Evaluation of the diagnostic yield of ARQIP: A new restless legs syndrome diagnostic questionnaire and validation of its Hindi translation

Modification and Validation of a Diagnostic Questionnaire for Restless Legs Syndrome: Modified-Restless Legs Syndrome Diagnostic Questionnaire (m-RLS-DQ)

Background

Diagnostic questionnaire that are available for restless legs syndrome does not include items related to RLS mimics and, hence, increases chances of false positive cases. This study aimed at modification and validation of RLS-diagnostic Questionnaire.

Methods

During modification, additional items were identified, developed, and subjected to evaluation by experts. Experts were requested to validate the content of each item. Based on their responses, content validity indices (average and universal agreement) were calculated. It was then translated to Hindi and validated in a clinical population that included patients with RLS, somatic symptoms disorder, anxiety, other RLS mimics, and osteoarthritis. In addition, a group of healthy controls was also included. Face, concurrent, and discriminant validities were calculated.

Results

Among 209 subjects, nearly 40 subjects had clinical diagnosis of RLS, osteoarthritis, somatic-symptoms-disorder, and anxiety disorder, each. In addition, 16 patients had other RLS mimics (akathisia, varicose veins, BFS, leg-cramps, chronic insomnia) and 30 were healthy controls. After multiple revisions, content validity indices achieved a score of 1 for m-RLS-DQ. Sensitivity and specificity of m-RLS-DQ v. 1.4 for the diagnosis of RLS were 94.9% and 94.1%, respectively. For the diagnosis of RLS, PPV was 78.7%, and NPV was 98.7% with an accuracy of 94.3%. Less than one fourth of participants having chronic insomnia, somatic symptoms disorder, anxiety disorder, and knee osteoarthritis were found to be false positive on m-RLS-DQ; however, none of the healthy controls were found positive on m-RLS-DQ. Concurrent validity with clinical diagnosis of RLS was 0.83 (P < 0.001). Discriminant validity with somatic symptoms disorder was -0.14 (P = 0.03) and with osteoarthritis -0.24 (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

m-RLS-DQ is a valid instrument with acceptable psychometric properties, which can be used for the screening as well as diagnosis of RLS in clinical practice and research studies.

A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study of Sleep Disturbances in Children with ADHD and Matched Controls

Background: Systematic reviews conducted on sleep disturbances in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have found inconsistent results due to the presence of several moderating variables which were not controlled for in previous studies. The aim of this study was to examine sleep disturbances in children with ADHD compared to their typically developing peers after controlling for moderating variables (age, sex, medication status, body mass index, and psychiatric and medical comorbidities). Methods: ADHD was diagnosed using DSM-IV-TR criteria (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) and Conners’ Parent Rating Scales. Children recruited (aged 6−12 years) for the ADHD group (n = 40) met the following criteria: IQ > 80, unmedicated, and no psychiatric or medical comorbidities. The control group consisted of age- and sex-matched typically developing peers (n = 40). Sleep was assessed subjectively (through parent reported questionnaires and sleep logs) and objectively (using video polysomnography). Results: 65% of children with ADHD had a sleep disorder, as compared to 17% of controls. The ADHD group reported more sleep disturbances and disorders, both on subjective measures and objective measures. Conclusions: Sleep disturbances and primary sleep disorders in children with ADHD exist independent of moderating variables and differences in sleep assessment methods, thereby bolstering support for previously documented literature on the ADHD and sleep connection.

Validation and Diagnostic Accuracy of Hindi Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS-H) Screening Tool

Background  Restless legs syndrome (RLS), a prevalent and treatable entity, has high impact on quality of life, requiring a better screening tool for its early detection. Thus, present study aimed to derive a Hindi RLS (RLS-H) screening tool for its use in Indian population.

Materials and Methods  RLS-H screening tool, derived by translating first four criteria of 2012 revised International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) diagnostic criteria in Hindi and was validated in 50 RLS and 50 non-RLS patients. This validated RLS-H tool was used to screen 1,066 patients attending neurology clinic for assessing its diagnostic accuracy. Internal consistency, discriminatory validity, and various diagnostic yields were calculated. IRLSSG was used as gold standard for final diagnosis of RLS.

