Prevalent practice patterns in glaucoma: Poll of Indian ophthalmologists at a national conference

Barriers and Potential Solutions to Glaucoma Screening in the Developing World: A Review

PURPOSE

Glaucoma is a leading public health concern globally and its detection and management are way more complex and challenging in the developing world. This review article discusses barriers to glaucoma screening in developing countries from the perspective of different key stakeholders and proposes solutions.

METHODS/RESULTS

A literature search was carried out in the electronic catalogs of PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane database of systematic reviews to find studies that focused on barriers and enablers to glaucoma screening. The authors' interpretations were tabulated as descriptive and qualitative data and presented concisely from the point of view of key stakeholders such as the patients and their relatives, care providers, and system/governing bodies. Key barriers to glaucoma care identified are lack of awareness, poor accessibility to ophthalmic centers, inadequately trained human resources, unsatisfactory infrastructure, and nonavailability of financially viable screening programs. Educating care providers, as well as the public, providing care closer to where people live, and developing cost-effective screening strategies are needed to ensure proper identification of glaucoma patients in developing countries.

CONCLUSIONS

The logistics of glaucoma detection and management are complex. Hence, glaucoma detection programs should be implemented only when facilities for glaucoma management are in place. Understanding the importance of glaucoma screening and its future implications, addressing the various roadblocks, empowering and efficiently implementing the existing strategies, and incorporating novel ones using Artificial Intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL) will help in establishing a robust glaucoma screening program in developing countries.

Bridging gaps in ophthalmology residency programs: the link between practice, training and confidence in ocular examination and gonioscopy for diagnosing glaucoma, a blinding disease

BACKGROUND

To evaluate real-world utilization of gonioscopy for diagnosing glaucoma among ophthalmologists with diverse subspecialties, and understand current perceptions of teaching, training, and confidence in gonioscopy.

METHODS

A nationwide anonymous online survey was conducted among practicing ophthalmologists, querying about demographics, professional experience, practice of routine ocular examination for glaucoma and perceptions of confidence in performing them.

RESULTS

136 ophthalmologists participated in the survey, with various levels of experience from residency to over twenty years of ophthalmology practice. Glaucoma specialists comprised 23 (16.9%) of the participants. Of the non-glaucoma-specialist respondents, only 33 (29.2%) expressed being highly confident in interpreting gonioscopic findings, which correlated significantly with their self-reported inadequate level of training in gonioscopy during residency (p < 0.001) and even more so with their low frequency of implementing gonioscopy in routine examinations (p < 0.001). The commonly cited reasons for the low practice of gonioscopy were insufficient time allotted to examinations and lack of experience, knowledge or equipment.

CONCLUSIONS

Gonioscopy is fundamental to the detection of glaucoma. This study reveals underutilization of gonioscopy in the practice of ophthalmology and its association with lower training opportunities, calling for expedited changes in the residency's curriculum, alongside measures to promote its use in clinical practice.

Review of glaucoma management in France

PURPOSE

To conduct a review of glaucoma management in France.

METHOD

A 15-question survey was sent to ophthalmologists listed in the journal Réalités Ophtalmologiques and the Syndicat National des Ophtalmologues de France.

RESULTS

459/471 responses were analyzed. Gonioscopy was performed by 64.7% of respondents with a Goldmann three-mirror lens, by 51.4% with a four-mirror lens, and 8.2% preferred to perform the procedure with anterior segment imaging. The visual field was reported to be interpreted without difficulty by 87.8% of the practitioners, and 54.0% utilize a progression software. Ultrasound biomicroscopy was reported to be interpreted without difficulty by 20.0% of practitioners. In cases of severe ocular hypertonia with flat bleb in early postoperative trabeculectomy, 61.7% chose ocular massage as a first-line treatment, 52.9% chose laser suture lysis, 50.5% utilized needling, and 24.8% employed hypotonizing eyedrops. In case of severe ocular hypertonia with flat bleb in early postoperative deep sclerectomy, 53.2% chose goniopuncture as their first treatment, 34.4% employed needling, 31.8% utilized ocular massage, and 23.3% chose hypotonizing eyedrops. The selective laser trabeculoplasty is used as soon as the diagnosis is made by 37.5%, in association with a mono or dual therapy by 93.2%, after trying different combinations of eyedrops by 45.5%, when the visual field deteriorates despite a normalized intraocular pressure by 46.6%, and in cases of hypertonia after filtering surgery by 19.2%. Concerning management for primary angle-closure glaucoma, 80.8% considered peripheral iridotomy, and 18.7% utilized cataract surgery.

