Epidemiology and Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis in Korea

Standardized mortality ratios in systemic sclerosis: a meta-analysis assessing overall and sex- and disease subtype-specific differences

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the overall and sex- and illness subtype-specific standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).

METHODS

We searched and examined studies that compared the overall and sex- and illness subtype-specific SMRs in patients with SSc to those in the general population using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases (until May 2023). We then conducted a meta-analysis of the overall and sex- and illness subtype-specific SMRs in patients with SSc.

RESULTS

Overall, 29 studies including 30,673 patients with SSc and 5582 deaths met the inclusion criteria. Patients with SSc had a higher overall SMR than that in the general population (SMR: 2.742, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.224-3.38091, p < 0.001). The SMR significantly increased in populations from Europe, North America, Asia, and Oceania according to regional stratification. A sex-specific meta-analysis revealed a substantial increase in the SMR in both men and women (SMR: 3.598, 95% CI: 3.097-4.180, p < 0.001; SMR: 2.833, 95% CI: 2.4384-3.292, p < 0.001, respectively) and the mortality rate was higher in men compared to women. A substantial increase in the SMR in diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) and limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) was observed in a disease subtype-specific meta-analysis. In addition, the SMR in the dcSSc group was higher than that in the lcSSc group (SMR: 4.726, 95% CI: 3.795-5.885, p < 0.001; SMR: 1.987, 95% CI: 1.586-2.489, p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrated that the mortality rate in patients with SSc was 2.74-times greater than that in the general population. The mortality rate was higher in men compared to women. Additionally, compared to patients with lcSSc, those with dcSSc showed much higher fatality rates.

Association between systemic sclerosis and venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, and deep vein thrombosis: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyze the published data pertaining to the correlation between venous thromboembolism (VTE) and systemic sclerosis (SSc).

METHODS

We conducted manual searches and explored MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases to review papers reporting the risk of VTE in patients with SSc. A meta-analysis was performed exploring the relative risks (RRs) of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and VTE in these individuals.

RESULTS

Six trials that included 41,105 patients with SSc were eligible for inclusion. A meta-analysis of the six included studies revealed a statistically significant correlation (RR 2.372, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.608-3.500, p < 0.001) between the risk of VTE and SSc. Regional subgroup study revealed a strong correlation between SSc and VTE risk in Americans, Europeans, and Asians. Additionally, a significant correlation between SSc and PE risk was observed (RR 3.154, 95% CI = 1.320-7.539, p = 0.010). Finally, the meta-analysis revealed a substantial correlation (RR 5.190, 95% CI = 1.513-17.01, p = 0.009) between the risk of DVT and SSc.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis showed that SSc is linked to an increased risk of DVT, PE, and VTE. This finding underscores the importance of close monitoring for the emergence of these conditions in patients with SSc.

Systemic sclerosis is a risk factor of incident psoriasis: results from a nationwide cohort study

Objective

Although the co-existence of systemic sclerosis (SSc) and psoriasis (PsO) has been reported, the risk relationship between the two diseases remains unclear. We aimed to assess whether SSc is associated with the risk of incident PsO.

Methods

From the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, 4,933 patients with SSc and 24,665 age- and sex-matched controls were selected. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for incident PsO were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for known risk factors of PsO. Further, we selected individuals whose health check-up data were available (2,355 patients with SSc and 11,775 age- and sex-matched controls). In this population, we further adjusted for additional risk factors of PsO using the health check-up data.

Results

In the analysis of 4,933 patients with SSc and 24,665 age- and sex-matched controls, incidence rates of PsO in patients with SSc and controls were 10.26 and 3.20 per 1,000 person-years, respectively. After adjusting for risk factors of PsO, patients with SSc had a significantly higher risk of incident PsO (adjusted HR: 3.055 [95% CI: 2.597, 3.594]). Moreover, in the analysis of individuals who had health check-up data, additional risk factors of PsO were further adjusted; the result also showed that patients with SSc have a significantly higher risk of incident PsO (adjusted HR: 2.820 [95% CI: 2.207, 3.603]).

Conclusion

Patients with SSc had a 3-fold higher risk of developing incident PsO than controls, independent of known risk factors of PsO.