Effects of olanzapine on polydipsia and intermittent hyponatremia

Pharmacological Augmentation in Unipolar Depression: A Guide to the Guidelines

BACKGROUND

Pharmacological augmentation is a recommended strategy for patients with treatment-resistant depression. A range of guidelines provide advice on treatment selection, prescription, monitoring and discontinuation, but variation in the content and quality of guidelines may limit the provision of objective, evidence-based care. This is of importance given the side effect burden and poorer long-term outcomes associated with polypharmacy and treatment-resistant depression. This review provides a definitive overview of pharmacological augmentation recommendations by assessing the quality of guidelines for depression and comparing the recommendations made.

METHODS

A systematic literature search identified current treatment guidelines for depression published in English. Guidelines were quality assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool. Data relating to the prescription of pharmacological augmenters were extracted from those developed with sufficient rigor, and the included recommendations compared.

RESULTS

Total of 1696 records were identified, 19 guidelines were assessed for quality, and 10 were included. Guidelines differed in their quality, the stage at which augmentation was recommended, the agents included, and the evidence base cited. Lithium and atypical antipsychotics were recommended by all 10, though the specific advice was not consistent. Of the 15 augmenters identified, no others were universally recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides a comprehensive overview of current pharmacological augmentation recommendations for major depression and will support clinicians in selecting appropriate treatment guidance. Although some variation can be accounted for by date of guideline publication, and limited evidence from clinical trials, there is a clear need for greater consistency across guidelines to ensure patients receive consistent evidence-based care.

Relationship between polydipsia and antipsychotics: A systematic review of clinical studies and case reports

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aimed to elucidate the relationship between polydipsia and antipsychotics.

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO, and included clinical studies and case reports on polydipsia induced or improved by antipsychotics.

RESULTS

We identified 61 articles: 1 double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT), 4 single-arm trials, 1 cross-sectional study, 3 case series, and 52 case reports. The double-blind RCT demonstrated no significant difference in improvement in polydipsia between olanzapine and haloperidol. Two single-arm trials showed that polydipsia improved during clozapine treatment, whereas the other 2 showed that risperidone did not improve polydipsia. The cross-sectional study showed the prevalence of hyponatremia with first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs: 26.1%) and second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs: 4.9%). Two case series reported that clozapine improved polydipsia; the other one indicated that patients with polydipsia who were treated with FGAs had schizophrenia (70.4%) and mental retardation (25.9%). Of 90 cases in the case reports, 67 (75.3%) were diagnosed with schizophrenia. Of 83 cases in which antipsychotic treatment started before the onset of polydipsia, 75 (90.3%) received FGAs, particularly haloperidol (n = 24, 28.9%), and 11 (13.3%) received risperidone. Among 40 cases in which polydipsia was improved following antipsychotic treatment, 36 (90.0%) received SGAs, primarily clozapine (n = 14, 35.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the causal relationship between polydipsia and antipsychotics remains unclear because of the paucity of high-quality studies, antipsychotics with high affinity to dopamine D₂ receptors may be associated with an increased risk of polydipsia while clozapine may be effective for treating polydipsia.

Olanzapine: Psychopharmacology, Clinical Efficacy, and Adverse Effects

Olanzapine is an atypical antipsychotic that has a pharmacological profile similar that of clozapine. It is biotransformed by hepatic enzymes and can be dosed on a once-daily basis. In large, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, olanzapine was shown to be efficacious in the treatment of schizophrenia relative to placebo. Many trials showed superior efficacy to haloperidol, especially against negative symptoms. Olanzapine is FDA-approved for the treatment of psychotic disorders, though data suggest possible use in depression, bipolar disorder, psychogenic polydipsia, and developmental disabilities. Olanzap-ine appears to be well-tolerated. Commonly reported adverse effects include orthostatic hypotension, sedation, hepatic transaminase elevations, weight gain, headache, agitation, dizziness, and constipation. The incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms and tardive dyskinesia is low. Few drug interactions have been reported. The recommended starting dose is 10 mg once daily. One trial indicated that the higher cost of this agent might be offset by a reduction in overall hospitalization costs.

