Acute Responses of Strength and Running Mechanics to Increasing and Decreasing Pain in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain

Kinematic and Kinetic Gait Characteristics in People with Patellofemoral Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a prevalent knee condition with many proposed biomechanically orientated etiological factors and treatments.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to systematically review and synthesize the evidence for biomechanical variables (spatiotemporal, kinematic, kinetic) during walking and running in people with PFP compared with pain-free controls, and determine if biomechanical variables contribute to the development of PFP.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

We searched Medline, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to October 2021.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

All study designs (prospective, case-control [± interventional component, provided pre-intervention data were reported for both groups], cross-sectional) comparing spatiotemporal, kinematic, and/or kinetic variables during walking and/or running between people with and without PFP.

RESULTS

We identified 55 studies involving 1300 people with PFP and 1393 pain-free controls. Overall pooled analysis identified that people with PFP had slower gait velocity [moderate evidence, standardized mean difference (SMD) - 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 0.72, - 0.27], lower cadence (limited evidence, SMD - 0.43, 95% CI - 0.74, - 0.12), and shorter stride length (limited evidence, SMD - 0.46, 95% CI - 0.80, - 0.12). People with PFP also had greater peak contralateral pelvic drop (moderate evidence, SMD - 0.46, 95% CI - 0.90, - 0.03), smaller peak knee flexion angles (moderate evidence, SMD - 0.30, 95% CI - 0.52, - 0.08), and smaller peak knee extension moments (limited evidence, SMD - 0.41, 95% CI - 0.75, - 0.07) compared with controls. Females with PFP had greater peak hip flexion (moderate evidence, SMD 0.83, 95% CI 0.30, 1.36) and rearfoot eversion (limited evidence, SMD 0.59, 95% CI 0.03, 1.14) angles compared to pain-free females. No significant between-group differences were identified for all other biomechanical variables. Data pooling was not possible for prospective studies.

CONCLUSION

A limited number of biomechanical differences exist when comparing people with and without PFP, mostly characterized by small-to-moderate effect sizes. People with PFP ambulate slower, with lower cadence and a shortened stride length, greater contralateral pelvic drop, and lower knee flexion angles and knee extension moments. It is unclear whether these features are present prior to PFP onset or occur as pain-compensatory movement strategies given the lack of prospective data.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO # CRD42019080241.

Are proximal and distal neuromuscular parameters able to predict hip and knee frontal plane kinematics during single-leg landing?

OBJECTIVE

To determine if proximal and distal neuromuscular parameters (EMG amplitude and median frequency - MDF) can predict frontal plane kinematics during single-leg landing.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross sectional study.

SETTING

Laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifteen participants (7 female) performed six single-leg landings with measures of frontal plane kinematics and EMG obtained 230 ms after first foot contact, totalizing 90 landings.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

(i) 2D hip adduction [hip ADD] and knee frontal plane projection angle [knee FPPA]; (ii) EMG amplitude and MDF of gluteus medius [GMed], tensor fascia latae [TFL], peroneus longus [PL] and tibialis anterior [TA].

RESULTS

We observed that MDF of TA was a significant predictor of hip ADD (p = 0.037; β = -0.049 Hz; R²c = 0.30). Also, MDF of PL was significant predictor of knee FPPA (p = 0.043; β = 0.042 Hz; R²c = 0.37). Hip muscles and EMG amplitude parameters were not considered predictors of frontal plane kinematics.

CONCLUSION

The firing frequency of ankle muscles predicted the variance of hip and knee frontal plane kinematics during single-leg landing.

Knee biomechanical factors associated with patellofemoral pain in recreational runners

BACKGROUND

Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a common injury among runners. Knee biomechanical factors associated with PFP, however, remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine possible associations between knee biomechanics and symptoms of PFP in recreational runners.

METHODS

Fifteen male and 15 female recreational runners with PFP were enrolled as the PFP group, 30 matched runners without PFP were recruited as the control group. The PFP group was tested running with and without knee pain, while the control group had only one running test. Reflective marker coordinates and ground reaction force data were collected in each test. Knee kinematics and kinetics during running were reduced and compared between groups (PFP group without knee pain and control group) and between pain conditions (PFP group with knee pain and without knee pain), as well as between sexes.

RESULTS

Female and male participants with PFP had an increased peak knee valgus angle when running without pain compared to matched controls (P = 0.001), and to themselves when running with pain (P = 0.001). Male participants with PFP also had an increased peak knee flexion angle when running without pain compared to matched controls (P = 0.008), however did not decrease their peak knee flexion angle when running with pain (P = 0.245). No significant main effect of group or pain condition on any peak knee joint moment during running was detected (P ≥ 0.175).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased peak knee valgus angle during running appears to be a critical biomechanical factor associated with PFP in recreational runners, while decreasing knee valgus angle during running may be an adaptation to reduce symptoms of PFP. Increased peak knee flexion angle during running appears to be another biomechanical factor associated with PFP that is sex specific for male recreational runners.

