Prognostic Impact of Progesterone Receptor Status in Chinese Estrogen Receptor Positive Invasive Breast Cancer Patients

Combination of IVIM with DCE-MRI for diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of breast cancer

PURPOSE

To identify the most effective combination of DCE-MRI (Ktrans,Kep) and IVIM (D,f) and analyze the correlations of these parameters with prognostic indicators (ER, PR, and HER2, Ki-67 index, axillary lymph node (ALN) and tumor size) to improve the diagnostic and prognostic efficiency in breast cancer.

METHODS

This is a prospective study. We performed T1WI, T2WI, IVIM, DCE-MRI at 3 T MRI examinations on benign and malignant breast lesions that met the inclusion criteria. We also collected pathological results of corresponding lesions, including ER, PR, and HER2, Ki-67 index, axillary lymph node (ALN) and tumor size. The diagnostic efficacy of DCE-MRI, IVIM imaging, and their combination for benign and malignant breast lesions was assessed. Correlations between the DCE-MRI and IVIM parameters and prognostic indicators were assessed.

RESULTS

Overall,59 female patients with 62 lesions (22 benign lesions and 40 malignant lesions) were included in this study. The malignant group showed significantly lower D values (p < 0.05) and significantly higher Ktrans, Kep, and f values (p < 0.05). The AUC values of DCE, IVIM, DCE + IVIM were 0.828, 0.882, 0.901. Ktrans, Kep, D and f values were correlated with the pathological grade (p < 0.05); Ktrans was negatively correlated with ER expression (r = -0.519, p < 0.05); Kep was correlated with PR expression and the Ki-67 index (r = -0.489, 0.330, p < 0.05); the DCE and IVIM parameters showed no significant correlations with the HER2 and ALN (p > 0.05). Tumor diameter was correlated with the Kep, D and f values (r = 0.246, -0.278, 0.293; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

IVIM and DCE-MRI allowed differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions, and their combination showed significantly better diagnostic efficiency. DCE- and IVIM-derived parameters showed correlations with some prognostic factors for breast cancer.

Predictive models and biomarkers for survival in stage III breast cancer: a review of clinical applications and future directions

Stage III breast cancer, characterized by locally advanced tumors and potential regional lymph node involvement, presents a formidable challenge to both patients and healthcare professionals. Accurate prediction of survival outcomes is crucial for guiding treatment decisions and optimizing patient care. This publication explores the potential clinical utility of predictive tools, encompassing genetic markers, imaging techniques, and clinical parameters, to improve survival outcome predictions in stage III breast cancer. Multimodal approaches, integrating these tools, hold the promise of delivering more precise and personalized predictions. Despite the inherent challenges, such as data standardization and genetic heterogeneity, the future offers opportunities for refinement, driven by precision medicine, artificial intelligence, and global collaboration. The goal is to empower healthcare providers to make informed treatment decisions, ultimately leading to improved survival outcomes and a brighter horizon for individuals facing this challenging disease.

The prognostic analysis of further axillary dissection in breast cancer with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph nodes undergoing mastectomy

Background

The ACOSOG Z0011 study has shown that axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is an option to be considered in patients who had 1-2 metastatic sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) who proceed with breast-conserving along with postoperative radiotherapy. However, there remains controversy regarding the applicability of this approach in patients who had a mastectomy. The aim of our study is to determine the prognostic differences and risk factors associated with the decision to opt for ALND in breast cancer patients who had 1-2 metastatic SLNs who receive a mastectomy.

Methods

The study conducted a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with cT1-2N0 breast cancer and treated at The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University between January 2016 and December 2021, and patients were divided into two cohorts according to whether ALND was performed after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB): SLNB cohort and SLNB + ALND cohort. Outcomes included the locoregional recurrence rate (LRR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to ensure the balance of variables between the two cohorts. Cox proportional hazard models were employed to ascertain the univariate and multivariate relative risks associated with survival.

