Modified Proximal Scarf Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus

Radiologic and Clinical Outcomes of the Dovetailed Notch Scarf Osteotomy for Correcting the First Metatarsal Pronation in Moderate to Severe Hallux Valgus Deformity: A Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

The traditional scarf osteotomy (TSO) has limited ability to correct the first metatarsal pronation. A novel modification that we refer to as a "dovetailed notch scarf osteotomy" (DNSO) has been developed to enhance the ability to correct coronal plane pronation. The study aimed to observe and compare TSO to DNSO in the treatment of moderate to severe hallux valgus deformity.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 78 feet that had a TSO and 105 feet that had a DNSO. Minimum follow-up was 24 months. Weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) and weightbearing anterior-posterior (AP) radiographs were taken preoperatively and at the last follow-up. We measured the intermetatarsal angle (IMA), hallux valgus angle, distal metatarsal articular surface angle on AP radiographs and first metatarsal coronal pronation angle (α angle), tibial sesamoid coronal grading, and first metatarsal length on WBCT. Clinical assessment was done using visual analog scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). The occurrence of postoperative complications was also documented.

RESULTS

The DNSO group exhibited a significantly higher correction amount of α angle and IMA (14.3 ± 9.9 and 10.3 ± 4.6 degrees) than the TSO group (8.6 ± 5.9 and 5.4 ± 5.9 degrees) during the final follow-up assessment (P < .05).The DNSO group (10.1 [8.0-12.0] degrees and 4.8 [3.9-5.6] degrees) demonstrated significantly smaller α angle and IMA compared with the TSO group (4.8 [3.9-5.6] degrees and 9.5 [7.5-11.5] degrees) at 24 months postsurgery (P < .05). The postoperative FAAM activities of daily living and SF-36 physical functioning scores were significantly higher in the DNSO group (97.2 ± 3.3 and 95.7 ± 4.4 points) compared with the TSO group (92.3 ± 3.3 and 87.7 ± 8.7 points) (P < .05). Additionally, hallux varus occurred in 1 case in the DNSO group, whereas 4 cases were observed in the TSO group.

CONCLUSION

Two osteotomy methods can effectively correct moderate to severe hallux valgus deformity. Compared with the TSO, the DNSO has stronger correction ability. The most crucial aspect lies in its controllability when correcting first metatarsal pronation and addressing IMA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Comparative effects of modified rotary scarf osteotomy and traditional scarf osteotomy in treating moderate to severe hallux valgus: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Traditional Scarf osteotomy (TSO) is an effective procedure with a good record in moderate to severe hallux valgus (MSHV) surgery. In order to overcome shortcomings of TSO, Modified Rotary Scarf osteotomy (MRSO) was introduced in this study, which aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcome in the patients treated with MRSO or TSO.

METHODS

Of 175 patients (247 feet) with MSHV, 100 patients (138 feet) treated with MRSO and 75 patients (109 feet) treated with TSO were evaluated according to relevant indicators in twenty-four months follow-up. Pre-surgical and post-surgical HVA, IMA, DMAA, MTP-1 ROM, sesamoid grade and AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society) scores and postsurgical complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

Both groups manifested similar baseline characters. The mean follow-up was of 25.9 (range, 22-37) months. Significantly lower IMA, lower Sesamoid grade and higher DMAA at six months, twelve months and twenty-four months post-surgically had been showed in MRSO group compared to TSO group. There was no significant difference in HVA, MTP-1 ROM and AOFAS data at each follow-up time point post-surgically between the two groups. No major complications occurred in either group.

CONCLUSION

MRSO showed comparable results to TSO, and improved IMA and sesamoid grade to a greater extent, with a lower probability of throughing effect. Although DMAA could be increased by MRSO, MRSO could still be a reproducible, non-dangerous and efficacious alternative procedure for treating HV patients which do not have severe DMAA.

Biomechanical Comparison between Rotational Scarf Osteotomy and Translational Scarf Osteotomy: A Finite Element Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Rotational Scarf osteotomy has its unique advantages in treating hallux valgus, but it also has certain drawbacks. The biomechanical differences between rotational Scarf and translational Scarf osteotomy are not clear evaluates the correction ability and biomechanical difference of two surgical methods for hallux valgus by finite element analysis.

