1
|
Miller ED, Klamer BG, Cloyd JM, Pawlik TM, Williams TM, Hitchcock KE, Romesser PB, Mamon HJ, Ng K, Gholami S, Chang GJ, Anker CJ. Consideration of Metastasis-Directed Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Expert Survey and Systematic Review. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2024; 23:160-173. [PMID: 38365567 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2024.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/20/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A survey of medical oncologists (MOs), radiation oncologists (ROs), and surgical oncologists (SOs) who are experts in the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) was conducted to identify factors used to consider metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). MATERIALS AND METHODS An online survey to assess clinical factors when weighing MDT in patients with mCRC was developed based on systematic review of the literature and integrated with clinical vignettes. Supporting evidence from the systematic review was included to aid in answering questions. RESULTS Among 75 experts on mCRC invited, 47 (response rate 62.7%) chose to participate including 16 MOs, 16 ROs, and 15 SOs. Most experts would not consider MDT in patients with 3 lesions in both the liver and lung regardless of distribution or timing of metastatic disease diagnosis (6 vs. 36 months after definitive treatment). Similarly, for patients with retroperitoneal lymph node and lung and liver involvement, most experts would not offer MDT regardless of timing of metastatic disease diagnosis. In general, SOs were willing to consider MDT in patients with more advanced disease, ROs were more willing to offer treatment regardless of metastatic site location, and MOs were the least likely to consider MDT. CONCLUSIONS Among experts caring for patients with mCRC, significant variation was noted among MOs, ROs, and SOs in the distribution and volume of metastatic disease for which MDT would be considered. This variability highlights differing opinions on management of these patients and underscores the need for well-designed prospective randomized trials to characterize the risks and potential benefits of MDT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric D Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology at the Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH.
| | - Brett G Klamer
- Center for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology at the Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology at the Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | - Paul B Romesser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Harvey J Mamon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Sepideh Gholami
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY
| | - George J Chang
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Christopher J Anker
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, VT
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhou JM, Wang L, Mao AR. Value and prognostic factors of repeat hepatectomy for recurrent colorectal liver metastasis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2023; 22:570-576. [PMID: 36858891 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2023.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND More than 50% of patients with colorectal cancer develop liver metastases. Hepatectomy is the preferred treatment for resectable liver metastases. This review provides a perspective on the utility and relevant prognostic factors of repeat hepatectomy in recurrent colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). DATA SOURCES The keywords "recurrent colorectal liver metastases", "recurrent hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer", "liver metastases of colorectal cancer", "repeat hepatectomy", "repeat hepatic resection", "second hepatic resection", and "prognostic factors" were used to retrieve articles published in the PubMed database up to August 2020. Additional articles were identified by a manual search of references from key articles. RESULTS Despite improvements in surgical methods and perioperative chemotherapy, recurrence remains common in 37%-68% of patients. Standards or guidelines for the treatment of recurrent liver metastases are lacking. Repeat hepatectomy appears to be the best option for patients with resectable metastases. The commonly reported prognostic factors after repeat hepatectomy were R0 resection, carcinoembryonic antigen level, the presence of extrahepatic disease, a short disease-free interval between initial and repeat hepatectomy, the number (> 1) and size (≥ 5 cm) of hepatic lesions, requiring blood transfusion, and no adjuvant chemotherapy after initial hepatectomy. The median overall survival after repeat hepatectomy ranged from 19.3 to 62 months, and the 5-year overall survival ranged from 21% to 73%. Chemotherapy can act as a test for the biological behavior of tumors with the goal of avoiding unnecessary surgery, and a multimodal approach involving aggressive chemotherapy and repeat hepatectomy might be the treatment of choice for patients with early recurrent CRLM. CONCLUSIONS Repeat hepatectomy is a relatively safe and effective treatment for resectable recurrent CRLM. The presence or absence of prognostic factors might facilitate patient selection to improve short- and long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-Min Zhou
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Lu Wang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - An-Rong Mao