Results

There were 812 cases enrolled. After the PSM, 234 receiving ALND and 234 not receiving ALND were matched. A median follow-up period of 56.72 ± 20.29 months was observed. During that time, no significant difference was identified in the DFS and OS in the SLNB + ALND cohort and the SLNB cohort (P = 0.208 and P = 0.102), except for those under 40 years old, SLNB + ALND group showed a reduction in LRR compared to SLNB group (11.1% vs. 2.12%, P = 0.044). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that younger (≤ 40 years), progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and SLNB alone were independent risk factors for LRR; perineural invasion was a risk factor, while endocrinotherapy was a beneficial prognostic indicator for DFS and OS among patients with positive hormone receptor.

Conclusion

ALND does not impact DFS and OS in patients with 1-2 metastatic SLNs who have completed a mastectomy. Being younger (≤ 40 years), having a negative PR, and undergoing SLNB alone were independent risk factors for LRR. Given this finding, we recommend avoiding axillary treatment such as ALND or radiotherapy in patients without risk factors.

Genetic and clinical landscape of ER + /PR- breast cancer in China

BACKGROUND

Estrogen receptor-positive and progesterone receptor-negative (ER + /PR-) breast cancer comprise a special type. More than 10% breast cancer patients belonged to ER + /PR-.

METHODS

In order to better understand this patient population, we utilized a unique dataset from China, examining the clinicopathological features and genomic profiles of ER + /PR- breast cancers. Our study involved three cohorts: Cohort 1 included 2120 unselected ER-positive female patients with re-evaluated clinicopathological and survival data; Cohort 2 comprised 442 ER-positive females who underwent genetic testing; and Cohort 3 consisted of 77 ER-positive/HER2-negative females tested with MammaPrint and BluePrint.

RESULTS

Patients were stratified into four categories based on the PR/ER ratio. Clinically, ER + /PR- tumors (PR/ER ratio = 0) showed the lowest proportion of T1 tumors (10.88%) and highest proportion of HER2-positive tumors (28.36%) than did other ER + /PR + tumors groups. The ER + /PR- group contained a higher number of underweight patients (20.20%). Independently of HER2 status, ER + /PR- patients demonstrated the poorest prognosis. Genomically, the most prevalent mutations were PIK3CA (50%) in ER + /PR + tumors and TP53 (65%) in ER + /PR- tumors. ER + /PR- tumors presented more frequent mutations in TP53, ERBB2, CDK12, SPEN, and NEB, with mutation rates of 65%, 42%, 27%, 13%, and 10%, respectively. Additionally, the Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) was higher in the ER + /PR- group compared to the ER + /PR + group. The MammaPrint score for the ER + /PR-/HER2- group was significantly lower than that of other groups. In the BluePrint analysis, only four patients were classified as Basal-Type, all of whom were ER + /PR-/HER2-.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we identified the clinical and genetic characteristics of ER + /PR- breast cancer patients in China. Distinct PR statuses indicated different biological processes of ER + breast cancer and survival outcomes. Future treatment strategies may need to be tailored for ER + /PR- patients.

The clinical value of progesterone receptor expression in luminal breast cancer: A study of a large cohort with long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

The routine assessment of progesterone receptor (PR) expression in breast cancer (BC) remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the role of PR expression in luminal BC, with emphasis on the definition of positivity and its prognostic significance as compared to Ki67 expression.

METHODS

A large cohort (n = 1924) of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative BC was included. PR was immunohistochemically (IHC) stained on full face sections and core needle biopsies (CNB) where the optimal scoring cutoff was evaluated. In addition, the association of PR with other clinicopathological factors, cellular proliferation, disease outcome, and response to adjuvant therapy were analyzed.

RESULTS

Although several cutoffs showed prognostic significance, the optimal cutoff to categorize PR expression into two clinically distinct prognostic groups on CNB was 10%. PR negativity showed a significant association with features of aggressive tumor behavior and poor outcome. Multivariate analyses indicated that the association between PR negativity and poor outcome was independent of tumor grade, size, node stage, and Ki67. PR negativity showed independent association with shorter survival in patients who received endocrine therapy whereas Ki67did not.

CONCLUSION

PR IHC expression provides independent prognostic value superior to Ki67. Routine assessment of PR expression in BC using 10% cutoff in the clinical setting is recommended.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

In this study, we have established an optimal approach to determine the prognostic value of progesterone receptor expression in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients. To do this, the levels of progesterone receptor were measured in a large cohort of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients. We have refined the definition of progesterone receptor positivity in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. We show that progesterone receptor expression adds prognostic and predictive value of endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients, and our results show that the absence of progesterone receptor is associated with poorer outcomes independent of tumor grade, size, node stage, and Ki67 expression.

