Volitional Preemptive Abdominal Contraction and Upper Extremity Muscle Latencies During D1 Flexion and Scaption Shoulder Exercises

Voluntary Contraction of the Abdominal Muscles During Shoulder Exercises Increases Scapular Muscle Activation: A Critically Appraised Topic

CLINICAL SCENARIO

The fascial relationship between scapular muscles and abdominal muscles has been documented from previous studies. However, it is not yet clear whether voluntary abdominal contraction has a beneficial effect on scapular muscle activity during shoulder exercises.

CLINICAL QUESTION

Do scapulothoracic muscle activation levels increase if shoulder exercises are performed with voluntary abdominal activation? Summary of Key Finding: After the literature review, 4 cross-sectional studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this critically appraised topic.

CLINICAL BOTTOM LINE

There is moderate evidence to support dynamic shoulder exercises with voluntary abdominal contraction can increase trapezius and serratus anterior muscle activation level in asymptomatic shoulders. Strength and Recommendation: Findings from 4 cross-sectional trials indicate that there is moderate evidence supporting that dynamic shoulder exercises performed with voluntary abdominal contraction can increase scapular muscle activity.

Feedforward co-activation of trunk muscles during rapid shoulder movements

Background

Shoulder movements that involve unilateral and bilateral flexion, extension, abduction, and asymmetrical flexion-extension cause the activity of trunk muscles. There has not been a fixed consensus on the onset of deep trunk muscle activities including the psoas major (PM), quadratus lumborum (QL), transversus abdominis (TrA), and lumbar multifidus (MF) during shoulder movements. The purpose of this study was to measure the onset of electromyographic activity of the deep trunk muscles during rapid shoulder movements and clarify the coordinated activity pattern of the deep trunk muscles during 11 shoulder movements.

Methods

Thirteen men participated in this study. The onset of activity of the right deep trunk muscles (PM, QL, TrA, and MF) were measured using fine-wire electrodes, and those of the right and left deltoid (anterior, middle, and posterior) and right superficial trunk muscles (rectus abdominis, external oblique [EO], and internal oblique [IO]) were measured using surface electrodes as participants performed 6 types of unilateral, 3 types of bilateral, and 2 types of asymmetrical rapid shoulder movements. We defined feedforward activation as the onset of activity of trunk muscle before or within +50 ms onset of the deltoid muscle and feedback activation as that after +50 ms. A 1-way analysis of variance was performed to compare the onset of activity of each muscle during each shoulder movement.

Results

The mean onset of activity of the PM (26.0 ms), QL (13.1 ms), TrA (−19.7 ms), and MF (20.4 ms) muscles demonstrated feedforward activation during left shoulder flexion. The onset of activity of the TrA (1.6-48.7 ms), rectus abdominis (−1.7 to 17.3 ms), and EO (5.6–40.8 ms) muscles demonstrated feedforward activation during left, right, and bilateral shoulder extension. The onset of activity of the PM (22.9 ms), QL (23.0 ms), TrA (18.9 ms), and EO (15.4 ms) demonstrated feedforward activation during left shoulder abduction, while that of the IO (4.4–10.9 ms) only demonstrated feedforward activation during right and bilateral shoulder abduction. The onset of activity of the TrA (−27.6 ms) and IO (−23.9 ms) demonstrated feedforward activation during left shoulder flexion-right shoulder extension, and that of the MF (33.4 ms) and EO (−17.2 ms), during left shoulder extension-right shoulder flexion.

Conclusion

Rapid shoulder movements occur with coordinated muscle activation of the deep trunk muscles depending on the direction of shoulder movements. Feedforward activation of single or combined deep trunk muscles may facilitate rapid shoulder movements.

Effect of conscious abdominal contraction on the activation of periscapular muscles in individuals with subacromial pain syndrome

BACKGROUND

Synergism between shoulder and trunk muscles seems to be effective to increase periscapular muscle activation in asymptomatic subjects. The influence of conscious contraction of the abdominal muscles has not yet been studied in non-athlete subjects with pain. The study aimed to investigate the effect of the instruction for conscious activation of the abdominal muscles on the activity of the scapulothoracic muscles during shoulder exercises in subjects with subacromial pain syndrome.

