Outcome of tendon transfer for radial nerve paralysis: Comparison of three methods

Results of Tendon Transfers in Radial Nerve Palsies: A New Evaluation Protocol

Radial nerve palsies present a challenging clinical scenario, often leading to substantial functional impairment. This study focuses on evaluating the outcomes of tendon transfer surgeries in patients with post-traumatic radial nerve injuries. The radial nerve, vital for upper limb movements, faces various etiologies, such as trauma, compression, or idiopathy. Patients with radial nerve palsy encounter difficulties in daily activities, emphasizing the need for effective management strategies. The research introduces a novel evaluation protocol, aiming to comprehensively assess tendon transfer outcomes. This protocol incorporates functional movements of wrist and finger joints, encompassing both objective and subjective parameters. The retrospective study includes eleven patients treated between 2010 and 2022, with a minimum follow-up of one year post-surgery. Tendon transfers demonstrated positive results. The evaluation protocol covers a wide range of parameters, including wrist and finger mobility, thumb function, grip strength, and patient satisfaction. The results indicate successful restoration of motor function, with an average grip strength of 70% compared to the healthy arm. The proposed evaluation protocol facilitates standardized and reproducible assessment, minimizing subjective errors in clinical evaluations. Despite the study's limitations, such as a relatively small sample size, the findings underscore the effectiveness of tendon transfers in treating radial nerve palsies. The introduced evaluation scheme provides a comprehensive and reproducible approach to assess outcomes, contributing to the global standardization of tendon transfer assessments in radial nerve injuries.

Distal nerve transfers for peripheral nerve injuries: indications and outcomes

Distal nerve transfer is a refined surgical technique involving the redirection of healthy sacrificable nerves from one part of the body to reinstate function in another area afflicted by paralysis or injury. This approach is particularly valuable when the original nerves are extensively damaged and standard repair methods, such as direct suturing or grafting, may be insufficient. As the nerve coaptation is close to the recipient muscles or skin, distal nerve transfers reduce the time to reinnervation. The harvesting of nerves for transfer should usually result in minimal or no donor morbidity, as any anticipated loss of function is compensated for by adjacent muscles or overlapping cutaneous territory. Recent years have witnessed notable progress in nerve transfer procedures, markedly enhancing the outcomes of upper limb reconstruction for conditions encompassing peripheral nerve, brachial plexus and spinal cord injuries.

Tendon Transfers, Nerve Grafts, and Nerve Transfers for Isolated Radial Nerve Palsy: A Systematic Review and Analysis

BACKGROUND

Isolated radial nerve palsy is a debilitating injury that may potentially be reconstructed with either tendon transfers, nerve grafts, or nerve transfers. Currently, there is no consensus on the optimal technique for reconstruction. We performed a systematic review and analysis to determine which surgical intervention provides the best clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Twenty-nine papers met inclusion criteria. Grading scales of function and strength were converted into a tripartite scoring system to compare outcomes between techniques. χ2 analyses were performed with a P value < .05.

RESULTS

Seven hundred fifty-four patients were analyzed. Tendon transfers resulted in the highest percentage of good outcomes (82%) and the lowest percentage of poor outcomes (9%). Tendon transfers were superior to nerve grafts and nerve transfers for restoration of wrist extension. Nerve transfers for wrist extension were superior to nerve transfers for finger extension. Nerve grafts and nerve transfers had equivalent rates of good and poor clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study analyzed reported outcomes of tendon transfers, nerve grafts, and nerve transfers for reconstruction of isolated radial nerve palsy. On pooled analysis, tendon transfers had higher rates of superior clinical outcomes as compared with nerve transfers and nerve grafts. Tendon transfers should be considered first-line reconstruction for isolated radial nerve palsy as nerve-based reconstruction is less predictable and reproducible.

The comparative efficacy of nerve transfer versus tendon transfer in the management of radial palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

There is no clear census as to which operative technique provides better recovery for radial nerve injuries. Therefore, in this systematic review, we examined the functional recovery, patient-reported outcomes, and complications of tendon transfer (TT) and nerve transfer (NT).