Prediction of Oncotype DX Recurrence Score Using Clinicopathological Variables in Estrogen Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Oncotype DX (ODX) is a well-validated multigene assay that is increasingly used in Korean clinical practice. This study aimed to develop a clinicopathological prediction (CPP) model for the ODX recurrence scores (RSs).

METHODS

A total of 297 patients (study group, n = 175; external validation group, n = 122) with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, T1-3N0-1M0 breast cancer, and available ODX test results were included in the study. Risk categorization as determined by ODX RSs concurred with the TAILORx study (low-risk, RS ≤ 25; high-risk, RS > 25). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the relationships between clinicopathological variables and risk stratified by the ODX RSs. A CPP model was constructed based on regression coefficients (β values) for clinicopathological variables significant by multivariate regression analysis.

RESULTS

Progesterone receptor (PR) negativity, high Ki-67 index, and nuclear grade (NG) 3 independently predicted high-risk RS, and these variables were used to construct the CPP model. The C-index, which represented the discriminatory ability of our CPP model for predicting a high-risk RS, was 0.915 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.859-0.971). When the CPP model was applied to the external validation group, the C-index was 0.926 (95% CI, 0.873-0.978).

CONCLUSION

Our CPP model based on PR, Ki-67 index, and NG could aid in the selection of patients with breast cancer requiring an ODX test.

Combination of Anatomical and Biological Factors to Predict Disease-Free Survival in Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

The combination of anatomical and biological factors of breast cancer in a new staging system has a prognostic role. This study investigates the prognostic value of the Bioscore among patients with breast cancer with respect to disease-free survival (DFS).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study included 317 patients with breast cancer who were identified between January 2015 and December 2018 at Clinical Oncology Department of Assiut University Hospital. Their cancer baseline characteristics were recorded: pathologic stage (PS), T stage (T), nodal stage (N), grade (G), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) status. Univariate and two multivariate analyses were performed to identify which of these variables are associated with DFS. Model performance was quantified using Harrell's concordance index (C-index), and the Akaike information criterion (AIC) was used to compare model fits.

RESULTS

The significant factors in the univariate analysis were PS3, T2, T3, T4, N3, G2, G3, ER-negative, PR-negative, and HER2-negative. In the first multivariate analysis, PS3, G3, and ER-negative were the significant factors, and in the second multivariate analysis, T2, T4, N3, G3, and ER-negative were the significant factors. Two sets of models were built to determine the utility of combining variables. Models incorporating G and ER status had the highest C-index (0.72) for T + N + G + ER in comparison with (0.69) PS + G + ER and the lowest AIC (953.01) for T + N + G + ER and (966.9) for PS + G + ER.

CONCLUSION

Using the Bioscore in breast cancer staging helps to identify patients at increased risk of recurrence. It provides more optimistic prognostic stratification than the anatomical staging alone for DFS.

Biomarker Alteration after Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy or Chemotherapy in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer

In estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer, changes in biomarker expression after neoadjuvant therapy indicate the therapeutic response and are prognostic. However, there is limited information about the biomarker alteration caused by neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in ER-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer. We recruited ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT), neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET), or sequential neoadjuvant endocrine-chemotherapy (NECT) at Peking University Cancer Hospital from 2015 to 2021. A total of 579 patients had paired immunohistochemistry information in both diagnostic biopsy samples and post-neoadjuvant therapy surgical samples. Through a paired comparison of the immunohistochemical information in pre-treatment and post-treatment samples, we found that progesterone receptor (PR) expression reductions were more frequent than ER expression reductions (70.8% vs. 35.2%) after neoadjuvant therapy. The percentage of patients who had a decreased Ki-67 index in the post-operative samples was similar in the three groups (79.8% vs. 79.7% vs. 78.4%). Moreover, PR losses caused by NET were related to low baseline PR expression (p = 0.001), while we did not find a significant association between PR losses and Ki-67 reductions (p = 0.428) or ER losses (p = 0.274). All three types of neoadjuvant therapies caused a reduction in ER, PR, and Ki-67 expression. In conclusion, we found that PR loss after NET was only significantly related to low baseline PR expression, and there is no significant difference in the extent of prognostic factor change including Ki-67 and ER between the PR loss and non-loss groups.

