1
|
Martinez-Sanchez J, Castrillo L, Jerez D, Torramade-Moix S, Palomo M, Mendieta G, Zafar MU, Moreno-Castaño AB, Sanchez P, Badimon JJ, Diaz-Ricart M, Escolar G, Roqué M. Antithrombotic and prohemorrhagic actions of different concentrations of apixaban in patients exposed to single and dual antiplatelet regimens. Sci Rep 2023; 13:22969. [PMID: 38151494 PMCID: PMC10752876 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50347-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023] Open
Abstract
We evaluated modifications in the hemostatic balance of different concentrations of apixaban (APIX) in 25 healthy donors and 53 patients treated with aspirin (ASA, n = 21), ASA and clopidogrel (ASA + CLOPI, n = 11), or ASA and ticagrelor (ASA + TICA, n = 21). Blood samples from participants were spiked ex vivo with apixaban 0 (APIX0), 40 (APIX40), and 160 ng/mL (APIX160). We assessed the effects of APIX on (1) clot formation, by ROTEM thromboelastometry; (2) thrombin generation primed by platelets; and (3) platelet and fibrin interactions with a thrombogenic surface, in a microfluidic model with circulating blood. APIX caused dose-related prolongations of clotting time with minimal impact on other ROTEM parameters. Thrombin generation was significantly inhibited by APIX160, with ASA + TICA actions showing the strongest inhibition (p < 0.01 vs APIX0). Microfluidic studies showed that APIX160 was more potent at suppressing platelet and fibrin interactions (p < 0.001 vs. APIX0). APIX40 demonstrated a consistent antithrombotic action but with a favorable protective effect on the structural quality of fibrin. APIX potentiated the antithrombotic effects of current antiplatelet regimens. APIX at 40 ng/mL, enhanced the antithrombotic action of single or dual antiplatelet regimens but was more conservative for hemostasis than the 160 ng/mL concentration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Martinez-Sanchez
- Hemostasis and Erythropathology LaboratoryHematopathologyDepartment of Pathology, Centre de Diagnostic Biomedic (CDB), Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Josep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute (Campus Clinic), Barcelona, Spain
- Barcelona Endothelium Team, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Leticia Castrillo
- Department of Cardiology, ICCV, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Didac Jerez
- Hemostasis and Erythropathology LaboratoryHematopathologyDepartment of Pathology, Centre de Diagnostic Biomedic (CDB), Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sergi Torramade-Moix
- Hemostasis and Erythropathology LaboratoryHematopathologyDepartment of Pathology, Centre de Diagnostic Biomedic (CDB), Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Palomo
- Hemostasis and Erythropathology LaboratoryHematopathologyDepartment of Pathology, Centre de Diagnostic Biomedic (CDB), Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Barcelona Endothelium Team, Barcelona, Spain
- Hematology External Quality Assessment Laboratory, CDB, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Guiomar Mendieta
- Department of Cardiology, ICCV, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Urooj Zafar
- Department of Medicine, AtheroThrombosis Research Unit (ATRU), Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Ana Belén Moreno-Castaño
- Hemostasis and Erythropathology LaboratoryHematopathologyDepartment of Pathology, Centre de Diagnostic Biomedic (CDB), Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Barcelona Endothelium Team, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pablo Sanchez
- Department of Marine Biology and Oceanography, Institut de Ciències del Mar, Spanish National Research Council, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Jose Badimon
- Department of Medicine, AtheroThrombosis Research Unit (ATRU), Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Maribel Diaz-Ricart
- Hemostasis and Erythropathology LaboratoryHematopathologyDepartment of Pathology, Centre de Diagnostic Biomedic (CDB), Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Barcelona Endothelium Team, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gines Escolar
- Hemostasis and Erythropathology LaboratoryHematopathologyDepartment of Pathology, Centre de Diagnostic Biomedic (CDB), Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Barcelona Endothelium Team, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mercè Roqué
- Department of Cardiology, ICCV, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bays HE, Taub PR, Epstein E, Michos ED, Ferraro RA, Bailey AL, Kelli HM, Ferdinand KC, Echols MR, Weintraub H, Bostrom J, Johnson HM, Hoppe KK, Shapiro MD, German CA, Virani SS, Hussain A, Ballantyne CM, Agha AM, Toth PP. Ten things to know about ten cardiovascular disease risk factors. Am J Prev Cardiol 2021; 5:100149. [PMID: 34327491 PMCID: PMC8315386 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2021.100149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2020] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Given rapid advancements in medical science, it is often challenging for the busy clinician to remain up-to-date on the fundamental and multifaceted aspects of preventive cardiology and maintain awareness of the latest guidelines applicable to cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. The “American Society for Preventive Cardiology (ASPC) Top Ten CVD Risk Factors 2021 Update” is a summary document (updated yearly) regarding CVD risk factors. This “ASPC Top Ten CVD Risk Factors 2021 Update” summary document reflects the perspective of the section authors regarding ten things to know about ten sentinel CVD risk factors. It also includes quick access to sentinel references (applicable guidelines and select reviews) for each CVD risk factor section. The ten CVD risk factors include unhealthful nutrition, physical inactivity, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, high blood pressure, obesity, considerations of select populations (older age, race/ethnicity, and sex differences), thrombosis/smoking, kidney dysfunction and genetics/familial hypercholesterolemia. For the individual patient, other CVD risk factors may be relevant, beyond the CVD risk factors discussed here. However, it is the intent of the “ASPC Top Ten CVD Risk Factors 2021 Update” to provide a succinct overview of things to know about ten common CVD risk factors applicable to preventive cardiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harold E. Bays
- Medical Director / President, Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY USA
- Corresponding author.
