1
|
Romøren M, Hermansen KB, Sævareid TJL, Brøderud L, Westbye SF, Wahl AK, Thoresen L, Rostoft S, Førde R, Ahmed M, Aas E, Midtbust MH, Pedersen R. Implementation of advance care planning in the routine care for acutely admitted patients in geriatric units: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:220. [PMID: 38374100 PMCID: PMC10875743 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10666-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acutely ill and frail older adults and their next of kin are often poorly involved in treatment and care decisions. This may lead to either over- or undertreatment and unnecessary burdens. The aim of this project is to improve user involvement and health services for frail older adults living at home, and their relatives, by implementing advance care planning (ACP) in selected hospital wards, and to evaluate the clinical and the implementation interventions. METHODS This is a cluster randomized trial with 12 hospital units. The intervention arm receives implementation support for 18 months; control units receive the same support afterwards. The ACP intervention consists of 1. Clinical intervention: ACP; 2. Implementation interventions: Implementation team, ACP coordinator, network meetings, training and supervision for health care personnel, documentation tools and other resources, and fidelity measurements with tailored feedback; 3. Implementation strategies: leadership commitment, whole ward approach and responsive evaluation. Fidelity will be measured three times in the intervention arm and twice in the control arm. Here, the primary outcome is the difference in fidelity changes between the arms. We will also include 420 geriatric patients with one close relative and an attending clinician in a triadic sub-study. Here, the primary outcomes are quality of communication and decision-making when approaching the end of life as perceived by patients and next of kin, and congruence between the patient's preferences for information and involvement and the clinician's perceptions of the same. For patients we will also collect clinical data and health register data. Additionally, all clinical staff in both arms will be invited to answer a questionnaire before and during the implementation period. To explore barriers and facilitators and further explore the significance of ACP, qualitative interviews will be performed in the intervention units with patients, next of kin, health care personnel and implementation teams, and with other stakeholders up to national level. Lastly, we will evaluate resource utilization, costs and health outcomes in a cost-effectiveness analysis. DISCUSSION The project may contribute to improved implementation of ACP as well as valuable knowledge and methodological developments in the scientific fields of ACP, health service research and implementation science. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05681585. Registered 03.01.23.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Romøren
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
- Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Karin Berg Hermansen
- Department for Health Sciences in Aalesund, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Aalesund, Norway
| | | | - Linn Brøderud
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Siri Færden Westbye
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Astrid Klopstad Wahl
- Department for Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lisbeth Thoresen
- Department for Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Siri Rostoft
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Reidun Førde
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marc Ahmed
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eline Aas
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Division of Health Science, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - May Helen Midtbust
- Department for Health Sciences in Aalesund, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Aalesund, Norway
| | - Reidar Pedersen
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kumlin M, Berg GV, Kvigne K, Hellesø R. Dilemmas and deliberations in managing the care trajectory of elderly patients with complex health needs: a single-case study. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1030. [PMID: 35962337 PMCID: PMC9375356 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08422-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Today, the ageing population is larger than ever before, and people who are living longer with chronic illnesses and multimorbidity need support from multiple healthcare service levels. Similarly, healthcare systems are becoming increasingly specialised and fragmented. The World Health Organization has highlighted novel policies for developing integrated and person-centred services. However, patients, next of kin and health professionals face several challenges in managing healthcare during the care trajectory. Limited literature has addressed the challenges experienced by these groups. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the dilemmas and deliberations faced by patients, next of kin and health professionals during the care trajectory of elderly patients with complex healthcare needs. Method The study had a qualitative single-case design. The case was taken from a multi-case study exploring the care trajectory of elderly patients. The participants were the patient, their next of kin and the health professionals involved in the patient’s care trajectory. Data were obtained via observation and individual interviews conducted during the patient’s hospital stay and after the patient returned home. Results The dilemmas and deliberations in managing the care trajectory were divided into four main themes: the health professionals’ pursuit of appropriate and feasible healthcare services, the next of kin’s planning horizons, being the person left in limbo and reorganising the home for comprehensive healthcare. Conclusion The pursuit of a tailored and suitable healthcare service lead to a comprehensive mobilisation of and work by all actors involved. Having a comprehensive understanding of these conditions are of importance in developing an appropriate care trajectory for the elderly patient with complex need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Kumlin
- Department of Health and Nursing Sciences, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Elverum, Norway. .,Innlandet Hospital Trust, Lillehammer, Norway. .,Department of Nursing Science, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Geir Vegar Berg
- Innlandet Hospital Trust, Lillehammer, Norway.,Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology Gjøvik, Gjøvik, Norway
| | - Kari Kvigne
- Department of Health and Nursing Sciences, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Elverum, Norway
| | - Ragnhild Hellesø
