Tacrolimus Ointment for Treatment of Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis

Efficacy and Safety of Topical Tacrolimus for Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis: A Systematic Review

Objectives

Vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) poses a significant challenge in ocular inflammation management, necessitating potent anti-inflammatory interventions. Despite its restricted utilization, tacrolimus has emerged as a promising agent in inflammation control. However, the specific efficacy of topical tacrolimus in VKC remains underexplored.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the impact of topical tacrolimus on VKC, adhering meticulously to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant studies were meticulously retrieved from comprehensive databases including Cochrane Library, PubMed, EBSCO Host, ProQuest, and Google Scholar, with a focus on English-language publications. This systematic review protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022302291).

Results

The review encompassed 11 studies involving 607 participants, with an average age of 8.45 years. Tacrolimus concentrations utilized in the interventions spanned from 0.005% to 0.1%, delivered through eye ointment or drops. Across the studies, topical tacrolimus demonstrated significant reductions in both the total objective signs score and total subjective symptoms score. Adverse events reported encompassed sensory experiences such as burning sensation, ocular stinging, pain, redness, and sporadic photophobia.

Conclusion

This systematic review underscores the notable efficacy of topical tacrolimus in ameliorating the clinical manifestations and symptomatic burden associated with VKC. Furthermore, tacrolimus exhibited a favorable safety profile, with minor adverse effects reported infrequently.

Long-Term Clinical Outcome of Tacrolimus Skin Ointment (0.03%) for the Treatment of Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Background Vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) is an allergic conjunctival inflammation with severe ocular complications if left untreated. The current management regimen is plagued with adverse effects, long-term problems, and clinical relapses. Tacrolimus offers an alternative treatment option, and long-term studies are needed to determine its efficacy. Methods A two-year follow-up based study was conducted on moderate to severe VKC patients, who were prescribed tacrolimus skin ointment. The 5-5-5 exacerbation scale was used for the monitoring and grading severity of the disease. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and intergroup comparisons were conducted on exacerbation scale scores among follow-ups. Results A significant reduction was observed in the total score of severity from baseline (203.17±102.05) to three months' follow-up (69.94±70.54), and it kept reducing for 18 months post therapy. Similar results with statistically significant reduction were observed for all grades of the scale. The relapse rate was 5.71% within a month after therapy cessation, and none of the other patients showed relapse afterward. No significant ocular and systemic complications were observed during the study. Conclusion Tacrolimus is effective in the long-term management of VKC without the complications of conventional steroid-based therapy.

Management of vernal keratoconjunctivitis: Navigating a changing treatment landscape

Vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) is a chronic, progressive, and potentially sight-threatening form of ocular inflammatory disease that primarily affects children and young adults. Prevalence varies by region, ranging from <2 per 10,000 in the United States to as high as 1,100 per 10,000 in parts of Africa. The rarity of VKC in developed countries can make differential diagnosis challenging, and treatment is often delayed until the disease is advanced, and symptoms are significantly impacting patients' quality of life. Although once viewed primarily as an immunoglobulin E-mediated condition, approximately 50% of patients with VKC do not exhibit allergic sensitization. It is now recognized that the immunopathology of VKC involves multiple inflammatory pathways that lead to the signs, symptoms, and conjunctival eosinophilic and fibroproliferative lesions that are a hallmark of the disease. We examine the evolution of our understanding of the immunopathology of VKC, the expanding VKC treatment armamentarium, the clinical implications of emerging treatment approaches, and future directions for VKC research and practice.

Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis: A Systematic Review

Vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) is a chronic, bilateral corneal and conjunctival problem which typically presents in young individuals. VKC is characterized by itching, photophobia, white mucous discharge, lacrimation, foreign body sensation, and pain due to corneal involvement of shield ulcers. Vernal keratoconjunctivitis is categorized within ocular diseases. The diagnosis is clinical, as no sure biomarkers pathognomonic of the disease have yet been identified. The VKC therapy relies on different types of drugs, from antihistamines and topical steroids to cyclosporine or tacrolimus eye drops. In extremely rare cases, there is also the need for surgical treatment for the debridement of ulcers, as well as for advanced glaucoma and cataracts, caused by excessive prolonged use of steroid eye drops. We performed a systematic review of the literature, according to PRISMA guideline recommendations. We searched the PubMed database from January 2016 to June 2023. Search terms were Vernal, Vernal keratoconjunctivitis, and VKC. We initially identified 211 articles. After the screening process, 168 studies were eligible according to our criteria and were included in the review. In this study, we performed a systematic literature review to provide a comprehensive overview of currently available diagnostic methods, management of VKC, and its treatments.