CONCLUSION

The diversity of responses concerning glaucoma management should draw attention to the need for standardized practices.

Automated Focal Plane Merging From a Stack of Gonioscopic Photographs Using a Focus-Stacking Algorithm

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of automated focal plane merging with the collection of gonio-photographs with different depths of field (DOF) using an established focus-stacking algorithm.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted at Shimane University Hospital, Izumo, Japan. Sixteen eyes from 16 subjects from the glaucoma clinic were included in this study. Image processing was performed for the images of 16 eyes from 16 angle sector following the successful gonio-photography. The 256 sets of focus-stacked and best-focused images were prepared in random order and were compared for the DOF and informativeness to diagnose angle pathology by masked observers in each set as the subjective assessments. Moreover, the energy of the Laplacian (average |ΔI|), which is an indicator of image sharpness between the photographs with and without the focus-stacking processing was also analyzed with the Laplacian filter as the objective assessment.

Results

The automated image processing was successfully performed in all stacks of images. The significant deepening of DOF and improvement of informativeness achieved in 255 (99.6%) and 216 (84.4%) images (P < 0.0001 for both, sign test) and the energy of the Laplacian also significantly increased in 243 (94.9%) images (P < 0.0001, sign test).

Conclusions

Focal plane merging by the automated algorithm can make the gonio-images deeper focus compared with the paired best-focused images subjectively and objectively, which would be useful for angle pathological assessment in clinical practice.

Translational Relevance

Focal plane merging algorithm for the automated gonio-photography can facilitate the angle assessment by providing informative deep-focus image, which would be useful for glaucoma care.

Erroneous assumption of ocular hypertension in patients with elevated intraocular pressure

Purpose:

To determine the proportion of erroneously assumed ocular hypertension (OHT) among referred patients of elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) seen in glaucoma clinic of a teaching hospital in Northern India.

Methods:

Retrospective review of case records of referred, diagnosed patients of OHT or unspecified glaucoma seen between January 2019 and March 2020. Using an algorithmic clinical approach, including gonioscopy, Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), and pachymetry, underlying cause for elevated-IOP was amended and proportion of erroneously assumed OHT was calculated.

Results:

Of 276 patients diagnosed either as OHT or unspecified glaucoma before being seen at our glaucoma clinic, 44 (16%) had IOP within normal range (10–21 mmHg) on GAT. In 97 (35%) cases elevated-IOP was associated with angle closure. The central corneal thickness (CCT) was >550 μm in 39 (14%) patients with elevated-IOP. The proportion of erroneously assumed OHT was 70% in this study.

Conclusion:

The elevated-IOP does not imply with OHT unless evident through comprehensive clinical examination and appropriate investigations.

Diagnosis of Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome in Pseudophakic Patients

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of pseudoexfoliation syndrome diagnosis in pseudophakic patients and potential means of improving it.

METHODS

This prospective, nonrandomized study comprised 41 consecutive patients (41 eyes) scheduled for cataract surgery at a tertiary medical center during 2016 and 2017. Preoperatively, all patients underwent a detailed slit-lamp examination, including gonioscopic assessment of the iridocorneal angle. The examination was performed by a glaucoma specialist who completed an assessment form documenting the presence/absence of clinical signs of pseudoexfoliation syndrome. It was repeated 1-2 weeks postoperatively by a second, masked, glaucoma specialist.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (39.0%) were diagnosed with pseudoex-foliation syndrome preoperatively. The diagnosis was confirmed postoperatively in 11/16 patients (68.8% sensitivity) and in an additional patient not diagnosed preoperatively (96% specificity). The ability to diagnose pseudoexfoliation syndrome postoperatively was significantly worse than preoperatively (Z = 12.161, p < 0.0001). Pupillary border deposits (75% of cases) and the Sampaolesi line (83.3%) were the cornerstones of the postoperative diagnosis; anterior capsular deposits were evident in only 41.6% of cases diagnosed postoperatively (31.3% of the originally diagnosed cases).

