Nipple-sparing Mastectomy in Breast Cancer: From an Oncologic Safety Perspective

Comparative Analysis of Nipple Reconstruction Techniques: Five Flap vs. C-V Flap

Background

Nipple-areola complex reconstruction represents the final phase in the comprehensive post-mastectomy treatment regimen. Despite the diversity of approaches available, there is currently no universally accepted benchmark technique for this critical aspect of breast reconstruction. In this study, we conducted a comparative assessment of two prominent techniques, the five Flap and C-V Flap.

Materials and Methods

Between November 2016 and April 2023, we recruited 100 female patients who had undergone unilateral post-oncological mastectomy and divided them into two groups: Group A comprising 50 patients who underwent the 5-Flap technique, whereas Group B comprising the remaining 50 underwent the C-V Flap technique. Over a 6-month observation period, we assessed nipple projection loss and evaluated overall satisfaction through self-reporting by patients and independent assessments by a medical observer.

Results

In our study, none of the reconstructed nipples in Group A (5 Flap) experienced either total or partial necrosis, contrasting with Group B (C-V Flap) which encountered a 10% incidence of partial necrosis and 4% incidence of total necrosis. Furthermore, the average nipple projection loss in Group B was substantial, measuring a 30% reduction from the initial projection at the 1-year mark, whereas Group A demonstrated a significantly lower 13% reduction. Notably, despite these variations in outcomes, both groups reported an equal and high level of satisfaction, with patients and external observers providing an average satisfaction score of 8.0 and 9.0, respectively.

Conclusion

The five-flap technique represents a safe and effective approach for patients undergoing nipple reconstruction.

The learning curve of the MS-TRAM/DIEP breast reconstruction by dual-trained breast surgeons

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer surgeries involving MS-TRAM/DIEP breast reconstruction has traditionally been collaborative efforts between breast surgeons and plastic surgeons. However, in our institution, this procedure is performed by dual-trained breast surgeons who are proficient in both breast surgery and MS-TRAM/DIEP breast reconstruction. This study aims to provide insights into the learning curve associated with this surgical approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included eligible breast cancer patients who underwent MS-TRAM/DIEP breast reconstruction by dual-trained breast surgeons between 2015 and 2020 at our institution. We present the learning curve of this surgical approach, with a focus on determining factors affecting flap harvesting time, surgery time, and ischemic time. Additionally, we assessed the surgical complication rates.

RESULTS

A total of 147 eligible patients were enrolled in this study. Notably, after 30 cases, a statistically significant reduction of 1.7 h in surgery time and 21 min in ischemic time was achieved, signifying the attainment of a plateau in the learning curve. And the major and minor complications were comparable between the early and after 30 cases.

CONCLUSION

This study explores the learning curve and feasibility experienced by dual-trained breast surgeons in performing MS-TRAM/DIEP breast reconstruction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05560633.

How to accurately preoperative screen nipple-sparing mastectomy candidate-a nomogram for predicting nipple-areola complex involvement risk in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) offers superior cosmetic outcomes and has been gaining wide acceptance. It has always been difficult to objectively quantify the risk of nipple-areola complex involvement (NACi). The goal was to develop a prediction model for clinical application.

METHODS

Patients who had a total mastectomy (TM) between January 2016 and January 2020 at a single institute formed the development cohort (n = 578) and those who had NSM + immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) between January 2020 and January 2021 formed the validation cohort (n = 112). The prediction model was developed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression studies. Based on NACi risk variables identified in the development cohort, a nomogram was created and evaluated in the validation cohort. Meanwhile, stratified analysis was performed based on the model's risk levels and was combined with intraoperative frozen pathology (IFP) to optimize the model.

RESULTS

Tumor central location, clinical tumor size (CTS) > 4.0 cm, tumor-nipple distance (TND) ≤ 1.0 cm, clinical nodal status positive (cN +), and KI-67 ≥ 20% were revealed to be good predictive indicators for NACi. A nomogram based on these major clinicopathologic variables was employed to quantify preoperative NACi risk. The accuracy was verified internally and externally. The diagnostic accuracy of IFP was 92.9%, sensitivity was 64.3%, and specificity was 96.9% in the validation group. Stratified analysis was then performed based on model risk. The diagnostic accuracy rates of IFP and NACiPM in low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk respectively were 96.0%, 93.3%, 83.9%, 61.3%, 66.7%, and 83.3%.