A case report of rapid-onset hyponatremia induced by low-dose olanzapine

Hyponatremia has been reported with the use of psychotropic drugs. Olanzapine does not find much mention as a cause of hyponatremia in literature; however, it has been found to be the second most frequently reported atypical antipsychotic to cause it. We report a case of hyponatremia due to syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion which occurred at a rapid onset following the administration of low-dose olanzapine during inpatient treatment of a patient with bipolar disorder. We would like to highlight our case for the need to be vigil about such fatal side complications apart from metabolic side effects of atypical antipsychotics.

Atypical antipsychotics and polydipsia: a cause or a treatment?

Primary polydipsia (PP) is a frequent complication that affects many chronic schizophrenic inpatients. Due to possible lethal consequences, for example, hyponatremia, coma and death, it's fundamental for the physician achieving early diagnosis and treating this condition. The first step is identifying polydipsia by clinical, biochemical and pharmacological means. Nowadays, the pathophysiology of PP remains unclear, and this limits the possibility of detecting an appropriate drug treatment. Typical antipsychotics have been associated to a worsening of polydipsic behavior, while more recently atypical antipsychotics have been reported as being useful. However results are still mixed and controversial. It appears that risperidone and olanzapine are not clearly effective; clozapine may improve symptoms, although it is difficult to manage from a therapeutic point of view; quetiapine has been poorly studied so far, nonetheless it has given interesting results. Through a case study analysis, this report presents a brief, yet selective, overview of the current state of psychopharmacology in the treatment of PP with atypical antipsychotics in schizophrenia.

Association of an orexin 1 receptor 408Val variant with polydipsia-hyponatremia in schizophrenic subjects

BACKGROUND

Primary polydipsia is a common complication in patients with chronic psychoses, particularly schizophrenia. Disease pathogenesis is poorly understood, but one contributory factor is thought to be dopamine dysregulation caused by prolonged treatment with neuroleptics. Both angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and orexin (hypocretin) signaling can modulate drinking behavior through interactions with the dopaminergic system.

METHODS

We performed association studies on the insertion/deletion (I/D) sequence polymorphism of ACE and single nucleotide polymorphisms within the prepro-orexin (HCRT), orexin receptor 1 (HCRTR1), and orexin receptor 2 (HCRTR2) genes. Genotypes were determined by polymerase chain reaction amplification, followed by either electrophoretic separation or direct sequencing.

RESULTS

The ACE I/D polymorphism showed no association with polydipsic schizophrenia. Screening of the orexin signaling system detected a 408 isoleucine to valine mutation in HCRTR1 that showed significant genotypic association with polydipsic-hyponatremic schizophrenia (p = .012). The accumulation of this mutation was most pronounced in polydipsic versus nonpolydipsic schizophrenia (p = .0002 and p = .008, for the respective genotypic and allelic associations). The calcium mobilization properties and the protein localization of mutant HCRTR1 seem to be unaltered.

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary data suggest that mutation carriers might have an increased susceptibility to polydipsia through an undetermined mechanism.

Treatment of psychogenic polydipsia: comparison of risperidone and olanzapine, and the effects of an adjunctive angiotensin-II receptor blocking drug (irbesartan)

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to determine the outcome of novel strategies in managing a case of severe polydipsia.

CLINICAL PICTURE

The patient was a 39-year-old male with a 20-year history of paranoid schizophrenia who, despite only mild residual psychotic symptoms, had been hospitalized for the previous 10 years because of severe polydipsic behaviour complicated by water intoxication.

TREATMENT

Novel antipsychotic agents, risperidone and olanzapine, as well as the specific angiotensin-II receptor blocking drug, irbesartan were employed at selected intervals in a study lasting nearly 3 years. A strict behavioural management programme was ongoing, in which diurnal weight change and the number of breaches of weight limits, requiring management in a low-stimulus environment, were documented on a daily basis. Summary measures of diurnal weight change and behavioural intervention were charted against changes in treatment.

OUTCOME

Polydipsic behaviour improved on risperidone up to 4 mg daily, but was not sustained. Olanzapine was similarly successful in stabilizing polydipsia, and improvement was achieved with the addition of irbesartan.

CONCLUSION

We suggest that the D2-sparing profiles of receptor binding achieved with low-dose risperidone and olanzapine may account for this beneficial effect. The benefit derived with irbesartan implicates the involvement of brain angiotensin systems centrally in helping to regulate drinking behaviour.