METHODS

The computerized tomography data of a hallux valgus patient were selected to establish a finite element model. The standard Scarf osteotomy was simulated based on the model, and the rotation and translation were performed, respectively. The size of the intermetatarsal angle, contact area, distal metatarsal articular angle and the absolute length of the first metatarsal was compared between the two groups. We completed the cartilage, ligament and other tissues on the bone model to establish a full foot model. We analyzed the troughing, plantar aponeurosis tension, plantar soft tissue, and ground stress and also observed the stability of the fracture site by a three-point bending test.

RESULTS

Both surgical methods may effectively correct the intermetatarsal angle. After rotational osteotomy, the contact area increased, and the length of the first metatarsal bone initially increased and then decreased compared to that in the translational group. Furthermore, rotational Scarf significantly increased the distal metatarsal articular angle. Mechanical analysis showed that the cancellous bone in the contact part of the fracture site in the translation group had greater stress, which was the reason for the occurrence of the troughing. Stress distribution of plantar aponeurosis, plantar soft tissue, and the ground showed no significant difference. The three-point bending test showed that the separation of the broken ends of the rotational Scarf osteotomy model (0.133 mm) was slightly smaller than the translational group (0.147 mm).

CONCLUSION

Both surgical methods can successfully correct intermetatarsal angle (IMA). Compared to traditional translational Scarf osteotomy, rotational Scarf osteotomy is more conducive to postoperative stability and healing, but it also has certain drawbacks. In clinical practice, individualized surgical methods still need to be selected for different types of patients with hallux valgus.

Medial Reduction in Sesamoid Position after Hallux Valgus Correction Surgery Showed Better Outcome in S.E.R.I. Osteotomy than DCMO

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to compare the degree of sesamoid reduction after hallux valgus correction between distal chevron metatarsal osteotomy (DCMO) and S.E.R.I. (simple, effective, rapid, and inexpensive) osteotomy, and to analyze the effects on the recurrence of hallux valgus.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the foot radiographs of 60 feet (30 DCMO and 30 SERI) treated for hallux valgus from August 2013 to July 2017. Radiographic assessments were performed preoperatively, at early follow-up (at a mean of 3.1 months) and at the most recent follow-up (at a mean of 16.7 months). The location of the medial sesamoid was classified into seven stages, in accordance with the method described by Hardy and Clapham; stage IV or less was defined as the normal position for the medial sesamoid, and stage V or greater was defined as lateral displacement of the sesamoid. The pre- and post-operative hallux valgus angle, 1-2 intermetatarsal angle, and sesamoid position were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 18.4 (12-36) months in the DCMO group and 15.0 (12-36) months in the S.E.R.I. group (p = 0.108). The radiologic results showed that the hallux valgus angles were not significantly different between the two groups preoperatively and at the early follow-up: preoperatively, they were 28.8 ± 7.7 in the DCMO group and 32.6 ± 9.5 in the S.E.R.I. group (p = 0.101), and they were 10.4 ± 4.0 and 8.7 ± 5.0 (p = 0.148) at the early follow-up, respectively. However, at the most recent follow-up, the DCMO group (13.9 ± 5.6) showed significantly higher hallux valgus angles than the S.E.R.I. group (10.4 ± 6.4, p = 0.030), and there were no differences between the recurrence of hallux valgus in the DCMO group (13%)and that in the S.E.R.I. group (10%) (p = 0.553). There were no significant differences in the 1-2 intermetatarsal angles between the two groups at the early follow-up (6.1 ± 2.5 vs. 4.8 ± 3.1, p = 0.082) and at the most recent follow-up (7.3 ± 2.9 vs. 6.6 ± 3.5, p = 0.408). After hallux-valgus-correction surgery, the stage change of the tibia sesamoid position from the preoperative stage to the initial follow-up was significantly larger in the S.E.R.I. group (-4.4 ± 1.4) than in the DCMO group (-3.4 ± 1.1) (p = 0.003); the changes from the preoperative stage to the last follow-up were also significantly larger in the SERI group (-3.3 ± 1.7) than in the DCMO group (-2.4 ± 1.5) (p = 0.028); however, the changes from the initial follow-up to the last follow-up showed no significant differences between the two groups (+1.0 ± 1.1 in the DCMO group vs. +1.1 ± 1.2 in the S.E.R.I. group) (p = 0.822). The medial sesamoid was laterally subluxated in all the preoperative cases in the DCMO and S.E.R.I. groups. The lateral subluxation of the tibia sesamoid was more frequently observed in the DCMO group (four cases, 13%) than in the S.E.R.I. group (0 cases, 0%) (p = 0.038) at the early follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our results demonstrated that the S.E.R.I. procedure is superior to DCMO in decreasing the hallux valgus angle and showed that the early post-operative reduction in the sesamoids can be a risk factor for the recurrence of hallux valgus.

