Oral Tranexamic Acid with Fluocinolone-Based Triple Combination Cream Versus Fluocinolone-Based Triple Combination Cream Alone in Melasma: An Open Labeled Randomized Comparative Trial

Tranexamic acid as a therapeutic option for melasma management: meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of tranexamic acid (TXA) in treating melasma through a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The study focused on identifying associated adverse effects and comparing TXA's effectiveness with other melasma treatments.Materials and methods: Following PROSPERO and PRISMA guidelines, an extensive electronic search was conducted across four databases for RCTs on TXA use in melasma. Inclusion criteria encompassed full-text English articles with specific outcome measures, while studies with high bias risk or non-English publications were excluded. Data were extracted from 22 relevant studies and analyzed using the RevMan software, with heterogeneity identified using I² statistics and forest plots.Results: A total of 22 studies with 1280 patients were included. TXA was administered orally, topically, or via injection, with treatment durations ranging from 8 weeks to nearly 2 years. TXA significantly reduced melasma severity, evidenced by reductions in MASI, mMASI, MI, and hemi-MASI scores. Oral TXA showed the most substantial decrease in MASI scores, followed by injections and topical applications. However, studies exhibited high heterogeneity, particularly in combined treatments. Adverse effects included gastrointestinal discomfort, skin irritation, and menstrual irregularities.Conclusions: TXA is effective in treating melasma, either alone or combined with other treatments. Despite significant reductions in melasma severity, further research is necessary to standardize TXA administration methods and address long-term effects. The high heterogeneity observed suggests a need for more consistent treatment protocols.

A Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Oral Tranexamic Acid, Modified Kligman's Formula, and Placebo Cream in Melasma

Background

Despite the availability of various treatment modalities, the treatment of melasma is often incomplete, with a high recurrence rate. The present study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of oral tranexamic acid (TXA), modified Kligman's formula (MKF), and a placebo cream in melasma.

Materials and Methods

Ninety cases of melasma of both sexes were enrolled, and divided into three groups of 30 patients each. The baseline severity of melasma was graded by Melasma Area Severity Index (MASI) score. Group A, B, and C patients were treated with oral TXA 250 mg twice daily, daily MKF cream at night, and daily placebo cream at night, respectively, for 12 weeks. Improvement in MASI score was calculated after 4, 8, and 12 weeks. At each visit, adverse effects, if any, were noted. Statistical analysis was done using Chi-square test.

Results

Based on intention to treat analysis, at the end of 12 weeks, the reduction in MASI score in oral TXA, MKF, and placebo groups was 9.94(65.91%), 6.12(54.78%), and 2.07(17.22%), respectively (P = 0.00). The difference in reduction of mean MASI scores after 12 weeks between oral TXA group and MKF group was not significant (P = 0.29). The efficacy of oral TXA and MKB was significantly higher than that of the placebo group (P = 0.01 and P = 0.03, respectively). Adverse effects in all groups were mild and self-limiting.

Limitations

A limited sample size, non-blinded design, and absence of dermoscopic evaluation were the study limitations.

Conclusion

In view of its excellent safety profile, oral TXA may be considered as a better option for moderate to severe melasma.

Comparative efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid for melasma by different administration methods: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Tranexamic acid (TA) is a new and promising drug for the treatment of melasma.

OBJECTIVES

This network meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of various ways of administration of TA on melasma.

METHODS

We collected researches from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. Melasma area severity index (MASI) is used to evaluate the severity of melasma. After treatment with different TA administration methods, a difference in MASI is named ΔMASI. We evaluate the curative effect by comparing the ΔMASI of different TA administration methods at a certain time point.

RESULTS

At the Weeks 4, 8, and 12 and the last follow-up, the ΔMASI of oral TA combined with routine topical agents (oTA + RTA) was higher than that of intradermal TA (iTA), topical TA (tTA) as well as microneedling TA (MNsTA), with statistical significance. At the 8th week, the ΔMASI of oTA was higher than that of iTA, with statistical significance. Compared with placebo, oTA showed statistically significant differences at Week 4, while tTA, iTA, and MNsTA showed statistically significant differences starting from Week 8.

