Warfarin Use and Mortality, Stroke, and Bleeding Outcomes in a Cohort of Elderly Patients with non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical outcomes of oral anticoagulant discontinuation in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Oral anticoagulants (OACs) should generally be continued lifelong in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) to ensure optimal benefits, unless contraindications arise. However, discontinuation of OACs might occur for various reasons, potentially affecting clinical outcomes. In this review, we synthesized evidence on the clinical outcomes following OAC discontinuation in patients with AF.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using PubMed, Embase and Scopus. Cohort or case-control studies were included if data were available on clinical outcomes of OAC discontinuation, compared with continuation, in patients with AF. A random-effect meta-analyses were conducted for key outcomes of stroke, mortality, and major bleeding.

RESULTS

Eighteen observational studies having a total of 283,418 patients were included. Discontinuation significantly increased the risk of stroke (hazard ratio [HR] 1.88; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58-2.23), all-cause (HR 1.90; 95% CI 1.40-2.59) and cardiovascular (HR 1.83; 95% CI 1.06-3.18) mortality. The risk of major bleeding was not significantly different between the discontinued and continued groups (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.72-1.52).

CONCLUSIONS

Discontinuation of OAC therapy was associated with an increased risk of stroke and mortality, with no difference in the risk of major bleeding. Acknowledging heterogeneity among the studies, the findings underline the need to ensure continuity of OAC therapy in patients with AF to prevent thrombotic complications and associated mortality.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020186116.

Methods to Correct Drug-Induced Coagulopathy in Bleeding Emergencies: A Comparative Review

OBJECTIVE

Anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy have become increasingly popular. The goal of therapy is to prevent venous thromboembolism and platelet aggregation, respectively. Traditional anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs are quickly being replaced with novel medications with more predictable pharmacokinetics. Unfortunately, these drugs carry the risk of uncontrolled hemorrhage because of drug-induced coagulopathy. Uncontrolled hemorrhage continues to be a major cause of preventable death: hemorrhage accounts for approximately 30% of trauma-related deaths, second to brain injury. Controlling hemorrhage while dealing with comorbidities remains a challenge to clinicians. There are many gaps in care and knowledge that contribute to the struggle of treating this patient population.

METHODS

This literature review is focused on the most effective ways to achieve hemostasis in a patient with drug-induced coagulopathy. The antiplatelet therapies aspirin, clopidogrel, ticlopidine, pasugrel, and ticagrelor are analyzed. Anticoagulant therapies are also reviewed, including warfarin, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran. In addition, viscoelastic testing and platelet function assays are reviewed for their ability to monitor drug effectiveness and to accurately depict the patient's ability to clot. This review focuses on articles from the past 10 years. However, there are limitations to the 10-year restriction, including no new research posted within the 10-year timeline on particular subjects. The most recent article was then used where current literature did not exist (within 10 years).

RESULTS

Traditional anticoagulants have unpredictable pharmacokinetics and can be difficult to correct in bleeding emergencies. Vitamin K has been proven to reliably and effectively reverse the effect of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) while having a lower anaphylactoid risk than frozen plasma. Prothrombin complex concentrates should be used when there is risk of loss of life or limb. Frozen plasma is not recommended as a first-line treatment for the reversal of VKAs. Novel anticoagulants have specific reversal agents such as idarucizumab for dabigatran and andexxa alfa for factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors. Although reliable, these drugs carry a large price tag. As with traditional anticoagulants, cheaper alternative therapies are available such as prothrombin complex concentrates. Finally, static coagulation testing works well for routine therapeutic drug monitoring but may not be appropriate during bleeding emergencies. Viscoelastic testing such as thromboelastography and rotational thromboelastometry depict in vivo hemostatic properties more accurately than static coagulation assays. Adding viscoelastic testing into resuscitation protocols may guide blood product usage more efficiently.

CONCLUSION

This review is intended to be used as a guide. The topics covered in this review should be used as a reference for treating the conditions described. This review article also covers laboratory testing and is meant as a guide for physicians on best practices. These findings illustrate recommended testing and reversal techniques based off evidence-based medicine and literature.

Meta-regression of randomized control trials with antithrombotics: weak correlation between net clinical benefit and all cause-mortality

This study aimed to explore the validity of the use of the net clinical benefit (NCB), i.e. the sum of major bleeding and thrombotic events, as a potential surrogate for all-cause mortality in clinical trials assessing antithrombotics. Published randomized controlled trials testing anticoagulants in the prevention or treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) were systematically reviewed. The validity of NCB as a surrogate endpoint was estimated by calculating the strength of correlation of determination (R²) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) between the relative risks of NCB and all-cause mortality. Amongst the 125 trials retrieved, the highest R²_trial values were estimated for NVAF (R²_trial = 0.41, 95% CI [0.03; 0.48]), and acute VTE (R²_trial = 0.30, 95% CI [0.04; 0.84]). Conversely, the NCB did not correlate with all-cause mortality in prevention studies with medical (R²_trial = 0.12, 95% CI [0.00; 0.36]), surgical (R²_trial = 0.05, 95% CI [0.00; 0.23]), and cancer patients (R²_trial = 0.006, 95% CI [0.00; 1.00]). A weak correlation between NCB and all cause-mortality was found in NVAF and acute VTE, whereas no correlation was observed in clinical situations where the mortality rate was low. Consequently, NCB should not be considered a surrogate outcome for all cause-mortality in anticoagulation trials.