Development and validation of an extended Cox prognostic model for patients with ER/PR+ and HER2- breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Background

The purpose of this study was to explore a new estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR)+ and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)− breast cancer prognostic model, called the extended Cox prognostic model, for determining the cutoff values for multiple continuous prognostic factors and their interaction via the new model concept and variable selection method.

Methods

A total of 335 patients with ER/PR+ and HER2− breast cancer were enrolled for the final analysis. The primary endpoint was breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM). Prognostic factors (histological grade, histological type, stage, T, N, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), P53, Ki67, ER, PR, and age) were included in this study. The four continuous variables (Ki67, ER, PR, and age) were partitioned into a series of binary variables that were fitted in the multivariate Cox analysis. A smoothly clipped absolute deviation (SCAD) variable selection method was used. Model performance was expressed in discrimination and calibration.

Results

We developed an extended Cox model with a time threshold of 164-week (more than 3 years) postoperation and developed a user-friendly nomogram based on our extended Cox model to facilitate clinical application. We found that the cutoff values for PR, Ki67, and age were 20%, 60%, and 41–55 years, respectively. There was an interaction between age and PR for patients aged ≥ 41 years and PR ≥ 20% at 164-week postoperation: the older the patients with ER/PR+, HER2−, and PR ≥ 20% were, the lower the survival and more likely to recur and metastasize exceeding 164 weeks (more than 3 years) after surgery.

Conclusions

Our study offers guidance on the prognosis of patients with ER/PR+ and HER2− breast cancer in China. The new concept can inform modeling and the determination of cutoff values of prognostic factors in the future.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-022-02790-0.

Assessment of Predictive Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: Challenges and Updates

The management of patients with breast cancer (BC) relies on the assessment of a defined set of well-established prognostic and predictive markers. Despite overlap, prognostic markers are used to assess the risk of recurrence and the likely benefit of systemic therapy, whereas predictive markers are used to determine the type of systemic therapy to be offered to an individual patient. In this review, we provide an update and present some challenges in the assessment of the main BC-specific molecular predictive markers, namely hormone receptors (oestrogen receptor [ER] and progesterone receptor [PR]), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and KI67. As the main platform for assessing these markers in BC is immunohistochemistry (IHC), we address the cut-off values used to define positivity, the ER-low subgroup, the existence and significance of the ER-/PR+ phenotype, the use of PR in routine practice, and the role of hormone receptors in ductal carcinoma in situ. We discuss the newly introduced HER2-low class of BC and the clinical/biological difference between different HER2 groups (e.g., HER2 IHC score 3+ BCs vs. those with a HER2 IHC score 2+ with HER2 gene amplification). The review concludes with an update on the applications of KI67 assessment in BC and observations on the role of immune checkpoint identification in BC.

Expression of estrogen-, progesterone-, and androgen-responsive genes in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells treated with o,p'-DDT, p,p'-DDT, or endosulfan

Endocrine disruptors are a major concern due to their possible association with hormone-dependent carcinogenesis. Some examples of compounds with such properties are organochlorine pesticides (OCPs). OCPs are persistent pollutants with high lipophilicity, long half-life, and bioaccumulation potential. In the past, some of the most commonly used OCPs were dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and endosulfan. Here, we investigated the effects of o,p'-DDT, p,p'-DDT, and endosulfan and of hormones estradiol, testosterone, and progesterone on the expression of estrogen, progesterone, and androgen receptors (ER, PR, and AR) and of their target genes (KLF4, VEGFA, CCND1, PRLR, CDKN1A, and BCL6) in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells. The results confirmed that under the action of the insecticides, there are dose- and time-dependent changes in the expression of these receptors and target genes. As corroborated by an experiment with ER, PR, and AR negative MDA-MB-231 cells, the change in the expression of KLF4, VEGFA, CCND1, and PRLR in MCF-7 cells treated with o,p'-DDT and the change in CDKN1A and PRLR expression in MCF-7 cells treated with p,p'-DDT are likely mediated by ER, PR, and AR pathways. In conclusion, we have identified some targets of DDT and endosulfan and confirmed that the effects of insecticides on the expression of these target genes differ for breast cancer cell lines with different receptor statuses.

