Treatment with a laminin-derived peptide suppresses lupus nephritis

Association of Autoantibody Concentrations and Trajectories With Lupus Nephritis Histologic Features and Treatment Response

OBJECTIVE

Autoantibodies are a hallmark of lupus nephritis (LN), but their association with LN classes and treatment response are not adequately known. In this study, we quantified circulating autoantibodies in the Accelerating Medicines Partnership LN longitudinal cohort to identify serological biomarkers of LN histologic classification and treatment response and how these biomarkers change over time based on treatment response.

METHODS

Peripheral blood samples were collected from 279 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus undergoing diagnostic kidney biopsy based on proteinuria. Of these, 268 were diagnosed with LN. Thirteen autoantibody specificities were measured by bead-based assays (Bio-Rad Bioplex 2200) and anti-C1q by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at the time of biopsy (baseline) and at 3, 6, and 12 months after biopsy. Clinical response was determined at 12 months.

RESULTS

Proliferative LN (International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society class III/IV±V, n = 160) was associated with higher concentrations of anti-C1q, anti-chromatin, anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), and anti-ribosomal P autoantibodies compared to nonproliferative LN (classes I/II/V/VI, n = 108). Anti-C1q and-dsDNA were independently associated with proliferative LN. In proliferative LN, higher baseline anti-C1q levels predicted complete response (area under the curve [AUC] 0.72; P = 0.002) better than baseline proteinuria (AUC 0.59; P = 0.21). Furthermore, all autoantibody levels except for anti-La/SSB decreased over 12 months in patients with proliferative, but not membranous, LN with a complete response.

CONCLUSION

Baseline levels of anti-C1q and anti-dsDNA may serve as noninvasive biomarkers of proliferative LN, and anti-C1q may predict complete response at the time of kidney biopsy. In addition, tracking autoantibodies over time may provide further insights into treatment response and pathogenic mechanisms in patients with proliferative LN.

SLE: a cognitive step forward-a synthesis of rethinking theories, causality, and ignored DNA structures

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is classified by instinctual classification criteria. A valid proclamation is that these formally accepted SLE classification criteria legitimate the syndrome as being difficult to explain and therefore enigmatic. SLE involves scientific problems linked to etiological factors and criteria. Our insufficient understanding of the clinical condition uniformly denoted SLE depends on the still open question of whether SLE is, according to classification criteria, a well-defined one disease entity or represents a variety of overlapping indistinct syndromes. Without rational hypotheses, these problems harm clear definition(s) of the syndrome. Why SLE is not anchored in logic, consequent, downstream interdependent and interactive inflammatory networks may rely on ignored predictive causality principles. Authoritative classification criteria do not reflect consequent causality criteria and do not unify characterization principles such as diagnostic criteria. We need now to reconcile legendary scientific achievements to concretize the delimitation of what SLE really is. Not all classified SLE syndromes are "genuine SLE"; many are theoretically "SLE-like non-SLE" syndromes. In this study, progressive theories imply imperative challenges to reconsider the fundamental impact of "the causality principle". This may offer us logic classification and diagnostic criteria aimed at identifying concise SLE syndromes as research objects. Can a systems science approach solve this problem?

A critical view on autoantibodies in lupus nephritis: Concrete knowledge based on evidence

Deposition of autoantibodies in glomeruli is a key factor in the development of lupus nephritis (LN). For a long time, anti-dsDNA and anti-C1q antibodies were thought to be the main cause of the kidney damage. However, recent studies have shown that the list of autoantibidies that have renal tropism and deposit in the kidney in LN is increasing and the link between anti-dsDNA and renal pathology is weak due to potential confounders. Aspecific bindings of dsDNA with cationic antibodies and of anti-dsDNA with several renal antigens such as actinin, laminin, entactin, and annexinA2 raised doubts about the specific target of these antibodies in the kidney. Moreover, the isotype of anti-dsDNA in SLE and LN has never received adequate interest until the recent observation that IgG2 are preponderant over IgG1, IgG3 and IgG4. Based on the above background, recent studies investigated the involvement of anti-dsDNA IgG2 and of other antibodies in LN. It was concluded that circulating anti-dsDNA IgG2 levels do not distinguish between LN versus non-renal SLE, and, in patients with LN, their levels do not change over time. Circulating levels of other antibodies such as anti-ENO1 and anti-H2 IgG2 were, instead, higher in LN vs non-renal SLE at the time of diagnosis and decreased following therapies. Finally, new classes of renal antibodies that potentially modify the anti-inflammatory response in the kidney are emerging as new co-actors in the pathogenetic scenario. They have been defined as 'second wave antibodies' for the link with detoxifying mechanisms limiting the oxidative stress in glomeruli that are classically stimulated in a second phase of inflammation. These findings have important clinical implications that may modify the laboratory approach to LN. Serum levels of anti-ENO1 and anti-H2 IgG2 should be measured in the follow up of patients for designing the length of therapies and identify those patients who respond to treatments. Anti-SOD2 could help to monitor and potentiate the anti-inflammatory response in the kidney.

The greatest contribution to medical science is the transformation from studying symptoms to studying their causes-the unrelenting legacy of Robert Koch and Louis Pasteur-and a causality perspective to approach a definition of SLE

The basic initiative related to this study is derived from the fact that systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a unique and fertile system science subject. We are, however, still far from understanding its nature. It may be fair to indicate that we are spending more time and resources on studying the complexity of classified SLE than studying the validity of classification criteria. This study represents a theoretical analysis of current instinctual SLE classification criteria based on "the causality principle." The discussion has its basis on the radical scientific traditions introduced by Robert Koch and Louis Pasteur. They announced significant changes in our thinking of disease etiology through the implementation of the modern version of "the causality principle." They influenced all aspects of today's medical concepts and research: the transformation of medical science from studies of symptoms to study their causes, relevant for monosymptomatic diseases as for syndromes. Their studies focused on bacteria as causes of infectious diseases and on how the immune system adapts to control and prevent contagious spreading. This is the most significant paradigm shift in the modern history of medicine and resulted in radical changes in our view of the immune system. They described acquired post-infection immunity and active immunization by antigen-specific vaccines. The paradigm "transformation" has a great theoretical impact also on current studies of autoimmune diseases like SLE: symptoms and their cause(s). In this study, the evolution of SLE classification and diagnostic criteria is discussed from "the causality principle" perspective, and if contemporary SLE classification criteria are as useful as believed today for SLE research. This skepticism is based on the fact that classification criteria are not selected based on cogent causal strategies. The SLE classification criteria do not harmonize with Koch's and Pasteur's causality principle paradigms and not with Witebsky's Koch-derived postulates for autoimmune and infectious diseases. It is not established whether the classification criteria can separate SLE as a "one disease entity" from "SLE-like non-SLE disorders"-the latter in terms of SLE imitations. This is discussed here in terms of weight, rank, and impact of the classification criteria: Do they all originate from "one basic causal etiology"? Probably not.