CONCLUSIONS

Among various ways of administration of TA, oTA + RTA has the best effect on melasma. In the short term, the curative effect of oTA is better than that of iTA, and the onset time of oTA is faster than that of tTA, iTA and MNsTA. In the long run, the curative effect of TA alone has nothing to do with the mode of administration.

Best practices in the treatment of melasma with a focus on patients with skin of color

BACKGROUND

Melasma is a chronic hypermelanosis of the skin that affects approximately 1% of the global population, predominantly affects women, and is more prevalent in skin of color. Melasma is a common driver for patients with skin of color to seek out a dermatologist for treatment, and ensuring the right approach for these patients is important because some treatments may be associated with adverse side effects. Because of the chronicity of the disease and established psychosocial and emotional impacts, there is a large need to ensure care follows the best available evidence on the treatment of patients with melasma.

OBJECTIVE

Here, we summarized current available topical treatments for melasma with considerations dermatologists should have for their patients with skin of color.

METHODS

Steering committee consensus on clinical best practices.

RESULTS

We describe a flexible and focused treatment algorithm that reflects both treatment and maintenance periods that is a consensus of our extensive clinical experience.

LIMITATIONS

Use of real-world evidence and potential for individual practice bias.

CONCLUSION

Melasma can be challenging to treat, particularly in patients with skin of color, and our recommendations for best practices for patients in the United States are an important step toward standardizing care.

Prescribing practices of tranexamic acid for melasma: Delphi consensus from the Pigmentary Disorders Society

Introduction There is ambiguity regarding usage of tranexamic acid for melasma in India, be it in its pre-administration evaluation, administration route, dosing or monitoring. Hence, we conducted this study to understand various tranexamic-acid prescribing patterns and provide practical guidelines. Materials and methods A Google-form-based questionnaire (25-questions) was prepared based on the key areas identified by experts from the Pigmentary Disorders Society, India and circulated to practicing dermatologists across the country. In rounds 2 and 3, the questionnaire was re-presented to the same group of experts and their opinions were sought. The results of the practitioners' survey were denoted graphically alongside, to guide them. Consensus was deemed when at least 80% of respondents chose an option. Results The members agreed that history pertaining to risk factors for thromboembolism, cardiovascular and menstrual disorders should be sought in patients being started on oral tranexamic-acid. Baseline coagulation profile should be ordered in all patients prior to tranexamic-acid and more exhaustive investigations such as complete blood count, liver function test, protein C and S in patients with high risk of thromboembolism. The preferred oral dose was 250 mg orally twice daily, which can be used alone or in combination with topical hydroquinone, kojic acid and sunscreen. Repeated dosing of tranexamic-acid may be required for those relapsing with melasma following initial tranexamic-acid discontinuation. Coagulation profile should ideally be repeated at three monthly intervals during follow-up, especially in patients with clinically higher risk of thromboembolism. Treatment can be stopped abruptly post improvement and no tapering is required. Limitation This study is limited by the fact that open-ended questions were limited to the first general survey round. Conclusion Oral tranexamic-acid provides a valuable treatment option for melasma. Frequent courses of therapy may be required to sustain results and a vigilant watch is recommended for hypercoagulable states during the course of therapy.

Targeting the dermis for melasma maintenance treatment

Melasma relapse is almost common after discontinuation of conventional treatment. Recent studies suggesting that photoaging dermis is the main pathomechanism of melasma, emphasize the dermal targeting therapy. We investigated maintenance effect of microneedling radiofrequency (RF) for melasma treatment. Subjects with melasma were administered oral tranexamic acid and triple combination cream for 2 months and a randomly assigned half face was treated with RF. After discontinuation of conventional therapy, the half face RF continued monthly over 6 months. Modified melasma area severity index (mMASI) score and L* value by a chromameter were collected monthly. Fifteen subjects were enrolled and eleven completed the 8-month study. At 2nd month of conventional therapy, all subjects showed improvement with a 64% reduction in mMASI score. With continuous RF treatment, the improvement was well maintained; whereas in untreated side, the Δ L* gradually decreased, returning to the baseline after the conventional therapy ended. The continuous microneedling RF therapy is beneficial in maintaining the conventional therapy of melasma suggesting the protective effect of dermal targeting therapy in melasma development.(Clinical Trial registration number: NCT05710068, date of first registration: 02/02/2023).

