An audit of radiation doses received by paediatric patients undergoing computed tomography investigations at academic hospitals in South Africa

Paediatric minor head injury applied to Paediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network CT recommendations: An audit

Background

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a common cause of paediatric morbidity and mortality, with higher TBI rates in low- and middle-income countries. Non-contrast brain CT is the gold standard for diagnosing intracranial injuries; however, it exposes patients to ionising radiation. The Paediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) clinical decision rule (CDR) aids clinicians in their decision-making processes whilst deciding whether a patient at very low risk of a clinically important TBI (ciTBI) requires a CT scan.

Objectives

To establish whether the introduction of the PECARN CDR would affect CT utilisation rates for paediatric patients presenting with minor blunt head injuries to an academic hospital in Gauteng, South Africa.

Method

This was an audit of paediatric patients who presented with minor blunt head injuries and were referred for CT imaging at an academic hospital in Gauteng, compared with PECARN CDR recommendations, over a 1-year period.

Results

A total of 100 patients were referred for CT imaging. Twenty patients were classified as very low risk, none of whom had any CT findings of a TBI or ciTBI (p < 0.01). A total of 61 patients were classified as intermediate risk and 19 as high risk. In all, 23% of the intermediate and 47% of the high-risk patients had CT features of a TBI, whilst 8% and 37% had a ciTBI, respectively.

Conclusion

Computed tomography brain imaging may be omitted in patients classified as very low risk without missing a clinically important TBI. Implementing the PECARN CDR in appropriate patients would reduce CT utilisation rates.

An audit of published South African diagnostic reference level data

Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are accepted as a dose optimisation tool for patients undergoing x-ray imaging and are required by South African (SA) legislation for 26 fluoroscopically guided procedures (FGPs). The aim of this paper is to collate all published SA data on DRLs in preparation for a project to establish national DRLs. Systematic searches were conducted of various applicable databases. All research that proposed DRLs for any imaging procedure in South Africa was included. Twenty-one works met inclusion criteria, the earliest from 2001. Two-thirds of all work reported on FGPs and five studies documented computed tomography DRLs. Three publications focussed exclusively on paediatric imaging DRLs. No studies on mammography or dental radiography were found. For clinical procedures with more than one proposed DRL, the range of proposed DRL varied by up to a factor of five. The highest proposed DRL is 373.1 Gy cm²for endovascular aneurysm/aortic repair procedures. Data were collected in six public hospitals and two private hospital groups. Thirty-six authors contributed to the manuscripts, but only six studies had an inter-disciplinary authorship. This is the first paper to provide a comprehensive review of SA DRL data and thereby advances international radiation protection initiatives. The data suggests there is room for more interdisciplinary work and that there must be rigorous standardization of reported parameters and data collection. This audit also highlights the need for standardized terminology, particularly for FGPs.