1
|
Schreiber F, Czauderna T. Design considerations for representing systems biology information with the Systems Biology Graphical Notation. J Integr Bioinform 2022; 19:jib-2022-0024. [PMID: 35786424 PMCID: PMC9377698 DOI: 10.1515/jib-2022-0024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Visual representations are commonly used to explore, analyse, and communicate information and knowledge in systems biology and beyond. Such visualisations not only need to be accurate but should also be aesthetically pleasing and informative. Using the example of the Systems Biology Graphical Notation (SBGN) we will investigate design considerations for graphically presenting information from systems biology, in particular regarding the use of glyphs for types of information, the style of graph layout for network representation, and the concept of bricks for visual network creation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Falk Schreiber
- Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.,Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Tobias Czauderna
- Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.,Faculty of Applied Computer Sciences & Biosciences, University of Applied Sciences Mittweida, Mittweida, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schreiber F, Gleeson P, Golebiewski M, Gorochowski TE, Hucka M, Keating SM, König M, Myers CJ, Nickerson DP, Sommer B, Waltemath D. Specifications of standards in systems and synthetic biology: status and developments in 2021. J Integr Bioinform 2021; 18:jib-2021-0026. [PMID: 34674411 PMCID: PMC8573232 DOI: 10.1515/jib-2021-0026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
This special issue of the Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics contains updated specifications of COMBINE standards in systems and synthetic biology. The 2021 special issue presents four updates of standards: Synthetic Biology Open Language Visual Version 2.3, Synthetic Biology Open Language Visual Version 3.0, Simulation Experiment Description Markup Language Level 1 Version 4, and OMEX Metadata specification Version 1.2. This document can also be consulted to identify the latest specifications of all COMBINE standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Falk Schreiber
- Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
- Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | | | - Martin Golebiewski
- Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Matthias König
- Institute for Theoretical Biology, Humboldt-University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Chris J. Myers
- Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Eng., University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, USA
| | - David P. Nickerson
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Keating SM, Waltemath D, König M, Zhang F, Dräger A, Chaouiya C, Bergmann FT, Finney A, Gillespie CS, Helikar T, Hoops S, Malik‐Sheriff RS, Moodie SL, Moraru II, Myers CJ, Naldi A, Olivier BG, Sahle S, Schaff JC, Smith LP, Swat MJ, Thieffry D, Watanabe L, Wilkinson DJ, Blinov ML, Begley K, Faeder JR, Gómez HF, Hamm TM, Inagaki Y, Liebermeister W, Lister AL, Lucio D, Mjolsness E, Proctor CJ, Raman K, Rodriguez N, Shaffer CA, Shapiro BE, Stelling J, Swainston N, Tanimura N, Wagner J, Meier‐Schellersheim M, Sauro HM, Palsson B, Bolouri H, Kitano H, Funahashi A, Hermjakob H, Doyle JC, Hucka M. SBML Level 3: an extensible format for the exchange and reuse of biological models. Mol Syst Biol 2020; 16:e9110. [PMID: 32845085 PMCID: PMC8411907 DOI: 10.15252/msb.20199110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2019] [Revised: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Systems biology has experienced dramatic growth in the number, size, and complexity of computational models. To reproduce simulation results and reuse models, researchers must exchange unambiguous model descriptions. We review the latest edition of the Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML), a format designed for this purpose. A community of modelers and software authors developed SBML Level 3 over the past decade. Its modular form consists of a core suited to representing reaction-based models and packages that extend the core with features suited to other model types including constraint-based models, reaction-diffusion models, logical network models, and rule-based models. The format leverages two decades of SBML and a rich software ecosystem that transformed how systems biologists build and interact with models. More recently, the rise of multiscale models of whole cells and organs, and new data sources such as single-cell measurements and live imaging, has precipitated new ways of integrating data with models. We provide our perspectives on the challenges presented by these developments and how SBML Level 3 provides the foundation needed to support this evolution.