Assessment of anti-nucleosome antibody (ANuA) isotypes for the diagnosis and prediction of systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis activity

Our study aims to investigate the serum levels of anti-nucleosome antibody (ANuA) isotypes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and clarify ANuA isotypes that may diagnose and predict SLE. We detected anti-nucleosome antibodies (ANuA) in the serum from 120 patients with SLE, 99 patients suffering from other autoimmune diseases (OAD), and 50 healthy controls by performing IgG-, IgA-, and IgM-specific ELISAs. The serum levels of total anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA IgG), ANuA IgG subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4), anti-dsDNA antibodies, and the avidities of ANA IgG were also analysed using ELISAs. The levels of three ANuA isotypes (IgG, IgA, and IgM) were significantly higher in patients with SLE than in patients with OAD and healthy controls (p < 0.05). Moreover, the concentrations of ANuA isotypes increased in the active SLE and lupus nephritis (LN) groups and in patients with SLE presenting high-avidity IgG ANA (p < 0.05). Furthermore, ANuA isotype levels decreased significantly with drug therapy, while anti-dsDNA IgG levels decreased with the same trend. Additionally, ANuA isotypes were positively related to the SLEDAI (SLE Disease Activity Index) score, RAI (relative avidity index) of high-avidity IgG ANAs, and serum anti-dsDNA IgG levels. Last, the sensitivity and specificity values for SLE were 83.33 and 96.67% for ANuA IgG, 85.83 and 93.33% for ANuA IgA, and83.33 and 86.67% for ANuA IgM, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity values for LN were 61.67 and 96.67% for ANuA IgG, 49.17 and 96.67% for ANuA IgA, and 52.50 and 96.67% for ANuA IgM, respectively. In conclusion, we evaluated whether ANuA isotypes represent a diagnostic tool to predict SLE activity and define subsets of patients with LN.

Evidence for charge-based mimicry in anti dsDNA antibody generation

Mechanisms for the generation of anti-dsDNA autoantibodies are still not completely elucidated. One theory states that dsDNA interacts for mimicry with antibodies raised versus other antigens but molecular features for mimicry are unknown. Here we show that, at physiological acid-base balance, anti-Annexin A1 binds IgG2 dsDNA in a competitive and dose-dependent way with Annexin A1 and that the competition between the two molecules is null at pH 9. On the other hand, these findings also show that dsDNA and Annexin A1 interact with their respective antibodies on a strictly pH-dependent basis: in both cases, the binding was minimal at pH 4 and maximal at pH9-10. The anionic charge of dsDNA is mainly conferred by the numerous phosphatidic residues. The epitope binding site of Annexin A1 for anti-Annexin A1 IgG2 was here characterized as a string of 34 amino acids at the NH2 terminus, 10 of which are anionic. Circulating levels of anti-dsDNA and anti-Annexin A1 IgG2 antibodies were strongly correlated in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (n 496) and lupus nephritis (n 425) stratified for age, sex, etc. These results show that dsDNA competes with Annexin A1 for the binding with anti-Annexin A1 IgG2 on a dose and charged mediated base, being able to display an inhibition up to 75%. This study provides the first demonstration that dsDNA may interact with antibodies raised versus other anionic molecules (anti-Annexin A1 IgG2) because of charge mimicry and this interaction may contribute to anti-dsDNA antibodies generation.

Autoreactive B cells recruited to lungs by silica exposure contribute to local autoantibody production in autoimmune-prone BXSB and B cell receptor transgenic mice

Occupational exposure to inhaled crystalline silica dust (cSiO2) is linked to systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody vasculitis. Each disease has a characteristic autoantibody profile used in diagnosis and implicated in pathogenesis. A role for cSiO2 in modulating humoral autoimmunity in vivo is supported by findings in mice, where respirable cSiO2 induces ectopic lymphoid structures as well as inflammation in exposed lungs across genetically diverse backgrounds. In lupus-prone mice cSiO2 exposure also leads to early onset autoantibody production and accelerated disease. Elevated autoantibody levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and lung transcriptome analysis suggest that the lung is a hub of cSiO2-evoked autoimmune activity. However, mechanisms by which cSiO2 and lung microenvironments interact to promote autoantibody production remain unclear. We previously demonstrated elevated anti-DNA Ig in BALF but not in lung cell cultures from cSiO2-exposed C57BL/6 mice, suggesting that BALF autoantibodies did not arise locally in this non-autoimmune strain. Autoantibodies were also elevated in BALF of cSiO2-exposed lupus-prone BXSB mice. In this report we test the hypothesis that dysregulated autoreactive B cells recruited to cSiO2-exposed lungs in the context of autoimmune predisposition contribute to local autoantibody production. We found that anti-DNA and anti-myeloperoxidase (MPO) Ig were significantly elevated in cultures of TLR ligand-stimulated lung cells from cSiO2-exposed BXSB mice. To further explore the impact of strain genetic susceptibility versus B cell intrinsic dysfunction on cSiO2-recruited B cell fate, we used an anti-basement membrane autoantibody transgenic (autoAb Tg) mouse line termed M7. In M7 mice, autoAb Tg B cells are aberrantly regulated and escape from tolerance on the C57BL/6 background. Exposure to cSiO2 elicited prominent pulmonary B cell and T cell aggregates and autoAb Tg Ig were readily detected in lung cell culture supernatants. Taken together, diverse disease-relevant autoreactive B cells, including cells specific for DNA, MPO, and basement membrane, are recruited to lung ectopic lymphoid aggregates in response to cSiO2 instillation. B cells that escape tolerance can contribute to local autoantibody production. Our demonstration of significantly enhanced autoantibody induction by TLR ligands further suggests that a coordinated environmental co-exposure can magnify autoimmune vulnerability.

