Non-osteotomy and osteotomy large animal fracture models in orthopedic trauma research

Validation of a novel large animal intra-articular tibial plafond fracture model

BACKGROUND

Large animal fracture models that allow for anatomic fracture fixation are currently lacking. It was hypothesized that a compressed air impaction system can generate a reproducible tibial plafond fracture and be adjustable to create fractures consistent with high and low energy fractures seen in humans.

METHODS

Pilot testing of the impaction system was done by impacting polyurethane foam blocks at varying compressed air pressures. A guillotine impaction test was performed on the same foam blocks to create an energy conversion. A total of 12 porcine hindlimb hindlimbs were subjected to low-energy (42.2 J) and high-energy (73.9 J) impact to create tibial plafond fractures.

FINDINGS

Guillotine impaction test demonstrated strong correlations between potential energy and foam block impaction depth (R² = 0.99). Compressed air impaction system test strongly correlated with foam block impaction depth (R² = 0.99). All six porcine hindlimbs in the low-energy group developed simple coronal split tibial plafond fractures. All six porcine hindlimbs in the high-energy group developed complex, multi-fragmentary tibial plafond fractures.

INTERPRETATION

This porcine fracture model created tibial plafond fracture patterns with similar fracture morphology as human patients without violation of the soft tissue structures or adjacent joints. This model would allow for anatomic fixation, the study of post-traumatic osteoarthritis, or the delivery of locally targeted therapeutics to the ankle joint.

Biomechanical duality of fracture healing captured using virtual mechanical testing and validated in ovine bones

Bone fractures commonly repair by forming a bridging structure called callus, which begins as soft tissue and gradually ossifies to restore rigidity to the bone. Virtual mechanical testing is a promising technique for image-based assessment of structural bone healing in both preclinical and clinical settings, but its accuracy depends on the validity of the material model used to assign tissue mechanical properties. The goal of this study was to develop a constitutive model for callus that captures the heterogeneity and biomechanical duality of the callus, which contains both soft tissue and woven bone. To achieve this, a large-scale optimization analysis was performed on 2363 variations of 3D finite element models derived from computed tomography (CT) scans of 33 osteotomized sheep under normal and delayed healing conditions. A piecewise material model was identified that produced high absolute agreement between virtual and physical tests by differentiating between soft and hard callus based on radiodensity. The results showed that the structural integrity of a healing long bone is conferred by an internal architecture of mineralized hard callus that is supported by interstitial soft tissue. These findings suggest that with appropriate material modeling, virtual mechanical testing is a reliable surrogate for physical biomechanical testing.

Magnesium-based materials in orthopaedics: material properties and animal models

As a new generation of medical metal materials, degradable magnesium-based materials have excellent mechanical properties and osteogenic promoting ability, making them promising materials for the treatment of refractory bone diseases. Animal models can be used to understand and evaluate the performance of materials in complex physiological environments, providing relevant data for preclinical evaluation of implants and laying the foundation for subsequent clinical studies. To date, many researchers have studied the biocompatibility, degradability and osteogenesis of magnesium-based materials, but there is a lack of review regarding the effects of magnesium-based materials in vivo. In view of the growing interest in these materials, this review briefly describes the properties of magnesium-based materials and focuses on the safety and efficacy of magnesium-based materials in vivo. Various animal models including rats, rabbits, dogs and pigs are covered to better understand and evaluate the progress and future of magnesium-based materials. This literature analysis reveals that the magnesium-based materials have good biocompatibility and osteogenic activity, thus causing no adverse reaction around the implants in vivo, and that they exhibit a beneficial effect in the process of bone repair. In addition, the degradation rate in vivo can also be improved by means of alloying and coating. These encouraging results show a promising future for the use of magnesium-based materials in musculoskeletal disorders.

Fracture Healing Research-Shift towards In Vitro Modeling?

Fractures are one of the most frequently occurring traumatic events worldwide. Approximately 10% of fractures lead to bone healing disorders, resulting in strain for affected patients and enormous costs for society. In order to shed light into underlying mechanisms of bone regeneration (habitual or disturbed), and to develop new therapeutic strategies, various in vivo, ex vivo and in vitro models can be applied. Undeniably, in vivo models include the systemic and biological situation. However, transferability towards the human patient along with ethical concerns regarding in vivo models have to be considered. Fostered by enormous technical improvements, such as bioreactors, on-a-chip-technologies and bone tissue engineering, sophisticated in vitro models are of rising interest. These models offer the possibility to use human cells from individual donors, complex cell systems and 3D models, therefore bridging the transferability gap, providing a platform for the introduction of personalized precision medicine and finally sparing animals. Facing diverse processes during fracture healing and thus various scientific opportunities, the reliability of results oftentimes depends on the choice of an appropriate model. Hence, we here focus on categorizing available models with respect to the requirements of the scientific approach.