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vandeputte M, Saveyn T, Lutin B, De Meyere C, Parmentier I, D'Hondt M. Combined Ablation and Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Minimally Invasive Surgical Era. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2023; 33:121-128. [PMID: 36821654 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000001153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thermal ablation is an accepted treatment modality for small and central liver tumors. In extensive colorectal liver metastatic disease (CRLM), hepatectomy can be combined with ablation, resulting in a parenchymal-sparing strategy. This may increase salvageability rates in case of recurrence. METHODS All patients with advanced CRLM that underwent combined ablation and resection between April 2012 and April 2021, were retrospectively analyzed from a prospectively maintained database. Primary endpoints include postoperative 30-day morbidity and ablation-site recurrence (ASR). The surgical approaches were compared. Ablated lesions were screened for ASR on postoperative follow-up imaging. RESULTS Of 54 patients that underwent combined ablation and resection, 32 (59.3%) were performed through a minimally invasive approach. Eleven (20.4%) were minor resections, 32 (59.3%) were technically major and 11 (20.4%) were anatomically major resections. Twelve complications occurred (22.2%), among which 2 (3.8%) major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥IIIa). Ninety-day mortality rate was 1.9%. Out of 82 ablated lesions, 6 ASRs (11.1%) occurred. Median blood loss was significantly lower in the minimally invasive group, compared with open [90 mL (32.5 to 200) vs. 200 mL (100 to 400), P =0.005]. Pringle maneuver was significantly performed less in the minimally invasive group [8 (25.0%) vs. 16 (72.7%), P =0.001], but took more time [36.1 min (±15.6) vs. 21.6 (±9.9); P =0.011]. Short-term (1 y) overall and disease-free survival were respectively 81.4% and 50.0%. CONCLUSION Combining microwave ablation and liver resection is a feasible and safe parenchymal-sparing technique, through both minimally invasive and open approach for treating extended CRLM disease. It has a low ablation-related complication rate and acceptable ablation-site recurrence rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Departments of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yusupov TA, Kostylieva NM. Radiofrequency ablation in treatment of hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer. KLINICHESKAIA KHIRURGIIA 2022. [DOI: 10.26779/2522-1396.2022.7-8.62] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Radiofrequency ablation in treatment of hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer
Collapse
|
5
|
Gennaro N, Schiaffino S, Mauri G, Monfardini L. The What, the Why, and the How of Liver Ablations: A Practical Guide for the Medical Oncologist. Oncology 2021; 99:722-731. [PMID: 34515198 DOI: 10.1159/000518358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Interventional oncology plays a major role within modern oncological patient management. Image-guided thermal ablation has been recognized as a successful local therapeutic option in patients with primary and secondary malignant liver diseases, as also recalled by the recent European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines on colorectal metastases. As image-guided treatments may be as effective as surgery in selected patients with liver lesions, the clinical oncologist should be familiar with the indications, risks, and technical aspects of liver ablation in order to provide their patients with the best outcomes. This article provides a broad overview of the most commonly used ablation techniques and highlights the most relevant technical aspects such as the ideal setting in the operating theatre; which image-guided methods are available, including the growing application of fusion imaging; or contrast-enhanced ultrasound for guiding/monitoring the procedure. A further aim is to expand the knowledge among medical oncologists about liver ablation procedures and to provide insights into the future perspectives of percutaneous minimally invasive procedures in the liver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Gennaro
- Istituto di Imaging della Svizzera Italiana (IIMSI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Simone Schiaffino
- Radiology Unit IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Piazza Edmondo Malan 2, San Donato Milanese, Italy
| | - Giovanni Mauri
- Divisione di Radiologia Interventistica, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Dipartimento di Oncologia ed Emato-Oncologia, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
With the changing lifestyle and the acceleration of aging in the Chinese population, the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC) have risen in the last decades. On the contrary, the incidence and mortality of CRC have continued to decline in the USA since the 1980s, which is mainly attributed to early screening and standardized diagnosis and treatment. Rectal cancer accounts for the largest proportion of CRC in China, and its treatment regimens are complex. At present, surgical treatment is still the most important treatment for rectal cancer. Since the first Chinese guideline for diagnosis and treatment of CRC was issued in 2010, the fourth version has been revised in 2020. These guidelines have greatly promoted the standardization and internationalization of CRC diagnosis and treatment in China. And with the development of comprehensive treatment methods such as neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, the post-operative quality of life and prognosis of patients with rectal cancer have improved. We believe that the inflection point of the rising incidence and mortality of rectal cancer will appear in the near future in China. This article reviewed the current status and research progress on surgical therapy of rectal cancer in China.