Deletions in VANGL1 are a risk factor for antibody-mediated kidney disease

We identify an intronic deletion in VANGL1 that predisposes to renal injury in high risk populations through a kidney-intrinsic process. Half of all SLE patients develop nephritis, yet the predisposing mechanisms to kidney damage remain poorly understood. There is limited evidence of genetic contribution to specific organ involvement in SLE.1,2 We identify a large deletion in intron 7 of Van Gogh Like 1 (VANGL1), which associates with nephritis in SLE patients. The same deletion occurs at increased frequency in an indigenous population (Tiwi Islanders) with 10-fold higher rates of kidney disease compared with non-indigenous populations. Vangl1 hemizygosity in mice results in spontaneous IgA and IgG deposition within the glomerular mesangium in the absence of autoimmune nephritis. Serum transfer into B cell-deficient Vangl1+/- mice results in mesangial IgG deposition indicating that Ig deposits occur in a kidney-intrinsic fashion in the absence of Vangl1. These results suggest that Vangl1 acts in the kidney to prevent Ig deposits and its deficiency may trigger nephritis in individuals with SLE.

Autoimmunity and SLE: Factual and Semantic Evidence-Based Critical Analyses of Definitions, Etiology, and Pathogenesis

One cannot discuss anti-dsDNA antibodies and lupus nephritis without discussing the nature of Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). SLE is insistently described as a prototype autoimmune syndrome, with anti-dsDNA antibodies as a central biomarker and a pathogenic factor. The two entities, "SLE" and "The Anti-dsDNA Antibody," have been linked in previous and contemporary studies although serious criticism to this mutual linkage have been raised: Anti-dsDNA antibodies were first described in bacterial infections and not in SLE; later in SLE, viral and parasitic infections and in malignancies. An increasing number of studies on classification criteria for SLE have been published in the aftermath of the canonical 1982 American College of Rheumatology SLE classification sets of criteria. Considering these studies, it is surprising to observe a nearby complete absence of fundamental critical/theoretical discussions aimed to explain how and why the classification criteria are linked in context of etiology, pathogenicity, or biology. This study is an attempt to prioritize critical comments on the contemporary definition and classification of SLE and of anti-dsDNA antibodies in context of lupus nephritis. Epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, and measures of therapy efficacy are implemented as problems in the present discussion. In order to understand whether or not disparate clinical SLE phenotypes are useful to determine its basic biological processes accounting for the syndrome is problematic. A central problem is discussed on whether the clinical role of anti-dsDNA antibodies from principal reasons can be accepted as a biomarker for SLE without clarifying what we define as an anti-dsDNA antibody, and in which biologic contexts the antibodies appear. In sum, this study is an attempt to bring to the forum critical comments on the contemporary definition and classification of SLE, lupus nephritis and anti-dsDNA antibodies. Four concise hypotheses are suggested for future science at the end of this analytical study.

Therapeutic peptides for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: a place in therapy

INTRODUCTION

Studies in vitro and in vivo have identified several peptides that are potentially useful in treating systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The rationale for their use lies in the cost-effective production, high potency, target selectivity, low toxicity, and a peculiar mechanism of action that is mainly based on the induction of immune tolerance. Three therapeutic peptides have entered clinical development, but they have yielded disappointing results. However, some subsets of patients, such as those with the positivity of anti-dsDNA antibodies, appear more likely to respond to these medications.

AREAS COVERED

This review evaluates the potential use of therapeutic peptides for SLE and gives an opinion on how they may offer advantages for SLE treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

Given their acceptable safety profile, therapeutic peptides could be added to agents traditionally used to treat SLE and this may offer a synergistic and drug-sparing effect, especially in selected patient populations. Moreover, they could temporarily be utilized to manage SLE flares, or be administered as a vaccine in subjects at risk. Efforts to ameliorate bioavailability, increase the half-life and prevent immunogenicity are ongoing. The formulation of hybrid compounds, like peptibodies or peptidomimetic small molecules, is expected to yield renewed treatments with a better pharmacologic profile and increased efficacy.

Silica Exposure Differentially Modulates Autoimmunity in Lupus Strains and Autoantibody Transgenic Mice

Inhalational exposure to crystalline silica is linked to several debilitating systemic autoimmune diseases characterized by a prominent humoral immune component, but the mechanisms by which silica induces autoantibodies is poorly understood. To better understand how silica lung exposure breaks B cell tolerance and unleashes autoreactive B cells, we exposed both wildtype mice of healthy C57BL/6 and lupus-prone BXSB, MRL, and NZB strains and mice carrying an autoantibody transgene on each of these backgrounds to instilled silica or vehicle and monitored lung injury, autoimmunity, and B cell fate. Silica exposure induced lung damage and pulmonary lymphoid aggregates in all strains, including in genetically diverse backgrounds and in autoantibody transgenic models. In wildtype mice strain differences were observed in specificity of autoantibodies and site of enhanced autoantibody production, consistent with genetic modulation of the autoimmune response to silica. The unique autoantibody transgene reporter system permitted the in vivo fate of autoreactive B cells and tolerance mechanisms to be tracked directly, and demonstrated the presence of transgenic B cells and antibody in pulmonary lymphoid aggregates and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, respectively, as well as in spleen and serum. Nonetheless, B cell enumeration and transgenic antibody quantitation indicated that B cell deletion and anergy were intact in the different genetic backgrounds. Thus, silica exposure sufficient to induce substantial lung immunopathology did not overtly disrupt central B cell tolerance, even when superimposed on autoimmune genetic susceptibility. This suggests that silica exposure subverts tolerance at alternative checkpoints, such as regulatory cells or follicle entry, or requires additional interactions or co-exposures to induce loss of tolerance. This possibility is supported by results of differentiation assays that demonstrated transgenic autoantibodies in supernatants of Toll-like receptor (TLR)7/TLR9-stimulated splenocytes harvested from silica-exposed, but not vehicle-exposed, C57BL/6 mice. This suggests that lung injury induced by silica exposure has systemic effects that subtly alter autoreactive B cell regulation, possibly modulating B cell anergy, and that can be unmasked by superimposed exposure to TLR ligands or other immunostimulants.

Anti-double Stranded DNA Antibodies: Origin, Pathogenicity, and Targeted Therapies

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by high-titer serological autoantibodies, including antibodies that bind to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). The origin, specificity, and pathogenicity of anti-dsDNA antibodies have been studied from a wider perspective. These autoantibodies have been suggested to contribute to multiple end-organ injuries, especially to lupus nephritis, in patients with SLE. Moreover, serum levels of anti-DNA antibodies fluctuate with disease activity in patients with SLE. By directly binding to self-antigens or indirectly forming immune complexes, anti-dsDNA antibodies can accumulate in the glomerular and tubular basement membrane. These autoantibodies can also trigger the complement cascade, penetrate into living cells, modulate gene expression, and even induce profibrotic phenotypes of renal cells. In addition, the expression of suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 is reduced by anti-DNA antibodies simultaneously with upregulation of profibrotic genes. Anti-dsDNA antibodies may even participate in the pathogenesis of SLE by catalyzing hydrolysis of certain DNA molecules or peptides in cells. Recently, anti-dsDNA antibodies have been explored in greater depth as a therapeutic target in the management of SLE. A substantial amount of data indicates that blockade of pathogenic anti-dsDNA antibodies can prevent or even reverse organ damage in murine models of SLE. This review focuses on the recent research advances regarding the origin, specificity, classification, and pathogenicity of anti-dsDNA antibodies and highlights the emerging therapies associated with them.

