Effect of fiber-reinforced composites on the failure load and failure mode of composite veneers

Fracture behaviour of MOD restorations reinforced by various fibre-reinforced techniques - An in vitro study

PURPOSE

The aim was to evaluate the fracture resistance of various direct restorative techniques utilizing different fibre-reinforced materials for restoring deep class II. MOD cavities in molar teeth.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two hundred forty intact mandibular third molars were randomly divided into twelve groups (n = 20). Except for the control group (G12), deep mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities were prepared all other groups. After adhesive treatment and rebuilding the missing interproximal walls with composite, the specimen were restored with different fibres and a final occlusal layer of composite as follows: composite only (G1), short fibre-reinforced composite (SFRC) (G2), glass fibre net (GFN) on the base of the cavity bucco-lingually (BL) and SFRC (G3), SFRC and GFN on top of it BL (G4), SFRC and occlusal splinting with GFN (G5), GFN circumferentially and SFRC (G6), polyethylene fibres (PF) on the base of the cavity BL and composite (G7), composite and PF on top of it BL (G8), composite and occlusal splinting with PF (G9), PF circumferentially and composite (G10), transcoronal splinting with PF (G11). Fracture-resistance for the restored teeth were tested using universal-testing machine. Fracture thresholds and fracture patterns were measured and evaluated.

RESULTS

The transcoronal splinting (G11) yielded the highest fracture resistance among the restored groups. Groups 1, 3 and 4 showed significantly lower fracture resistance values compared to intact teeth.

CONCLUSION

Incorporating polyethylene or a combination of short and bidirectional glass fibres in certain positions in direct restorations seems to be able to restore the fracture resistance of sound molar teeth.

Tensile Bond Strength of Self Adhesive Resin Cement After Various Surface Treatment of Enamel

INTRODUCTION

In self adhesive resin cements adhesion is achieved to dental surface without surface pre-treatment, and requires only single step application. This makes the luting procedure less technique-sensitive and decreases postoperative sensitivity.

AIM

The purpose of this study was to evaluate bond strength of self adhesive resin after surface treatment of enamel for bonding base metal alloy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

On the labial surface of 64 central incisor rectangular base metal block of dimension 6 mm length, 5mm width and 1 mm height was cemented with RelyX U200 and Maxcem Elite self adhesive cements with and without surface treatment of enamel. Surface treatment of enamel was application of etchant, one step bonding agent and both. Tensile bond strength of specimen was measured with universal testing machine at a cross head speed of 1mm/min.

RESULTS

Least tensile bond strength (MPa) was in control group i.e. 1.33 (0.32) & 1.59 (0.299), Highest bond strength observed when enamel treated with both etchant and bonding agent i.e. 2.72 (0.43) & 2.97 (0.19) for Relyx U200 and Elite cement. When alone etchant and bonding agent were applied alone bond strength is 2.19 (0.18) & 2.24 (0.47) for Relyx U200, and 2.38 (0.27) 2.49 (0.16) for Max-cem elite. Mean bond strength was higher in case of Max-cem Elite as compared to RelyX U200 resin cement, although differences were non-significant (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Surface treatment of enamel increases the bond strength of self adhesive resin cement.

Flexural properties of polyethylene, glass and carbon fiber-reinforced resin composites for prosthetic frameworks

OBJECTIVE

High flexural properties are needed for fixed partial denture or implant prosthesis to resist susceptibility to failures caused by occlusal overload. The aim of this investigation was to clarify the effects of four different kinds of fibers on the flexural properties of fiber-reinforced composites.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Polyethylene fiber, glass fiber and two types of carbon fibers were used for reinforcement. Seven groups of specimens, 2 × 2 × 25 mm, were prepared (n = 10 per group). Four groups of resin composite specimens were reinforced with polyethylene, glass or one type of carbon fiber. The remaining three groups served as controls, with each group comprising one brand of resin composite without any fiber. After 24-h water storage in 37°C distilled water, the flexural properties of each specimen were examined with static three-point flexural test at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min.

RESULTS

Compared to the control without any fiber, glass and carbon fibers significantly increased the flexural strength (p < 0.05). On the contrary, the polyethylene fiber decreased the flexural strength (p < 0.05). Among the fibers, carbon fiber exhibited higher flexural strength than glass fiber (p < 0.05). Similar trends were observed for flexural modulus and fracture energy. However, there was no significant difference in fracture energy between carbon and glass fibers (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Fibers could, therefore, improve the flexural properties of resin composite and carbon fibers in longitudinal form yielded the better effects for reinforcement.

Effect of fiber orientation and type of restorative material on fracture strength of the tooth

Aim:

To determine the effect of fiber and its orientation on the fracture resistance of composite restorations in root-filled premolars.

Materials and Methods:

50 sound human premolars were collected and assigned to five groups of ten specimens each. In group 1 (control), specimens were not root-filled. In the other four groups, MOD cavities were prepared and the cusps were reduced to 1.5 mm. In groups 2 and 3, the samples were filled with Z-250 and spectrum composites respectively without fiber reinforcement. Groups 4 and 5 were reinforced with Fiber-Ribbon-(Angelus) and restored with spectrum composite. Fibers were placed in the U-shaped design in group 4 while they were placed in the cross-shape in occlusal region in group 5. The fracture resistance was tested using a mechanical testing machine at crosshead speed of 1mm/min.

Results:

The fracture strength of control group was 1271.16±722.04 N while it was 952.05±330.16 N for group 2, 918.52±256.6 N for group 3, 857.13±184.58 N for group 4 and 1138.81±406.64 N for group 5. Fracture strength of group 5 was more than other groups except for group 1, there was no statistically significant differences.

Conclusions:

The reinforcement of composite with fiber does not increase fracture resistance of root-filled premolars significantly.

Indirect resin composites

Aesthetic dentistry continues to evolve through innovations in bonding agents, restorative materials, and conservative preparation techniques. The use of direct composite restoration in posterior teeth is limited to relatively small cavities due to polymerization stresses. Indirect composites offer an esthetic alternative to ceramics for posterior teeth. This review article focuses on the material aspect of the newer generation of composites. This review was based on a PubMed database search which we limited to peer-reviewed articles in English that were published between 1990 and 2010 in dental journals. The key words used were 'indirect resin composites,' composite inlays,' and 'fiber-reinforced composites.'