Topical and Systemic Therapies in Melasma: A Systematic Review

Introduction

Melasma is an acquired disorder, which presents with well-demarcated, brown-colored hyperpigmented macules, commonly involving the sun-exposed areas such as the face. It is a chronic and distressing condition, affecting the patients' quality of life, and has been conventionally treated with "first-line" agents including hydroquinone (HQ) alone or as a part of a triple combination cream (TCC), while "second-line" options include chemical peels, and third line options include laser therapy.

Materials and Methods

A systematic search was performed for all topical and systemic treatments for melasma up till May 4, 2021, using the PubMed and EMBASE databases, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. The search terms "melasma" and "treatment" were used to search for the relevant articles on both these databases, and a total of 4020 articles were identified. After removing the duplicate entries and screening the titles, abstracts, and full-text articles, we identified 174 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or controlled clinical trials.

Results

Based on our review, HQ, TCCs, sunscreens, kojic acid (KA), and azelaic acid receive grade A recommendation. Further large-scale studies are required to clearly establish the efficacy of topical vitamin C, resorcinol, and topical tranexamic acid (TXA). Several newer topical agents may play a role only as an add-on or second-line drugs or as maintenance therapy. Oral TXA has a strong recommendation, provided there are no contraindications. Procyanidins, Polypodium leucotomos (PL), and even synbiotics may be taken as adjuncts.

Discussion

Several newer topical and systemic agents with multimodal mechanisms of action have now become available, and the balance seems to be tipping in favor of these innovative modalities. However, it is worth mentioning that the choice of agent should be individualized and subject to availability in a particular country.

Tranexamic acid microinjections versus tranexamic acid mesoneedling in the treatment of facial melasma: A randomized assessor-blind split-face controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Melasma is a hyperpigmentary disorder causing cosmetic disfigurement. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) microinjections with TXA mesoneedling for facial melasma.

METHODS

This randomized assessor-blind split-face controlled trial included patients with symmetric facial melasma. One side of the face received TXA (100 mg/ml) mesoneedling and the other side intradermal TXA microinjections. The interventions were repeated three times with 4-week intervals (weeks 0, 4, and 8). The primary outcome was improvement in modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI) 4 weeks after the final treatment session. Secondary outcomes were complications and patient satisfaction with the treatments evaluated by a visual analog scale (VAS).

RESULTS

All 27 patients included in the study were female (mean age: 44.22 ± 8.39 years). Both groups were comparable in terms of mMASI scores before and after treatment (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.22; 0.85, p = 0.248 and SMD = -0.13, 95% CI -0.66; 0.40, p = 0.633, respectively). The mMASI score change from baseline was not different (SMD = -0.39, 95% CI -0.93; 0.15, p = 0.157). However, patient satisfaction was significantly higher with TXA mesoneedling (SMD = 0.77, 95% CI 0.21; 1.32, p = 0.007). Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation occurred in one patient in the TXA mesoneedling group. Erythema, scaling, and edema were significantly higher with TXA mesoneedling (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

TXA mesoneedling was comparable with TXA microinjection in the treatment of facial melasma, while patient satisfaction was significantly higher with TXA mesoneedling; however, the high frequency of complications occurring with this treatment should be taken into account.

Oral Tranexamic Acid for the Treatment of Melasma: Evidence and Experience-Based Consensus Statement from Indian Experts

Melasma, a chronic pigmentary skin condition mainly affecting the face, remains a challenge despite the availability of several options for treatment. Many melasma patients are not satisfied with treatment outcomes. Tranexamic acid (TXA), an anti-fibrinolytic drug has shown promising results in patients with melasma. Evidence from several clinical studies has surfaced on efficacy and tolerability of TXA in these patients. It can be used as monotherapy or adjuvant with other therapies. Currently, there is no published consensus or guideline document for its use in the treatment of melasma. TXA is available for oral use, topical use as well as an injection. In this article, a consensus of Indian experts is prepared based on the available literature and experience with use of oral TXA in melasma. This review article might help clinicians for use of oral TXA appropriately while treating melasma.

