Early detection of communication delays with the PEDS tools in at-risk South African infants

Caregivers' perspectives of early developmental tele-assessments in challenging circumstances

BACKGROUND

 Outbreaks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, exacerbate barriers to accessing early childhood developmental care. Tele-assessment may serve as an innovative approach to developmental monitoring to overcome service delivery amidst challenging circumstances. It is vital to collect caregivers' perspectives of this potential service delivery method to inform clinical decision making.

OBJECTIVES

 This study aimed to determine caregivers' perspectives of interview-based early developmental tele-assessment in a South African context.

METHOD

 Thirty caregivers of children (aged birth - 36 months) completed a caregiver-report developmental assessment via a telecommunications platform, as well as an online questionnaire probing their perspectives on the tele-assessment.

RESULTS

 Most participants (96.7%, n = 29 out of 30) rated their overall experience of the tele-assessment as positive; however, 53.8% (n = 14 out of 26 that answered the question) indicated that they would additionally still prefer in-person assessment.

CONCLUSION

 Tele-assessment appears to be a viable approach for caregivers to access developmental care during circumstances such as COVID-19.Contribution: This study provided valuable insight into a novel approach using interview-based early developmental tele-assessment and the perspectives of caregivers thereof.

mHealth developmental screening for preschool children in low-income communities

Children are often only identified with a developmental delay when they enter primary school due to developmental delays hindering academic progress. Detection of at-risk children in low-income communities is typically unavailable due to several challenges. This study validated an mHealth-based developmental screening tool as a potential time- and cost-effective way of delivering services for preschool children. This cross-sectional within-subject study screened 276 preschool children from low-income communities using the mHealth Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS) tools. The mHealth PEDS tools' performance was then evaluated by comparing caregiver concerns according to the PEDS tools with results obtained using a reference standard assessment tool, the Vineland-3. The mHealth PEDS tools identified 237 (85.9%) of children at risk of developmental delay compared to 80.1% (n = 221) of children identified with a developmental delay using the Vineland-3. Sensitivity of the PEDS tools was high (92.6%) with low specificity (22.5%) using US standardised criteria. Literacy skills were found to be most delayed, according to the PEDS: DM (89.3%; n = 142) and Vineland-3 (87.1%; n = 134). Low specificity of the prescribed criteria may require the implementation of adapted referral criteria within low socio-economic status (SES) settings. The mHealth PEDS tools may still be valuable for preschool developmental surveillance of children within low SES settings. It is recommended, however, that children who are identified with a developmental concern undergo a second screen to reduce false positives.

Developmental Risks in Vulnerable Children from a Low-Income South African Community

OBJECTIVE

To describe the developmental risks, and its influence, in young children from a low-income South African community.

METHOD

An exploratory, cross-sectional research study design was employed. Developmental screening was conducted during home visits with 126 caregivers and children between 0 and 42 months of age from a low-income South African community. Children who failed the rescreen were referred for diagnostic assessment. A binomial logistic regression was used to determine the effect of developmental risks on developmental outcomes.

RESULTS

Seventy-three percent of children screened were identified with a possible developmental delay (n = 59) according to caregiver-report using the PEDS tools. The regression model was statistically significant (χ² (3) = 34.902, p < 0.001) with exposure to multiple languages (p < 0.05; odds ratio 3.810, CI 1.2-12.4) most indicative of potential developmental delay. Older children (19-42 months) were also more at risk of developmental delay (p < 0.001) than younger children (0-18 months).

CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE

Healthcare professionals serving these vulnerable populations should create awareness amongst caregivers about the effect of developmental risks, in particularly multiple language exposure, on development.