- Department of Nursing Science, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nijdam TMP, Laane DWPM, Spierings JF, Schuijt HJ, Smeeing DPJ, van der Velde D. Proxy-reported experiences of palliative, non-operative management of geriatric patients after a hip fracture: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e063007. [PMID: 35948383 PMCID: PMC9379475 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to explore the experiences from the period after the choice was made for palliative, non-operative management for geriatric patients with a hip fracture, to the most important factors in the process, as reported by a proxy. DESIGN Semistructured interviews were conducted between 1 August 2020 and 1 April 2021 to investigate by-proxy reported patient experiences of non-operative management after hip fracture. Interviews followed a topic guide, recorded and transcribed per word. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes in the data. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Patients were retrospectively identified from the electronic patient record. Relatives (proxies) of the patients who underwent palliative, non-operative management were contacted and were asked to participate in a semistructured interview and were named participants. The participants were proxies of the patients since patients were expected to be deceased during the timing of the interview. RESULTS A total of 26 patients were considered eligible for inclusion in this study. The median age of the patients was 88 years (IQR 83-94). The 90-day mortality rate was 92.3%, with a median palliative care period of 11 days (IQR 4-26). A total of 19 participants were subjected to the interview. After thematic analysis, four recurring themes were identified: (1) the decision-making process, (2) pain experience, (3) patient-relative interaction and (4) the active dying. CONCLUSIONS With the introduction of shared decision-making in an acute setting for geriatric patients with hip fracture, proxies reported palliative, non-operative management as an acceptable and adequate option for patients with high risk of adverse outcomes after surgery. The emerged themes in palliative care for patients with hip fracture show great similarity with severe end-stage disease palliative care, with pain identified as the most important factor influencing comfort of the patient and their environment after hip fracture. Future research should focus on further improving targeted analgesia for these patients focusing on acute pain caused by the fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jelle Friso Spierings
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Ziekenhuis Locatie Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Henk Jan Schuijt
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Ziekenhuis Locatie Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Detlef van der Velde
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Ziekenhuis Locatie Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Harbin NJ, Lindbæk M, Romøren M. Barriers and facilitators of appropriate antibiotic use in primary care institutions after an antibiotic quality improvement program - a nested qualitative study. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:458. [PMID: 35624423 PMCID: PMC9137170 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03161-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antibiotic prescribing by physicians in primary care institutions is common and affected by several factors. Diagnosis and treatment of infections in a nursing home (NH) resident is challenging, with the risk of both under- and overtreatment. Identifying barriers and facilitators of appropriate antibiotic prescribing in NHs and municipal acute care units (MACUs) is essential to ensure the most adequate antibiotic treatment possible and develop future antibiotic stewardship programs. METHODS After implementing a one-year antibiotic quality improvement program, we conducted six semi-structured focus group interviews with physicians (n = 11) and nurses (n = 14) in 10 NHs and 3 MACUs located in the county of Østfold, Norway. We used a semi-structured interview guide covering multiple areas influencing antibiotic use to identify persistent barriers and facilitators of appropriate antibiotic prescribing after the intervention. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The content analysis was performed following the six phases of thematic analysis developed by Braun and Clarke. RESULTS We identified thirteen themes containing barriers and facilitators of the appropriateness of antibiotic use in primary care institutions. The themes were grouped into four main levels: Barriers and facilitators 1) at the clinical level, 2) at the resident level, 3) at the next of kin level, and 4) at the organisational level. Unclear clinical presentation of symptoms and lack of diagnostic possibilities were described as essential barriers to appropriate antibiotic use. At the same time, increased availability of the permanent nursing home physician and early and frequent dialogue with the residents' next of kin were emphasized as facilitators of appropriate antibiotic use. The influence of nurses in the decision-making process regarding infection diagnostics and treatment was by both professions described as profound. CONCLUSIONS Our qualitative study identified four main levels containing several barriers and facilitators of appropriate antibiotic prescribing in Norwegian NHs and MACUs. Diagnostic uncertainty, frequent dialogue with next of kin and organisational factors should be targeted in future antibiotic stewardship programs in primary care institutions. In addition, for such programs to be as effective as possible, nurses should be included on equal terms with physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolay Jonassen Harbin
- Antibiotic Center for Primary Care, Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Postboks 1130 Blindern, 0317, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Morten Lindbæk
- Antibiotic Center for Primary Care, Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Postboks 1130 Blindern, 0317, Oslo, Norway
| | - Maria Romøren
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Coulongeat M, Aïdoud A, Poupin P, Dubnitskiy-Robin S, Fougère B. A Local COVID-19 Support Platform for Nursing Homes: Feedback and Perspectives. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2021; 22:1599-1601. [PMID: 34197795 PMCID: PMC8189762 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Revised: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a major impact on nursing homes (NHs), which were not prepared to manage infections among their at-risk patient populations. In order to comply with the French government's guidelines, we rapidly set up a local support platform (LSP) to help NHs manage their cases of COVID-19. The LSP comprised multidisciplinary decision support, a specialist phone hotline, mobile geriatric medicine teams, and videoconferences on COVID-19. We first quantified the LSP's interventions in 63 local NHs since the start of the first wave of COVID-19 (March 2020): 9 instances of multidisciplinary decision support, 275 calls to the specialist phone hotline, 84 interventions by mobile geriatric medicine teams, and 16 videoconferences. The LSP had been used during and between the first and second waves of the epidemic, and all had evolved to meet the NHs' needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthieu Coulongeat
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Tours University Medical Center, Tours, France.