The dsDNA, Anti-dsDNA Antibody, and Lupus Nephritis: What We Agree on, What Must Be Done, and What the Best Strategy Forward Could Be

This study aims to understand what lupus nephritis is, its origin, clinical context, and its pathogenesis. Truly, we encounter many conceptual and immanent tribulations in our attempts to search for the pathogenesis of this disease—and how to explain its assumed link to SLE. Central in the present landscape stay a short history of the early studies that substantiated the structures of isolated or chromatin-assembled mammalian dsDNA, and its assumed, highly controversial role in induction of anti-dsDNA antibodies. Arguments discussed here may provoke the view that anti-dsDNA antibodies are not what we think they are, as they may be antibodies operational in quite different biological contexts, although they bind dsDNA by chance. This may not mean that these antibodies are not pathogenic but they do not inform how they are so. This theoretical study centers the content around the origin and impact of extra-cellular DNA, and if dsDNA has an effect on the adaptive immune system. The pathogenic potential of chromatin-anti-dsDNA antibody interactions is limited to incite lupus nephritis and dermatitis which may be linked in a common pathogenic process. These are major criteria in SLE classification systems but are not shared with other defined manifestations in SLE, which may mean that they are their own disease entities, and not integrated in SLE. Today, the models thought to explain lupus nephritis are divergent and inconsistent. We miss a comprehensive perspective to try the different models against each other. To do this, we need to take all elements of the syndrome SLE into account. This can only be achieved by concentrating on the interactions between autoimmunity, immunopathology, deviant cell death and necrotic chromatin in context of elements of system science. System science provides a framework where data generated by experts can be compared, and tested against each other. This approach open for consensus on central elements making up “lupus nephritis” to separate what we agree on and how to understand the basis for conflicting models. This has not been done yet in a systematic context.

Plasma Cell Depletion Attenuates Hypertension in an Experimental Model of Autoimmune Disease

Numerous studies show a direct relation between circulating autoantibodies, characteristic of systemic autoimmune disorders, and primary hypertension in humans. Whether these autoantibodies mechanistically contribute to the development of hypertension remains unclear. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disorder characterized by aberrant immunoglobulin production, notably pathogenic autoantibodies, and is associated with prevalent hypertension, renal injury, and cardiovascular disease. Because plasma cells produce the majority of serum immunoglobulins and are the primary source of autoantibodies in SLE, we hypothesized that plasma cell depletion using the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib would lower autoantibody production and attenuate hypertension. Thirty-week-old female SLE (NZBWF1) and control (NZW [New Zealand White]) mice were injected IV with vehicle (0.9% saline) or bortezomib (0.75 mg/kg) twice weekly for 4 weeks. Bortezomib treatment significantly lowered the percentage of bone marrow plasma cells in SLE mice. Total plasma IgG and anti-dsDNA IgG levels were higher in SLE mice compared with control mice but were lowered by bortezomib treatment. Mean arterial pressure (mm Hg) measured in conscious mice by carotid artery catheter was higher in SLE mice than in control mice, but mean arterial pressure was significantly lower in bortezomib-treated SLE mice. Bortezomib also attenuated renal injury, as assessed by albuminuria and glomerulosclerosis, and reduced glomerular immunoglobulin deposition and B and T lymphocytes infiltration into the kidneys. Taken together, these data show that the production of autoantibodies by plasma cells mechanistically contributes to autoimmune-associated hypertension and suggests a potential role for patients with primary hypertension who have increased circulating immunoglobulins.

Murine and Human Lupus Nephritis: Pathogenic Mechanisms and Theoretical Strategies for Therapy

Lupus nephritis is one of the most serious manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus, and represents one of the criteria implemented to classify systemic lupus erythematosus. Although studied for decades, no consensus has been reached related to the basic cellular, molecular, and immunologic mechanism(s) responsible for lupus nephritis. No causal treatments have been developed; therapy is approached mainly with nonspecific immunosuppressive medications. More detailed insight into disease mechanisms therefore is indispensable to develop new therapeutic strategies. In this review, contemporary knowledge on the pathogenic mechanisms of lupus nephritis is discussed based on recent data in murine and human lupus nephritis. Specific focus is given to the effect of anti-double-stranded DNA/antinucleosome antibodies in the kidneys and whether they bind exposed chromatin fragments in glomeruli or whether they bind inherent glomerular structures by cross-recognition. Overall, the data presented here favor the exposed chromatin model because we did not find any indication to substantiate the anti-double-stranded DNA antibody cross-reacting model. At the end of this review we present data on why chromatin fragments are expressed in the glomeruli of patients with lupus nephritis, and discuss how this knowledge can be used to direct the development of future therapies.

Basement membranes and autoimmune diseases

Basement membrane components are targets of autoimmune attack in diverse diseases that destroy kidneys, lungs, skin, mucous membranes, joints, and other organs in man. Epitopes on collagen and laminin, in particular, are targeted by autoantibodies and T cells in anti-glomerular basement membrane glomerulonephritis, Goodpasture's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, post-lung transplant bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, and multiple autoimmune dermatoses. This review examines major diseases linked to basement membrane autoreactivity, with a focus on investigations in patients and animal models that advance our understanding of disease pathogenesis. Autoimmunity to glomerular basement membrane type IV is discussed in depth as a prototypic organ-specific autoimmune disease yielding novel insights into the complexity of anti-basement membrane immunity and the roles of genetic and environmental susceptibility.

Exploring new territory: considering the future

The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)'s guidelines for lupus state that mycophenolate mofetil has at least equivalent efficacy to and less toxicity than cyclophosphamide for the short-and medium-term treatment of lupus nephritis but that long-term data are available only for cyclophosphamide. New therapies are needed to reduce toxicity and the need for steroids and to offer the possibility of cure. Therapies under investigation include other immunosuppressive agents, anticellular therapies, drugs that modify cell-cell interactions, (anti-)cytokine therapy, hormone therapy and lupus-specific immunomodulation.