Collapse
|
7
|
Li Y, Xiao W, Gao Z. A systematic review and meta-analysis of radio frequency ablation and routine resection in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 12:770-780. [PMID: 34012665 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-21-52] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study sought to conduct a meta-analysis of the relevant literature on radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and routine resection in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma (SHCC) in recent years, and to examine the clinical efficacy and safety of different schemes. Methods PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, Chinese biomedical literature, VIP Chinese journal and the Wanfang Database were used to comprehensively search for relevant papers on clinical control studies of RFA and the routine resection SHCC published between January 2008 and December 2019. The clinical efficacy and safety of different schemes in the treatment of SHCC were compared, including the overall survival rate within 1, 3, and 5 years, and the incidence of complications during treatment. A meta-analysis was undertaken using methods provided by the Cochrane Collaboration and RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 13 publications of studies were retrieved in which 2,384 patients participated. Of these patients, 1,256 (52.68%) were allocated to the RFA group and 1,128 patients (47.32%) to the conventional resection group. The effect size of the 1-year overall survival rate for the two groups was odds ratio (OR): 0.78 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.43-1.38]; Z test: P=0.32. The effect size of the overall survival rate within 3 years was OR: 0.71 (95% CI, 0.48-1.05); Z test: P=0.07. The difference was not statistically significant. The 5-year overall survival rate of the RFA group and conventional resection group was OR: 0.55 (95% CI, 0.40-0.72). The OR value fell within the CI, excluding 1; Z test: P<0.0001. The difference was statistically significant. The incidence of complications in the RFA group during treatment was lower than that in the conventional resection group (OR: 0.45; 95% CI, 0.32-0.69). The OR value was within the CI, excluding 1; Z test: P=0.0002. The difference was statistically significant. Conclusions The short-term effect of RFA in the treatment of SHCC is basically the same as that of routine resection; however, the long-term effect is significantly lower than that of routine resection. RFA has a lower incidence of complications during treatment, and thus better clinical safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Li
- Department of General Surgery, PLA 942 Hospital, Yinchuan, China
| | - Weike Xiao
- Department of General Surgery, PLA 942 Hospital, Yinchuan, China
| | - Zhenrong Gao
- Department of General Surgery, PLA 942 Hospital, Yinchuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hao W, Binbin J, Wei Y, Kun Y. Can Radiofrequency Ablation Replace Liver Resection for Solitary Colorectal Liver Metastasis? A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2020; 10:561669. [PMID: 33312946 PMCID: PMC7706822 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.561669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) can be a favorable option for patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). However, current reports about the therapeutic efficacy of liver resection (LR) and RFA for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) still remain controversial, especially for solitary CRLM. Therefore, this meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy between LR and RFA for solitary CRLM. First, a comprehensive search for published studies was conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Library Central, and Web of Science. Each study was reviewed and data extracted. In this meta-analysis, 10 studies (11 study arms) were finally included. The meta-analysis was performed using risk ratio (RR) and random effect model or fixed effect model, in which 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for RR were calculated. The primary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) at 1, 3, or 5 years plus complication rate. The results showed that patients treated by LR achieved better PFS and OS than those by RFA, but subgroup analysis and meta-regression displayed that the efficacy of RFA was equivalent to that of LR in solitary CRLM, when conditions were limited to tumors of ≤ 3 cm and fewer synchronous metastasis in the publication years 2011–2018. Meanwhile, RFA achieved lower complication rates when compared with LR. In conclusion, although patients treated by RFA cannot achieve better PFS and OS than those by LR, RFA can be considered a viable treatment option for solitary CRLM, with potentially lower complication rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wu Hao
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Ultrasound, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Jiang Binbin
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Ultrasound, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Yang Wei
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Ultrasound, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Kun