CONCLUSION

We created a visual nomogram to predict NACi risk in breast cancer patients. The NACiPM can be used to distinguish the low, intermediate, and high risk of NAC before surgery. Combined with IFP, we can develop a decision-making system for the implementation of NSM.

Nipple-areolar complex (NAC) or skin flap ischemia necrosis post nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM)-analysis of clinicopathologic factors and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to identify clinicopathologic factors and/or preoperative MRI vascular patterns in the prediction of ischemia necrosis of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) or skin flap post nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 441 NSM procedures from January 2011 to September 2021 from the breast cancer database at our institution. The ischemia necrosis of NAC or skin flap was evaluated in correlation with clinicopathologic factors and types of skin incision. Patients who received NSM with preoperative MRI evaluation were further evaluated for the relationship between vascular pattern and the impact on ischemia necrosis of NAC or skin flap.

RESULTS

A total of 441 cases with NSM were enrolled in the current study, and the mean age of the cases was 49.1 ± 9.8 years old. A total of 41 (9.3%) NSM procedures were found to have NAC ischemia/necrosis. Risk factors were evaluated of which old age, large mastectomy specimen weight (> 450 g), and peri-areola incision were identified as predictors of NAC necrosis. Two-hundred seventy NSM procedures also received preoperative MRI, and the blood supply pattern was 18% single-vessel type and 82% double-vessel pattern. There were no correlations between MRI blood supply patterns or types of skin flap incisions with ischemia necrosis of NAC. There were also no correlations between blood loss and the pattern or size of the blood vessel.

CONCLUSION

Factors such as the type of skin incision, age, and size of mastectomy weight played an important role in determining ischemia necrosis of NAC; however, MRI vascular (single or dual vessel supply) pattern was not a significant predictive factor.

Effect of the Nipple-Excising Breast-Conserving Therapy in Female Breast Cancer: A Competing Risk Analysis and Propensity Score Matching Analysis of Results Based on the SEER Database

Introduction

Due to the lack of randomized controlled trial, the effectiveness and oncological safety of nipple-excising breast-conserving therapy (NE-BCT) for female breast cancer (FBC) remains unclear. We aimed to explore and investigate the prognostic value of NE-BCT versus nipple-sparing breast-conserving therapy (NS-BCT) for patients with early FBC.

Methods

In this cohort study, data between NE-BCT and NS-BCT groups of 276,661 patients diagnosed with tumor–node–metastasis (TNM) stage 0–III FBC from 1998 to 2015 were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Propensity score matching analysis, Kaplan–Meier, X-tile, Cox proportional hazards model, and competing risk model were performed to evaluate the effectiveness and oncological safety for patients in NE-BCT and NS-BCT groups.

Results

A total of 1,731 (0.63%) patients received NE-BCT (NE-BCT group) and 274,930 (99.37%) patients received NS-BCT (NS-BCT group); 44,070 subjects died after a median follow-up time of 77 months (ranging from 1 to 227 months). In the propensity score matching (PSM) cohort, NE-BCT was found to be an adversely independent prognostic factor affecting overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR), 1.24; 95% CI, 1.06–1.45, p=0.0078]. Subjects in NE-BCT group had similar breast-cancer-specific survival (BCSS) (HR, 1.15; 95%CI, 0.88–1.52, p=0.30) and worse other-causes-specific death (OCSD) (HR, 1.217; 95%CI, 1.002–1.478, p=0.048<0.05) in comparison with those in the NS-BCT group.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that the administration of NE-BCT is oncologically safe and reliable and can be widely recommended in clinics for women with non-metastatic breast cancer.

Investigation of the current situation of nipple-sparing mastectomy: a large multicenter study in China (CSBrs-003)

BACKGROUND

Mastectomy techniques have been extended to nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM). This study aimed to assess the actual application of NSM in China and identify the factors influencing postoperative complications.

METHODS

The clinical data of 615 patients (641 surgeries) undergoing NSM from January 1st, 2018 to December 31st, 2018 at 28 centers nationwide were retrospectively analyzed to obtain the rate of NSM and investigate factors related to NSM surgery.