Collapse
|
4
|
Schreiber F, Sommer B, Czauderna T, Golebiewski M, Gorochowski TE, Hucka M, Keating SM, König M, Myers C, Nickerson D, Waltemath D. Specifications of standards in systems and synthetic biology: status and developments in 2020. J Integr Bioinform 2020; 17:jib-2020-0022. [PMID: 32598316 PMCID: PMC7756620 DOI: 10.1515/jib-2020-0022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
This special issue of the Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics presents papers related to the 10th COMBINE meeting together with the annual update of COMBINE standards in systems and synthetic biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Falk Schreiber
- Dept. of Computer and Information Science, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
- Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Tobias Czauderna
- Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Martin Golebiewski
- Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Matthias König
- Institute for Theoretical Biology, Humboldt-University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Chris Myers
- Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - David Nickerson
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wani N, Raza K. Integrative approaches to reconstruct regulatory networks from multi-omics data: A review of state-of-the-art methods. Comput Biol Chem 2019; 83:107120. [PMID: 31499298 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2019.107120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2018] [Revised: 02/22/2019] [Accepted: 08/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Data generation using high throughput technologies has led to the accumulation of diverse types of molecular data. These data have different types (discrete, real, string, etc.) and occur in various formats and sizes. Datasets including gene expression, miRNA expression, protein-DNA binding data (ChIP-Seq/ChIP-ChIP), mutation data (copy number variation, single nucleotide polymorphisms), annotations, interactions, and association data are some of the commonly used biological datasets to study various cellular mechanisms of living organisms. Each of them provides a unique, complementary and partly independent view of the genome and hence embed essential information about the regulatory mechanisms of genes and their products. Therefore, integrating these data and inferring regulatory interactions from them offer a system level of biological insight in predicting gene functions and their phenotypic outcomes. To study genome functionality through regulatory networks, different methods have been proposed for collective mining of information from an integrated dataset. We survey here integration methods that reconstruct regulatory networks using state-of-the-art techniques to handle multi-omics (i.e., genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic) and other biological datasets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nisar Wani
- Govt. Degree College Baramulla, J & K, India; Department of Computer Science, jamia Milia Islamia, New Delhi, India
| | - Khalid Raza
- Department of Computer Science, jamia Milia Islamia, New Delhi, India.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schreiber F, Sommer B, Bader GD, Gleeson P, Golebiewski M, Hucka M, Keating SM, König M, Myers C, Nickerson D, Waltemath D. Specifications of Standards in Systems and Synthetic Biology: Status and Developments in 2019. J Integr Bioinform 2019; 16:/j/jib.2019.16.issue-2/jib-2019-0035/jib-2019-0035.xml. [PMID: 31301675 PMCID: PMC6798822 DOI: 10.1515/jib-2019-0035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
This special issue of the Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics presents an overview of COMBINE standards and their latest specifications. The standards cover representation formats for computational modeling in synthetic and systems biology and include BioPAX, CellML, NeuroML, SBML, SBGN, SBOL and SED-ML. The articles in this issue contain updated specifications of SBGN Process Description Level 1 Version 2, SBML Level 3 Core Version 2 Release 2, SBOL Version 2.3.0, and SBOL Visual Version 2.1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Falk Schreiber
- Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
- Faculty of IT, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Björn Sommer
- Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
| | - Gary D. Bader
- The Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Padraig Gleeson
- Department of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Martin Golebiewski
- Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Hucka
- California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - David Nickerson
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Waltemath D, Bergmann FT, Chaouiya C, Czauderna T, Gleeson P, Goble C, Golebiewski M, Hucka M, Juty N, Krebs O, Le Novère N, Mi H, Moraru II, Myers CJ, Nickerson D, Olivier BG, Rodriguez N, Schreiber F, Smith L, Zhang F, Bonnet E. Correction to: Meeting report from the fourth meeting of the Computational Modeling in Biology Network (COMBINE). Stand Genomic Sci 2018; 13:17. [PMID: 30117501 PMCID: PMC6083578 DOI: 10.1186/s40793-018-0320-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.4056/sigs.5279417.].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dagmar Waltemath
- Department of Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Frank T. Bergmann
- Department of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA USA
| | - Claudine Chaouiya
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência - IGC, Rua da Quinta Grande, Oeiras, Portugal
| | | | - Padraig Gleeson
- Department of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Carole Goble
- School of Computer Science, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Michael Hucka
- Department of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA USA
| | - Nick Juty
- EMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
| | - Olga Krebs
- Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nicolas Le Novère
- EMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
- The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Huaiyu Mi
- Department of preventive medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Ion I. Moraru
- Center for Cell Analysis and Modeling, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT USA
| | - Chris J. Myers
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - David Nickerson