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Ultrasound, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jin H, Chalkidou A, Hawkins M, Summers J, Eddy S, Peacock JL, Coker B, Kartha MR, Good J, Pennington M. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy Compared With Surgery and Radiofrequency Ablation in Two Patient Cohorts: Metastatic Liver Cancer and Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 33:e143-e154. [PMID: 32951952 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2020] [Revised: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To compare the cost-effectiveness of stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy (SABR) with radiofrequency ablation and surgery in adult patients with metastatic liver cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Two patient cohorts were assessed: liver oligometastases and HCC. For each patient cohort, a decision analytic model was constructed to assess the cost-effectiveness of interventions over a 5-year horizon. A Markov process was embedded in the decision model to simulate the possible prognosis of cancer. Data on transition probabilities, survival, side-effects, quality of life and costs were obtained from published sources and the SABR Commissioning through Evaluation (CtE) scheme. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio with respect to quality-adjusted life-years. The robustness of the results was examined in a sensitivity analysis. Analyses were conducted from a National Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective. RESULTS In the base case analysis, which assumed that all three interventions were associated with the same cancer progression rates and mortality rates, SABR was the most cost-effective intervention for both patient cohorts. This conclusion was sensitive to the cancer progression rate, mortality rate and cost of interventions. Assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20 000 per quality-adjusted life-year, the probability that SABR is cost-effective was 57% and 50% in liver oligometastases and HCC, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate a potential for SABR to be cost-effective for patients with liver oligometastases and HCC. This finding supports further investigation in clinical trials directly comparing SABR with surgery and radiofrequency ablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Jin
- King's Health Economics (KHE), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience at King's College London, London, UK.
| | - A Chalkidou
- King's Technology Evaluation Centre (KiTEC), London, UK
| | - M Hawkins
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - J Summers
- School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - S Eddy
- School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - J L Peacock
- School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - B Coker
- School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - M R Kartha
- King's Health Economics (KHE), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience at King's College London, London, UK; King's Technology Evaluation Centre (KiTEC), London, UK
| | - J Good
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - M Pennington
- King's Health Economics (KHE), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience at King's College London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Urbonas T, Anderson EM, Gordon-Weeks AN, Kabir SI, Soonawalla Z, Silva MA, Gleeson FV, Reddy S. Factors predicting ablation site recurrence following percutaneous microwave ablation of colorectal hepatic metastases. HPB (Oxford) 2019; 21:1175-1184. [PMID: 30777696 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2018] [Revised: 01/17/2019] [Accepted: 01/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microwave ablation (MWA) is a recognised treatment option for liver metastases. The size of the tumour is a well-established factor that influences the success of MWA. However, the effect of "heat sink" on the success of MWA for hepatic metastases is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether heat sink effect is a factor that contributes to ablation site recurrence (ASR). METHODS A prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent percutaneous MWA for treatment of colorectal liver metastases was analysed. Imaging and demographic characteristics were compared between metastases that recurred following ablation and those that did not. Proximity to a large hepatic vein was defined as <10 mm. RESULTS 126 ablations in 87 patients met the inclusion criteria and were studied over a median follow-up period of 28 (12-75) months. ASR was detected in 43 ablations (34%) and was associated with clinical risk score (CRS) ≥2 (OR 2.2 95% CI 1.3-3.3, p = 0.029), metastasis size (OR 0.953 95% CI (0.929-0.978), p < 0.001) and proximity to a large hepatic vein (OR 7.5 95%CI 2.4-22.8, p < 0.001). Proximity to a large hepatic vein was not associated with reduced overall survival (OS) but was associated with liver-specific recurrence (HR 4.7 95%CI 1.7-12.5, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS In addition to tumour size proximity to large hepatic venous structures is an independent predictor of ASR and liver-specific recurrence following MWA. However, this was not associated with overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomas Urbonas
- Department of HPB Surgery, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.
