Iron Toxicity and Hemopoietic Cell Transplantation: Time to Change the Paradigm

Busulfan-Based and Treosulfan-Based Myeloablative Conditioning for Allogeneic Transplantation in Children with Thalassemia Major: a Single-Center Experience From Southern Turkey

OBJECTIVES

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant is the only curative treatment for patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia major. In recent years, a number of novel approaches have improved patient outcomes and quality of life by minimizing the toxicity of conditioning regimens. The objective of this study was to compare the role of treosulfan- and busulfan-based conditioning in transfusion-dependent thalassemia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively on 121 children with beta thalassemia major who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplant using treosulfan-based (n = 37) or busulfan-based (n = 84) conditioning regimens between 2012 and 2022.

RESULTS

Two-year overall survival was 87.5% in the busulfan-based conditioning group and 91.1% in the treosulfan-based conditioning group.The group given the busulfan regimen compared with treosulfan regimen had significantly increased number of side effects (58.3% vs 21.6%, respectively; P < .001). When the busulfan-based regimen by level was evaluated, we observed no significant differences between the frequency of side effects according to drug serum levels. In addition, no significant differences were shown between the 2 regimen groups for cumulative incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety and effectiveness of a treosulfan-based myeloablative conditioning regimen has been confirmed by ourretrospective investigation of pediatric patients with beta thalassemia.

Impact of iron overload in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Iron overload (IOL) is a common condition in patients with hematological malignancies(HMs) undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Pathophysiologically, IOL results in iron-induced toxicity in HSCT by producing reactive oxygen species (ROS), which leads to detrimental effects on hematopoiesis, clonal evolution, and immunosuppression. IOL, therefore, may have a negative impact on the clinical outcomes of HSCT. For patients at a higher risk of developing IOL before HSCT, it is necessary to monitor red blood cell transfusion units, serum ferritin (SF) levels and MRI image of organs, and initiate iron removal therapy as soon as possible. Iron chelating therapy (ICT) might be safe and efficient in the post-HSCT period. We provide an overview of results from experimental and clinical evidence on the current understanding of IOL in patients with HMs undergoing HSCT, involving the underlying pathophysiological and clinical impact of IOL, as well as the significance of iron reduction therapy.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in children receiving haematopoietic cell transplantation and immune effector cell therapy: an international and multidisciplinary consensus statement

Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in children receiving haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and immune effector cell therapy is controversial and evidence-based guidelines have not been established. Remarkable advancements in HCT and immune effector cell therapies have changed expectations around reversibility of organ dysfunction and survival for affected patients. Herein, members of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO), Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) Network (HCT and cancer immunotherapy subgroup), the Pediatric Diseases Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), the supportive care committee of the Pediatric Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Consortium (PTCTC), and the Pediatric Intensive Care Oncology Kids in Europe Research (POKER) group of the European Society of Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) provide consensus recommendations on the use of ECMO in children receiving HCT and immune effector cell therapy. These are the first international, multidisciplinary consensus-based recommendations on the use of ECMO in this patient population. This Review provides a clinical decision support tool for paediatric haematologists, oncologists, and critical care physicians during the difficult decision-making process of ECMO candidacy and management. These recommendations can represent a base for future research studies focused on ECMO selection criteria and bedside management.

Beta Thalassemia: New Therapeutic Options Beyond Transfusion and Iron Chelation

Hemoglobinopathies are among the most common monogenic diseases worldwide. Approximately 1–5% of the global population are carriers for a genetic thalassemia mutation. The thalassemias are characterized by autosomal recessive inherited defects in the production of hemoglobin. They are highly prevalent in the Mediterranean, Middle East, Indian subcontinent, and East and Southeast Asia. Due to recent migrations, however, the thalassemias are now becoming more common in Europe and North America, making this disease a global health concern. Currently available conventional therapies in thalassemia have many challenges and limitations. A better understanding of the pathophysiology of β-thalassemia in addition to key developments in optimizing transfusion programs and iron-chelation therapy has led to an increase in the life span of thalassemia patients and paved the way for new therapeutic strategies. These can be classified into three categories based on their efforts to address different features of the underlying pathophysiology of β-thalassemia: correction of the globin chain imbalance, addressing ineffective erythropoiesis, and improving iron overload. In this review, we provide an overview of the novel therapeutic approaches that are currently in development for β-thalassemia.