Methods

Five electronic databases were searched for studies (>10 cases per study) comparing NT and TT regardless of the study design (observational or experimental). Manual search was also conducted. The quality was assessed by the NIH tool. Outcomes included functional recovery, patient-reported outcomes (DASH score, satisfaction, and inability to return to work), and complications. The prevalence was pooled across studies using STATA software, and then, a subgroup analysis based on the intervention type.

Results

Twenty-one studies (542 patients) were analyzed. Excellent recovery, assessed by the Bincaz scale, was higher in the TT group (29 % vs. 11 %) as well as failure to extend the fingers (49 % vs. 9 %). No significant difference was noted between both groups regarding DASH score (mean difference = -2.76; 95 % CI: -12.66: 6.93). Satisfaction was great in the TT group (89 %) with a limited proportion of patients unable to return to work (7 %). Complications were slightly higher in the TT group (8 % vs. 7 %) while 18 % of patients undergoing TT requiring revision surgery. Radial deviation was encountered in 18 % of patients in the TT group and 0 % in the NT group. The quality was good, fair, and poor in 2, 13, and 6, respectively.

Conclusions

In radial nerve injuries, although tendon transfer may seem to provide better functional motor recovery than nerve transfer, it is associated with a higher rate of failure to extend the finger. Given the large confidence interval, the accuracy of this finding is questioned. However, a great proportion of those patients require revision surgery afterward. Additionally, tendon transfer is associated with a greater complication rate than nerve transfer, particularly radial deviation.

Comparison of nerve versus tendon transfer for radial nerve palsy

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the choice of intervention time and operation mode between nerve and tendon transfer for the treatment of radial nerve palsy (RNP).

METHODS

46 RNP patients underwent nerve transfer (n = 22) and tendon transfer (n = 24). The intraoperative blood loss, main incision length, operation duration, and length of hospital stay and follow-up period of patients in these two groups were recorded and compared. The range of motion (ROM) of the elbow, wrist, fingers, and thumb, the hand grip and pinch strength, the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) scores were measured and compared preoperatively and postoperatively between the two groups.

RESULTS

The ROM of thumb and the hand grip strength of patients in the nerve transfer group were greater than that in the tendon transfer (P < 0.05). Both of the two groups indicated significant improvements in the ROM of elbow, wrist, finger, thumb and the hand grip and pinch strength (P < 0.05) postoperatively. The DASH scores decreased significantly at 6 months (P < 0.05) and 12 months (P < 0.05) after surgery in both groups, while the postoperative SF-36 scores significantly increased (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative DASH and SF-36 scores between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In summary, both nerve and tendon transfer techniques are effective treatments for RNP. Nerve transfer is particularly advantageous for early RNP, while tendon transfer is suitable for patients with radial nerve injury more than one year.

Median to Radial Nerve Transfer: An 8-Year Experience From a Lower-Middle Income Country

INTRODUCTION

With an incidence of 2-16%, radial nerve palsy is one of the common forms of nerve injuries globally. Radial nerve palsy causes debilitating effects including loss of elbow extension, wrist drop and loss of finger extension. Reparative surgical pathways range from primary repair and neurolysis, to nerve grafting, nerve transfers, and tendon transfers. Due to ease of performance and acceptability and reproducibility of outcomes, tendon transfers are considered the gold standard of radial nerve palsy repair. However, independent finger function cannot be achieved and as such may not give truly desirable results. In lower-middle income countries, the question of nerve transfer versus tendon transfer for patients who are keen to get back to work is key. While tendon transfer recovery is faster, the functional loss is often considered devastating for fine hand function due to loss of grip secondary to lack of wrist and finger extension. In this study, we present our experience of performing median nerve transfers for radial nerve palsy in Pakistan.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective case-series of patients undergoing median to radial nerve transfer for radial nerve palsy over a period of 6 y, from 2012 to 2019. Patients with radial nerve palsy were diagnosed via electromyography and nerve conduction studies. The procedure involved coapting the branches of the flexor carpi radialis and flexor digitorum superficialis (long and ring finger) nerves to the posterior interosseous nerve and extensor carpi radialis brevis, respectively. Patients were assessed using the Medical Research Council scale for muscle strength of wrist, finger and thumb extension separately at 1 y time. Our results were then compared to results from similar nerve transfer studies.

