Rapid Functional Decline of Activated and Memory Graft-versus-Host-Reactive T Cells Encountering Host Antigens in the Absence of Inflammation

Tolerance in intestinal transplantation

Intestinal transplantation (ITx) is highly immunogenic, resulting in the need for high levels of immunosuppression, with frequent complications along with high rejection rates. Tolerance induction would provide a solution to these limitations. Detailed studies of alloreactive T cell clones as well as multiparameter flow cytometry in the graft and peripheral tissues have provided evidence for several tolerance mechanisms that occur spontaneously following ITx, which might provide targets for further interventions. These include the frequent occurrence of macrochimerism and engraftment in the recipient bone marrow of donor hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells carried in the allograft. These phenomena are seen most frequently in recipients of multivisceral transplants and are associated with reduced rejection rates. They reflect powerful graft-vs-host responses that enter the peripheral lymphoid system and bone marrow after expanding within and emigrating from the allograft. Several mechanisms of tolerance that may result from this lymphohematopoietic graft-vs-host response are discussed. Transcriptional profiling in quiescent allografts reveals tolerization of pre-existing host-vs-graft-reactive T cells that enter the allograft mucosa and become tissue-resident memory cells. Dissection of the pathways driving and maintaining this tolerant tissue-resident state among donor-reactive T cells will allow controlled tolerance induction through specific therapeutic approaches.

Immunotherapy for neuroblastoma by hematopoietic cell transplantation and post-transplant immunomodulation

Neuroblastoma represents a relatively common childhood tumor that imposes therapeutic difficulties. High risk neuroblastoma patients have poor prognosis, display limited response to radiochemotherapy and may be treated by hematopoietic cell transplantation. Allogeneic and haploidentical transplants have the distinct advantage of reinstitution of immune surveillance, reinforced by antigenic barriers. The key factors favorable to ignition of potent anti-tumor reactions are transition to adaptive immunity, recovery from lymphopenia and removal of inhibitory signals that inactivate immune cells at the local and systemic levels. Post-transplant immunomodulation may further foster anti-tumor reactivity, with positive but transient impact of infusions of lymphocytes and natural killer cells both from the donor, the recipient or third party. The most promising approaches include introduction of antigen-presenting cells in early post-transplant stages and neutralization of inhibitory signals. Further studies will likely shed light on the nature and actions of suppressor factors within tumor stroma and at the systemic level.

The important role of non-covalent drug-protein interactions in drug hypersensitivity reactions

Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHR) are heterogeneous and unusual immune reactions with rather unique clinical presentations. Accumulating evidence indicates that certain non‐covalent drug‐protein interactions are able to elicit exclusively effector functions of antibody reactions or complete T‐cell reactions which contribute substantially to DHR. Here, we discuss three key interactions; (a) mimicry: whereby soluble, non‐covalent drug‐protein complexes (“fake antigens”) mimic covalent drug‐protein adducts; (b) increased antibody affinity: for example, in quinine‐type immune thrombocytopenia where the drug gets trapped between antibody and membrane‐bound glycoprotein; and (c) p‐i‐stimulation: where naïve and memory T cells are activated by direct binding of drugs to the human leukocyte antigen and/or T‐cell receptors. This transient drug‐immune receptor interaction initiates a polyclonal T‐cell response with mild‐to‐severe DHR symptoms. Notable complications arising from p‐i DHR can include viral reactivations, autoimmunity, and multiple drug hypersensitivity. In conclusion, DHR is characterized by abnormal immune stimulation driven by non‐covalent drug‐protein interactions. This contrasts DHR from “normal” immunity, which relies on antigen‐formation by covalent hapten‐protein adducts and predominantly results in asymptomatic immunity.

Engineering Strategies for Allogeneic Solid Tissue Acceptance

Advances in allogeneic transplantation of solid organs and tissues depend on our understanding of mechanisms that mediate the prevention of graft rejection. For the past decades, clinical practice has established guidelines to prevent allograft rejection, which mostly rely on the intake of nontargeted immunosuppressants as the gold standard. However, such lifelong regimens have been reported to trigger severe morbidities and commonly fail in preventing late allograft loss. In this review, the biology of allogeneic rejection and self-tolerance is analyzed, as well as the mechanisms of cellular-based therapeutics driving suppression and/or tolerance. Bioinspired engineering strategies that take advantage of cells, biomaterials, or combinations thereof to prevent allograft rejection are addressed, as well as biological mechanisms that drive their efficacy.

Donor IL-6 deficiency evidently reduces memory T cell responses in sensitized transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Resistance of tolerance induction in sensitized transplantation is mainly caused by generation of memory T cells. It is unknown whether alteration of graft niche such as level of pro-inflammatory cytokines can affect generation of memory T cells.

METHODS

IL-6 deficient or wild-type (WT) C57BL/6 heart grafts were transplanted into pre-sensitized wild-type BALB/c recipients. Frequencies of memory T cells in the peripheral blood, grafts, and spleen were evaluated.

RESULTS

We revealed that deficiency of donor IL-6 could significant prolong sensitized allograft survival. Compared with counterpart of WT group, frequency of effector memory CD4 + T cells (CD4 + CD44 + CD62L-) in the peripheral blood was significantly lower in the IL-6 KO group (p = .026) at day 3 post-transplantation. Frequency of effector memory CD8 + T cells (CD8 + CD44 + CD62L-) in the peripheral blood was significantly lower in the IL-6 KO group (p < .0001) at day 3 post-transplant in comparison to that of WT group. No significant difference of central memory T cells was found between these groups. Histology demonstrated that deficiency of donor pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 (IL-6 KO group) preserved cardiac architecture with a mild infiltration of lymphocytes, whereas wild-type donor (control group) caused an evident lymphocytic infiltration within myocardial fibers of grafts and destruction of cardiac structure.

CONCLUSION

Deficiency of pro-inflammatory IL-6 of donor graft could effectively prolong sensitized allograft survival, which was caused by a remarkable decrease of peripheral memory T cells rather than central memory T cells. This unveiled mechanism of targeting IL-6 signaling pathway might provide a novel insight into preventing allograft rejection for sensitized transplant recipients.