The effect of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell co-transplantation with hematopoietic stem cells on liver fibrosis alleviation and survival in patients with class III β-thalassemia major

Background

Hepatic fibrosis is a common complication in transfusion-dependent thalassemia patients. Data on the co-transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) with hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in beta-thalassemia major patients are scarce. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effect of co-transplantation of bone marrow-derived MSC with HSCs on the liver fibrosis alleviation and transplant outcomes in class III beta-thalassemia major.

Methods

Between April 1998 and January 2017, a total of 224 consecutive patients with class III beta-thalassemia major underwent allogeneic HSCT in the Research Institute for Oncology, Hematology and Cell Therapy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. To assess liver fibrotic changes after transplantation, 47 patients participated in the MSC plus HSC group and 30 patients in the HSC only group at the end of the follow-up period. All patients underwent laboratory tests, especially serum ferritin and liver function testing, hepatic T2* MRI, liver biopsy, and FibroScan before and 2 years after transplantation. Kaplan-Meier curves were derived to determine survival and were compared using the log-rank test. Repeated-measure, mixed-effect linear regression models were used to examine the changes in liver fibrosis over time.

Results

The 10-year OS rate was 71.84% in the mesenchymal group and 61.89% in the non-mesenchymal group (P value = 0.294), while the 10-year TFS rate was 63.64% in the mesenchymal group and 52.78% in the non-mesenchymal group (P value = 0.285). No significant difference was observed in the 10-year NRM, rejection rate, ANC engraftment, platelet engraftment, acute GvHD, and chronic GvHD between the two groups. In addition, the results of repeated-measure, mixed-effect linear regression models showed that none of the variables determining hepatic fibrosis had a significant difference between patients receiving MSCs and patients who did not receive MSCs.

Conclusions

Based on the results of this study, a single infusion of MSCs at the time of HSCT to patients with class III beta-thalassemia major could not significantly improve the liver fibrosis alleviation and transplantation outcomes, including OS, TFS, TRM, rejection rate, ANC engraftment, platelet engraftment, acute GvHD, and chronic GvHD.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13287-021-02242-8.

Novel genetic therapeutic approaches for modulating the severity of β-thalassemia (Review)

Thalassemia is a genetic haematological disorder that arises due to defects in the α and β-globin genes. Worldwide, 0.3-0.4 million children are born with haemoglobinopathies per year. Thalassemic patients, as well as their families, face various serious clinical, socio-economic, and psychosocial challenges throughout their life. Different therapies are available in clinical practice to minimize the suffering of thalassemic patients to some extent and potentially cure the disease. Predominantly, patients undergo transfusion therapy to maintain their haemoglobin levels. Due to multiple transfusions, the iron levels in their bodies are elevated. Iron overload results in damage to body organs, resulting in heart failure, liver function failure or endocrine failure, all of which are commonly observed. Certain drugs have been developed to enhance the expression of the γ-gene, which ultimately results in augmentation of fetal haemoglobin (HbF) levels and total haemoglobin levels in the body. However, its effectiveness is dependent on the genetic makeup of the individual patient. At present, allogeneic haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) is the only practically available option with a high curative rate. However, the outcome of HSCT is strongly influenced by factors such as age at transplantation, irregular iron chelation history before transplantation, histocompatibility, and source of stem cells. Gene therapy using the lentiglobin vector is the most recent method for cure without any mortality, graft rejection and clonal dominance issues. However, delayed platelet engraftment is being reported in some patients. Genome editing is a novel approach which may be used to treat patients with thalassemia; it makes use of targeted nucleases to correct the mutations in specific DNA sequences and modify the sequence to the normal wild-type sequence. To edit the genome at the required sites, CRISPR/Cas9 is an efficient and accurate tool that is used in various genetic engineering programs. Genome editing mediated by CRISPR/Cas9 has the ability to restore the normal β-globin function with minimal side effects. Using CRISPR/Cas9, expression of BCL11A can be downregulated along with increased production of HbF. However, these genome editing tools are still under in-vitro trials. CRISPR/Cas9 has can be used for precise transcriptional regulation, genome modification and epigenetic editing. Additional research is required in this regard, as CRISPR/Cas9 may potentially exhibit off-target activity and there are legal and ethical considerations regarding its use.