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Brett G. Olivier
- Systems Bioinformatics, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Falk Schreiber
- IPK Gatersleben, Gatersleben, Germany
- Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
- Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lucian Smith
- Department of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA USA
| | - Fengkai Zhang
- Computational Biology Unit, Laboratory of Systems Biology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, MD USA
| | - Eric Bonnet
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
- INSERM U900, 75248 Paris, France
- Mines ParisTech, 77300 Fontainebleau, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schreiber F, Bader GD, Gleeson P, Golebiewski M, Hucka M, Keating SM, Novère NL, Myers C, Nickerson D, Sommer B, Waltemath D. Specifications of Standards in Systems and Synthetic Biology: Status and Developments in 2017. J Integr Bioinform 2018; 15:/j/jib.2018.15.issue-1/jib-2018-0013/jib-2018-0013.xml. [PMID: 29596055 PMCID: PMC6167034 DOI: 10.1515/jib-2018-0013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2018] [Revised: 02/08/2018] [Accepted: 02/08/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Standards are essential to the advancement of Systems and Synthetic Biology. COMBINE provides a formal body and a centralised platform to help develop and disseminate relevant standards and related resources. The regular special issue of the Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics aims to support the exchange, distribution and archiving of these standards by providing unified, easily citable access. This paper provides an overview of existing COMBINE standards and presents developments of the last year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Falk Schreiber
- Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
- Faculty of IT, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Gary D. Bader
- The Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Padraig Gleeson
- Department of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Martin Golebiewski
- Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Hucka
- California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - David Nickerson
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Björn Sommer
- Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
- Faculty of IT, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hucka M. SBMLPkgSpec: a LaTeX style file for SBML package specification documents. BMC Res Notes 2017; 10:451. [PMID: 28877760 PMCID: PMC5588604 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-017-2788-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2017] [Accepted: 08/31/2017] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) is a popular open format for storing and exchanging computational models in biology. The definition of SBML is captured in formal specification documents. SBMLPkgSpec is a LaTeX document style intended to fill the need for a standard format for writing such specification documents. RESULTS Specification documents for SBML Level 3 extensions (known as packages in SBML) are made more uniform with the use of a standard template. SBMLPkgSpec is a LaTeX class that provides a document framework for SBML Level 3 package specifications, to simplify the work of document authors while improving the overall quality of the family of SBML specifications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Hucka
- Department of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, California, 91125, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Waltemath D, Karr JR, Bergmann FT, Chelliah V, Hucka M, Krantz M, Liebermeister W, Mendes P, Myers CJ, Pir P, Alaybeyoglu B, Aranganathan NK, Baghalian K, Bittig AT, Burke PEP, Cantarelli M, Chew YH, Costa RS, Cursons J, Czauderna T, Goldberg AP, Gomez HF, Hahn J, Hameri T, Gardiol DFH, Kazakiewicz D, Kiselev I, Knight-Schrijver V, Knupfer C, Konig M, Lee D, Lloret-Villas A, Mandrik N, Medley JK, Moreau B, Naderi-Meshkin H, Palaniappan SK, Priego-Espinosa D, Scharm M, Sharma M, Smallbone K, Stanford NJ, Song JH, Theile T, Tokic M, Tomar N, Toure V, Uhlendorf J, Varusai TM, Watanabe LH, Wendland F, Wolfien M, Yurkovich JT, Zhu Y, Zardilis A, Zhukova A, Schreiber F. Toward Community Standards and Software for Whole-Cell Modeling. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2016; 63:2007-14. [PMID: 27305665 PMCID: PMC5451320 DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2016.2560762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Whole-cell (WC) modeling is a promising tool for biological research, bioengineering, and medicine. However, substantial work remains to create accurate comprehensive models of complex cells. METHODS We organized the 2015 Whole-Cell Modeling Summer School to teach WC modeling and evaluate the need for new WC modeling standards and software by recoding a recently published WC model in the Systems Biology Markup Language. RESULTS Our analysis revealed several challenges to representing WC models using the current standards. CONCLUSION We, therefore, propose several new WC modeling standards, software, and databases. SIGNIFICANCE We anticipate that these new standards and software will enable more comprehensive models.
Collapse
|
11
|
Waltemath D, Wolkenhauer O. How Modeling Standards, Software, and Initiatives Support Reproducibility in Systems Biology and Systems Medicine. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2016; 63:1999-2006. [PMID: 27295645 DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2016.2555481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Only reproducible results are of significance to science. The lack of suitable standards and appropriate support of standards in software tools has led to numerous publications with irreproducible results. Our objectives are to identify the key challenges of reproducible research and to highlight existing solutions. RESULTS In this paper, we summarize problems concerning reproducibility in systems biology and systems medicine. We focus on initiatives, standards, and software tools that aim to improve the reproducibility of simulation studies. CONCLUSIONS The long-term success of systems biology and systems medicine depends on trustworthy models and simulations. This requires openness to ensure reusability and transparency to enable reproducibility of results in these fields.