Contribution Ratio of Metatarsal Osteotomy and First Tarsometatarsal Joint Reduction in Moderate to Severe Hallux Valgus Correction

Hallux valgus is a common foot and ankle disease, for which numerous surgical procedures were introduced. So, understanding the mechanism of deformity reduction is important to select the proper method. Intermetatarsal angle (IMA) determines the severity of hallux valgus, which is influenced by the translated metatarsal head and the reduction of the first tarsometatarsal joint. We hypothesized that both of the mechanisms simultaneously contribute to the correction of IMA. Hallux valgus (70 feet) operated with a Scarf osteotomy with the Akin procedure were reviewed. Hallux valgus angle (HVA), IMA (mechanical and anatomical), hallux valgus interphalangeal angle (HVIP), distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA), and sesamoid position were checked. The ratio of contributions to the IMA changes were calculated and compared. When the individual contributions by metatarsal head translation and first tarsometatarsal joint reduction were compared, metatarsal head translation contributed by 82%, whereas first tarsometatarsal joint reduction contributed by 18%. Both were responsible for mechanical IMA correction. However, IMA change by metatarsal head translation was a major correction mechanism compared to anatomical IMA change by first tarsometatarsal joint reduction.

Iatrogenic second transfer metatarsalgia and the first metatarsal shortening and elevation after Scarf osteotomy

BACKGROUND

Transfer metatarsalgia is a potential complication of hallux valgus surgery. This study aimed to investigate the shortened first metatarsal length and elevation and to compare groups with and without second transfer metatarsalgia after Scarf osteotomy.

METHODS

The first metatarsal length of 123 feet was measured via the Maestro's method using the metatarsal axial length and the relative second metatarsal protrusion to the first metatarsal. Metatarsal elevation was measured using the first metatarsal angle.

RESULTS

Second transfer metatarsalgia occurred after Scarf osteotomy in 11 (8.9%) feet. When baseline characteristics were considered in propensity score matching, the 11 feet were compared with the 33 feet in the control group. The group with transfer metatarsalgia showed a more shortened first metatarsal axial length (-4.1 ± 1.8 mm vs. -2.5 ± 2.2 mm, p = 0.032), a significantly longer relative second metatarsal protrusion (+5.8 ± 2.6 mm vs. +1.2 ± 2.6 mm, p < 0.001), and a significantly lower first metatarsal angle (18.1 ± 4.3° vs. 21.5 ± 4.0°, p = 0.012) than the control group postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

To avoid iatrogenic transfer metatarsalgia, first metatarsal length shortening should be minimized to at least less than 4.0 mm. Furthermore, the metatarsal parabola should be retained.

Effectiveness of hallux valgus surgery on improving health-related quality of life: A follow up study

BACKGROUND

Hallux valgus (HV) negatively impacts health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Patientreported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used in clinical studies of the foot and ankle. We aimed to evaluate the effect of HV surgery on PROMs (i.e., pain scales, general HRQoL, and region-specific scales) and radiological angles. Additionally, we aimed to determine whether the effect on these outcomes depends on the type of surgery (including open and percutaneous techniques) and if it is influenced by potential confounding factors (i.e., age, HVA, 1-2 IMA, body mass index (BMI), and distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA).

METHODS

This was a longitudinal prospective study. We collected the clinical data of all patients who underwent surgery for symptomatic HV deformity in the orthopedic department of the Virgen de la Luz Hospital of Cuenca (Spain).The clinical outcomes were assessed using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Hallux metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal (HMI) scale, visual analogue scale (VAS), Manchester Oxford foot questionnaire (MOXFQ), short form health survey (SF-12) and European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D).