| | - Amal Aïdoud
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Tours University Medical Center, Tours, France
| | - Pierre Poupin
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Tours University Medical Center, Tours, France; INSERM 1246-SPHERE, Tours and Nantes Universities, Tours, France
| | - Sophie Dubnitskiy-Robin
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Tours University Medical Center, Tours, France; INSERM 1246-SPHERE, Tours and Nantes Universities, Tours, France
| | - Bertrand Fougère
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Tours University Medical Center, Tours, France; Education, Ethics, Health (EA 7505), Tours University, Tours, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Thoresen L, Pedersen R, Lillemoen L, Gjerberg E, Førde R. Advance care planning in Norwegian nursing homes - limited awareness of the residents' preferences and values? A qualitative study. BMC Geriatr 2019; 19:363. [PMID: 31870302 PMCID: PMC6929496 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-019-1378-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Accepted: 12/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND 52% of all deaths in Norway occur in nursing homes. Still advance care planning (ACP) is scarce and heterogeneous. To improve the implementation and practice of ACP in nursing homes, knowledge about health care professionals' views on ACP is vital. The objective of this study is to explore nurses and physicians' aims and experiences with carrying out ACP in nursing homes. METHODS Semi-structured group interviews were conducted with 20 health care professionals, recruited from nursing homes where ACP was performed regularly. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyse the data. RESULTS The primary aim of the nursing home professionals when doing ACP in nursing homes were to build alliances with next of kin to avoid misunderstandings and future conflicts. Two main experiences with ACP were described: i) due to the sensitivity of ACP issues, it was important to balance directness with being sensitive, and ii) when the physicians raised questions concerning future medical treatment, the answers from residents as well as next of kin were often hesitant and unclear. CONCLUSION Our study add insights into how ACP is practiced in nursing homes and the professionals' agenda. A focus on medical issues and achieving consensus with next of kin may result in lack of involvement of the residents and limited awareness of the residents' needs. Interdisciplinary approaches, ACP-training and tailored guidelines may improve the implementation and practice of ACP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisbeth Thoresen
- Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Harald Schjelderups hus Forskningsveien 3a/2b, Post Box 1089, 0373, Oslo, Norway.