Amongst Women Stratified to Receive Endocrine Therapy on the Basis of Their Tumor Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Levels, Those with Higher Tumor Progesterone Receptor Levels Had a Better Outcome Than Those with Lower Levels of Tumor Progesterone Receptor

Simple Summary

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death of women worldwide. Several cut-points for estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) have been proposed as predictive effects of hormone therapy; while the cut-off values were inconsistent. The aim of our retrospective study was to propose better prognostic cut-off levels for ER and PgR, and their effects on breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) over 5 and 10 years were evaluated in 1807 eligible patients. Subgroups were generated based on ER and PgR expression percentage and scoring from the Allred scoring system (Allred scores). After comparing the hazard ratios (event rates in each group to reference group) of BCSS and DFS using multivariate analyses, our results suggested that patients with PgR expression ≤50% or Allred score ≤5 revealed a poor prognosis and should be paid more attention during follow-up.

Abstract

Background: To realize the association between stratified expression levels of ER and PgR and long-term prognosis of breast cancer patients who received adjuvant hormone therapy, this study aimed to propose better prognostic cut-off levels for estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR). Methods: Patients who received adjuvant hormone therapy after surgical intervention were selected. The ER and PgR status and their effects on breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) over 5 and 10 years were evaluated. Next, subgroups were generated based on ER and PgR expression percentage and Allred scores. Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: ER and PgR expression were significantly associated with better prognosis in 5 years, whereas only PgR expression was significantly associated during the 10-year follow-up. The optimal cut-off values for better 5-year BCSS were ER > 50%; ER Allred score > 7; PgR ≥ 1%; or PgR Allred score ≥ 3; the corresponding values for DFS were ER > 40%; ER Allred score > 6; PgR > 10%; or PgR Allred score ≥ 3. In the long-term follow-up, PgR of > 50% or Allred score of > 5 carriers revealed a better prognosis of both BCSS and DFS. Conclusion: Patients with a PgR expression > 50% or an Allred score > 5 exhibited better 10-year BCSS and DFS.

Hormone Receptor Expression on Endocrine Therapy in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of hormone receptor expression on endocrine therapy in patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

The databases were used to collect the effect of high expression and low expression of hormone receptors on the efficacy of endocrine therapy in breast cancer. Two evaluators independently screened the literature based on preset inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of the article was evaluated using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) system. The survival data included in the literature were extracted and the ln(hazard ratio (HR)) and se[ln(HR)] of the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were calculated according to different level of hormone receptors. The RevMan 5.3 software was used to evaluate the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 13 relevant literature were included in the study. There were 8318 estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and 7926 progesterone receptor (PR)-positive patients. Overall survival, DFS, and RFS rates in high expression of ER(+) patients were significantly higher in low expression of ER(+) patients (OS HR = .59, 95% confidence interval (CI): .46-.76, P < .0001; DFS HR = .62, 95%CI: .50-.76, P < .00001; RFS HR = .44, 95% CI: .33-.58, P < .00001). In patients with high expression of PR(+), OS, DFS, and RFS rates were significantly higher than those with low expression of PR(+) (OS HR = .66, 95% CI: .57-.78, P < .00001; DFS HR = .52, 95% CI: .42-.65, P < .00001; RFS HR = .24, 95% CI: .11-.53, P = .0004).

CONCLUSION

The expression of ER and PR are powerful predictors of adjuvant endocrine therapy response. Breast cancer patients with high expression of hormone receptors benefit more from endocrine therapy and have better prognosis.

Primary tumor removal improves the prognosis in patients with stage IV breast cancer: A population-based study (cohort study)

Adjuvant therapy including chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and radiotherapy were often used as a common stereotypy for female stage IV breast cancer rather than surgery. This study aimed to define the role of local surgery in metastatic breast cancer. Female metastatic breast cancer patients were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program data (2010-2013). We compared survival time between patients who received primary tumor removal (PTR) versus those who did not. Multivariate Cox regression models and competitive risk models were built to adjust potential confounders. Of 7669 female stage IV breast cancer patients, 2704 (35.3%) had surgery on their breast tumor and 4965 (64.7%) did not. In the entire cohort, women who underwent PTR had a 45% reduced risk of breast cancer-related death (multi-adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.60) compared with women who did not undergo PTR (P < 0.001). In a cause-specific hazard model (CS model), the multivariable HRs (95% CI) for the association of PTR with breast cancer related-death were 0.54 (0.50-0.60) in the multivariate-adjusted analysis. Similar results were also observed in the sub-distribution hazard function model (SD model) with corresponding multivariate HRs (95%CI) of 0.57 (0.52-0.63). Our study suggested that PTR was associated with improved survival in female stage IV breast cancer patients. The role of PTR in these patients needs to be re-evaluated.