Results  RLS-H screening tool had an internal consistency of 0.910. No correlation was found between RLS-H screening tool and Epworth sleepiness scale, Pittsburgh sleep quality index, or International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group rating scale indicating satisfactory discriminant validity. Prevalence of RLS was 13.6%. The question (Q)1 had highest sensitivity (97.9%) and Q4 had highest specificity (92.66%). Thus, its combinations (Q1 + Q4) along with addition of Q2 or Q3 were compared for best combination of diagnostic accuracy. A minimum cutoff value of RLS-H screening tool was 2.5 for considering patients requiring detailed RLS evaluation.

Conclusion  RLS-H screening tool can be used as a screening tool for early detection of RLS among susceptible patients. Patients answering “yes” to more than two questions (cutoff = 2.5) or “yes” to Q1 and Q4 should be interviewed and assessed for RLS.

Restless legs syndrome/Willis-Ekbom disease among patients with resistant hypertension versus stroke patients-a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological studies have shown an increased prevalence and incidence of hypertension as well as a higher incidence of stroke among patients suffering from RLS. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of RLS among patients with resistant hypertension (RH) and compare the clinical characteristics of these patients with patients of stroke pre-existing RLS and with patients with primary RLS presenting to the Sleep clinic.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with RH (without any identifiable cause on extensive work up) and consecutive in-patients with stroke were enrolled over a 3-year-period. Patients with RH fulfilling revised-IRLSSG-criteria for RLS comprised group 1 and those with stroke and RLS formed group 2. These were compared with patients diagnosed to have idiopathic RLS (iRLS) (Group 3). Prevalence of RLS in groups 1 and 2 and RLS characteristics in all groups were compared.

RESULTS

Sixteen out of 56 RH patients (29%) formed group 1 and 43 out 346 of stroke patients (12%) formed group 2, while 43 consecutive iRLS patients were included in group 3. Age was significantly higher, with male dominance in group 2. Median age at symptom onset was significantly lower in group 1. Positive family history was similar in RH and iRLS patients and was significantly less common in stroke patients. Asymmetrical/unilateral distribution of symptoms was significantly more common in stroke group, compared to RH and iRLS groups.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated a high prevalence of RLS among patients with resistant hypertension. RLS characteristics are different from those in patients with stroke, and very similar to primary RLS.

Tools for the Assessment of Pediatric Restless Legs Syndrome

BACKGROUND

There are only a few of the questionnaires for the diagnosis, severity and quality of life of adult Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) that have been utilized in children. Even fewer of these types of instruments have been developed specifically for Pediatric RLS.

METHODS

This article is a review of instruments used in adult RLS, their applicability to children and of instruments specifically developed for childhood RLS.

RESULTS

A single question for the diagnosis of RLS has been validated for adults and utilized in one epidemiology study of adolescents with RLS. The Pediatric Emory RLS questionnaire has been developed as a diagnostic instrument for childhood RLS, utilized in two studies of RLS in children, but not yet validated. The IRLS (International Restless Legs Scale), the CGI (Clinical Global Impression), and the RLS-6, which have been validated for determining adult RLS severity, were administered without difficulty in one therapeutic study of adolescent RLS. In addition, the IRLS has also been utilized in another 5 studies of childhood and adolescent RLS. The pediatric Restless Legs Syndrome Severity Scale (P-RLS-SS) has been developed for use in children but not yet validated. A modification of the P-RLS-SS based upon rating the severity of the 4 diagnostic criteria for RLS has been developed for children but not yet validated. There are no Quality of Life scales developed for Pediatric RLS. However, 3 separate studies utilized the general Peds Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) in RLS children and adolescents and one of these studies also employed the general Sleep Behavior Questionnaire (SBQ) and yet another of these studies also employed the Pediatric Symptom checklist (PSC).

DISCUSSION

There is a need for the development and validation of instruments specific to Pediatric RLS. Meanwhile, we recommend the use of the Pediatric RLS instruments that have been developed and we recommend use of the adult scales in adolescent RLS where language barriers are not a problem. If adult scales are used in younger children, we recommend that they be administered in conjunction with an ongoing discussion between the parent and the child during the scale administration.