Rituximab has shown promise in patients refractory to conventional immunosuppression, which suggests that targeting B cells may be successful. Other anti-cell therapies include epratuzumab, belimumab and alemtuzumab. Anti-cytokine approaches include tumour necrosis factor alpha blockade with infliximab, anti-interleukin 6-receptor therapy with tocilizumab and interferon-α blockade. As anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies correlate with flares of lupus nephritis, they may represent another therapeutic target – as do monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and protein kinase CK2. Therapeutic options to prevent damage in lupus nephritis include non-immunosuppressive treatments aimed at reducing cardiovascular risk (such as statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and aspirin).

As was the case with rheumatoid arthritis, a change in therapeutic aims – from survival through prevention of renal failure to induction of remission – may modify outcomes. EULAR's guidelines state that renal biopsy is the best monitor of clinical outcome in lupus nephritis, as immunological tests have limited predictive value. Measurement of urinary mRNA for cytokine and growth factor genes may provide a more sensitive, non-invasive method of monitoring therapeutic response.

Autoantibodies in SLE: Specificities, Isotypes and Receptors

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by a wide spectrum of auto-antibodies which recognize several cellular components. The production of these self-reactive antibodies fluctuates during the course of the disease and the involvement of different antibody-secreting cell populations are considered highly relevant for the disease pathogenesis. These cells are developed and stimulated through different ways leading to the secretion of a variety of isotypes, affinities and idiotypes. Each of them has a particular mechanism of action binding to a specific antigen and recognized by distinct receptors. The effector responses triggered lead to a chronic tissue inflammation. DsDNA autoantibodies are the most studied as well as the first in being characterized for its pathogenic role in Lupus nephritis. However, others are of growing interest since they have been associated with other organ-specific damage, such as anti-NMDAR antibodies in neuropsychiatric clinical manifestations or anti-β2GP1 antibodies in vascular symptomatology. In this review, we describe the different auto-antibodies reported to be involved in SLE. How autoantibody isotypes and affinity-binding to their antigen might result in different pathogenic responses is also discussed.

Nanomaterials, Autophagy, and Lupus Disease

Nanoscale materials hold great promise in the therapeutic field. In particular, as carriers or vectors, they help bioactive molecules reach their primary targets. Furthermore, by themselves, certain nanomaterials-regarded as protective-can modulate particular metabolic pathways that are deregulated in pathological situations. They can also synergistically improve the effects of a payload drug. These properties are the basis of their appeal. However, nanoscale materials can also have intrinsic properties that limit their use, and this is the case for certain types of nanomaterials that influence autophagy. This property can be beneficial in some pathological settings, but in others, if the autophagic flux is already accelerated, it can be deleterious. This is notably the case for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and other chronic inflammatory diseases, including certain neurological diseases. The nanomaterial-autophagy interaction therefore must be treated with caution for therapeutic molecules and peptides that require vectorization for their administration.

The anti-DNA antibody: origin and impact, dogmas and controversies

The inclusion of 'the anti-DNA antibody' by the ACR and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) as a criterion for systemic lupus erythematosus does not convey the diverse origins of these antibodies, whether their production is transient or persistent (which is heavily influenced by the nature of the inducing antigens), the specificities exerted by these antibodies or their clinical impact-or lack thereof. A substantial amount of data not considered in clinical medicine could be added from basic immunology evidence, which could change the paradigms linked to what 'the anti-DNA antibody' is, in a pathogenic, classification or diagnostic context.

Anti-dsDNA antibodies as a classification criterion and a diagnostic marker for systemic lupus erythematosus: critical remarks

Antibodies to mammalian dsDNA have, for decades, been linked to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and particularly to its most serious complication, lupus nephritis. This canonical view derives from studies on its strong association with disease. The dogma was particularly settled when the antibody was included in the classification criteria for SLE that developed during the 1970s, most prominently in the 1982 American College of Rheumatology (ACR), and recently in The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) classification criteria. There are several problems to be discussed before the anti-dsDNA antibody can be accepted without further distinction as a criterion to classify SLE. Old and contemporary knowledge make it clear that an anti-dsDNA antibody is not a unifying term. It embraces antibodies with a wide spectrum of fine molecular specificities, antibodies that are produced transiently in context of infections and persistently in the context of true autoimmunity, and also includes anti-dsDNA antibodies that have the potential to bind chromatin (accessible DNA structures) and not (specificity for DNA structures that are embedded in chromatin and therefore unaccessible for the antibodies). This critical review summarizes this knowledge and questions whether or not an anti-dsDNA antibody, as simply that, can be used to classify SLE.

Annexin A2 autoantibodies in thrombosis and autoimmune diseases

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease characterized by arterial, venous or small-vessel thrombotic events, and recurrent miscarriages or fetal loss. APS diagnosis is based on the repeated detection of anti-phospholipid (PL) antibodies (Ab), typically associated with anti-β2 glycoprotein I (β2GPI)-Ab. Recent studies suggest that anti-β2GPI Ab activity involves a protein complex including β2GPI and annexin A2 (ANXA2). Anti-ANXA2 Ab recognizes this complex, and these Ab can effectively promote thrombosis by inhibiting plasmin generation, and by activating endothelial cells. Therefore, anti-ANXA2 Ab represent a new biomarker, which can be detected in up to 25% of APS patients. Moreover, anti-ANXA2 Ab have been detected, in thrombotic associated diseases including pre-eclampsia, in other autoimmune diseases, and in cancer.

The pathogenesis and diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus: still not resolved

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease with various clinical manifestations affecting different tissues. A characteristic feature of SLE is the presence of autoantibodies against double-stranded (ds)DNA, histones and nucleosomes, and other chromatin components. SLE is a prototype type III hypersensitivity reaction. Local deposition of anti-nuclear antibodies in complex with released chromatin induces serious inflammatory conditions by activation of the complement system. The severe renal manifestation, lupus nephritis, is classified based on histological findings in renal biopsies. Apoptotic debris, including chromatin, is present in the extracellular matrix and circulation of patients with SLE. This may be due to an aberrant process of apoptosis and/or insufficient clearance of apoptotic cells/chromatin. The non-cleared apoptotic debris may lead to activation of both the innate and adaptive immune systems. In addition, an aberrant presentation of peptides by antigen-presenting cells, disturbed selection processes for lymphocytes, and deregulated lymphocyte responses may be involved in the development of autoimmunity. In the present review, we briefly will summarize current knowledge on the pathogenesis of SLE. We will also critically discuss and challenge central issues that need to be addressed in order to fully understand the pathogenic mechanisms involved in the development of SLE and in order to have an improved diagnosis for SLE. Disappointingly, in our opinion, there are still more questions than answers for the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of SLE.