RESULTS

We operated on 10 right-hand dominant patients, eight males and two females with a median age of 33 y (6-63 y). four sustained injury to the right hand and six to the left. Causes of the injuries included road traffic accident (n = 3), firearm injury (n = 4), shrapnel (n = 1), iatrogenic injury (injection in deltoid region (n = 1) and fall (n = 1). Types of fracture included mid humerus fracture, fracture of the surgical neck of the humerus, and supracondylar fracture of the humerus. Median time to surgery since injury was 4 mo (1-8 mo). Independent wrist extension was M4+ in all patients and independent finger extension was M4+ in seven and M4-in two patients. However, a patient who presented late at 8 mo had poorer finger outcomes with extension at M2-. All patients had independent movement of fingers.

CONCLUSIONS

Nerve transfer is a reliable method of post traumatic nerve repair and reinnervation, particularly in lower-middle income countries, even in cases where the nerve damage is severe and extensive and up to 6 mo may have elapsed between injury and presentation. Timely median to radial nerve transfer is a highly recommended option for radial nerve palsy, with regular follow-ups and physical therapy added to ensure positive outcomes.

Pronator teres nerve branch transfer to the extensor carpi radialis brevis nerve branch for wrist extension reconstruction in proximal radial nerve injury following humeral shaft fractures

Background

Tendon and nerve transfers are used for functional reconstruction in cases of proximal radial nerve injury complicated by humeral fractures in patients who do not show functional recovery after primary nerve repair. The effectiveness of pronator teres (PT) nerve branch transfer to the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ERCB) nerve branch for wrist extension reconstruction was investigated and compared to the results of tendon transfer.

Methods

This study included 10 patients with proximal radial nerve injury, who did not show functional recovery after primary nerve repair at our hospital between April 2016 and May 2019. The nerve transfer procedure included PT nerve branch transfer to the ECRB nerve branch to restore wrist extension and the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) nerve branch to the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) to restore thumb and finger extension. Tendon transfer procedures included PT transfer to the ECRB for wrist extension, FCR transfer to the extensor digitorum communis (EDC) for finger extension and palmaris longus (PL) transfer to the extensor pollicis longus (EPL) for thumb extension.

Results

Five patients recovered Medical Research Council grade M4 muscle strength in the ECRB and EPL in both tendon and nerve groups. Two patients recovered grade M3 strength and three patients recovered grade M4 strength in the EDC in the tendon transfer group, and all five patients recovered grade M4 strength in the EDC in the nerve transfer group. Limited wrist flexion was observed only in one patient in the tendon transfer group.

Conclusion

PT nerve branch transfer to the ECRB nerve branch combined with FCR nerve branch transfer to PIN is a useful strategy for wrist and fingers extension reconstruction in patients with proximal radial nerve injuries.

Presentation and Management Outcome of High Radial Nerve Palsy with Tendon Transfers

Background

This randomized clinical trial was carried out to document the clinical presentation of isolated high radial nerve palsy (high RNP) and compare the outcome of triple tendon transfers.

Methods

The study included patients of all genders and ages who presented with isolated high RNP. Half of them were randomly assigned to the flexor carpi radialis set (FCR-set) of tendon transfers (group A) and a half to the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU-set) of tendon transfers (group B).

Results

Out of 44 patients, 38 were males, and 6 were females. The age ranged from 7 years to 55 years. 26(59.09%) patients had primary RNP in association with fractures of the humerus. The postoperative mean disability of arm, shoulder, and hand score (Quick DASH-11 score) for the patients in the FCR-set of transfers was 34.54%% versus 41.81% for the FCU-set of transfers. 11 patients (25%) developed radial deviation deformity.

Conclusion

RNP was predominantly found among males of the young age group, and the majority of the cases resulted from preventable causes. The triple tendon transfers among patients of the two groups robustly restored the lost extension of the wrist and digits in a matching way. The patients also subjectively reported remarkable improvement in terms of the favorable Quick-DASH-11 scores. Radial deviation deformity occurred among half of the patients who underwent the FCU set of tendon transfers.