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients (70 women, 97.2%) were included in the study 72 (72 feet).The AOFAS pre-post-surgery score changed from 42.16 (SD: 10.11) to 83.31 (SD: 6.23). Considering AOFAS domains, the pre-post change was from 14.17 (SD: 9.15) to 33.19 (SD: 4.69) for pain, from 27.22 (SD: 3.90) to 37.94 (SD: 2.78) for function, and from 0.78 (SD: 2.38) to 12.18 (SD: 3.45) for alignment. For other clinical outcomes was VAS score from 5.01(SD: 1.26) to 1.26 (SD: 0.96) and MOXFQ score from 61.44 (SD: 7.09) to 12.35 (SD: 4.85). SF-12 (physical) changed from 36.26 (SD: 5.32) to 47.06 (SD: 4.82), SF-12 (mental) from 38.23 (SD: 8.04) to 46.49 (SD: 4.16), and EQ5-D from 0.64 (SD: 0.008) to 0.90 (SD: 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirmed the improvements in the clinical and radiological outcomes after HV surgery, and provided some evidence of these improvements not depending on the type of surgery or on some potential confounding factors such as BMI, HVA, 1-2 IMA, and DMAA.

The effect of Scarf osteotomy on the distal metatarsal articular angle in hallux valgus: a case series

BACKGROUND

Hallux valgus is a deformity of the forefoot involving a phalangeal valgus and a metatarsal adductus. In most cases its correction requires surgical treatment with different types of osteotomies. The best known is Scarf osteotomy.

AIM

To study the effet of Scarf osteotomy on distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA) as well as the validitiy of this angle and the value of its correction after review of the literature.

METHODS

It was a retrospective study including patients operated on for severe hallux valgus by a Scarf osteotomy. The clinical assessment was based on the the American-Orthopedic-Foot-and-Ankle-society (AOFAS) score. Radiologically, we calculated the metatarsophalangeal angle, the inter-metatarsal angle and the DMAA. This assessment was performed preoperatively and one year postoperatively.

RESULTS

We collected 37 cases of evolved hallux valgus. The average AOFAS score went from 60.7 to 85.8 / 100 postoperatively with a gain of 25 points. We've noted a significant correction of the 3 angular measurements at one year postoperatively (the metatarsophalangeal angle, the inter-metatarsal angle and the DMAA) which went from 38.8° to 20.5°, from 17° at 10° and 13.5° to 8.5° respectively (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The literature has shown that there is no consensus regarding the effect of HV surgery on the DMAA. As for the accuracy, reproducibility and interest of correcting this angle we deduce that the DMAA is an interesting measure in the pathology of HV. Its correction seems not to be necessary in order not to hamper the correction of metatarsus varus. But in cases where the preoperative DMAA is high (> 15 °), efforts should be made to correct it to avoid recurrence.

Hallux Valgus With Second Brachymetatarsia Discovered Accidentally: A Case Report

Hallux valgus deformity is one of the most common foot and ankle diseases, while brachymetatarsia is a rare foot anomaly with pathological shortening of a metatarsal bone. We present a case of hallux valgus deformity possibly due to second brachymetatarsia. As the hallux valgus was associated with dorsal dislocation of the second toe that made it difficult to evaluate the length of the second toe, the patient was unaware of the second metatarsal shortening until the lengths of the toes compared by manual reposition of the second MTP joint. In this case, proximal osteotomy of the first metatarsal on the hallux valgus and single-stage bone lengthening of the second metatarsal with iliac bone grafting on the second brachymetatarsia were performed. One year after the operation, the callosity of the third toe resolved and the clinical scores were improved. In the case of a hallux valgus deformity with second dorsal dislocation of the toes, surgeons should consider that there are rare cases with second metatarsal shortening. When hallux valgus associated with second brachymetatarsia is diagnosed, second metatarsal lengthening should be considered in addition to hallux valgus surgery.

Open vs Minimally Invasive Scarf Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus Correction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive (MI) surgery is becoming increasingly popular in the treatment of hallux valgus (HV). The scarf osteotomy is an effective procedure with a track record in open HV surgery. We adapted this effective osteotomy to MI surgery as a novel technique never reported before. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of patients who underwent open or MI scarf.