| | | | | | | | - Reidun Førde
- Centre for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hanratty B, Craig D, Brittain K, Spilsbury K, Vines J, Wilson P. Innovation to enhance health in care homes and evaluation of tools for measuring outcomes of care: rapid evidence synthesis. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2019. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr07270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundFlexible, integrated models of service delivery are being developed to meet the changing demands of an ageing population. To underpin the spread of innovative models of care across the NHS, summaries of the current research evidence are needed. This report focuses exclusively on care homes and reviews work in four specific areas, identified as key enablers for the NHS England vanguard programme.AimTo conduct a rapid synthesis of evidence relating to enhancing health in care homes across four key areas: technology, communication and engagement, workforce and evaluation.Objectives(1) To map the published literature on the uses, benefits and challenges of technology in care homes; flexible and innovative uses of the nursing and support workforce to benefit resident care; communication and engagement between care homes, communities and health-related organisations; and approaches to the evaluation of new models of care in care homes. (2) To conduct rapid, systematic syntheses of evidence to answer the following questions. Which technologies have a positive impact on resident health and well-being? How should care homes and the NHS communicate to enhance resident, family and staff outcomes and experiences? Which measurement tools have been validated for use in UK care homes? What is the evidence that staffing levels (i.e. ratio of registered nurses and support staff to residents or different levels of support staff) influence resident outcomes?Data sourcesSearches of MEDLINE, CINAHL, Science Citation Index, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, DARE (Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects) and Index to Theses. Grey literature was sought via Google™ (Mountain View, CA, USA) and websites relevant to each individual search.DesignMapping review and rapid, systematic evidence syntheses.SettingCare homes with and without nursing in high-income countries.Review methodsPublished literature was mapped to a bespoke framework, and four linked rapid critical reviews of the available evidence were undertaken using systematic methods. Data were not suitable for meta-analysis, and are presented in narrative syntheses.ResultsSeven hundred and sixty-one studies were mapped across the four topic areas, and 65 studies were included in systematic rapid reviews. This work identified a paucity of large, high-quality research studies, particularly from the UK. The key findings include the following. (1) Technology: some of the most promising interventions appear to be games that promote physical activity and enhance mental health and well-being. (2) Communication and engagement: structured communication tools have been shown to enhance communication with health services and resident outcomes in US studies. No robust evidence was identified on care home engagement with communities. (3) Evaluation: 6 of the 65 measurement tools identified had been validated for use in UK care homes, two of which provide general assessments of care. The methodological quality of all six tools was assessed as poor. (4) Workforce: joint working within and beyond the care home and initiatives that focus on staff taking on new but specific care tasks appear to be associated with enhanced outcomes. Evidence for staff taking on traditional nursing tasks without qualification is limited, but promising.LimitationsThis review was restricted to English-language publications after the year 2000. The rapid methodology has facilitated a broad review in a short time period, but the possibility of omissions and errors cannot be excluded.ConclusionsThis review provides limited evidential support for some of the innovations in the NHS vanguard programme, and identifies key issues and gaps for future research and evaluation.Future workFuture work should provide high-quality evidence, in particular experimental studies, economic evaluations and research sensitive to the UK context.Study registrationThis study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016052933, CRD42016052933, CRD42016052937 and CRD42016052938.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Hanratty
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Dawn Craig
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Katie Brittain
- Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - John Vines
- Northumbria School of Design, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Paul Wilson
- Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (NIHR CLAHRC) Greater Manchester, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Klomstad K, Pedersen R, Førde R, Romøren M. Involvement in decisions about intravenous treatment for nursing home patients: nursing homes versus hospital wards. BMC Med Ethics 2018; 19:34. [PMID: 29739393 PMCID: PMC5941318 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-018-0258-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2016] [Accepted: 02/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Many of the elderly in nursing homes are very ill and have a reduced quality of life. Life expectancy is often hard to predict. Decisions about life-prolonging treatment should be based on a professional assessment of the patient’s best interest, assessment of capacity to consent, and on the patient’s own wishes. The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare how these types of decisions were made in nursing homes and in hospital wards. Methods Using a questionnaire, we studied the decision-making process for 299 nursing home patients who were treated for dehydration using intravenous fluids, or for bacterial infections using intravenous antibiotics. We compared the 215 (72%) patients treated in nursing homes to the 84 (28%) nursing home patients treated in the hospital. Results The patients’ capacity to consent was considered prior to treatment in 197 (92%) of the patients treated in nursing homes and 56 (67%) of the patients treated in hospitals (p < 0.001). The answers indicate that capacity to consent can be difficult to assess. Patients that were considered capable to consent, were more often involved in the decision-making in nursing homes than in hospital (90% vs. 52%). Next of kin and other health personnel were also more rarely involved when the nursing home patient was treated in hospital. Whether advance care planning had been carried out, was more often unknown in the hospital (69% vs. 17% in nursing homes). Hospital doctors expressed more doubt about the decision to admit the patient to the hospital than about the treatment itself. Conclusions This study indicates a potential for improvement in decision-making processes in general, and in particular when nursing home patients are treated in a hospital ward. The findings corroborate that nursing home patients should be treated locally if adequate health care and treatment is available. The communication between the different levels of health care when hospitalization is necessary, must be better. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01023763 (12/1/09) [The registration was delayed one month after study onset due to practical reasons]. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12910-018-0258-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin Klomstad
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O box 1130 Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway
| | - Reidar Pedersen
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O box 1130 Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway
| | - Reidun Førde
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O box 1130 Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway
| | - Maria Romøren
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O box 1130 Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway. .,Antibiotic centre for primary care, Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O box 1130 Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cock LL. Re: Én pasient, to verdener – samhandling mellom sykehjemsleger og sykehusleger. TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LEGEFORENING 2017; 137:423-424. [DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.17.0183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
|
10
|
|