULTS

The results indicated interfacial damage at the butt-joint cavosurface margin, dentinoenamel junction, and internal line angle. The percentage of damaged interfacial area was found to increase with decreasing diameter for restorations of the same height. For a given diameter, the damage was more severe for restorations of greater depth. The effects of the damage were further illustrated in the model with a restoration of 2-mm diameter and height. The interfacial damage occurred primarily at the internal line angle (83.3 % of all the damaged interfacial area), leading to local stress relief (from 18.3 MPa to 12.8 MPa), but also higher stress at the damage fronts. Greater local shrinkage was found in composites adjacent to the damage.

SIGNIFICANCE

The damage mechanics-based CZM is an essential refinement of the FEA to predict interfacial damage and its implications. The extent of damage was found to be greater around restorations with smaller diameters and greater depths. The entire simulation is available via an open-source platform to facilitate further applications in adhesive dentistry.

Microleakage of resin infiltration in artificial white-spot lesions

This study examined the effectiveness of resin infiltration in inhibiting microleakage from artificial white-spot lesions (AWL) in enamel. Fifty sound extracted premolars were selected and randomly divided into five groups (n = 10 each). Group 1 included sound teeth. In contrast, an AWL was created in all specimens in groups 2 to 5, as follows-Group 2: AWL with no treatment; Group 3: AWL treated with resin infiltration; Group 4: AWL treated with resin infiltration and 5,000 cycles of thermocycling; Group 5: AWL treated with resin infiltration and 10,000 cycles of thermocycling. All specimens were then coated with nail varnish, except for a 4 × 4 mm² area on the buccal surface (the measurement area), immersed in 2% methylene blue solution, and sectioned buccolingually. Microleakage was evaluated with a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed by using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Bonferroni post-hoc correction. Application of resin infiltrant reduced microleakage in AWL. No microleakage was seen in Group 3, and differences between Groups 3, 4, and 5 were not significant (P > 0.05). The resin infiltration technique appears to aid in sealing enamel AWL and may help provide long-term protection against microleakage in enamel AWL.