Collapse
|
12
|
Nickerson D, Atalag K, de Bono B, Geiger J, Goble C, Hollmann S, Lonien J, Müller W, Regierer B, Stanford NJ, Golebiewski M, Hunter P. The Human Physiome: how standards, software and innovative service infrastructures are providing the building blocks to make it achievable. Interface Focus 2016; 6:20150103. [PMID: 27051515 PMCID: PMC4759754 DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2015.0103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Reconstructing and understanding the Human Physiome virtually is a complex mathematical problem, and a highly demanding computational challenge. Mathematical models spanning from the molecular level through to whole populations of individuals must be integrated, then personalized. This requires interoperability with multiple disparate and geographically separated data sources, and myriad computational software tools. Extracting and producing knowledge from such sources, even when the databases and software are readily available, is a challenging task. Despite the difficulties, researchers must frequently perform these tasks so that available knowledge can be continually integrated into the common framework required to realize the Human Physiome. Software and infrastructures that support the communities that generate these, together with their underlying standards to format, describe and interlink the corresponding data and computer models, are pivotal to the Human Physiome being realized. They provide the foundations for integrating, exchanging and re-using data and models efficiently, and correctly, while also supporting the dissemination of growing knowledge in these forms. In this paper, we explore the standards, software tooling, repositories and infrastructures that support this work, and detail what makes them vital to realizing the Human Physiome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Nickerson
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Koray Atalag
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- National Institute for Health Innovation (NIHI), The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Bernard de Bono
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London NW1 2DA, UK
| | - Jörg Geiger
- Interdisciplinary Bank of Biomaterials and Data, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Carole Goble
- School of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Susanne Hollmann
- Research Center Plant Genomics and Systems Biology, Universitat Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
| | | | - Wolfgang Müller
- Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS gGmbH), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Martin Golebiewski
- Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS gGmbH), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Hunter
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Olivier BG, Swat MJ, Moné MJ. Modeling and Simulation Tools: From Systems Biology to Systems Medicine. Methods Mol Biol 2016; 1386:441-63. [PMID: 26677194 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3283-2_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Modeling is an integral component of modern biology. In this chapter we look into the role of the model, as it pertains to Systems Medicine, and the software that is required to instantiate and run it. We do this by comparing the development, implementation, and characteristics of tools that have been developed to work with two divergent methodologies: Systems Biology and Pharmacometrics. From the Systems Biology perspective we consider the concept of "Software as a Medical Device" and what this may imply for the migration of research-oriented, simulation software into the domain of human health.In our second perspective, we see how in practice hundreds of computational tools already accompany drug discovery and development at every stage of the process. Standardized exchange formats are required to streamline the model exchange between tools, which would minimize translation errors and reduce the required time. With the emergence, almost 15 years ago, of the SBML standard, a large part of the domain of interest is already covered and models can be shared and passed from software to software without recoding them. Until recently the last stage of the process, the pharmacometric analysis used in clinical studies carried out on subject populations, lacked such an exchange medium. We describe a new emerging exchange format in Pharmacometrics which covers the non-linear mixed effects models, the standard statistical model type used in this area. By interfacing these two formats the entire domain can be covered by complementary standards and subsequently the according tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brett G Olivier
- Systems Bioinformatics, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Maciej J Swat
- EMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Martijn J Moné
- Molecular Cell Physiology, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Systems and Synthetic Biology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dräger A, Palsson BØ. Improving collaboration by standardization efforts in systems biology. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2014; 2:61. [PMID: 25538939 PMCID: PMC4259112 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2014.00061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2014] [Accepted: 11/14/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Collaborative genome-scale reconstruction endeavors of metabolic networks would not be possible without a common, standardized formal representation of these systems. The ability to precisely define biological building blocks together with their dynamic behavior has even been considered a prerequisite for upcoming synthetic biology approaches. Driven by the requirements of such ambitious research goals, standardization itself has become an active field of research on nearly all levels of granularity in biology. In addition to the originally envisaged exchange of computational models and tool interoperability, new standards have been suggested for an unambiguous graphical display of biological phenomena, to annotate, archive, as well as to rank models, and to describe execution and the outcomes of simulation experiments. The spectrum now even covers the interaction of entire neurons in the brain, three-dimensional motions, and the description of pharmacometric studies. Thereby, the mathematical description of systems and approaches for their (repeated) simulation are clearly separated from each other and also from their graphical representation. Minimum information definitions constitute guidelines and common operation protocols in order to ensure reproducibility of findings and a unified knowledge representation. Central database infrastructures have been established that provide the scientific community with persistent links from model annotations to online resources. A rich variety of open-source software tools thrives for all data formats, often supporting a multitude of programing languages. Regular meetings and workshops of developers and users lead to continuous improvement and ongoing development of these standardization efforts. This article gives a brief overview about the current state of the growing number of operation protocols, mark-up languages, graphical descriptions, and fundamental software support with relevance to systems biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Dräger
- Systems Biology Research Group, Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Cognitive Systems, Center for Bioinformatics Tübingen (ZBIT), Department of Computer Science, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Bernhard Ø. Palsson
- Systems Biology Research Group, Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|