A Review of the Relationships Between Knee Pain and Movement Neuromechanics

CONTEXT

Knee injury and disease are common, debilitating, and expensive. Pain is a chief symptom of knee injury and disease and likely contributes to arthrogenic muscle inhibition. Joint pain alters isolated motor function, muscular strength, and movement biomechanics. Because knee pain influences biomechanics, it likely also influences long-term knee joint health.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is 2-fold: (1) review effects of knee pain on lower-extremity muscular activation and corresponding biomechanics and (2) consider potential implications of neuromechanical alterations associated with knee pain for long-term knee joint health. Experimental knee pain is emphasized because it has been used to mimic clinical knee pain and clarify independent effects of knee pain. Three common sources of clinical knee pain are also discussed: patellofemoral pain, anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction, and knee osteoarthritis.

DATA SOURCES

The PubMed, Web of Science, and SPORTDiscus databases were searched for articles relating to the purpose of this article.

CONCLUSION

Researchers have consistently reported that knee pain alters neuromuscular activation, often in the form of inhibition that likely occurs via voluntary and involuntary neural pathways. The effects of knee pain on quadriceps activation have been studied extensively. Knee pain decreases voluntary and involuntary quadriceps activation and strength and alters the biomechanics of various movement tasks. If allowed to persist, these neuromechanical alterations might change the response of articular cartilage to joint loads during movement and detrimentally affect long-term knee joint health. Physical rehabilitation professionals should consider neuromechanical effects of knee pain when treating knee injury and disease. Resolution of joint pain can likely help to restore normal movement neuromechanics and potentially improve long-term knee joint health and should be a top priority.

Effectiveness of local exercise therapy versus spinal manual therapy in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: medium term follow-up results of a randomized controlled trial

Background

Increasing evidence has shown benefits of spinal manipulations in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). There is scarcity regarding medium term effects of spinal manual therapy on outcome measures in PFPS patients. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of local exercise therapy and spinal manual therapy for knee pain, function and maximum voluntary peak force (MVPF) velocity of the quadriceps in PFPS patients.

Methods

Forty-three patients with PFPS were randomly assigned to a local exercise or spinal manual therapy group. The local exercise group received six sessions (one session per week) of supervised training of the knee-and hip muscles with mobilization of the patellofemoral joint. The spinal manual therapy group received six interventions (one intervention per week) of high velocity low thrust manipulations at the thoracolumbar region, sacroiliac joint, and/or hip. All patients were also asked to do home exercises. Maximum, minimum and current pain were measured using the visual analogue scale. Function was assessed with the anterior knee pain scale (AKPS) and MPFV was recorded using a Biodex System 3 dynamometer. Patients were assessed before intervention, after 6 weeks of intervention and after 6 weeks of follow-up. Between-group differences at assessments were analysed by way of analysis of covariance with Bonferroni correction.

Results

Pain and functionality improved more following spinal manipulative therapy than local exercise therapy. After 6 weeks of intervention the between-group difference (local versus spinal) for maximal pain was 23.4 mm [95% CI: 9.3, 37.6; effect size (ES): 1.04] and − 12.4 [95% CI: − 20.2, − 4.7; ES: 1.00] for the AKPS. At 6 weeks of follow-up the between-group difference for maximal pain was 18.7 mm [95% CI: 1.4, 36.0; ES: 0.68] and − 11.5 [95% CI: − 19.9, − 3.3; ES: − 0.87] for the AKPS.

Conclusions

This study suggests that spinal manual therapy is more effective than local exercise therapy in improving pain and function in patients with PFPS in the medium term. We suggest for future research to investigate whether combining local exercise therapy and spinal manual therapy is more effective than either single intervention on its own.

This clinical trial study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee METC Z under registration number NL57207.096. and registered retrospectively in ClinicalTrials.gov PRS with registration ID number NCT04748692 on the 10th of February 2021.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04310-9.

Biomechanics Differ for Individuals With Similar Self-Reported Characteristics of Patellofemoral Pain During a High-Demand Multiplanar Movement Task

CONTEXT

Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is often categorized by researchers and clinicians using subjective self-reported PFP characteristics; however, this practice might mask important differences in movement biomechanics between PFP patients.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether biomechanical differences exist during a high-demand multiplanar movement task for PFP patients with similar self-reported PFP characteristics but different quadriceps activation levels.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional design.

SETTING

Biomechanics laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 15 quadriceps deficient and 15 quadriceps functional (QF) PFP patients with similar self-reported PFP characteristics.

INTERVENTION

In total, 5 trials of a high-demand multiplanar land, cut, and jump movement task were performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Biomechanics were compared at each percentile of the ground contact phase of the movement task (α = .05) between the quadriceps deficient and QF groups. Biomechanical variables included (1) whole-body center of mass, trunk, hip, knee, and ankle kinematics; (2) hip, knee, and ankle kinetics; and (3) ground reaction forces.

RESULTS

The QF patients exhibited increased ground reaction force, joint torque, and movement, relative to the quadriceps deficient patients. The QF patients exhibited: (1) up to 90, 60, and 35 N more vertical, posterior, and medial ground reaction force at various times of the ground contact phase; (2) up to 4° more knee flexion during ground contact and up to 4° more plantarflexion and hip extension during the latter parts of ground contact; and (3) up to 26, 21, and 48 N·m more plantarflexion, knee extension, and hip extension torque, respectively, at various times of ground contact.