The optimal dose of oral tranexamic acid in melasma: A network meta-analysis

Background

Melasma is a chronic skin condition that adversely impacts quality of life. Although many therapeutic modalities are available there is no single best treatment for melasma. Oral tranexamic acid has been used for the treatment of this condition but its optimal dose is yet to be established.

Objectives

We used network meta-analysis to determine the optimal dose of oral tranexamic acid for the treatment of melasma.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive search of all studies of oral tranexamic acid for the treatment of melasma up to September 2020 using PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library database. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the Jadad score and the Cochrane’s risk of bias assessment tool. Only high quality randomised controlled trials were selected. Some studies lacked standard deviation of changes from baseline and these were estimated using the correlation coefficient obtained from another similar study.

Results

A total of 92 studies were identified of which 6 randomized controlled trials comprising 599 patients were included to form 3 pair-wise network comparisons. The mean age of the patients in these studies ranged from 30.3 to 46.5 years and the treatment duration ranged from 8 to 12 weeks. The Jadad scores ranged from 5 to 8.

The optimal dose and duration of oral tranexamic acid was estimated to be 750 mg per day for 12 consecutive weeks.

Limitations

Some confounding factors might not have been described in the original studies. Although clear rules were followed, the Melasma Area and Severity Index and the modified Melasma Area and Severity Index were scored by independent physicians and hence inter-observer bias could not be excluded.

Conclusion

Oral tranexamic acid is a promising drug for the treatment of melasma. This is the first network meta-analysis to determine the optimal dose of this drug and to report the effects of different dosages. The optimal dose is 250 mg three times per day for 12 weeks, but 250 mg twice daily may be an acceptable option in poorly adherent patients. Our findings will allow physicians to balance drug effects and medication adherence. Personalized treatment plans are warranted.

Oral tranexamic acid with a triple combination cream versus oral tranexamic acid monotherapy in the treatment of severe melasma

BACKGROUND

Melasma is an acquired pigmentation disorder with a complex multifactorial etiopathogenesis. Oral tranexamic acid (TA) is a promising drug for its treatment, and may enhance outcomes when used in combination.

OBJECTIVE

To provide evidence of the efficacy and safety of oral TA as a monotherapy, and in combination with a triple combination cream, for treating melasma in the Hispanic population.

METHODS

44 female Hispanic patients with melasma were randomly assigned to receive 325 mg of oral TA every 12 h plus f-TCC (a triple action combination cream) every 24 h (group A) or 325 mg of oral TA every 12 h (group B) for 8 weeks, after which both groups were crossed-over, and treated for an additional 8 weeks. Evaluations of the mMASI score, the melanin index, and the MelasQoL were made at baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16.

RESULTS

There was a 50.04% and 65.45% improvement in mMASI at weeks 4 and 8, respectively in group A, compared to baseline, while for week 16, an improvement of 76.85% was achieved in group B compared to baseline. Highest scores were consistent with the use of the combined treatment modality in both groups, and was evidenced by the values of the melanin index obtained. There was no significant difference in MelasQoL scores between the 2 groups. No serious side effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

The combination of oral TA and f-TCC is more effective than oral TA alone in the treatment of severe melasma in Hispanic patients.

The uses of tranexamic acid in dermatology: a review

Tranexamic acid is a plasmin inhibitor that is used off-label for the treatment of melasma. The use of tranexamic acid has expanded in the field of dermatology based on its anti-inflammatory and anti-melanin-producing properties, which include the treatment of rosacea, urticaria, and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. Tranexamic acid may have more uses in dermatology that require future studies. It should be used with caution during the COVID-19 pandemic given its procoagulant nature.