METHOD

Thirty subjects with unilateral pain (mean age 52 ± 11 years) participated in this study. Three isometric and five dynamic exercises for the scapulothoracic muscles were assessed. The group without instruction just repeated the exercises, while the instruction group was evaluated before and after conscious abdominal training. The linear mixed model analysis was used to compare the muscle activation between groups.

FINDINGS

Differences between groups after the conscious abdominal contraction for activation of middle and lower trapezius on the symptomatic side in the "Full can"(p = 0.03; effect size:0.92 middle trapezius); (p = 0.02; effect size:0.96 lower trapezius) and "Knee Push" (p = 0.01; effect size:0.75 lower trapezius). For asymptomatic side, the exercises "External Rotation Kneeling" (p = 0.04; effect size: 0.81 lower trapezius); (p = 0.00; effect size: 2.09 serratus anterior), "Knee Push" (p = 0.04; effect size:1.24 serratus anterior) and "Wall Slide" (p = 0.01; effect size: 1.03 serratus anterior).

INTERPRETATION

Conscious contraction of the abdominal muscle immediately alter the activation of the serratus anterior muscle during closed kinetic chain exercises on the asymptomatic side and increased activation of trapezius on the symptomatic side during shoulder open kinetic chain exercise.

Effects of Volitional Spine Stabilization on Trunk Control During Asymmetric Lifting Task in Patients With Recurrent Low Back Pain

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, concurrent-cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of volitional preemptive abdominal contraction (VPAC) on trunk control during an asymmetric lift in patients with recurrent low back pain (rLBP) and compare with matched controls.

METHODS

Thirty-two rLBP patients and 37 healthy controls performed asymmetric lifting with and without VPAC. Trunk, pelvis, and hip biomechanical along with neuromuscular activity parameters were obtained using 3-dimensional motion capture and electromyography system. Hypotheses were tested using analysis of variance.

RESULTS

The VPAC resulted in significantly reduced muscle activity across all trunk extensor muscles in both groups (M ± SD, 6.4% ± 8.2% of maximum contraction; P ≤ .005), and reduced trunk side flexion (1.4° ± 5.1° smaller; P ≤ .005) and hip abduction (8.1° ± 21.1° smaller; P ≤ .003). rLBP patients exhibited reduced muscle activity in external oblique (12.3% ± 5.5% of maximum contraction; P ≤ .012), as well as decreased hip flexion (4.7°, P ≤ .008) and hip abduction (5.2°, P ≤ .001) at the final position of lifting in comparison with healthy controls.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study defend the recommendation that the use of a VPAC increase spine stability during an asymmetrical loading task. Our results provide an indication that a VPAC strategy that is achieved during an asymmetric lifting decreases exposure for lumbar spine injury and instability. Spine care providers and ergonomists can use this information when designing neuromuscular control training programs, both for healthy individuals aimed at prevention of injury, as well as those with a history of rLBP, aimed at full functional recovery and protection from future injury.

Do surface electrodes validly represent lower trapezius activation patterns during shoulder tasks?

Because of its superficial location, surface electrodes are commonly used to record lower trapezius activity. Recent evidence, however, would suggest that surface electromyography is not a valid to record activity from other superficially placed shoulder muscles. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the validity of using surface electrodes to record lower trapezius activity. Ten asymptomatic subjects performed ramped isometric (0-100% maximum load) and dynamic (70% maximum load) shoulder tasks. Intramuscular electrodes were inserted into lower trapezius and rhomboid major. Surface electrodes were placed over lower trapezius around the intramuscular electrodes. Differences in the recorded activity of lower trapezius between surface and intramuscular electrodes were tested using a 2 factor repeated measures analysis of variance with factors: test and electrode type. Similarity in the recorded activity patterns between the two electrodes was tested using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r). Results indicated that there was no difference in lower trapezius activity levels (p = 0.98) or activation patterns (r ≥ 0.74) recorded by the intramuscular and surface electrodes. The results of this study indicate that any potential crosstalk contamination in the surface electrode signal is having little influence on the recorded activity from lower trapezius and therefore, support the common practice of surface electromyography to investigate lower trapezius function.