Tendon transfer surgery for radial nerve palsy

Palliative tendon transfer is an integral part of radial nerve palsy treatment. It can be considered in the first weeks when the possibility of nerve repair by direct suture or nerve grafting is not feasible or reasonable. Mostly, it is discussed secondarily when it is too late for nerve surgery and motor recovery cannot be expected, or after failure or incomplete recovery after nerve repair. The goal of tendon transfers is to restore wrist, finger and thumb extension. For wrist extension, the use of pronator teres is well accepted. The best tendon transfer for finger extension is debated. This can be restored doing a flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU), flexor carpi radialis or flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) to extensor digitorum communis transfer. Regarding thumb extension and abduction, a palmaris longus (PL) or one FDS tendon to the rerouted extensor pollicis longus (EPL) transfer can be performed. If a transfer is done on the EPL without rerouting it, abduction can be restored by doing a tendon transfer to the abductor pollicis longus (APL) or an APL tenodesis. The different tendon transfer options are selected based on the surgeon's preference, and most importantly, discussed with the patients to define the objectives together. The transfer is chosen based on the clinical examination (high or low radial nerve palsy, tendon available for transfer like PL, wrist mobility) and based on the patient's needs and expectations (activities requiring the FCU, finger independence, independence of thumb extension or abduction). If the surgical rules and the postoperative instructions for rehabilitation are followed, tendon transfers for radial nerve palsy regularly produce very satisfactory results.

Radial nerve palsy following humeral shaft fracture: a theoretical PNF rehabilitation approach for tendon and nerve transfers

Background:Humerus fracture-induced radial nerve injury can create severe and permanent disabilities. Purpose:Surgical management often relies on either tendon or nerve transfer. Regardless of which procedure is selected, physical therapists are challenged to restore functional outcomes without jeopardizing repair healing. Through synergistic, multi planar upper extremity movement patterns, neuromuscular irradiation, or overflow, and neuroplasticity, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) may improve strength, range of motion and tone. Methods:After reviewing the literature, a five phase PNF-based treatment approach is proposed with timing differences based on the selected procedure. Findings:Phase I (2 or 4 weeks pre-surgery for tendon or nerve transfer, respectively) consists of comprehensive patient education; Phase II (4-6 or 1-2 weeks post-surgery for tendon or nerve transfer, respectively) explores variable duration peripheral and central nervous system motor learning during isometric activation to enhance central neuroplasticity; Phase III (7-12 or 3-20 weeks post-surgery for tendon or nerve transfer, respectively) incorporates low-intensity motor control including contralateral isotonic upper extremity loading to maximize overflow and neuroplastic effects; Phase IV (13-26 or 21-52 weeks post-surgery for tendon or nerve transfer, respectively) adds high-intensity strength and motor control using ipsilateral isotonic upper extremity loading to maximize overflow and neuroplastic effects. Phase V (27-52 or 53-78 weeks post-surgery for tendon or nerve transfer, respectively) progresses to more activity of daily living, vocational, or sport-specific training with higher intensity strength and motor control tasks. Conclusions:Through manually guided synergistic, multi planar movement, overflow, and neuroplasticity, a PNF treatment approach may optimize neuromuscular recovery. Validation strategies to confirm clinical treatment efficacy are discussed.

Nerve Versus Tendon Transfer for Radial Nerve Paralysis Reconstruction

PURPOSE

With radial nerve lesions, the results of nerve transfers and how they objectively compare with the outcomes of tendon transfers remain unstudied. We compared the results after nerve transfer in patients with less than 12 months since radial nerve injury with the results after tendon transfer in patients not eligible for nerve surgery because of longstanding paralysis (minimum of 15 months).

METHODS

In 14 patients with radial nerve lesions incurred less than 12 months previously, we transferred the anterior interosseous nerve to the nerve of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB), while the nerve to the flexor carpi radialis was transferred to the posterior interosseous nerve. In 13 patients with lesions of longer duration, we transferred the pronator teres tendon to the ECRB, the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon to the extensor digitorum communis, and the palmaris longus to the rerouted extensor pollicis longus (EPL) tendon. At a final evaluation, we measured passive and active range of motion (ROM) of the wrist, finger, and thumb and grasp strength.