RESULTS

The proportion of NSM surgery performed in this study was 2.67% (17/641). Malignant breast tumors accounted for the majority of NSM surgery (559/641, 87.2%). A total of 475 (77.3%) patients underwent NSM combined with reconstructive surgery. The rate of reconstruction decreased with age in our study, and implants were the most common option (344/641, 53.7%) in reconstruction. Radial incision was the most selected method regardless of reconstruction. However, for those who underwent reconstruction surgery, 18.4% (85/462) of cases also chose curvilinear incision, while in the simple NSM surgery group, more patients chose circumareolar incision (26/136, 19.1%). The tumor-to-nipple distance (TND) influenced postoperative complications (P = 0.004). There were no relationships between postoperative complications and tumor size, tumor location, histologic grade, molecular subtype, nipple discharge, and axillary lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

NSM surgery is feasible and only TND influenced postoperative complications of NSM surgery. But the proportion of NSM surgery performed is still low in nationwide centers of China. The selection criteria for appropriate surgical methods are important for NSM in clinical practice. To optimize clinical applications of NSM, further multicenter prospective randomized controlled studies are needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR.org.cn, ChiCTR1900027423; http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=38739.

A novel MRI-based predictive index can identify patients suitable for preservation of the nipple-areola complex in breast reconstructive surgery

INTRODUCTION

Accurately predicting nipple-areola complex (NAC) involvement in breast cancer is necessary for identifying patients who may be candidates for a nipple-sparing mastectomy. Although multiple risk factors are indicated in the guidelines, it is difficult to predict NAC involvement (NAC-i) preoperatively even if these factors are evaluated individually. This study aimed to develop a more accurate and practical preoperative NAC-i prediction model using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All tumors in 252 patients were evaluated using postcontrast T1-weighted subtraction on MRI.

RESULTS

The receiver operating characteristic curves identified cut-off values for tumor size and tumor-to-nipple distance (TND) as 4 cm and 1.2 cm, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that TND (p < 0.001), ductal enhancement extending to the nipple (DEEN) (p < 0.001), and nipple enhancement (NE) (p = 0.005) were independent clinical risk factors for pathological NAC-i. A formula was constructed using odds ratios for these three independent preoperative risk factors in multivariate analysis: the MRI-based NAC-i predictive index (mNACPI) = TND × 4 + DEEN × 3 + NE × 1. A total score of ≤4 points was defined as low risk and ≥5 points as high risk. NAC-i rates were 2.4% in the low-risk group and 89.4% in the high-risk group; a significant correlation was observed between the risk group and permanent pathological NAC-i (p < 0.001). Assuming that the NAC was preserved in low-risk patients and resected in high-risk patients, NAC-i was verified using the mNACPI.

CONCLUSION

mNACPI may contribute greatly to the improvement of selecting suitable patients for NAC preservation in breast reconstructive surgery while maintaining oncological safety.

Radiotherapy and nipple-areolar complex necrosis after nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To perform a meta-analysis to determine the effect of radiotherapy (RT) on nipple-areolar complex (NAC) and skin flap necrosis, and local recurrence in women who undergo nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and immediate breast reconstruction.

METHODS

Medline, PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases were searched until October 16, 2015. Randomized-controlled-trials, prospective, retrospective, and cohort studies were included. The primary outcome was the NAC necrosis rate, and the secondary outcomes were the skin flap necrosis and local recurrence rates.

RESULTS

Of 186 studies identified, 2 prospective and 5 retrospective studies including a total of 3692 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Five, 3, and 2 studies reported data of NAC necrosis (3461 breasts), skin flap necrosis (2490 breasts), and local recurrence (988 breasts), respectively. Pooled results showed no difference in the odds of NAC necrosis [odds ratio (OR) = 1.250, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.481-3.247, P = 0.647], or local recurrence (OR = 0.564, 95% CI 0.056-5.710, P = 0.627) between patients who received and did not receive RT. Patients treated with RT had a higher likelihood of skin flap necrosis (OR = 2.534, 95% CI 1.720-3.735, P < 0.001). Significant heterogeneity, however, was noted in the analysis of NAC and local recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of the limitations of the small number of studies and heterogeneity in the analysis, this study does not allow drawing any definitive conclusions and highlights the need of well-controlled trials to determine the effect of RT in patients undergoing NSM.

