Testosterone replacement and prostate cancer

Clinically occult prostate cancer cases may distort the effect of testosterone replacement therapy on risk of PCa

BACKGROUND

Although prostate cancer (PCa) screening is conducted before testosterone replacement therapy (TRT), clinically occult PCa cases may exist.

METHODS

To evaluate whether the possible inclusion of occult PCa cases distorts the effect of TRT on risk of PCa, we followed 776 hypogonadal males (TRT = 400, non-TRT = 376) from a urology center in Germany from 2004 to 2016, with a mean follow-up period of 7 years. We assumed occult cases might take 1-2 years (latency period) to become clinically detectable after receiving TRT. We selected several latency periods (12/18/24 months) and compared the risk of PCa in the TRT and non-TRT group over the latency period, from the end of latency period till the end of follow-up, and over the whole follow-up time.

RESULTS

Overall, 26 PCa cases occurred in the non-TRT group vs 9 cases in the TRT group. Within 18 months of follow-up, 9 cases occurred in the TRT group vs 0 cases in the non-TRT group; from the end of 18 months till the end of follow-up, 26 cases occurred in the non-TRT group vs 0 cases in the TRT group. The adjusted table showed seemingly adverse effects of TRT on PCa development within 18 months (p = 0.0301) and beneficial effects from the end of 18 months till the end of follow-up (p = 0.0069). Similar patterns were observed for 12 or 24 months as the latency period.

CONCLUSIONS

TRT may make occult PCa cases detectable within early phase of treatment and present a beneficial effect in the long run. Future longitudinal studies are needed to confirm findings from our exploratory analyses.

In vitro bioassay investigations of suspected obesogen monosodium glutamate at the level of nuclear receptor binding and steroidogenesis

Monosodium glutamate (MSG) is a commonly used flavour enhancer in households, catering and food production. Recently it has been highlighted as a suspected dietary obesogen in epidemiological studies indicating a link between MSG consumption and weight gain. Additionally, animal studies have shown that MSG exposure has profound effects on sex steroid hormone levels and receptors; which have an important role in energy metabolism. However, the exact mechanism by which MSG exerts its effects has yet to be elucidated. Reporter gene assays (RGAs) and the H295R steroidogenesis assay have been used to investigate the endocrine disrupting potential of MSG. Receptor (ant)agonism was not observed in the MMV-Luc (oestrogen responsive) or TM-Luc (progestagen responsive) cell lines following exposure to MSG. Also, no effects on hormone production were observed. However, MSG exhibited an antagonist response in the androgen and progestagen responsive TARM-Luc cell line, with a dose dependent reduction in androgen response of 33%, 36.9% and 50.6% (in comparison to the solvent control) at 50, 250 and 500 μg/ml MSG, respectively (P ≤  0.05; P ≤ 0.05; P ≤  0.001). No cytotoxicity or pre-lethal cytotoxicity was observed at the concentrations tested. These findings demonstrate one potential pathway whereby MSG may act as a dietary obesogen.

ASSOCIATION OF TESTOSTERONE WITH COLORECTAL CANCER (HT29), HUMAN GLIOBLASTOMA (A172) AND HUMAN EMBRYONIC KIDNEY (HEK293) CELLS PROLIFERATION

Testosterone influences cancer development. This in vitro experiment was exerted to determine the association of testosterone with human colorectal cancer(HT29), glioblastoma (A172) and human embryonic kidney(HEK293) cells proliferation. HT-29, A172 and HEK293 cell lines were cultured in standard growth medium, then randomly divided into control group (not exposed to testosterone) and groups exposed to 1, 10, 100 and 1000 μg/mL of testosterone. Cell viability was quantified by MTT assay. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA. Viability of HEK293 cells significantly increased in groups exposed to 1 μg/mL and decreased in groups exposed to 100 and 1000 μg/mL of testosterone compared to control group (P<0.05, P<0.05 and P<0.001, respectively). Viability of HT29 cells significantly increased in groups exposed to 10 and 100 μg/mL of testosterone and significantly decreased when exposed to 1000 μg/mL of testosterone compared to control group (P<0.05, P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). Viability of A172 cells significantly decreased in groups exposed to 100 and 1000 μg/mL of testosterone compared to control group (P<0.001). In conclusion, different doses of testosterone have enhancing or suppressive effects on HEK293, HT29 and A172 cells proliferation; according to which, considering clinical use of testosterone therapy for cancer treatment is a highly controversial issue.

Current opinion on the role of testosterone in the development of prostate cancer: a dynamic model

BACKGROUND

Since the landmark study conducted by Huggins and Hodges in 1941, a failure to distinguish between the role of testosterone in prostate cancer development and progression has led to the prevailing opinion that high levels of testosterone increase the risk of prostate cancer. To date, this claim remains unproven.

PRESENTATION OF THE HYPOTHESIS

We present a novel dynamic mode of the relationship between testosterone and prostate cancer by hypothesizing that the magnitude of age-related declines in testosterone, rather than a static level of testosterone measured at a single point, may trigger and promote the development of prostate cancer.

TESTING THE HYPOTHESIS

Although not easily testable currently, prospective cohort studies with population-representative samples and repeated measurements of testosterone or retrospective cohorts with stored blood samples from different ages are warranted in future to test the hypothesis.

IMPLICATIONS OF THE HYPOTHESIS

Our dynamic model can satisfactorily explain the observed age patterns of prostate cancer incidence, the apparent conflicts in epidemiological findings on testosterone and risk of prostate cancer, racial disparities in prostate cancer incidence, risk factors associated with prostate cancer, and the role of testosterone in prostate cancer progression. Our dynamic model may also have implications for testosterone replacement therapy.

Testosterone Replacement Therapy: Playing Catch-up With Patients

As patients seek treatment for low testosterone, it is important for primary care providers to understand the risks and benefits of the therapy and the off-label promotions of its advocates.

An Overview of Testosterone Therapy

Millions of men, as a result of the natural aging process, injury, illness, and medical therapies, experience a decline in testosterone levels that necessitate a need for testosterone supplementation therapy (TST). The signs and symptoms of testosterone decline may occur gradually, and low testosterone levels may be misdiagnosed as other medical conditions. Over the past two decades, there has been an increase in testing of testosterone levels and the use of TST. With so many men now on TST, it is essential for health care professionals to know the signs and symptoms, the causes of testosterone decline, how testosterone deficiency is diagnosed, what pathological changes are associated with testosterone decline, and the benefits and risks of TST. In addition, health care providers need to be aware of the various forms of testosterone available as well as the advantages and disadvantages of each. This article provides a brief overview of testosterone deficiency, TST treatment options and guidelines, and the risks and benefits associated with of TST.

Risks of testosterone replacement therapy in men

Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) is a widely used treatment for men with symptomatic hypogonadism. The benefits seen with TRT, such as increased libido and energy level, beneficial effects on bone density, strength and muscle as well as cardioprotective effects, have been well-documented. TRT is contraindicated in men with untreated prostate and breast cancer. Men on TRT should be monitored for side-effects such as polycythemia, peripheral edema, cardiac and hepatic dysfunction.