RESULTS

In a comparison of wrist flexion-extension ROM and grasp strength, we observed better recovery in the nerve transfer than in the tendon transfer group. In the tendon transfer group, we observed limitations in wrist flexion in 9 of the 13 patients and permanent radial deviation in 5. Half of the patients in the tendon transfer group needed to flex their wrist to fully extend their fingers, whereas finger extension was possible with the wrist either extended or at neutral in all patients following nerve transfer. After nerve transfer, extension at the first carpometacarpal joint was restored in 11 of the 14 patients, whereas this occurred in just 4 of the 13 patients following tendon transfer. In both groups, we observed a 30° lag in thumb metacarpophalangeal extension, which reflects poor recovery of EPL function.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, we observed better outcomes in those who underwent nerve transfer versus tendon transfer procedures. However, room still remains for improved thumb motion with both procedures.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Outcome of tendon transfer for radial nerve palsy using Flexor Carpi Radialis combination (Brands transfer)

INTRODUCTION

-Loss of radial nerve function leads to severe weakness of grip and tendon transfer is considered the standard treatment. However; there is continuing debate as to the best combination of tendon transfers in such patients. The aim of this study is to present the results of Flexor carpi radialis (FCR) combination of triple tendon transfer for radial nerve palsy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

It is a retrospective study conducted over 15 years. 58 patients of with irreversible radial nerve paralysis were included. Brands transfer was performed in all cases. The ranges of movement of the wrist, fingers and thumb were evaluated pre-operatively and postoperatively using Bincaz scale.

RESULTS

Total 58 patients were included in the study, 47 were male and 11 female patients with mean age of 35.27 years. Causes of radial nerve palsy were comminuted open humeral fracture (n = 42), penetrating injuries (n = 13) and brachial plexus palsy (n = 3). Mean duration of palsy was 9.37 months (range = 9-12 months). The mean post-operative follow-up was 10 (range = 2-15) years. On evaluation with the Bincaz score, 6 patients had excellent results, 49 patients had good results, and 3 patients had poor results. There were 3 complications in 5 patients, including radial deviation of wrist, inadequate abduction of thumb and restricted wrist flexion. 55 patients (94.82%) were able to return to their normal daily work after ∼8 weeks. Conclusions - Tendon transfer is a standard procedure for radial nerve palsy but potential advantage of one method over the other has not been demonstrated. Brand's transfer results in an acceptable restoration of hand function.

Surgical restoration of drop-hand syndrome with tendon transfer in patients injured in the Syrian civil war

BACKGROUND

The radial nerve is one of the most common war-related injury sites due to penetrating cutting tool injuries or gunshot wounds, resulting in drop-hand syndrome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of tendon transfer in patients with drop-hand syndrome who had been injured in the Syrian Civil War.

METHODS

This level-II, prospective, comparative study included 13 civilians injured in the Syrian Civil War 2015 and 2017. The palmaris longus tendon was used for transfer to the extensor pollicis longus for thumb extension. The pronator teres was transferred to the extensor carpi radialis brevis for wrist extension. The flexor carpi radialis was transferred to the extensor digiti communis for 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th finger extension. All outcomes of thumb abduction and extension, wrist extension, wrist flexion, and finger extension were assessed.

RESULTS

There was a high level of radial nerve injury in all patients included in the study. The time from injury to treatment ranged from 1.5 months to 9 months. The mechanism of injury most commonly observed was a gunshot wound, which was observed in 8 patients (61.5%), followed by a penetrating cutting tool injury (n = 3; 23.1%) and humerus fracture (n = 2; 15.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

In radial nerve injuries, successful results can be achieved with tendon transfer. All patients regained thumb abduction of up to approximately 60°. All the patients were able to bend the wrist, grip, and extend the fingers while in wrist flexion, neutral wrist and wrist extension positions. Although the reason for the radial injury varied, the postoperative outcomes were good for all patients, and the rehabilitation period progressed successfully in patients who underwent tendon transfer repair within 90 days of injury.

Outcome of Tendon Transfers for Radial Nerve Palsy in a Malaysian Tertiary Centre

Tendon transfers for radial nerve palsy is a common operation with good results. We did a retrospective study on twenty patients with radial nerve palsy who underwent tendon transfer surgery and recovered between January 2008 and December 2012. Outcomes measured were motor power of wrist extension, finger extension, grip strength and DASH scores. There was significant improvement of motor power of wrist and finger extension between the preoperative period and three months post-operatively, between the pre operative period and six months post operatively and between three and six months postoperatively (p = 0.0005). Grip strength improved significantly as well between preoperative, three and six months postoperatively (p = 0.0005). DASH scores reflecting patient satisfaction at six months postoperatively showed only mild or moderate difficulty of function.