| | - Pam R. Taub
- University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, CA USA
| | | | - Erin D. Michos
- Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Richard A. Ferraro
- Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alison L. Bailey
- Chief, Cardiology, Centennial Heart at Parkridge, Chattanooga, TN USA
| | - Heval M. Kelli
- Northside Hospital Cardiovascular Institute, Lawrenceville, GA USA
| | - Keith C. Ferdinand
- Professor of Medicine, John W. Deming Department of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA USA
| | - Melvin R. Echols
- Assistant Professor of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cardiology Division, Morehouse School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA USA
| | - Howard Weintraub
- NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, New York, NY USA
| | - John Bostrom
- NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, New York, NY USA
| | - Heather M. Johnson
- Christine E. Lynn Women's Health & Wellness Institute, Boca Raton Regional Hospital/Baptist Health South Florida, Clinical Affiliate Associate Professor, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL USA
| | - Kara K. Hoppe
- Assistant Professor, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI USA
| | - Michael D. Shapiro
- Center for Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC USA
| | - Charles A. German
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC USA
| | - Salim S. Virani
- Section of Cardiology, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Section of Cardiovascular Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA
| | - Aliza Hussain
- Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA
| | - Christie M. Ballantyne
- Department of Medicine and Center for Cardiometabolic Disease Prevention, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA
| | - Ali M. Agha
- Department of Medicine and Center for Cardiometabolic Disease Prevention, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA
| | - Peter P. Toth
- CGH Medical Center, Sterling, IL USA
- Cicarrone center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dai H, Zheng C, Lin C, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Chen F, Liu Y, Xiao J, Chen C. Technology-Based Interventions in Oral Anticoagulation Management: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e18386. [PMID: 32673227 PMCID: PMC7391164 DOI: 10.2196/18386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background An increasing number of patients have received prophylactic or therapeutic oral anticoagulants (OACs) for thromboembolic complications of diseases. The use of OACs is associated with both clinical benefits and risks. Considering the challenges imposed by this class of drugs, as well as the enormous progress made in portable device technology, it is possible that technology-based interventions may improve clinical benefits for patients and optimize anticoagulation management. Objective This study was designed to comprehensively evaluate the role of technology-based interventions in the management of OACs. Methods We searched 6 databases—PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, and PsycINFO—to retrieve relevant studies published as of November 1, 2019, to evaluate the effect of technology-based interventions on oral anticoagulation management. RevMan (version 5.3; Cochrane) software was used to evaluate and analyze clinical outcomes. The methodological quality of studies was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Results A total of 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected for analysis. They reported data for 2218 patients (1110 patients in the intervention groups and 1108 patients in the control groups). A meta-analysis was performed on the effectiveness and safety data reported in the RCTs. Technology-based interventions significantly improved the effectiveness of oral anticoagulation management (mean difference [MD]=6.07; 95% CI 0.84-11.30; I2=72%; P=.02). The safety of oral anticoagulation management was also improved, but the results were not statistically significant. Bleeding events were reduced (major bleeding events MD=1.02; 95% CI 0.78-1.32; I2=0%; P=.90; minor bleeding events MD=1.06, 95% CI 0.77-1.44; I2=41%; P=.73) and thromboembolism events were reduced (MD=0.71; 95% CI 0.49-1.01; I2=0%; P=.06). In general, patients were more satisfied with technology-based interventions, which could also improve their knowledge of anticoagulation management, improve their quality of life, and reduce mortality and hospitalization events. Conclusions Using technology to manage OACs can improve the effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulation management, result in higher patient satisfaction, and allow greater understanding of anticoagulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hengfen Dai
- Affiliated Fuzhou First Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | | | - Chun Lin
- School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yan Zhang
- Affiliated Fuzhou First Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Hong Zhang
- Affiliated Fuzhou First Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Fan Chen
- Affiliated Fuzhou First Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yunchun Liu
- Affiliated Fuzhou First Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jingwen Xiao
- Affiliated Fuzhou First Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Chaoxin Chen
- School of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bays HE. Ten things to know about ten cardiovascular disease risk factors ("ASPC Top Ten - 2020"). Am J Prev Cardiol 2020; 1:100003. [PMID: 34327447 PMCID: PMC8315360 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2020.100003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Revised: 04/04/2020] [Accepted: 04/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Preventive cardiology involves understanding and managing multiple cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. Given the rapid advancements in medical science, it may be challenging for the busy clinician to remain up-to-date on the multifaceted and fundamental aspects of CVD prevention, and maintain awareness of the newest applicable guidelines. The "American Society for Preventive Cardiology (ASPC) Top Ten 2020" summarizes ten essential things to know about ten important CVD risk factors, listed in tabular formats. The ten CVD risk factors include unhealthful nutrition, physical inactivity, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, high blood pressure, obesity, considerations of select populations (older age, race/ethnicity, and gender), thrombosis/smoking, kidney dysfunction and genetics/familial hypercholesterolemia. For the individual patient, other CVD risk factors may be relevant, beyond the CVD risk factors discussed here. However, it is the intent of the "ASPC Top Ten 2020" to provide a succinct overview of things to know about ten common CVD risk factors applicable to preventive cardiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harold Edward Bays
- Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, 3288, Illinois Avenue, Louisville, KY, 40213, USA
| |
Collapse
|