Clinical phenotype associations with various types of anti-dsDNA antibodies in patients with recent onset of rheumatic symptoms. Results from a multicentre observational study

Despite anti-dsDNA antibodies constitute a wide range of specificities, they are considered as the hallmark for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Lupus nephritis: enigmas, conflicting models and an emerging concept

Autoantibodies to components of chromatin, which include double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), histones and nucleosomes, are central in the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis. How anti-chromatin autoantibodies exert their nephritogenic activity, however, is controversial. One model assumes that autoantibodies initiate inflammation when they cross-react with intrinsic glomerular structures such as components of membranes, matrices or exposed nonchromatin ligands released from cells. Another model suggests glomerular deposition of autoantibodies in complex with chromatin, thereby inducing classic immune complex-mediated tissue damage. Recent data suggest acquired error of renal chromatin degradation due to the loss of renal DNaseI enzyme activity is an important contributing factor to the development of lupus nephritis in lupus-prone (NZBxNZW)F1 mice and in patients with lupus nephritis. Down-regulation of DNaseI expression results in reduced chromatin fragmentation and in deposition of extracellular chromatin-IgG complexes in glomerular basement membranes in individuals who produce IgG anti-chromatin autoantibodies. The main focus of the present review is to discuss whether exposed chromatin fragments in glomeruli are targeted by potentially nephritogenic anti-dsDNA autoantibodies or if the nephritogenic activity of these autoantibodies is explained by cross-reaction with intrinsic glomerular constituents or if both models coexist in diseased kidneys. In addition, the role of silencing of the renal DNaseI gene and the biological consequences of reduced chromatin fragmentation in nephritic kidneys are discussed.

Regulation of basement membrane-reactive B cells in BXSB, (NZBxNZW)F1, NZB, and MRL/lpr lupus mice

Autoantibodies to diverse antigens escape regulation in systemic lupus erythematosus under the influence of a multitude of predisposing genes. To gain insight into the differential impact of diverse genetic backgrounds on tolerance mechanisms controlling autoantibody production in lupus, we established a single lupus-derived nephritis associated anti-basement membrane Ig transgene on each of four inbred murine lupus strains, including BXSB, (NZBxNZW)F1, NZB, and MRL/lpr, as approved by the Duke University and the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Centers' Animal Care and Use Committees. In nonautoimmune C57BL/6 mice, B cells bearing this anti-laminin Ig transgene are stringently regulated by central deletion, editing, and anergy. Here, we show that tolerance is generally intact in unmanipulated Ig transgenic BXSB, (NZBxNZW)F1, and NZB mice, based on absence of serum transgenic anti-laminin autoantibodies and failure to recover spontaneous anti-laminin monoclonal antibodies. Four- to six-fold depletion of splenic B cells in transgenic mice of these strains, as well as in MRL/lpr transgenic mice, and reduced frequency of IgM+ bone marrow B cells suggest that central deletion is grossly intact. Nonetheless the 4 strains demonstrate distinct transgenic B cell phenotypes, including endotoxin-stimulated production of anti-laminin antibodies by B cells from transgenic NZB mice, and in vitro hyperproliferation of both endotoxin- and BCR-stimulated B cells from transgenic BXSB mice, which are shown to have an enrichment of CD21-high marginal zone cells. Rare anti-laminin transgenic B cells spontaneously escape tolerance in MRL/lpr mice. Further study of the mechanisms underlying these strain-specific B cell fates will provide insight into genetic modification of humoral autoimmunity in lupus.

Peptide-based approaches to treat lupus and other autoimmune diseases

After a long period where the potential of therapeutic peptides was let into oblivion and even dismissed, there is a revival of interest in peptides as potential drug candidates. Novel strategies for limiting metabolism and improve their bioavailability, and alternative routes of administration have emerged. This resulted in a large number of peptide-based drugs that are now being marketed in different indications. Regarding autoimmunity, successful data have been reported in numerous mouse models of autoimmune inflammation, yet relatively few clinical trials based on synthetic peptides are currently underway. This review reports on peptides that show much promises in appropriate mouse models of autoimmunity and describes in more detail clinical trials based on peptides for treating autoimmune patients. A particular emphasis is given to the 21-mer peptide P140/Lupuzor that has completed successfully phase I, phase IIa and phase IIb clinical trials for systemic lupus erythematosus.

Mesangial cell-specific antibodies are central to the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis

Not only is nephritis a common complaint in systemic lupus erythematosus, but it is also the most life-threatening complication of the disease. Anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies (Abs), which are found in up to 80% of these patients, might be nephritogenic per se. That is, they may cross-react with mesangial cell (MC) surface proteins, such as alpha-actinin and annexin A2, they may cross-react with mesangial matrix protein such as laminine and fibronectin, or they may recognize chromatin material previously deposited in the glomeruli. The consequence of the binding of anti-MC Abs may be their internalization, which results in activation and proliferation of these MCs. In turn, these activated MCs are suspected of promoting immune complex formation by sequestering and thereby protecting chromatin from degradation. The present paper will explain the mechanisms through which such autoAbs may initiate nephritis.

Novel targets for immunotherapy in glomerulonephritis

Glomerulonephritis is a common cause of chronic kidney disease and end stage renal failure. Current therapy relies on variably effective, nonspecific and toxic immunosuppression. Recent insights into underlying biology and disease pathogenesis in human glomerulonephritis combined with advances in the fields of inflammation and autoimmunity promise a cadre of novel targeted interventions. This review highlights the therapeutic potential of two antigens, alpha3 (IV)NC1 collagen and podocyte neutral endopeptidase, and two cell signaling and effector molecules, IgG Fc receptors and complement, judged to be particularly amenable to therapeutic manipulation in man. It is anticipated that continued dissection of pathogenesis in the diverse disorders that comprise the glomerulonephritides will provide the basis for individualized disease-specific therapy.

Heparin exerts a dual effect on murine lupus nephritis by enhancing enzymatic chromatin degradation and preventing chromatin binding in glomerular membranes

OBJECTIVE

Association of nucleosome-IgG immune complexes with glomerular basement membranes (GBMs) is an important event in the development of lupus nephritis. Preventing this binding and/or increasing nuclease sensitivity of nucleosomes may be viable strategies for the prevention of the disease. Theoretically, heparin may alter nucleosomal structure and increase sensitivity to proteinases and nucleases, and may also inhibit binding of nucleosomes and nucleosome-IgG complexes to basement membrane structures. The aim of this study was to investigate whether and eventually how heparin prevents murine lupus nephritis.

