Preparing Drugs for Infusion Via Syringe Pump: A Key Step to Ensure Homogeneous Concentration

Optimization of intravenous administration of hydroxocobalamin in pediatric emergencies - HYDROX-OPTIMIS study

INTRODUCTION

Procedures to prepare and infuse intravenous drugs are poorly documented.

OBJECTIVE

To determinate the optimal mode of hydroxocobalamin administration in children in emergency care.

METHODS

We identified three modes of administration: (1) connect infusion tubing to the vial, start the infusion and interrupt it when the desired dose has been delivered; (2) remove from the vial the volume corresponding to the excessive dose and connect infusion tubing and (3) extract from the vial the required volume to be delivered and infuse directly.

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

25 nurses performed each of these three procedures for children weighting 15 and 30 kg. Speed and precision were primary end-points; ease, safety and drug economy were secondary end-points.

RESULTS

Mode 3 was the fastest (42[37-61] sec) followed by modes 1 and 2 (p < 0.05). Mode 3 was the most precise (100[100-100]%) followed by modes 1 and 2 (p = 0.001). Mode 3 was the easiest (10.0[9.0-10.0]) followed by modes 2 and 3 (p = 0.001). Modes 1 and 3 allowed administration of a second dose whereas mode 2 did not.

CONCLUSION

Taking the required volume from the vial and infuse directly was the fastest, the most precise, the easiest and most economical mode of administration. It should be recommended.

Evaluation of the importance of mixing during preparation of antibiotic infusions

Background

The mixing step after medication addition to the infusion bag is frequently omitted during the preparation of drug infusions. However, the importance of mixing when preparing antibiotic infusions is still unknown.

Methods

The primary aim of this study was to assess the importance of the mixing step by comparing the concentrations of unmixed antibiotic infusions (cefuroxime, flucloxacillin, meropenem, and vancomycin) with the declared concentration at regular intervals during infusion. The secondary aim was to compare concentrations between preparation sites (hospital pharmacy versus clinical ward). Infusion bags were run through electronic infusion pumps. For cefuroxime, flucloxacillin, and meropenem, samples were collected 1, 15, and 20 min after starting the administration (infusion duration: 30 min). For vancomycin, samples were collected after 1, 60, and 110 min (infusion duration: 120 min). Vancomycin concentrations were measured using the Architect c4000 analyser and other concentrations using a validated UPC²-MS–MS multimethod.

Results

The median concentrations of the four antibiotics were comparable to the declared concentration at all three time points. No significant differences were found between preparation sites.

Conclusions

Spontaneous mixing occurred in the examined antibiotic solutions during normal handling.

Prevalence and determinants of intravenous admixture preparation errors: A prospective observational study in a university hospital

Background Intravenous admixture preparation errors (IAPEs) may lead to patient harm. Insight into the prevalence as well as the determinants associated with these IAPEs is needed to elicit preventive measures. Aim The primary aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of IAPEs. Secondary aims were to identify the type, severity, and determinants of IAPEs. Method A prospective observational study was performed in a Dutch university hospital. IAPE data were collected by disguised observation. The primary outcome was the proportion of admixtures with one or more IAPEs. Descriptive statistics were used for the prevalence, type, and severity of IAPEs. Mixed-effects logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the determinants of IAPEs. Results A total of 533 IAPEs occurred in 367 of 614 admixtures (59.8%) prepared by nursing staff. The most prevalent errors were wrong preparation technique (n = 257) and wrong volume of infusion fluid (n = 107). Fifty-nine IAPEs (11.1%) were potentially harmful. The following variables were associated with IAPEs: multistep versus single-step preparations (adjusted odds ratio [OR_adj] 4.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.27–7.35); interruption versus no interruption (OR_adj 2.32, CI 1.13–4.74); weekend versus weekdays (OR_adj 2.12, CI 1.14–3.95); time window 2 p.m.-6 p.m. versus 7 a.m.-10 a.m. (OR_adj 3.38, CI 1.60–7.15); and paediatric versus adult wards (OR_adj 0.14, CI 0.06–0.37). Conclusion IAPEs, including harmful IAPEs, occurred frequently. The determinants associated with IAPEs point to factors associated with preparation complexity and working conditions. Strategies to reduce the occurrence of IAPEs and therefore patient harm should target the identified determinants.

Nurse management of vasoactive medications in intensive care: A systematic review

AIM AND OBJECTIVE

To investigate how intensive care nurses prepare, initiate, administer, titrate, and wean vasoactive medications.

BACKGROUND

The management of vasoactive medications is core business for intensive care nurses, but little is known on how nurses manage these ubiquitous and potentially harmful medications.

DESIGN

A systematic review of the literature with narrative synthesis of data.

METHODS

The databases CINAHL Complete, Medline Complete and EMBASE were searched from 1965 to January 2019 with keywords under five concept headings and in a variety of configurations. This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies were assessed for quality and bias, and a modified narrative synthesis was used to analyse data, investigate findings and explore relationships within and between studies.

RESULTS

The review identified 13 studies: two observational studies, two pre and post intervention studies, four survey studies, two quasi-experimental studies, one longitudinal time series, one prospective controlled trial, and one interview incorporating content analysis. Four studies on preparing and initiating vasoactive medications described a lack of standardisation in infusion preparation and inconsistencies in dosing units and patient weights. Five of six studies on vasoactive medication administration examined nurses' use of syringe changeovers to reduce patient haemodynamic compromise and there were three studies on titration and weaning.

CONCLUSION

Further research on nurse management of vasoactive medications is needed to develop an evidence base for specialist education and standardised practices aimed at reducing risk for patient harm.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Nurses working in intensive care units in many parts of the world are responsible for the management of vasoactive medications. There is great variation in practices that include preparation, initiation, administration, titration and weaning of vasoactive medications, which increases the risk for medication errors and adverse events in a vulnerable population of critically ill patients.