Agenesis, functional deficiency and the common type of the flexor digitorum superficialis of the little finger: A meta-analysis

Agenesis, functional deficiency and the common type of the flexor digitorum superficialis of the little finger are reported in the literature to be highly variable with significant discrepancy between clinical and cadaveric frequencies. The aim of this systematic review was to generate overall clinical and cadaveric weighted frequencies, along with ancestry-based, side-based, sex-based and laterality-based frequencies. A systematic literature search identified 34 studies including 12,213 forearms/hands that met the inclusion criteria. Functional deficit of the FDS tendon of the little finger was significantly more prevalent among Iranian and Caucasian populations as compared to Indian, East African and Chinese populations. The weighted "clinical" frequency of functional absence of the FDS tendon of the little finger was 7.45%, while prevalence of the common type was 37.5%. The weighted "cadaveric" prevalence of muscle absence of the FDS-5 in the forearm was 2.5% while tendon absence in the hands was nil. An expanded examination technique proved to be the most accurate test for FDS function. In case of injury, inadequate knowledge of different connections or substitutions of the FDS-5 could lead to a total loss of flexion of the little finger. These findings support the hypothesis of a dual origin of the FDS-5 where the muscle portion originates in the forearm, while the tendon portion originates in the hand.

Irreparable Radial Nerve Palsy Due to Delayed Diagnostic Management of a Giant Lipoma at the Proximal Forearm Resulting in a Triple Tendon Transfer Procedure: Case report and Brief Review of Literature

Background:

Non-traumatic radial nerve palsy (RNP) caused by local tumors is a rare and uncommon entity.

Methods:

A 62-year-old female presented with a left non-traumatic RNP, initially starting with weakness only. It was caused by a benign giant lipoma at the proximal forearm that was misdiagnosed over a period of 2 years. The slowly growth of the tumor led to an irreparable overstretching-related partial nerve disruption. For functional recovery of the patient, a triple tendon transfer procedure had to be performed.

Results:

Four months after surgery, the patient was completely able to perform her activities of daily living again. At the 10-months follow-up, strength of wrist extension, thumb's extension and abduction, and long fingers II-V extension had all improved to grade 4 in Medical Research Council scale (0-5). In order to restore motion, the patient reported that she would undergo the same triple tendon transfer procedure a second time where necessary. Due to the initially misdiagnosed tumor, there was an overall delayed duration of time for functional recovery of the patient.

Conclusion:

The triple tendon transfer procedure offers a useful and reliable method to restore functionality for patients sustaining irreparable RNP. However, it must be noted critically with our patient that this procedure probably would have been avoided. Initially, there was weakness only by entrapment of the radial nerve. RNP caused by local tumors are uncommon but known from the literature, and so it should be considered generally in differential diagnosis of non-traumatic RNP.

An objective functional evaluation of the flexor carpi ulnaris set of triple tendon transfer in radial nerve palsy

This study reports an objective assessment of postoperative function of 11 triple transfers for high radial palsies, using pronator teres for wrist extension, flexor carpi ulnaris for finger extension and palmaris longus for thumb extension. The mean follow-up was 3.3 years. Assessment was done by recording the active ranges of wrist motion, grip strength, wrist and finger strength and work simulation. The mean strength and range of wrist extension were 42% and 86%, respectively, of the contralateral wrist. Other measured movements were within the functional range and work simulation confirmed good restoration of function. The mean DASH score was 3.45, with no patient reporting any specific functional complaints. This study shows that even though the range of wrist motion and the strength of the wrist and fingers are less than normal, hand function remains good. We conclude that the flexor carpi ulnaris set of tendon transfer works well.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

A Cadaver Study of Median-to-Radial Nerve Transfer for Radial Nerve Injuries

PURPOSE

To assess the anatomic feasibility of a median-to-radial nerve transfer in cadaver limbs and to quantify the number of axons present in the cut ends of the involved donor and recipient nerves.

METHODS

Ten fresh frozen cadaveric upper limbs were dissected. We investigated whether the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) branch/flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) branch (donor nerve) reached the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN)/extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) branch (recipient nerve) without tension. We also investigated the length of the transected supinator fascia for FCR-posterior interosseous nerve transfer and the FDS-ECRB positional relationship using the epicondyle line and the midline of the forearm as axes. The findings were used for these 2 types of nerve transfer with evaluation closer to the target muscles. The distance between the point at which the FDS and ECRB branches met and the point at which the ECRB branch entered the muscle was measured. After nerve coaptation, the axon number was determined by histological evaluation.

