Ankle blood pressure and pulse pressure as predictors of cerebrovascular morbidity and mortality in a prospective follow-up study

Four-Limb Blood Pressure Measurement with an Oscillometric Device: a Tool for Diagnosing Peripheral Vascular Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Traditionally, the term peripheral vascular disease (PAD) is restricted to the occlusive arterial disease in the leg, but now, the connotation of PAD is more widespread as it encompasses all extracoronary and extracerebral vascular disease. The incidence of PAD is increasing worldwide; therefore, it is necessary to diagnose PAD at an early stage.

RECENT FINDINGS

Oscillometric BP device is widely used for four-limb measurement in clinical practice and provides several parameters for evaluating inter-limb BP difference, such as ankle-brachial index (OS-ABI), inter-arm BP differences (IAD), and inter-ankle BP difference (IAND). Using angiographic results as reference, the ABI, IAD, and IAND from an oscillometric BP device have been demonstrated having high accuracy for diagnosis of PAD. Meanwhile, combination of these parameters could further improve the accuracy of PAD, including the occlusive artery disease in the arm, leg, and aorta. For example, some patients with severe PAD in the leg have normal ABI; in this situation, an increased sIAND could confirm the diagnosis of PAD in the leg. Because ABI, IAD, and IAND from inter-limb oscillometric BP measurement can also predict adverse prognosis, we encourage the use of an oscillometric device to measure four-limb BP and to evaluate the inter-limb BP difference.

Valuation of Normal Range of Ankle Systolic Blood Pressure in Subjects with Normal Arm Systolic Blood Pressure

Subject

This study aimed to establish a normal range for ankle systolic blood pressure (SBP).

Methods

A total of 948 subjects who had normal brachial SBP (90-139 mmHg) at investigation were enrolled. Supine BP of four limbs was simultaneously measured using four automatic BP measurement devices. The ankle-arm difference (An-a) on SBP of both sides was calculated. Two methods were used for establishing normal range of ankle SBP: the 99% method was decided on the 99% reference range of actual ankle BP, and the An-a method was the sum of An-a and the low or up limits of normal arm SBP (90–139mmHg).

Results

Whether in the right or left side, the ankle SBP was significantly higher than the arm SBP (right: 137.1±16.9 vs 119.7±11.4 mmHg, P<0.05). Based on the 99% method, the normal range of ankle SBP was 94~181 mmHg for the total population, 84~166 mmHg for the young (18–44 y), 107~176 mmHg for the middle-aged(45–59 y) and 113~179 mmHg for the elderly (≥60y) group. As the An-a on SBP was 13mmHg in the young group and 20mmHg in both middle-aged and elderly groups, the normal range of ankle SBP on the An-a method was 103–153 mmHg for young and 110–160 mmHg for middle-elderly subjects.

Conclusion

A primary reference for normal ankle SBP was suggested as 100-165 mmHg in the young and 110-170 mmHg in the middle-elderly subjects.

The prevalence and influence factors of inter-ankle systolic blood pressure difference in community population

Aim

The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of interankle systolic blood pressure difference (sIAND) and its influencing factors in community population.

Methods

This study included 2849 (65.1±9.4 y) subjects. Blood pressure (BPs) of four limbs was simultaneously measured with 4 electronic sphygmomanometers after 10 min rest in supine position. The difference of systolic BP (SBP) between two ankles was calculated as DETASBP. The criterion for abnormal sIAND was ≥10 mmHg of absolute DeltaSBP, in which the criterion for 1o sIAND was 10–19 mmHg and for 2o sIAND was ≥20 mmHg. Age, gender, smoking, hypertension, family histories of hypertension and diabetes were recorded. Fasting blood glucose and lipids, circumference of hip and waist, and body mass index (BMI) were measured.

Results

The SBP was higher in the right ankle than in the left ankle (158.9±21.8 vs 157.3±21.6 mmHg, P<0.05) and mean DeltaSBP was 6.08±6.26 mmHg. Similar difference was found in both genders. The prevalence of abnormal was 18.5%, in which, the prevalence 1o sIAND was 15.3% and that of 2o sIAND was 3.1%. Multivariate regression analysis showed that age, waist circumference and blood glucose level were the positive factors for DeltaSBP. The normal upper limit for DeltaSBP was 16.7 mmHg in this population, the prevalence of sIAND by≥16 mmHg was 5.8%.

Conclusion

Aging, hypertension, obesity and abnormal glucose metabolism are positive factors for inter-ankle SBP difference.