METHODS

Between 2017 and 2018, 58 patients were randomized to either open or MI scarf to treat HV deformity. Prospective patient-reported outcome measures and weightbearing radiographs were obtained. Data included the AOFAS score, radiologic angular correction, operative time, fluoroscopy radiation dose, and postoperative pain on visual analog scale (VAS).

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was of 21 (range, 12-38) months. Radiologic measurements (postoperative hallux valgus angle, first-to-second intermetatarsal angle, and distal metaphyseal articular angle) were similar in both groups and showed statistically significant improvement from preoperative measures. The mean operative time for the MI group was 16.7 vs 26.1 minutes in the open group, a statistically significant difference. Radiation exposure was 14 times higher in the MI group when compared to the open group (mean: 34 vs 2.4 mGy/cm², P < .001). There were no major complications in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The MI scarf provides a clinically and radiologically equivalent outcome to open scarf for the treatment of HV with reduced operative time and immediate postoperative VAS for pain but is associated with a small increase in radiation exposure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, randomized controlled trial.

Outcomes of Simultaneous Bilateral vs Unilateral Distal Chevron Metatarsal Osteotomy in Hallux Valgus Patients Aged ≥60 Years

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare radiographic outcomes of simultaneous bilateral and unilateral distal chevron metatarsal osteotomy (DCMO) in hallux valgus patients aged ≥60 years.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed consecutive outcomes of simultaneous bilateral DCMO and unilateral DCMO performed between June 2010 and August 2018 in 90 feet of 60 patients. Thirty patients underwent simultaneous bilateral DCMO, and 30 underwent unilateral DCMO. Comparative analysis of radiographic and clinical parameters between a simultaneous bilateral DCMO group (SB) and a unilateral DCMO group (U) was performed.

RESULTS

Mean age at surgery (65.7±4.8 vs 65.2±5.2 years), mean length of follow-up period (20.0 vs 18.6 months), and preoperative radiographic parameters were similar between the 2 groups (SB vs U). Mean hallux valgus angle (HVA) improved from 34.2 to 5.4 degrees (correction angle SB 28.8 vs U 28.8 degrees). Mean first-to-second intermetatarsal angle improved from 15.8 to 6.8 degrees (correction angle SB 8.9 vs U 8.9 degrees). Hallux varus deformity was observed in 4 feet (SB 3 vs U 1), and mechanical instability with callus formation in 1 foot in the unilateral group.

CONCLUSION

DCMOs in patients aged ≥60 years were radiographically effective and safe, even performed in one stage bilaterally. Radiographic parameters were similar in patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral and unilateral DCMO.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Pes Planus Deformity and Its Association With Hallux Valgus Recurrence Following Scarf Osteotomy

BACKGROUND

Hallux valgus recurrence is an unsatisfactory complication, with many causes postulated. This study investigated the effect of pes planus on recurrence after scarf osteotomy.

METHODS

A total of 183 feet were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were treated with a scarf osteotomy and if required Akin osteotomy. We measured preoperative lateral talus first metatarsal angle (T1MA) to study pes planus; an angle of under -4 degrees was considered pes planus. We measured pre and postoperative hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), and sesamoid location. In total 164 feet were suitable for inclusion, with follow-up of at least 6 months (10 males and 154 females, mean age: 52 years).

RESULTS

Recurrence frequency (HVA greater than 15 degrees) was 27 feet (16%). Hallux valgus recurrence was not influenced by gender (P value = .66) or preoperative IMA (P value = .48). Preoperative HVA greater than 35 degrees was associated with increased frequency of recurrence (P value = .004). Those with T1MA less than -10 degrees demonstrated progression in HVA and deterioration in sesamoid location up to 6 months postoperatively (P value = .038). HVA did not progress beyond 6 months. The prevalence of recurrent hallux valgus with normal T1MA was 1%, in T1MA -4 to -10 degrees it was 29% and in T1MA less than -10 degrees it was 47% (P value <.001). Breaks in T1MA less than -4 degrees were found at the naviculocuneiform joint in 68% of feet in this series.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of hallux valgus recurrence correlated with the severity of pes planus.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.