RESULTS

In all limbs, the FCR and FDS branches reached the PIN and the ECRB branch without tension. The transected supinator fascia was 17 (3-25) mm long. The point at which the FDS branch reached the ECRB branch [corrected] was 48 (23-65) mm distal to the epicondyle line and approximately 23 (18-27) mm radial to the midline of the forearm. The distance between the point at which the FDS and ECRB branches met and the point at which the ECRB branch entered the muscle was 27 (17-40) mm. The mean axon numbers were FCR, 1501 (932-3022); PIN, 5162 (4325-7732); FDS, 885 (558-962); and ECRB, 548 (433-723).

CONCLUSIONS

The FCR branch could be transferred to the PIN [corrected] and the FDS to the ECRB branch in all limbs without tension.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

We provide anatomical and histological information for median-to-radial nerve transfer.

Plastic surgery for the oncological patient

The therapy of oncological patients has seen tremendous progress in the last decades. For most entities, it has been possible to improve the survival as well as the quality of life of the affected patients. To supply optimal cancer care, a multidisciplinary approach is vital. Together with oncologists, radiotherapists and other physicians, plastic surgeons can contribute to providing such care in all stages of treatment. From biopsies to the resection of advanced tumors, the coverage of the resulting defects and even palliative care, plastic surgery techniques can help to improve survival and quality of life as well as mitigate negative effects of radiation or the problems arising from exulcerating tumors in a palliative setting. This article aims to present the mentioned possibilities by illustrating selected cases and reviewing the literature. Especially in oncological patients, restoring their quality of life with the highest patient safety possible is of utmost importance.

Motor and sensory nerve transfers in the forearm and hand

BACKGROUND

Peripheral nerve injury is a significant problem affecting more than 1 million people around the world each year and poses major challenges to the plastic and reconstructive surgeon. For high upper extremity nerve injuries, distal muscle reinnervation and functional outcomes are generally poor. Tendon transfer has been the traditional reconstructive option in these cases to restore hand function. More recently, nerve transfers have been described in the forearm and hand to recover hand and wrist function and critical sensation.

METHODS

This article reviews the surgical principles, donor nerve options, indications, and outcomes of distal nerve transfers for high upper extremity nerve injuries.

RESULTS

The functional results of nerve transfers to date have been comparable to tendon transfers. The primary advantage is the potential for individual finger motion from a donor nerve with singular function. The disadvantage is the longer recovery time required for muscle reinnervation.

CONCLUSIONS

Nerve transfers are a viable option for peripheral nerve injuries distal to the brachial plexus. The choice of management will depend on the patient's individual goals and priorities in terms of the need or desire for individual finger movement and the length of the recovery period.

Nerve transfers from branches to the flexor carpi radialis and pronator teres to reconstruct the radial nerve

PURPOSE

To present our method and results for transferring branches of the median nerve for radial nerve palsy or posterior cord lesions.

METHODS

We transferred 1 branch to the pronator teres to the branch to the extensor carpi radialis longus muscle and transferred the branch to the flexor carpi radialis to the posterior interosseous nerve. We carried out these transfers in 6 patients with radial nerve palsy or posterior cord lesions. We reviewed functional outcomes, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores, and Patient Evaluation Measure scores.

RESULTS

After 20 months of follow-up evaluation, all patients had recovered extensor carpi radialis longus activity of M4. Activity of the extensor carpi ulnaris was M3 in 2 patients and M4 in 4 patients. Extensor pollicis longus activity was M4 in all 6 cases. Metacarpophalangeal extension was M4 in 4 cases and M3 in 2 cases. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 26 (range, 7-43), and the mean Patient Evaluation Measure score was 34 (range, 24-53).

CONCLUSIONS

Selective independent synergistic transfer of median nerve fascicles to the radial nerve branches has shown excellent results in the treatment of severe lesions of the radial nerve.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

[Transfer of the flexor digitorum superficialis tendons of the middle and ring fingers to restore extension of fingers and thumb (Boyes' transfer)]

OBJECTIVES

Restoration of extension in the metacarpophalangeal joints of the fingers as well as in the interphalangeal joint of the thumb by transfer of the superficial flexor tendons of the long and ring fingers (flexor digitorum superficialis III and IV).