METHODS

Surface plasmon resonance was used to analyze if heparin inhibits binding of nucleosomes to laminin and collagen. The effect of heparin on nuclease- and proteinase-mediated degradation of nucleosomes was analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and agarose gel electrophoresis. In vitro results were compared with analyses in vivo in heparin-treated (NZB × NZW)F(1) mice. Anti-double-stranded DNA antibody production, deposition of nucleosome-IgG complexes in GBMs, and development of proteinuria were monitored, and circulating chromatin fragments were quantified using quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

In vitro studies demonstrated that heparin increased enzymatic degradation of nucleosomes and almost completely inhibited binding of nucleosomes to laminin and collagen. (NZB × NZW)F(1) mice treated with heparin demonstrated delayed or no antibody production and higher variation of circulating chromatin levels compared with untreated control mice. This effect was accompanied by highly reduced nucleosome-IgG complexes in GBMs and delayed development of nephritis.

CONCLUSION

Increasing the degradation of nucleosomes, reducing their immunogenicity, and preventing binding of nucleosome-IgG complexes in glomeruli together provide an alternative basis for the treatment of lupus nephritis.

Chromatin as a target antigen in human and murine lupus nephritis

The present review focuses on pathogenic molecular and transcriptional events in patients with lupus nephritis. These factors are renal DNaseI, exposed chromatin fragments and the corresponding chromatin-reactive autoantibodies. Lupus nephritis is the most serious complication in human systemic lupus erythematosus, and is characterised by deposition of chromatin fragment-IgG complexes in the mesangial matrix and glomerular basement membranes. The latter deposition defines end-stage disease. This event is stringently linked to a renal-restricted shutdown of expression of the DNaseI gene, as determined by loss of DNaseI mRNA level and DNaseI enzyme activity. The major aim of the present review is to generate new therapeutic strategies based on new insight into the disease pathogenesis.

Murine models of systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multifactorial autoimmune disorder. The study of diverse mouse models of lupus has provided clues to the etiology of SLE. Spontaneous mouse models of lupus have led to identification of numerous susceptibility loci from which several candidate genes have emerged. Meanwhile, induced models of lupus have provided insight into the role of environmental factors in lupus pathogenesis as well as provided a better understanding of cellular mechanisms involved in the onset and progression of disease. The SLE-like phenotypes present in these models have also served to screen numerous potential SLE therapies. Due to the complex nature of SLE, it is necessary to understand the effect specific targeted therapies have on immune homeostasis. Furthermore, knowledge gained from mouse models will provide novel therapy targets for the treatment of SLE.

Identification of new pathogenic players in lupus: autoantibody-secreting cells are present in nephritic kidneys of (NZBxNZW)F1 mice

An important hallmark of systemic lupus erythematosus is the production of autoantibodies specific for nuclear Ags, among which nucleosomes and their constituents, DNA and histones. It is widely admitted that some of these autoantibodies contribute largely in lupus pathogenesis because of their nephritogenic potential. However, the underlying mechanisms are still debated. In this study, we analyzed the autoimmune response against histone H2B during the course of the disease in lupus-prone (NZBxNZW)F1 mice, both in lymphoid organs and kidneys, and we assessed its potential involvement in lupus pathogenicity. We found that the N-terminal region of histone H2B represents a preferential target for circulating autoantibodies, which kinetics of appearance positively correlates with disease development. Furthermore, immunization of preautoimmune (NZBxNZW)F1 mice with H2B peptide 1-25 accelerates the disease. Kidney eluates from diseased (NZBxNZW)F1 mice do contain IgG Abs reacting with this peptide, and this H2B sequence was found to be accessible to specific Ab probes in Ag-containing deposits detected in nephritic kidneys. Finally, compared with control normal mice and to young preautoimmune (NZBxNZW)F1 animals, the frequency of cells secreting autoantibodies reacting with peptide 1-25 was significantly raised in the spleen and bone marrow and most importantly on a pathophysiological point of view, locally, in nephritic kidneys of diseased (NZBxNZW)F1 mice. Altogether our results demonstrate the existence in (NZBxNZW)F1 mice of both a systemic and local B cell response targeting the N-terminal region of histone H2B, and highlight the potential implication of this nuclear domain in lupus pathology.

Anti-dsDNA antibodies promote initiation, and acquired loss of renal Dnase1 promotes progression of lupus nephritis in autoimmune (NZBxNZW)F1 mice

Background

Lupus nephritis is characterized by deposition of chromatin fragment-IgG complexes in the mesangial matrix and glomerular basement membranes (GBM). The latter defines end-stage disease.

Methodology/Principals

In the present study we determined the impact of antibodies to dsDNA, renal Dnase1 and matrix metalloprotease (MMP) mRNA levels and enzyme activities on early and late events in murine lupus nephritis. The major focus was to analyse if these factors were interrelated, and if changes in their expression explain basic processes accounting for lupus nephritis.

Findings

Early phases of nephritis were associated with chromatin-IgG complex deposition in the mesangial matrix. A striking observation was that this event correlated with appearance of anti-dsDNA antibodies and mild or clinically silent nephritis. These events preceded down-regulation of renal Dnase1. Later, renal Dnase1 mRNA level and enzyme activity were reduced, while MMP2 mRNA level and enzyme activity increased. Reduced levels of renal Dnase1 were associated in time with deficient fragmentation of chromatin from dead cells. Large fragments were retained and accumulated in GBM. Also, since chromatin fragments are prone to stimulate Toll-like receptors in e.g. dendritic cells, this may in fact explain increased expression of MMPs.

Significance

These scenarios may explain the basis for deposition of chromatin-IgG complexes in glomeruli in early and late stages of nephritis, loss of glomerular integrity and finally renal failure.

