A comprehensive serological and supplemental evaluation of hepatitis B "seroyield" blood donors: A cross-sectional study from a tertiary healthcare center in India

Genotyping and sero-virological characterization of hepatitis B virus-infected blood donors in Central Eritrea

Aim: To determine the serological markers and genotype profiles of hepatitis B virus (HBV) isolates in Central Eritrea. Materials & methods: A total of 191 hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive sera were randomly selected for the study. ELISA was used to perform HBV seromarker screening, genotypes were determined using multiplex-nested PCR. Results: Of 191, 77.5% (148/191) were positive for HBcAb (total), among which 99.3% (147/148) and 0.7% (1/148) were positive for HBsAg and hepatitis B surface antibody, respectively. Of the 147 positive HBcAb/HBsAg, 16 (10.9%) and 131 (77.9%) were positive for HBeAg and HBeAb, respectively. A total of 73 HBV isolates were successfully genotyped: 39 (53.4%) D; 10 (13.7%) E; 6 (8.2%) A; 6 (8.2%) C/D; 4 (5.5%) C; 3 (4.1%) C/D/E; 2 (2.7%) A/D; 2 (2.7%) D/E; and 1 (1.4%) B/D. Conclusion: HBV genotype D is the predominant genotype among blood donors in Eritrea.

Nucleic acid amplification test: Bridging the gap in blood safety & re-evaluation of blood screening for cryptic transfusion-transmitted infection among Indian donors

Background & objectives:

Nucleic acid amplification test (NAT) in blood donor screening not only detects window period (WP) donors but also those with chronic occult infections which are negative by routine serological screening. This study was conducted to determine the time trend of NAT positivity and seroprevalence of transfusion-transmitted infections (TTIs) through a period of six years and evaluate the strength of NAT as a supplementary test in identifying the cryptic carriers in blood donor population.

Methods:

A total of 1,01,411 blood donations were screened between January 2011 and December 2016 by the ELISA and individual donor (ID) NAT Procleix Ultrio Plus Assay. Additional molecular and serological assays were done on the NAT yield samples to differentiate the type of cryptic carriers.

Results:

NAT yields comprised 0.05 per cent (50/101411) of the total samples tested with a yield rate of 1/2028. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) contributed to 80 per cent of the total NAT yields and the rest 20 per cent due to hepatitis C virus (HCV). Majority of HBV NAT yields (75%) were from chronic occult donors and 25 per cent were WP donors. Both HBV and HCV NAT yields had a wide range of viral count. There was no HIV NAT yield. A significant decline in the prevalence rate of TTIs through the study period of six years was observed.

Interpretation & conclusions:

The cryptic infections found in blood donors increase the risk of TTIs. Blood screening by both serology and NAT can reduce this threat.

Pattern of prevalent Hepatitis B virus genotypes in Zaria, Nigeria

Background:

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is hyperendemic in Nigeria. Available literature reveal genotype E as being predominant in West Africa. This study aimed at identifying the current pattern and prevalent genotypes of HBV in Zaria, Nigeria.

Materials and Methods:

Four millilitre of blood was collected in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid-container from each of 165 HBV surface antigen-positive participants recruited purposively from the gastroenterology clinic from May to August, 2017. Plasma was separated and frozen at −20°C till analysis. Multiplex-nested polymerase chain reaction using type-specific primers was used to identify the various HBV genotypes.

Results:

Median (and interquartile range ) age of the participants was 31.0 (25.5–39.0) years, with males constituting 107 (64.8%). Majority (83.6%) of the samples analysed were HBV-DNA-positive with 82.6% of the HBV-DNA-positive samples being mixed genotype infections. Irrespective of mode of occurrence, five HBV genotypes were identified with HBV/E (97.1%) being the most predominant, followed by HBV/B (82.6%), HBV/A (24.6%), then HBV/C (17.4%), while HBV/D (0.7%) was the least prevalent.

Conclusion:

In most (99.1%) of the mixed-infection were a combination of genotype E, the predominant genotype, with other genotypes predominantly genotype B. HBV genotypes E, B, A, C and D are the prevalent genotypes in Zaria, Nigeria, as they occur in single genotype and in mixed-genotypes pattern.

Prevalence of Hepatitis B and C Viral Markers in Blood Donors Deferred from Donating Blood on the Basis of a History of Jaundice of Unknown Origin

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The aim of the present study was to know the prevalence of viral hepatitis markers among blood donors deferred on the basis of a history of jaundice of unknown origin and to predict the impact of this deferral on blood safety.

METHODS

Observational study included 200 blood donors deferred on the basis of a history of jaundice of unknown origin and carried out serology and Individual Donation Nucleic Acid Testing (ID-NAT) for hepatitis B and hepatitis C.

RESULTS

Five (2.5%) out of 200 blood donors deferred on the basis of history of jaundice were reactive on ELISA. Three out of five were reactive for HBsAg; whereas two for anti-HCV antibodies. Out of the 12 ID-NAT initial reactive, 10 samples discriminated on further testing; 4 for HBV, 5 for HCV and 1 was co-infection (HBV + HCV). The odds of being picked up as sero reactive on ELISA was 2.53 (95% CI; 1.04-6.19) and being picked up as ID-NAT yield was 13.08 (95% CI; 5.29-32.37) in donors deferred on a history of jaundice of unknown origin as compared to selected donors without a history of jaundice, with the difference in means achieving statistically significance at P = 0.03 and <0.001 respectively.The potential of deferral on a history of jaundice of unknown origin has a capacity to interdict 2-3 HBV and/or HCV reactive blood donors on serology and 5 HBV and/or HCV reactive blood donors on ID-NAT from entering the quarantine blood supply per 100 donors.

CONCLUSION

The findings of the present study support that a deferral for a history of jaundice of unknown origin after attaining the age of 12 years in the present scenario of transfusion transmissible infectious disease screening in India.