INDICATIONS

The indications for surgery are substantial loss and palsy of muscles innervated by the radial nerve and its roots.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

The procedure is contraindicated by reversible radial palsy, palsy or substantial loss of flexors, limited passive mobility due to contracture, ankylosis or instability of the affected joints, instability of the wrist joint, palsy of the wrist flexors, ankylosis of the wrist joint in an unfavorable position, adhesions of flexor or extensor tendons, insufficient soft tissue coverage or soft tissue defects and passage of transposed tendons through scarred tissue.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

The surgical technique involves division of the superficialis tendons of the long and ring fingers proximal to Camper's chiasm and routing of the tendons to the dorsum of the hand through separate fenestrations of the interosseus membrane. The flexor digitorum superficialis tendon III is interwoven into the tendons of the extensor pollicis longus und extensor indicis and the flexor digitorum superficialis IV is interwoven into the extensor digitorum tendons.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Forearm splinting in 20° wrist extension including the metacarpophalangeal joints of the fingers in extension and the thumb in the automatic stop position for 4 weeks leaving the proximal and distal interphalangeal joints free.

RESULTS

From March 1999 to January 2010 a Boyes' transfer was performed in 13 patients (8 female and 5 male) and the right side was affected in 8, the left side in 5 and the dominant hand in 7 cases. The patient age at the time of surgery was an average of 47 ± 17 (13-73) years. The interval between radial palsy and tendon transfer was an average of 79 ± 144 (4-543) months. The final follow-up was performed at an average of 82 ± 35 (32-165) months. According to the Haas scoring system finger extension was excellent in 5, good in 5, fair in 3 and unfavorable in 4 cases and thumb extension was excellent in 5, good in 3, fair in 1 and unfavorable in 5 patients. The mean disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score was 36 ± 24 (11-85) points. Although disability of varying degrees persisted in all patients, Boyes' transfer is considered to be a safe procedure to restore finger and thumb extension with excellent and good functional results, a high degree of patient satisfaction and few complications.

Differential expression and cellular localization of novel isoforms of the tendon biomarker tenomodulin

Tenomodulin (Tnmd, also called Tendin) is classified as a type II transmembrane glycoprotein and is highly expressed in developing as well as in mature tendons. Along with scleraxis (scx), Tnmd is a candidate marker gene for tenocytes. Its function is unknown, but it has been reported to have anti-angiogenic properties. Results in a knockout mouse model did not substantiate that claim. It has homology to chondromodulin-I. Single nucleotide polymorphisms of TNMD have been associated with obesity, macular degeneration, and Alzheimer's disease in patients. In the present study, three Tnmd isoforms with deduced molecular weights of 20.3 (isoform II), 25.4 (isoform III), and 37.1 (isoform I) kDa were proposed and verified by Western blot from cells with green fluorescent protein-linked, overexpressed constructs, tissue, and by qPCR of isoforms from human tissues and cultured cells. Overexpression of each Tnmd isoform followed by immunofluorescence imaging showed that isoforms I and II had perinuclear localization while isoform III was cytoplasmic. Results of qPCR demonstrated differential expression of each Tnmd isoform in patient's specimens taken from flexor carpi radialis, biceps brachii, and flexor digitorum profundus tendons. Knockdown of Tnmd increased the expression of both scleraxis (scx) and myostatin, indicating a potential negative feedback loop between Tnmd and its regulators. Knockdown of all Tnmd isoforms simultaneously also reduced tenocyte proliferation. I-TASSER protein three-dimensional conformation modeling predictions indicated each Tnmd isoform had different structures and potential functions: isoform 1, modeled as a cytosine methyltransferase; isoform 2, a SUMO-1-like SENP-1 protease; and isoform 3, an α-syntrophin, plextrin homology domain scaffolding protein. Further functional studies with each Tnmd isoform may help us to better understand regulation of tenocyte proliferation, tendon development, response to injury and strain, as well as mechanisms in tendinoses. These results may indicate novel therapeutic targets in specific tenomodulin isoforms as well as treatments for tendon diseases.