CONCLUSIONS

Underdiagnosis of pseudoexfoliation syndrome is common in pseudophakic patients and may have significant implications for future management. Careful attention to pupillary border anatomy and meticulous gonioscopic assessment of the iridocorneal angle are essential for accurate diagnosis. Preoperative documentation of pseudoexfoliation syndrome could help prevent this diagnostic pitfall.

Patients' perception of glaucoma diagnosis practice: Results from a survey of glaucoma patients in North India

PURPOSE

This study assesses the practice patterns of diagnosing ophthalmologists, as reported by glaucoma patients attending specialty glaucoma clinics in urban and rural areas of North India, for a second opinion.

METHODS

Prospective cross-sectional study using a structured interview-based survey was conducted from 1 November 2011 to 31 October 2012 on patients attending two specialty glaucoma care facilities in North India. Both clinics were in North India; however, one was rural (Kaithal) and one was urban (Delhi). Patients were asked through descriptions of machines and processes, regarding practice patterns of their glaucoma diagnosing ophthalmologists. The interview was conducted by ophthalmic assistants in tune with the vernacular of the region, in a language understood by the interviewee.

RESULTS

A total of 1506 patients consented to participate in the survey. The majority of patients reported undergoing tests for intraocular pressure measurement; however, 56-60% of these tests were carried out by the non-contact tonometer. More than 90% of patients reported no knowledge regarding the type and severity of the glaucoma they suffered from, and even less reported undergoing gonioscopy (3.6% Karnal and 16% Delhi). 84-86% patients who underwent perimetry reported undergoing at least some digital imaging of the optic disc.

CONCLUSIONS

Better counselling of, and communication with, the patient would help increase their awareness regarding their condition and the care required. This has the potential to enable better compliance with and adherence to treatment. Standardized training of ophthalmologists to improve clinical diagnosis of glaucoma would also go a long way.

Clinical Evaluation of Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm-Faster Compared With Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm-Standard in Normal Subjects, Glaucoma Suspects, and Patients With Glaucoma

PURPOSE

To compare the visual fields results obtained using the Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm-Standard (SS) and the Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm-Faster (SFR) in normal subjects, glaucoma suspects, and patients with glaucoma and to quantify potential time-saving benefits of the SFR algorithm.

DESIGN

Prospective, cross-sectional study.

METHODS

One randomly selected eye from 364 patients (77 normal subjects, 178 glaucoma suspects, and 109 patients with glaucoma) seen in a single institution underwent testing using both SS and SFR on the Humphrey Field Analyzer. Cumulative test time using each algorithm was compared after accounting for different rates of test reliability. Pointwise and cluster analysis was performed to determine whether there were systematic differences between algorithms.

RESULTS

Using SFR had a greater rate of unreliable results (29.3%) compared with SS (7.7%, P < .0001). This was mainly because of high false positive rates and seeding point errors. However, modeled test times showed that using SFR could obtain a greater number of reliable results within a shorter period of time. SFR resulted in higher sensitivity values (on average 0.5 dB for patients with glaucoma) that was greater under conditions of field loss (<19 dB). Cluster analysis showed no systematic patterns of sensitivity differences between algorithms.

CONCLUSIONS

After accounting for different rates of test reliability, SFR can result in significant time savings compared with SS. Clinicians should be cognizant of false positive rates and seeding point errors as common sources of error for SFR. Results between algorithms are not directly interchangeable, especially if there is a visual field deficit <19 dB.