Controversies on the Consequences of Iron Overload and Chelation in MDS

Many patients with MDS are prone to develop systemic and tissue iron overload in part as a consequence of disease-immanent ineffective erythropoiesis. However, chronic red blood cell transfusions, which are part of the supportive care regimen to correct anemia, are the major source of iron overload in MDS. Increased systemic iron levels eventually lead to the saturation of the physiological systemic iron carrier transferrin and the occurrence of non-transferrin-bound iron (NTBI) together with its reactive fraction, the labile plasma iron (LPI). NTBI/LPI-mediated toxicity and tissue iron overload may exert multiple detrimental effects that contribute to the pathogenesis, complications and eventually evolution of MDS. Until recently, the evidence supporting the use of iron chelation in MDS was based on anecdotal reports, uncontrolled clinical trials or prospective registries. Despite not fully conclusive, these and more recent studies, including the TELESTO trial, unravel an overall adverse action of iron overload and therapeutic benefit of chelation, ranging from improved hematological outcome, reduced transfusion dependence and superior survival of iron-loaded MDS patients. The still limited and somehow controversial experimental and clinical data available from preclinical studies and randomized trials highlight the need for further investigation to fully elucidate the mechanisms underlying the pathological impact of iron overload-mediated toxicity as well as the effect of classic and novel iron restriction approaches in MDS. This review aims at providing an overview of the current clinical and translational debated landscape about the consequences of iron overload and chelation in the setting of MDS.

The History of Deferiprone (L1) and the Paradigm of the Complete Treatment of Iron Overload in Thalassaemia

Deferiprone (L1) was originally designed, synthesised and screened in vitro and in vivo in 1981 by Kontoghiorghes G. J. following his discovery of the novel alpha-ketohydroxypyridine class of iron chelators (1978–1981), which were intended for clinical use. The journey through the years for the treatment of thalassaemia with L1 has been a very difficult one with an intriguing turn of events, which continue until today. Despite many complications, such as the extensive use of L1 suboptimal dose protocols, the aim of chelation therapy-namely, the complete removal of excess iron in thalassaemia major patients, has been achieved in most cases following the introduction of specific L1 and L1/deferoxamine combinations. Many such patients continue to maintain normal iron stores. Thalassemia has changed from a fatal to chronic disease; also thanks to L1 therapy and thalassaemia patients are active professional members in all sectors of society, have their own families with children and grandchildren and their lifespan is approaching that of normal individuals. No changes in the low toxicity profile of L1 have been observed in more than 30 years of clinical use and prophylaxis against the low incidence of agranulocytosis is maintained using mandatory monitoring of weekly white blood cells’ count. Thousands of thalassaemia patients are still denied the cardioprotective and other beneficial effects of L1 therapy. The safety of L1 in thalassaemia and other non-iron loaded diseases resulted in its selection as one of the leading therapeutics for the treatment of Friedreich’s ataxia, pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration and other similar cases. There are also increasing prospects for the application of L1 as a main, alternative or adjuvant therapy in many pathological conditions including cancer, infectious diseases and as a general antioxidant for diseases related to free radical pathology.

Curing Hemoglobinopathies: Challenges and Advances of Conventional and New Gene Therapy Approaches

Inherited hemoglobin disorders, including beta-thalassemia (BT) and sickle-cell disease (SCD), are the most common monogenic diseases worldwide, with a global carrier frequency of over 5%.1 With migration, they are becoming more common worldwide, making their management and care an increasing concern for health care systems.

BT is characterized by an imbalance in the α/β-globin chain ratio, ineffective erythropoiesis, chronic hemolytic anemia, and compensatory hemopoietic expansion.1 Globally, there are over 25,000 births each year with transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT). The currently available treatment for TDT is lifelong transfusions and iron chelation therapy or allogenic bone marrow transplantation as a curative option. SCD affects 300 million people worldwide2 and severely impacts the quality of life of patients who experience unpredictable, recurrent acute and chronic severe pain, stroke, infections, pulmonary disease, kidney disease, retinopathy, and other complications. While survival has been dramatically extended, quality of life is markedly reduced by disease- and treatment-associated morbidity.

The development of safe, tissue-specific and efficient vectors, and efficient gene-editing technologies have led to the development of several gene therapy trials for BT and SCD. However, the complexity of the approach presents its hurdles. Fundamental factors at play include the requirement for myeloablation on a patient with benign disease, the age of the patient, and the consequent bone marrow microenvironment. A successful path from proof-ofconcept studies to commercialization must render gene therapy a sustainable and accessible approach for a large number of patients. Furthermore, the cost of these therapies is a considerable challenge for the health care system. While new promising therapeutic options are emerging,3,4 and many others are on the pipeline,5 gene therapy can potentially cure patients. We herein provide an overview of the most recent, likely potentially curative therapies for hemoglobinopathies and a summary of the challenges that these approaches entail.