Origin and fate of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus-specific CD8+ T cells coexpressing the inhibitory NK cell receptor Ly49G2

Functional Characterization of Ly49+CD8 T-Cells in Both Normal Condition and During Anti-Viral Response

The role of Ly49+CD8 T-cells in the immune system is not clear. Previously, several papers suggested Ly49+CD8 T-cells as immunosuppressors, while multiple studies also suggested their role as potent participants of the immune response. The mechanism of Ly49 expression on CD8 T-cells is also not clear. We investigated phenotype, functions, and regulation of Ly49 expression on murine CD8 T-cells in both normal state and during LCMV infection. CD8 T-cells express different Ly49 receptors compared with NK-cells. In intact mice, Ly49+CD8 T-cells have a phenotype similar to resting central memory CD8 T-cells and do not show impaired proliferation and cytokine production. Conventional CD8 T-cells upregulate Ly49 receptors during TCR-induced stimulation, and IL-2, as well as IL-15, affect it. At the same time, Ly49+CD8 T-cells change the Ly49 expression profile dramatically upon re-stimulation downregulating inhibitory and upregulating activating Ly49 receptors. We observed the expression of Ly49 receptors on the virus-specific CD8 T-cells during LCMV infection, especially marked in the early stages, and participation of Ly49+CD8 T-cells in the anti-viral response. Thus, CD8 T-cells acquire Ly49 receptors during the T-cell activation and show dynamic regulation of Ly49 receptors during stimulation.

Differential requirements for IRF-2 in generation of CD1d-independent T cells bearing NK cell receptors

NK cell receptors (NKRs) such as NK1.1, NKG2D, and Ly49s are expressed on subsets of CD1d-independent memory phenotype CD8(+) and CD4(-)CD8(-) T cells. However, the mechanism for the generation and functions of these NKR(+) T cells remained elusive. In this study, we found that CD1d-independent Ly49(+) T cells were reduced severely in the spleen, bone marrow, and liver, but not thymus, in mice doubly deficient for IFN regulatory factor-2 (IRF-2) and CD1d, in which the overall memory phenotype T cell population was contrastingly enlarged. Because a large fraction of Ly49(+) T cells coexpressed NK1.1 or NKG2D, the reduction of Ly49(+) T cells resulted indirectly in underrepresentation of NK1.1(+) or NKG2D(+) cells. Ly49(+) T cell deficiency was observed in IRF-2(-/-) mice additionally lacking IFN-α/βR α-chain (IFNAR1) as severely as in IRF-2(-/-) mice, arguing against the involvement of the accelerated IFN-α/β signals due to IRF-2 deficiency. Rather, mice lacking IFN-α/βR alone also exhibited relatively milder Ly49(+) T cell reduction, and IL-2 could expand Ly49(+) T cells from IFNAR1(-/-), but not from IRF-2(-/-), spleen cells in vitro. These results together indicated that IRF-2 acted in Ly49(+) T cell development in a manner distinct from that of IFN-α/β signals. The influence of IRF-2 deficiency on Ly49(+) memory phenotype T cells observed in this study suggested a unique transcriptional program for this T cell population among other NKR(+) T and memory phenotype T cells.

IL-15 expands unconventional CD8alphaalphaNK1.1+ T cells but not Valpha14Jalpha18+ NKT cells

Despite recent gains in knowledge regarding CD1d-restricted NKT cells, very little is understood of non-CD1d-restricted NKT cells such as CD8(+)NK1.1(+) T cells, in part because of the very small proportion of these cells in the periphery. In this study we took advantage of the high number of CD8(+)NK1.1(+) T cells in IL-15-transgenic mice to characterize this T cell population. In the IL-15-transgenic mice, the absolute number of CD1d-tetramer(+) NKT cells did not increase, although IL-15 has been shown to play a critical role in the development and expansion of these cells. The CD8(+)NK1.1(+) T cells in the IL-15-transgenic mice did not react with CD1d-tetramer. Approximately 50% of CD8(+)NK1.1(+) T cells were CD8alphaalpha. In contrast to CD4(+)NK1.1(+) T cells, which were mostly CD1d-restricted NKT cells and of which approximately 70% were CD69(+)CD44(+), approximately 70% of CD8(+)NK1.1(+) T cells were CD69(-)CD44(+). We could also expand similar CD8alphaalphaNK1.1(+) T cells but not CD4(+) NKT cells from CD8alpha(+)beta(-) bone marrow cells cultured ex vivo with IL-15. These results indicate that the increased CD8alphaalphaNK1.1(+) T cells are not activated conventional CD8(+) T cells and do not arise from conventional CD8alphabeta precursors. CD8alphaalphaNK1.1(+) T cells produced very large amounts of IFN-gamma and degranulated upon TCR activation. These results suggest that high levels of IL-15 induce expansion or differentiation of a novel NK1.1(+) T cell subset, CD8alphaalphaNK1.1(+) T cells, and that IL-15-transgenic mice may be a useful resource for studying the functional relevance of CD8(+)NK1.1(+) T cells.

Memory of mice and men: CD8+ T-cell cross-reactivity and heterologous immunity

Summary:  The main functions of memory T cells are to provide protection upon re‐exposure to a pathogen and to prevent the re‐emergence of low‐grade persistent pathogens. Memory T cells achieve these functions through their high frequency and elevated activation state, which lead to rapid responses upon antigenic challenge. The significance and characteristics of memory CD8⁺ T cells in viral infections have been studied extensively. In many of these studies of T‐cell memory, experimental viral immunologists go to great lengths to assure that their animal colonies are free of endogenous pathogens in order to design reproducible experiments. These experimental results are then thought to provide the basis for our understanding of human immune responses to viruses. Although these findings can be enlightening, humans are not immunologically naïve, and they often have memory T‐cell populations that can cross‐react with and respond to a new infectious agent or cross‐react with allo‐antigens and influence the success of tissue transplantation. These cross‐reactive T cells can become activated and modulate the immune response and outcome of subsequent heterologous infections, a phenomenon we have termed heterologous immunity. These large memory populations are also accommodated into a finite immune system, requiring that the host makes room for each new population of memory cell. It appears that memory cells are part of a continually evolving interactive network, where with each new infection there is an alteration in the frequencies, distributions, and activities of memory cells generated in response to previous infections and allo‐antigens.