Current status of breast reconstruction in China: an experience of 951 breast reconstructions from a single institute

BACKGROUND

Since mastectomy remained the primary strategy for treating breast cancer in China, post-mastectomy reconstruction is of great importance in the Chinese population. The current study aimed to assess the current status of breast reconstruction in China.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients who received breast reconstruction from August 2000 to July 2015 in the Department of Breast Surgery in our institute. Patients' baseline characteristics, reconstruction strategy, final pathology and loco-regional recurrence (LRR) information were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 951 breast reconstructions were conducted during the past 15 years, among which 247 (27.0%) were abdominal flap reconstruction; 471 (51.5%) were latissimus dorsi myocutaneous ± implant; and 233 (25.5%) were prosthesis-based reconstruction. The majority of cases (78.1%) were invasive breast cancer and up to 894 cases (94.0%) were immediate reconstruction. Prosthesis-based reconstruction rapidly increased in recent years, and was associated with bilateral reconstruction, contralateral augmentation and higher complications. 18 patients (2.0%) developed local-regional recurrence at the median follow-up time of 26.6 months (range, 3.7-62.0 months). A total of 66 nipple-areolar complex-sparing mastectomies (NSMs) (6.9%) were performed, none of which developed recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast reconstruction cases increased over the 15 years with the change of paradigm. Most strikingly, prosthesis-based reconstruction rapidly gained its prevalence and became the most common strategy. NSM was only performed for highly selected patients. Patients with breast reconstruction were able to achieve satisfactory loco-regional control in our cohort.

Can Vascular Patterns on Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Help Predict Skin Necrosis after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy?

BACKGROUND

Nipple-areola complex (NAC) and skin flap ischemia and necrosis can occur after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM). The purpose of this study was to correlate vascular findings on MRI with outcomes in patients who underwent NSM.

STUDY DESIGN

Female patients at a single institution who underwent NSM and had a preoperative breast MRI between 2010 and 2014 were identified. Medical records were reviewed for patient demographics, surgical factors, and complications. Magnetic resonance images were reviewed by 2 radiologists, blinded to outcomes, for the presence of dual vs single blood supply to the breast. The association between blood supply on MRI with ischemic and necrotic complications after NSM was analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-four NSM procedures were performed in 105 patients (mean age 45.5 years, range 25 to 69 years) who had a preoperative MRI. The majority of procedures were performed for malignancy (89 of 164 [54.3%]) or prophylaxis (73 of 164 [44.5%]). Nipple-areola complex or skin flap ischemia or necrosis occurred in 40 (24.4%) breasts. Ischemia or necrosis after NSM was less likely to occur in breasts with dual compared with single blood supply (20.8% vs 38.2%; p = 0.03). There was no association between surgical complications and age, BMI, smoking history, previous radiation therapy, indication for NSM, surgical specimen weight, surgical incision type, reconstruction approach, or operating surgeon on univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative MRI characterization of breast vascularity can be considered when planning NSM. The presence of a dual blood supply to the breast on MRI is associated with a decreased risk of nipple-areola complex and skin flap ischemia and necrosis after NSM.

Nipple-areola complex reconstruction techniques: A literature review

Many techniques for nipple-areola complex (NAC) reconstruction are described. Clarity is required on the currently available options. Since a complete list of all the techniques described until now is not available, a possibly comprehensive literature overview was carried out from 75 papers (years 1946-2015). The local flap was the most frequently described technique for the nipple reconstruction with no significant difference in complications' rate among the various types of techniques. Complications in nipple reconstruction were 46.9% after graft, 7.9% after local flap, and 5.3% in case of flaps with autologous graft/alloplastic/allograft augmentation, while complications in areola reconstruction were 10.1% after graft, and 1.6% after areola tattoo. Flaps appear to be more reliable than grafts in nipple reconstruction, while tattoo is thought to be safer than graft in areola reconstruction. The loss of projection, although considerable (45%-75%), had not significant impact on patients' satisfaction. Due to contraction, overcorrection of 25-50% of the desired result is advisory when adopting local flaps, in order to prevent loss of projection. The use of flaps with autologous graft/alloplastic/allograft augmentation (cartilage, fat, calcium hydroxylapatite, acellular dermal matrix, polymethylmethacrylate, biologic collagen) showed a minor loss of nipple projection but may expose to a relative increased number of postoperative flap necrosis.