Nucleic acid-associated autoantigens: pathogenic involvement and therapeutic potential

Autoimmunity to ubiquitously expressed macromolecular nucleic acid-protein complexes such as the nucleosome or the spliceosome is a characteristic feature of systemic autoimmune diseases. Disease-specificity and/or association with clinical features of some of these autoimmune responses suggest pathogenic involvement which, however, has been proven in only a few cases so far. Although the mechanisms leading to autoimmunity against nucleic acid-containing complexes are still far from being fully understood, there is increasing experimental evidence that the nucleic acid component may act as a co-stimulator or adjuvans via activation of nucleic acid-binding receptor systems such as Toll-like receptors in antigen-presenting cells. Dysregulated apoptosis and inappropriate stimulation of nucleic acid-sensing receptors may lead to loss of tolerance against the protein components of such complexes, activation of autoreactive T cells and formation of autoantibodies. This has been demonstrated to occur in systemic lupus erythematosus and seems to represent a general mechanism that may be crucial for the development of systemic autoimmune diseases. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the most thoroughly-characterized nucleic acid-associated autoantigens, describing their structure and biological function, as well as the nature and pathogenic importance of the reactivities directed against them. Furthermore, recent advances in immunotherapy such as antigen-specific approaches targeted at nucleic acid-binding antigens are discussed.

Molecular therapies for systemic lupus erythematosus: clinical trials and future prospects

The prognosis of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus has greatly improved since treatment regimens combining corticosteroids and immunosuppressive medications have been widely adopted in therapeutic strategies given to these patients. Immune suppression is evidently efficient but also leads to higher susceptibility to infectious and malignant diseases. Toxic effects and sometimes unexpectedly dramatic complications of current therapies have been progressively reported. Identifying novel molecular targets therefore remains an important issue in the treatment of lupus. The aim of this review article is to highlight emerging pharmacological options and new therapeutic avenues for lupus with a particular focus on non-antibody molecular strategies.

Exposure of chromatin and not high affinity for dsDNA determines the nephritogenic impact of anti-dsDNA antibodies in (NZBxNZW)F1 mice

Recent studies have demonstrated that the nephritogenicity of antibodies to dsDNA and nucleosomes confers to binding of glomerular membrane-associated nucleosomes, and not to cross-reacting glomerular antigens. There is no known parameter that determines antibody pathogenicity aside from specificity for dsDNA/nucleosomes, and systemic lupus erytheomatosus (SLE) patients may have high titer anti-dsDNA antibodies irrespective whether they have lupus nephritis or not. One parameter may be antibody affinity, as theoretically only high affinity antibodies may bind in vivo in a stable way. This was analyzed in (NZB x NZW)F1 mice with full-blown lupus nephritis. These mice had serum antibodies to dsDNA, and IgG autoantibodies bound in situ in glomerular membrane-associated electron dense structures as determined by immune electron microscopy (IEM). Intrinsic affinity of purified circulating and glomerular IgG anti-dsDNA antibodies was determined by surface plasmon resonance. The results demonstrate that affinity of glomerular-bound anti-dsDNA antibodies was higher than for those in circulation. However, affinity of glomerular in situ-bound antibodies from different mice varied considerably, from K(D) in the range from 10(- 8) to 10(- 13). These results indicate that antibody affinity is not a decisive pathogenic factor, but rather that availability of chromatin fragments may be the factor that determines whether an anti-dsDNA antibody binds in glomeruli or not.

Spliceosomal peptide P140 for immunotherapy of systemic lupus erythematosus: results of an early phase II clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of spliceosomal peptide P140 (IPP-201101; sequence 131-151 of the U1-70K protein phosphorylated at Ser140), which is recognized by lupus CD4+ T cells, in the treatment of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

An open-label, dose-escalation phase II study was conducted in two centers in Bulgaria. Twenty patients (2 male and 18 female) with moderately active SLE received 3 subcutaneous (SC) administrations of a clinical batch of P140 peptide at 2-week intervals. Clinical evaluation was performed using approved scales. A panel of autoantibodies, including antinuclear antibodies, antibodies to extractable nuclear antigens (U1 RNP, SmD1, Ro/SSA, La/SSB), and antibodies to double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA), chromatin, cardiolipin, and peptides of the U1-70K protein, was tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The plasma levels of C-reactive protein, total Ig, IgG, IgG subclasses, IgM, IgA, and IgE, and of the cytokines interleukin-2 and tumor necrosis factor alpha were measured by ELISA and nephelometry.

RESULTS

IgG anti-dsDNA antibody levels decreased by at least 20% in 7 of 10 patients who received 3 x 200 microg IPP-201101 (group 1), but only in 1 patient in the group receiving 3 x 1,000 microg IPP-201101 (group 2). Physician's global assessment of disease activity scores and scores on the SLE Disease Activity Index were significantly decreased in group 1. The changes occurred progressively in the population of responders, increased in magnitude during the treatment period, and were sustained. No clinical or biologic adverse effects were observed in the individuals, except for some local irritation at the highest concentration.

CONCLUSION

IPP-201101 was found to be safe and well tolerated by subjects. Three SC doses of IPP-201101 at 200 microg significantly improved the clinical and biologic status of lupus patients.

Tracking Differential Gene Expression in MRL/MpJ Versus C57BL/6 Anergic B Cells: Molecular Markers of Autoimmunity

Background

Anergy is a key mechanism controlling expression of autoreactive B cells and a major site for failed regulation in autoimmune diseases. Yet the molecular basis for this differentiated cell state remains poorly understood. The current lack of well-characterized surface or molecular markers hinders the isolation of anergic cells for further study. Global gene profiling recently identified transcripts whose expression differentiates anergic from naïve B cells in model mouse systems. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the molecular and cellular processes that differentiate anergic cells that develop in the healthy C57BL/6 (B6) milieu from those that develop in the autoimmune-prone MRL/MpJ (MRL) background. This approach takes advantage of B6 and MRL mice bearing an anti-laminin Ig transgene with a well characterized anergic B cell phenotype.

Results

Global gene expression was evaluated in purified transgenic B cells using Operon version 3.0 oligonucleotide microarray assaying >31,000 oligoprobes. Genes with a 2-fold expression difference in B6 as compared to MRL anergic B cells were identified. Expression of selected genes was confirmed using quantitative RT-PCR. This approach identified 43 probes corresponding to 37 characterized genes, including Ptpn22, CD74, Birc1f/Naip, and Ctla4, as differentially expressed in anergic B cells in the two strains. Gene Ontology classification identified differentiation, cell cycle, proliferation, development, apoptosis, and cell death as prominently represented ontology groups. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis identified two major networks incorporating 27 qualifying genes. Network 1 centers on beta-estradiol and TP53, and Network 2 encompasses RB1, p38 MAPK, and NFkB cell growth, proliferation, and cell cycle signaling pathways.

Conclusion

Using microarray analysis we identified 37 characterized genes and two functional pathways engaged in maintenance of B cell anergy for which expression is distorted by underlying autoimmune genetic susceptibility. This approach identifes a new biological role for multiple genes and potential new therapeutic targets in autoimmunity.