A Review of Oral Therapies for the Treatment of Skin Hyperpigmentation

This review article examines evidence supporting the use of oral therapies in treating idiopathic, actinic, and metabolically induced skin hyperpigmentation. A thorough review of the literature regarding oral treatments for hyperpigmentation was systematically conducted through PubMed. Keywords used in the primary search include "Hyperpigmentation," "Melanosis" or "Melasma," "Lightening," "Oral," and "Therapeutics." The search was limited to the English language, and no timeframe restrictions were implemented. Numerous orally administered therapies have been proposed for the treatment of skin hyperpigmentation. There is an abundant body of literature demonstrating the efficacy of orally administered tranexamic acid, glutathione, isotretinoin, and proanthocyanidin. It is reasonable to expect that the most effective oral therapies will address known underlying causes of hyperpigmentation such as thyroid disease, diabetes, and hormonal imbalance. Improvement due to oral therapy of otherwise unresponsive skin hyperpigmentation or hyperpigmentation of unknown cause is less predictable. This review is limited by the strength of evidence contained within the available studies. Clinical studies investigating the treatments discussed within this article are limited in number, at times lack blinding in the study design, and are based on small sample sizes. Based on existing research, the most promising oral remedies for hyperpigmentation appear to be tranexamic acid, glutathione, isotretinoin, and proanthocyanidin. Additional studies to better establish safety and efficacy are necessary.

Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in the treatment of adult melasma: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a novel treatment option for melasma; however, no consensus exists on its use. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of TXA for melasma.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was conducted to search for randomized controlled trials comparing TXA alone, TXA as adjuvant to routine treatment and placebo. Changes in the Melasma Area Severity Index (MASI)/modified MASI (mMASI) between pre- and post-treatment and between a certain melasma treatment and TXA were the primary outcomes. Twenty-four trials comparing oral, topical or intradermal TXA with routine treatment were included in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The change in MASI/mMASI scores at 4 (MD, 3.58; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.15-5.01), 8 (MD, 5.08; 95% CI, 3.34-6.81), 12 (MD, 4.89; 95% CI, 3.80-5.97) and 16 (MD, 6.55; 95% CI, 2.62-10.48) weeks after treatment was all less than the baseline scores, regardless of the delivery route. The reduction in the MASI/mMASI scores between TXA adjuvant and routine treatment at 4 (MD, -0.43; 95% CI, -0.79 to -0.08), 8 (MD, -0.81; 95% CI, -1.09 to -0.54), 12 (MD, -1.10; 95% CI, -1.78 to -0.43) and 16 (MD, -1.12; 95% CI, -1.51 to -0.74) weeks was significant. However, the superiority of TXA was not detected when the topical or intradermal route was adopted. No serious adverse events occurred with the use of TXA.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

These results suggest that oral TXA is an available, effective and safe alternative treatment for melasma.

Study of oral tranexamic acid, topical tranexamic acid, and modified Kligman's regimen in treatment of melasma

BACKGROUND

Melasma is a pigmentary disorder affecting mainly face . Various treatment modalities available as topicals, superficial chemical peels and lasers but none till date gives promising results, until date quest for the best treatment modality is on.

AIM

To study the effect of oral and topical Tranexamic acid (TXA) and modified Kligman's regimen in treatment of melasma.

METHOD

Patients having melasma were enrolled after consent for voluntary participation. A detailed history and clinical examination was done. Total 60 patients were enrolled and randomized in three groups, 20 received oral TXA 250 mg twice daily, 20 topical TXA and 20 received modified Kligman's regimen for 8 weeks along with sunscreen MASI(Melasma area severity index) was calculated at baseline, at end of 4 & 8 weeks. MASI score was compared with that at the end of the study. Based on reduction in mean MASI the therapeutic response was graded. Pre and post treatment photographs was also compared. Statistical analysis done by using student square T test , ANOVA And TUKEY test.

RESULTS

Reduction in MASI score was observed in all the groups but greater reduction in MASI score with modified Kligman's regimen by 30% followed with oral TXA by 25% reduction and least with topical TXA by 5%.

CONCLUSION

Although modified Kligman's regimen is comparatively more efficient but due to its side effects in long term usage oral tranexamic acid could be a promising therapeutic approach for melasma.

Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Oral Tranexamic Acid and 4% Topical Hydroquinone Cream in Melasma Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial and Review of Literature

Introduction. Melasma is a common skin pigmentation disorder affecting a patient’s life psychologically and socially. Topical medications or lasers can have temporary and limited therapeutic effects on melasma. Material and Methods. This study is a prospective clinical trial comparing therapeutic effects of oral Tranexamic acid (TXA) and topical Hydroquinone (HQ) cream. A total number of 69 patients were examined. During the study, 10 patients failed to appear for the follow-up and 59 of them completed the trial. The patients were also divided randomly into two groups. Group A received TXA capsule 250 mg every 12 hours and group B received 4% topical HQ cream day and night. The patients from both groups were treated for 3 months. Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) scores were then calculated at the baseline, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks into the treatment and 3 months after the end of intervention. Results. MASI baseline, 4 weeks,12 weeks, and 24 weeks in TXA group were 21.66, 13.69, 9.10, 9.24; respectively. Reduction of MASI between baseline and 4 weeks was statistically significant. Such a decreasing trend in MASI scores between baseline and 12 weeks was also reported as statistically significant (p=0.001). In the HQ group, MASI baseline,4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks were 21.46, 13.57, 10.93, 11.20; respectively. Reduction of MASI scores between baseline and 4 weeks was statistically significant. Moreover, a decline in MASI scores was observed between baseline and 12 weeks that was statistically significant (p=0.001). Considering both groups MASI scores were reduced but the difference between two study groups was not statistically significant (p=0.98). Conclusion. The efficacy of TXA and HQ was the same and both could significantly reduce MASI scores.

Tranexamic Acid for Adults with Melasma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

Melasma is a highly prevalent, chronic, and pigmentary disorder. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid (TA) for the treatment of adults with melasma.

Methods

We independently searched 3 databases from beginning to 26 April, 2018. The study included 21 eligible trials. Two writers extracted data at the same time independently. Study outcomes were calculated by standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager Version 5.3 and STATA Version 15.1.

Results

The combined results showed that the use of TA was associated with reduced Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) and Melanin Index (MI). No significant difference in Erythema Index (EI) was observed with TA treatment. Side effects were minor, with a few cases reporting mild gastrointestinal reaction, oligomenorrhoea, hypopigmentation, urticarial rash, and skin irritation xerosis.

Conclusion

The meta-analysis suggested that TA treatment appeared to be a promising therapeutic approach for melasma.

The role of systemic treatments for skin lightening

BACKGROUND

Pigmentation of the skin occurs as a result of increased melanin production or deposition due to various reasons including age, hormonal imbalances, endocrine disease, inflammation, and/or exposure to damaging radiation, resulting in dermatologic conditions such as lentigines, melasma, or postinflammatory hyperpigmentation. Although numerous topical therapies exist for skin lightening, they are limited by efficacy and pigmentation recurrence after treatment cessation. New research into systemic therapies for hyperpigmentation has been promising.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the current literature for systemic skin lightening therapies.

METHODS

A review of the literature surrounding systemic skin lightening therapies was completed using PubMed (US National Library of Medicine).

RESULTS

Multiple systemic therapies for skin lightening exist including oral carotenoids, glutathione, melatonin, Polypodium leucotomos hydrophilic extract, procyanidin, and tranexamic acid. Preliminary data for the treatment of hyperpigmentation are promising, and currently, these oral treatments appear safe. It is not suggested to use intravenous glutathione for skin lightening due to the increased risk of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

With the patient population seeking effective systemic treatments for skin pigmentation, it is important for dermatologists to understand the properties, the efficacy, and the adverse events profile of each compound, thus ensuring proper use by patients, and that patients are appropriately counseled regarding treatment expectation and safety.

Evaluation of Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Tranexamic Acid Local Infiltration in Combination with Topical 4% Hydroquinone Cream Compared to Topical 4% Hydroquinone Cream Alone in Patients with Melasma: A Split-Face Study

Introduction

Melasma is an acquired pigmentary disorder characterized by hyperpigmented macules and/or patches affecting sun-exposed skin. Tranexamic acid (TA) can reduce melanin content of epidermis. Thus, we conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid local infiltration in combination with topical 4% hydroquinone cream compared to topical 4% hydroquinone cream alone in patients with melasma.