CONCLUSIONS

PFP patients with similar self-reported PFP characteristics exhibit different movement biomechanics, and these differences depend upon quadriceps activation levels. These differences are important because movement biomechanics affect injury risk and athletic performance. In addition, these biomechanical differences indicate that different therapeutic interventions may be needed for PFP patients with similar self-reported PFP characteristics.

Influence of the exacerbation of patellofemoral pain on trunk kinematics and lower limb mechanics during stair negotiation

BACKGROUND

Although it is assumed that the presence of patellofemoral pain (PFP) may result in compensatory behaviors that can alter trunk kinematics and lower limb mechanics, the influence of the exacerbation of patellofemoral pain on trunk kinematics and lower limb mechanics during stair negotiation has not been established.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does the exacerbation of PFP symptoms lead to altered trunk kinematics and lower limb mechanics during stair negotiation?

METHODS

Three-dimensional kinematics and kinetics were obtained from 45 women with PFP during stair descent and ascent. Data were obtained before and after a pain exacerbation protocol. The variables of interest were peak trunk, hip, and knee flexion, and ankle dorsiflexion; peak hip, and knee extensor, and ankle plantarflexor moments. Paired t-tests were used to compare the variables of interest before and after pain exacerbation.

RESULTS

Following pain exacerbation, there was a decrease in peak knee extensor moment during stair descent (Effect size = -0.68; p = 0.01) and stair ascent (Effect size = -0.56; p = 0.02); as well as in peak ankle dorsiflexion during stair descent (Effect size = -0.33; p = 0.01) and stair ascent (Effect size = -0.30; p = 0.01). An increase in ankle plantarflexor moment during stair descent (Effect size = 0.79; p < 0.01) and stair ascent (Effect size = 0.89; p < 0.01) was also observed. No significant differences were observed for peak trunk, hip, and knee flexion or hip extensor moment (p > 0.05).

SIGNIFICANCE

Our findings show compensatory strategies used by people with PFP in response to symptoms exacerbation that may have a negative impact on knee and ankle mechanics. Our findings also suggest that people with PFP do not seem to change their trunk, hip, and knee flexion or hip extensor moment during stair negotiation in response to symptom exacerbation.

A Contemporary Approach to Patellofemoral Pain in Runners

Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is among the most common injuries in recreational runners. Current evidence does not identify alignment, muscle weakness, and patellar maltracking or a combination of these as causes of PFP. Rather than solely investigating biomechanics, we suggest a holistic approach to address the causes of PFP. Both external loads, such as changes in training parameters and biomechanics, and internal loads, such as sleep and psychological stress, should be considered. As for the management of runners with PFP, recent research suggested that various interventions can be considered to help symptoms, even if these interventions target biomechanical factors that may not have caused the injury in the first place. In this Current Concepts article, we describe how the latest evidence on education about training modifications, strengthening exercises, gait and footwear modifications, and psychosocial factors can be applied when treating runners with PFP. The importance of maintaining relative homeostasis between load and capacity will be emphasized. Recommendations for temporary or longer-term interventions will be discussed. A holistic, evidence-based approach should consist of a graded exposure to load, including movement, exercise, and running, while considering the capacity of the individual, including sleep and psychosocial factors. Cost, accessibility, and the personal preferences of patients should also be considered.

DO MALES WITH PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN HAVE POSTEROLATERAL HIP MUSCLE WEAKNESS?

BACKGROUND

Patellofemoral pain is common in physically active adults. Females with patellofemoral pain have been shown to have posterolateral hip muscle weakness, but there is a paucity of research examining hip muscle strength in males with patellofemoral pain.

HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine posterolateral hip muscle strength in males with patellofemoral pain compared to asymptomatic males. It was hypothesized that males with patellofemoral pain would have decreased strength of the hip extensor, hip external rotator, and hip abductor muscles compared to healthy, asymptomatic males.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive, cross-sectional.

METHODS

Thirty-six adult males with patellofemoral pain and 36 pain-free males participated in the study. The patellofemoral pain group were required to have retropatellar pain reproduced by activities that loaded the patellofemoral joint (squatting, descending stairs, etc.). Peak isometric torque of the hip extensors, hip external rotators, and hip abductors was measured with an instrumented dynamometer. Torque was normalized by body mass and height. Between-group differences were analyzed with parametric or non-parametric tests, as appropriate. The level of significance was adjusted for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

Hip extensor torque was significantly reduced in the patellofemoral pain group compared to the control group (p = .0165). No differences were found between groups for the hip external rotators or hip abductors (p > .0167).

CONCLUSION

Males with patellofemoral pain appear to have weakness of the hip extensors, but unlike females with patellofemoral pain, they do not appear to have weakness of the hip abductors or hip external rotators. The findings of this study suggest that muscle strength factors associated with patellofemoral pain in males may be different from muscle strength factors in females. Clinicians examining and designing plans of care for male patients with patellofemoral pain should consider that the hip abductors and hip external rotators may not be weak in men with this condition.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.