| | - Ewan M Anderson
- Department of Radiology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Alex N Gordon-Weeks
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Syed I Kabir
- Department of HPB Surgery, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Zahir Soonawalla
- Department of HPB Surgery, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Michael A Silva
- Department of HPB Surgery, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Fergus V Gleeson
- Department of Radiology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Srikanth Reddy
- Department of HPB Surgery, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tsitskari M, Filippiadis D, Kostantos C, Palialexis K, Zavridis P, Kelekis N, Brountzos E. The role of interventional oncology in the treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases. Ann Gastroenterol 2018; 32:147-155. [PMID: 30837787 PMCID: PMC6394269 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2018.0338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2018] [Accepted: 11/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of death both in Europe and worldwide. Unfortunately, 20-25% of patients with colorectal cancer already have metastases at the time of diagnosis, while 50-60% of the remainder will develop metastases later during the course of the disease. Although hepatic excision is the first-line treatment for patients with liver-limited colorectal metastases and is reported to prolong the survival of these patients, few patients are candidates. Locoregional therapy encompasses minimally invasive techniques practiced by interventional radiology. Most widely used locoregional therapies include ablative treatments (radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation) and transcatheter intra-arterial therapies (transarterial chemoembolization, and radioembolization with yttrium-90).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Tsitskari
- Second Department of Radiology, Unit of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitris Filippiadis
- Second Department of Radiology, Unit of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Chrysostomos Kostantos
- Second Department of Radiology, Unit of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Kostantinos Palialexis
- Second Department of Radiology, Unit of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Periklis Zavridis
- Second Department of Radiology, Unit of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Kelekis
- Second Department of Radiology, Unit of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Elias Brountzos
- Second Department of Radiology, Unit of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tsitskari M, Filippiadis D, Kostantos C, Palialexis K, Zavridis P, Kelekis N, Brountzos E. The role of interventional oncology in the treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases. Ann Gastroenterol 2018. [PMID: 30837787 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2019.0338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of death both in Europe and worldwide. Unfortunately, 20-25% of patients with colorectal cancer already have metastases at the time of diagnosis, while 50-60% of the remainder will develop metastases later during the course of the disease. Although hepatic excision is the first-line treatment for patients with liver-limited colorectal metastases and is reported to prolong the survival of these patients, few patients are candidates. Locoregional therapy encompasses minimally invasive techniques practiced by interventional radiology. Most widely used locoregional therapies include ablative treatments (radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation) and transcatheter intra-arterial therapies (transarterial chemoembolization, and radioembolization with yttrium-90).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Tsitskari
- Second Department of Radiology, Unit of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitris Filippiadis
- Second Department of Radiology, Unit of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Chrysostomos Kostantos
- Second Department of Radiology, Unit of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Kostantinos Palialexis
- Second Department of Radiology, Unit of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Periklis Zavridis
- Second Department of Radiology, Unit of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Kelekis
- Second Department of Radiology, Unit of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Elias Brountzos
- Second Department of Radiology, Unit of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Long L, Wei L, Hong W. Meta-Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases Undergoing Hepatectomy with or without Radiofrequency Ablation. Am Surg 2018. [DOI: 10.1177/000313481808401237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
This meta-analysis aimed to compare the long-term prognosis of patients with colorectal liver metastases undergoing liver resection (LR) with or without radiofrequency ablation (RFA). A systematic search was performed using both medical subject headings and truncated word searches to identify all comparative studies published on this topic. The primary outcomes were postoperative overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Pooled hazard ratios (HR) with 95 per cent confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. A total of 10 studies which included 3900 patients were finally enrolled in the meta-analysis. Patients treated by LR gained better OS (HR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.82–2.37) and DFS (HR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.70–2.15) than those patients treated by LR 1 RFA, after pooling unadjusted HRs from the 10 studies. Five studies provided the data of adjusted HR. The pooled results showed that patients in the LR 1 RFA group had shorter OS (HR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.18–2.32, P = 0.004) but similar DFS (HR: 1.36, 95% CI: 0.99–1.88) compared with patients in the LR group. Our meta-analysis showed that colorectal liver metastases patients who underwent LR gained better long-term outcomes compared with patients undergoing LR 1 RFA. However, after adjusting confounders, LR 1 RFA achieved comparable DFS with LR alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Long