Genetic variation in mice affects closed femoral fracture pattern outcomes

The purpose of this study was to determine whether differences in structural and material properties of bone between different mouse strains influence the fracture patterns produced under experimental fracture conditions. Femurs of C57BL/6 (B6), C3H/HeJ (C3H), and DBA/2 (DBA) strains were evaluated using micro-computed tomography (μCT), measurements derived from radiographic images and mechanical testing to determine differences in the geometry and mechanical properties. A fracture device was used to create femoral fractures on freshly sacrificed animals using a range of kinetic energies (∼20-80mJ) which were classified as transverse, oblique, or comminuted. B6 femurs had the lowest bone volume/total volume (BV/TV) and bone mineral density (BMD), thinnest cortex, and had the most variable fracture patterns, with 77.5% transverse, 15% oblique, and 7.5% comminuted fractures. In contrast, C3H had the highest BV/TV, BMD, and thickest cortices, resulting in 97.5% transverse, 2.5% oblique, and 0% comminuted fractures. DBA had an intermediate BV/TV and thickness of cortices, with BMD similar to C3H, resulting in 92.9% transverse, 7.1% oblique, and 0% comminuted fractures. A binomial logistic regression confirmed that bone morphometry was the single strongest predictor of the resulting fracture pattern. This study demonstrated that the reproducibility of closed transverse femoral fractures was most influenced by the structural and material properties of the bone characteristics in each strain, rather than the kinetic energy or body weight of the mice. This was evidenced through geometric analysis of X-ray and μCT data, and further supported by the bone mineral density measurements from each strain, derived from μCT. Furthermore, this study also demonstrated that the use of lower kinetic energies was more than sufficient to reproducibly create transverse fractures, and to avoid severe tissue trauma. The creation of reproducible fracture patterns is important as this often dictates the outcomes of fracture healing, and those studies that do not control this potential variability could lead to a false interpretation of the results.

The Generation of Closed Femoral Fractures in Mice: A Model to Study Bone Healing

Bone fractures impose a tremendous socio-economic burden on patients, in addition to significantly affecting their quality of life. Therapeutic strategies that promote efficient bone healing are non-existent and in high demand. Effective and reproducible animal models of fractures healing are needed to understand the complex biological processes associated with bone regeneration. Many animal models of fracture healing have been generated over the years; however, murine fracture models have recently emerged as powerful tools to study bone healing. A variety of open and closed models have been developed, but the closed femoral fracture model stands out as a simple method for generating rapid and reproducible results in a physiologically relevant manner. The goal of this surgical protocol is to generate unilateral closed femoral fractures in mice and facilitate a post-fracture stabilization of the femur by inserting an intramedullary steel rod. Although devices such as a nail or a screw offer greater axial and rotational stability, the use of an intramedullary rod provides a sufficient stabilization for consistent healing outcomes without producing new defects in the bone tissue or damaging nearby soft tissue. Radiographic imaging is used to monitor the progression of callus formation, bony union, and subsequent remodeling of the bony callus. Bone healing outcomes are typically associated with the strength of the healed bone and measured with torsional testing. Still, understanding the early cellular and molecular events associated with fracture repair is critical in the study of bone tissue regeneration. The closed femoral fracture model in mice with intramedullary fixation serves as an attractive platform to study bone fracture healing and evaluate therapeutic strategies to accelerate healing.

The Sheep Grimace Scale as an indicator of post-operative distress and pain in laboratory sheep

The EU Directive 2010/63/EU changed the requirements regarding the use of laboratory animals and raised important issues related to assessing the severity of all procedures undertaken on laboratory animals. However, quantifiable parameters to assess severity are rare, and improved assessment strategies need to be developed. Hence, a Sheep Grimace Scale (SGS) was herein established by observing and interpreting sheep facial expressions as a consequence of pain and distress following unilateral tibia osteotomy. The animals were clinically investigated and scored five days before surgery and at 1, 3, 7, 10, 14 and 17 days afterwards. Additionally, cortisol levels in the saliva of the sheep were determined at the respective time points. For the SGS, video recording was performed, and pictures of the sheep were randomized and scored by blinded observers. Osteotomy in sheep resulted in an increased clinical severity score from days 1 to 17 post-surgery and elevated salivary cortisol levels one day post-surgery. An analysis of facial expressions revealed a significantly increased SGS on the day of surgery until day 3 post-surgery; this elevated level was sustained until day 17. Clinical severity and SGS scores correlated positively with a Pearson´s correlation coefficient of 0.47. Further investigations regarding the applicability of the SGS revealed a high inter-observer reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.92 and an accuracy of 68.2%. In conclusion, the SGS represents a valuable approach for severity assessment that may help support and refine a widely used welfare assessment for sheep during experimental procedures, thereby meeting legislation requirements and minimizing the occurrence of unrecognized distress in animal experimentation.