Material and Methods

This study was a prospective assessor- and analyst-blind, randomized split-face clinical trial which was performed on patients with bilateral malar epidermal melasma. A total of 55 patients were enrolled, and each side of their face was randomly allocated to either TA+HQ or HQ alone treatment. The MASI score was applied as an objective measurement to compare two treatment groups. The patient's satisfaction of melasma treatment was evaluated using a four-scale grading, as well.

Results

The mean of MASI score in week 16 decreased in both groups significantly (p < 0.01). The therapeutic outcomes were significantly better in TA+HQ group than HQ group (p=0.001). Patients satisfaction with treatment was significantly higher in the TA + HQ group. The difference between the two groups regarding side effect occurrence was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Addition of tranexamic acid injections to conventional hydroquinone therapy can increase the efficacy of topical treatment. This trial is registered with IRCT2015110324865N1.

Medical Management of Melasma: A Review with Consensus Recommendations by Indian Pigmentary Expert Group

Melasma is one of the most common hyperpigmentary disorders found mainly in women and dark-skinned patients. Sunlight, hormones, pregnancy, and genetics remain the most implicated in the causation of melasma. Although rather recalcitrant to treatment, topical agents such as hydroquinone, modified Kligman's Regime, azelaic acid, kojic acid, Vitamin C, and arbutin still remain the mainstay of therapy with sun protection being a cornerstone of therapy. There are several new botanical and non botanical agents and upcoming oral therapies for the future. There is a lack of therapeutic guidelines, more so in the Indian setup. The article discusses available evidence and brings forward a suggested treatment algorithm by experts from Pigmentary Disorders Society (PDS) in a collaborative discussion called South Asian Pigmentary Forum (SPF).

Tranexamic Acid in the Treatment of Melasma: A Review of the Literature

Melasma is a common acquired pigmentary disorder marked by irregular hyperpigmented macules or patches and most commonly occurs in women of darker skin color. It is a chronic often-relapsing condition that causes negative psychosocial effects in those affected. Current treatments such as hydroquinone, kojic acid, and retinoids, among others, demonstrate variable efficacy and side-effect profiles. We conducted a comprehensive literature review examining the use of tranexamic acid (TA), a well-known anti-fibrinolytic agent, in the treatment of melasma. TA delivered orally, topically, and through physical methods works via the inhibition of ultraviolet (UV)-induced plasmin activity in keratinocytes. Predefined search terms were entered into PubMed. Articles were then independently screened by two authors to include only those written in the English language and relating to human subjects with at least mild melasma. The search identified 28 articles, 15 of which met the criteria for full review. The review revealed that TA treatment for melasma is equally effective or more effective than other standard therapies and may induce fewer side effects. Our comprehensive review suggests that TA may be a promising treatment option for melasma because of its demonstrated effectiveness alone and in combination with other modalities as well as its limited side-effect profile.

Evidence-based Review, Grade of Recommendation, and Suggested Treatment Recommendations for Melasma

Treatment of melasma is known to be less satisfactory, often incomplete, and relapse is frequent. Although many treatment options are available, they are either known to be unsafe on long-term use or their long-term safety profile is unknown. Patients often use various drugs, even topical steroid-based preparation without any medical supervision for long period of time, making the skin unsuitable for many of the drugs available. Thus, there has been gross disparity among the treating physician about what drugs and what regimen are best suitable for various categories of melasma patients and in different situations. With this background, numerous newer drugs, mostly combinations of some proprietary molecules or even unknown plant extracts, have flooded the market for the management of melasma. Information on efficacy or safety of these products are almost unknown. Studies on Asian people, especially Indian population, are far less commonly available. Therapeutic guideline for use on Indian patients with melasma is almost missing. Extrapolation of data from Caucasian people for use on Asian people may not be scientifically justifiable because Caucasian and Asian people are known to have inherent difference in their response as well as tolerance to the drugs used for melasma. With this background, we have extensively evaluated, following a strict, scientifically designed protocol, all the available studies on melasma management till May 2016 and prepared this document on level of evidence, grade of recommendation and suggested therapeutic guideline for melasma as per the method proposed by Oxford Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine. Various ethical, social, logical, regional, and economic issues in the context of Indian and similar populations were given due importance while preparing the suggested therapeutic recommendation.