- Department of General Surgery, Dingxi People's Hospital, Lanzhou University Second Hospital Dingxi Hospital, Dingxi, Gansu Province, China
| | - Li Wei
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Wu Hong
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Klubien J, Kohl AP, Nolsøe CP, Rosenberg J, Pommergaard HC. Prognostic factors after ultrasound-guided percutaneous ablation of colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review. Australas J Ultrasound Med 2018; 21:87-95. [PMID: 34760508 DOI: 10.1002/ajum.12088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Liver metastases from colorectal cancer are common and ablation therapy is a favourable treatment option for selected patients not suited for surgical resection. This study aimed to systematically review the literature and present prognostic factors associated with survival and local recurrence after percutaneous ultrasound-guided ablation treatment. Materials and methods This review is reported according to the PRISMA. PubMed, Embase and Scopus were searched and records were independently screened by two authors, initially on title and abstract and subsequently on full-text basis. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. Results Of 2.882 records screened, 18 studies were included. The median survival was 23 months. One-year survival was median 95% and 3-year survival was median 58%. Complete ablation response and adjuvant chemotherapy produce considerably improved survival and low local recurrence rate outcomes. Conclusion Percutaneous ultrasound-guided ablation technique for colorectal liver metastases provides impressive survival rates for patients not suited for surgical resection. However, there are some factors related to poorer prognosis, which may be considered when selecting patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanett Klubien
- Center for Perioperative Optimization Department of Surgery Herlev Hospital Herlev Ringvej 75 2730 Herlev Denmark.,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Blegdamsvej 3B 2200 København N Denmark
| | - Andreas P Kohl
- Center for Perioperative Optimization Department of Surgery Herlev Hospital Herlev Ringvej 75 2730 Herlev Denmark.,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Blegdamsvej 3B 2200 København N Denmark
| | - Christian P Nolsøe
- Center for Perioperative Optimization Department of Surgery Herlev Hospital Herlev Ringvej 75 2730 Herlev Denmark.,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Blegdamsvej 3B 2200 København N Denmark
| | - Jacob Rosenberg
- Center for Perioperative Optimization Department of Surgery Herlev Hospital Herlev Ringvej 75 2730 Herlev Denmark.,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Blegdamsvej 3B 2200 København N Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chakedis J, Squires MH, Beal EW, Hughes T, Lewis H, Paredes A, Al-Mansour M, Sun S, Cloyd JM, Pawlik TM. Update on current problems in colorectal liver metastasis. Curr Probl Surg 2017; 54:554-602. [PMID: 29198365 DOI: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2017.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Chakedis
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Malcolm H Squires
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Eliza W Beal
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Tasha Hughes
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Heather Lewis
- University of Colorado Health System, Fort Collins, CO
| | - Anghela Paredes
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Mazen Al-Mansour
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Steven Sun
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
van Amerongen MJ, Jenniskens SFM, van den Boezem PB, Fütterer JJ, de Wilt JHW. Radiofrequency ablation compared to surgical resection for curative treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases - a meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2017; 19:749-756. [PMID: 28687147 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2016] [Revised: 05/21/2017] [Accepted: 05/24/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatic resection and ablative treatments, such as RFA are available treatment options for liver tumors. Advantages and disadvantages of these treatment options in patients with colorectal liver metastases need further evaluation. The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the role of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) compared to surgery in the curative treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). METHODS A systematic search was performed from MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library for studies directly comparing RFA with resection for CRLM, after which variables were evaluated. RESULTS RFA had significantly lower complication rates (OR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.26-0.75, P = 0.002) compared to resection. However, RFA showed a higher rate of any recurrence (OR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.15-2.40, P = 0.007), local recurrence (OR = 9.56, 95% CI = 6.85-13.35, P = 0.001), intrahepatic recurrence (OR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.34-2.87, P = 0.001) and extrahepatic recurrence (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.90-1.63, P = 0.22). Also, 5-year disease-free survival (OR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.28-3.79, P = 0.005) and overall survival (OR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.49-3.69, P = 0.001) were significantly lower in patients treated with RFA. CONCLUSIONS RFA showed a significantly lower rate of complications, but also a lower survival and a higher rate of recurrence as compared to surgical resection. All the included studies were subject to possible patient selection bias and therefore randomized clinical trials are needed to accurately evaluate these treatment modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martinus J van Amerongen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, The Netherlands.
| | - Sjoerd F M Jenniskens
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jurgen J Fütterer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, The Netherlands; MIRA Institute for Biomedical Engineering and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes H W de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|