Interpreting Mamelodi Community-Oriented Primary Care data on tuberculosis loss to follow-up through the lens of intersectionality

Infrastructural Inequality and Household COVID-19 Vulnerability in a South African Urban Settlement

COVID-19 has highlighted the importance of household infrastructure in containing the spread of SARS-CoV-2, with Global South urban settlements particularly vulnerable. Targeted interventions have used area or dwelling type as proxies for infrastructural vulnerability, potentially missing vulnerable households. We use infrastructural determinants of COVID-19 (crowding, water source, toilet facilities, and indoor pollution) to create an Infrastructural Vulnerability Index using cross-sectional household data (2018-2019) from Mamelodi, a low-income urban settlement in South Africa. Households were stratified into vulnerability groups by index results; sociodemographic variables were assessed as predictors of index scores; and inequality analysis and decomposition were conducted. Thirty-three percent of households fell in the lowest risk group, 32% in the second, 21% in the third, and 14% in the highest. Dwelling type and geographical ward were associated with changes in index scores, with a shack (adjusted β (aβ) = 3.45, CI = 3.39-3.51) associated with highest increase compared to a house. Wards in more developed areas were not consistently associated with lower index scores in the final regression model. The infrastructural vulnerability of the top 10% of households was greater than the bottom 40%, and inequality was predominantly within (80%) rather than between (20%) wards, and more between (60%) than within (40%) dwelling types. Our results show a minority of households account for the majority of infrastructural vulnerability, with its distribution only partially explained by area and dwelling type. Efforts to contain COVID-19 can be improved by using local-level data, and a vulnerability index, to target infrastructural support to households in greatest need.

Public health and hospital-based nursing intersection: Case study of drug-resistant tuberculosis patients

OBJECTIVE

Public health nurses (PHN) are key partners in continuity of care for drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) patients. We examined complexities in DR-TB care transition between community- and hospital-based care.

DESIGN

We conducted a case study using medical record data. Four patients were purposively selected to illustrate intersectional complexities in DR-TB care transition involving PHN.

RESULTS

Case A (HIV negative male) received PHN care at a community-based facility 124 km from Cape Town. Cases B, C, and D (males living with HIV) received PHN community-based care, averaging 25 km from the hospital. Treatment failed in cases A, B, and C; they subsequently died. Case D was cured. All cases were granted leave of absence at least once while hospitalized. None returned when expected mainly due to lack of transport funds. PHN played critical roles regarding patients' return by conducting home visits, interacting with relatives, and assisting emergency officers to transport patients back to the hospital. PHN supported relatives to endure protracted patient hospitalizations.

CONCLUSION

The role of PHN in continuity of DR-TB care in low-middle income countries is unambiguous. PHN are key partners in the DR-TB care cascade, namely facilitating retention in care between hospital and community-based care. Effective DR-TB control relies on effective partnerships among healthcare personnel, patients, and their families.