Public health insurance and cancer-specific mortality risk among patients with breast cancer: A prospective cohort study in China

Little is known about how health insurance policies, particularly in developing countries, influence breast cancer prognosis. Here, we examined the association between individual health insurance and breast cancer-specific mortality in China. We included 7436 women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 2009 and 2016, at West China Hospital, Sichuan University. The health insurance plan of patient was classified as either urban or rural schemes and was also categorized as reimbursement rate (ie, the covered/total charge) below or above the median. Breast cancer-specific mortality was the primary outcome. Using Cox proportional hazards models, we calculated hazard ratios (HRs) for cancer-specific mortality, contrasting rates among patients with a rural insurance scheme or low reimbursement rate to that of those with an urban insurance scheme or high reimbursement rate, respectively. During a median follow-up of 3.1 years, we identified 326 deaths due to breast cancer. Compared to patients covered by urban insurance schemes, patients covered by rural insurance schemes had a 29% increased cancer-specific mortality (95% CI 0%-65%) after adjusting for demographics, tumor characteristics and treatment modes. Reimbursement rate below the median was associated with a 42% increased rate of cancer-specific mortality (95% CI 11%-82%). Every 10% increase in the reimbursement rate is associated with a 7% (95% CI 2%-12%) reduction in cancer-specific mortality risk, particularly in patients covered by rural insurance schemes (26%, 95% CI 9%-39%). Our findings suggest that underinsured patients face a higher risk of breast cancer-specific mortality in developing countries.

Evaluating the Relationship Between Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) Parameters and Pathological Characteristics in Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) is used to evaluate tumor microvasculature. However, studies demonstrating an association between perfusion parameters derived from DCE-MRI and histopathologic characteristics are limited to a small set of histopathologic factors, and the results are inconsistent.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the relationship between DCE-MRI perfusion parameters and common histopathologic tumor characteristics used to predict angiogenesis and determine prognosis in breast cancer.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

In all, 105 breast cancer patients with invasive ductal carcinoma (122 lesions).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3.0T, turbo spin-echo (TSE) T₁ -weighted, fat-suppressed T₂ -weighted, TSE T₂ -weighted, and dynamic unenhanced and contrast-enhanced 3D T₁ high-resolution isotropic volume examination.

ASSESSMENT

One reviewer obtained perfusion parameters (K^trans , k_ep , v_e , and v_p ) of each breast cancer from DCE MRI using the extended Tofts model with a fixed baseline T₁ value and a population-based arterial input function. The relationship between DCE-MRI perfusion parameters and histopathologic tumor characteristics used to predict angiogenesis and determine prognosis was evaluated.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Kruskal-Wallis test were used.

RESULTS

Triple-negative breast cancers exhibited higher K^trans and k_ep than luminal cancers (P < 0.05). Estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors showed higher K^trans than ER-positive tumors (P < 0.05). Progesterone receptor (PR)-negative tumors presented higher v_e than PR-positive tumors (P < 0.05). Tumors with higher Ki-67 showed higher k_ep than tumors with lower Ki-67 (P < 0.05). P53-positive tumors exhibited higher K^trans and k_ep than p53-negative tumors (P < 0.05). Higher histologic grade tumors (grade II/III) presented higher K^trans , k_ep , v_p (P < 0.05) than grade I tumors. Tumors with LVSI presented higher K^trans and k_ep than tumors without LVSI (P < 0.05).

DATA CONCLUSION

Breast cancer presenting higher K^trans and k_ep on DCE-MRI was associated with poor prognostic histopathologic factors. Therefore, pretreatment DCE-MRI perfusion parameters may be useful imaging biomarkers for the evaluation of tumor prognosis and angiogenesis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.