Safety and efficacy of topical tacrolimus 0.03% in the management of vernal keratoconjunctivitis: a non-randomized controlled clinical trial

Background

Vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) is a bilateral, recurrent, chronic conjunctival inflammatory disease with seasonal exacerbations. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus 0.03% eye ointment in the management of chronic VKC.

Methods

This was an open-label, prospective, non-randomized, comparative interventional study that enrolled 50 patients with chronic VKC, who were allocated to one of two groups. The first group was treated with tacrolimus 0.03% eye ointment twice daily for 2 months then once daily for 2 months, followed by once every other day for another 2 months. The control group was treated with standard anti-allergic drugs, topical fluorometholone 0.1% eye drops three times daily for 2 weeks and gradually tapered for another 2 weeks, with topical olopatadine 0.1% administered twice daily during the follow-up period. Disease severity was assessed using a four-point scale for symptoms and signs. Treatment efficacy was assessed by analyzing changes in symptoms and signs, and by clinical photography.

Results

Fifty patients with bilateral chronic VKC completed the follow-up. The mean (standard deviation) ages of the tacrolimus and control groups were comparable (16.20 [5.10] years versus 16.48 [4.19] years, P > 0.05). The most commonly reported symptom was itching, and the most common signs were papillary hypertrophy and conjunctival hyperemia. All symptoms and signs were significantly reduced after treatment in both groups. The tacrolimus group showed a more significant improvement at 3 and 6 months in the mean composite symptom score (both P < 0.05) and in the mean composite sign score (both P < 0.05). Regarding complications, one case of increased intraocular pressure occurred in the control group (4%) after 2 weeks of steroid treatment, while there were no complications in the tacrolimus group, except for some reports of stinging sensation, which was well tolerated.

Conclusions

Treatment of chronic bilateral VKC with tacrolimus 0.03% eye ointment is effective and safe. It could be considered an alternative treatment to reduce steroid-associated complications in patients with chronic VKC. Future double-blinded clinical trials with a longer follow-up period are necessary to confirm our findings and to determine the long-term safety of topical tacrolimus 0.03% ointment in VKC.

Diagnosis, Management, and Treatment of Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis in Asia: Recommendations From the Management of Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis in Asia Expert Working Group

Vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) is an underdiagnosed and underrecognized ocular surface disease with limited epidemiological data in Asia. It is more prevalent in warm, dry, and windy climates, and often has a substantial impact on a patient's quality of life. In rare cases, VKC can be associated with vision loss, either through corticosteroid overuse or inadequate treatment of persistent inflammation. As a potentially severe and complex disease, there is variability with how VKC is managed across Asia and among the various allergic eye diseases. Diagnosis and treatment of patients with VKC is a challenge for many ophthalmologists, since no precise diagnostic criteria have been established, the pathogenesis of the disease is unclear, and anti-allergic treatments are often ineffective in patients with moderate or severe disease. In addition, the choice of treatment and management strategies used for patients varies greatly from country to country and physician to physician. This may be because of a lack of well-defined, standardized guidelines. In response, the Management of Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis in Asia (MOVIA) Expert Working Group (13 experts) completed a consensus program to evaluate, review, and develop best-practice recommendations for the assessment, diagnosis, and management of VKC in Asia. The expert-led recommendations are summarized in this article and based on the currently available evidence alongside the clinical expertise of ophthalmologists from across Asia with specialism and interest in the ocular surface, VKC, and pediatric ophthalmology.

Efficacy of medical treatments for vernal keratoconjunctivitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) is a severe type of allergic conjunctivitis for which treatment strategies are still under debate.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of medical treatments for VKC.

METHODS

The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and ScienceDirect databases were searched to assess the efficacy of treatments for VKC. Random-effect meta-analyses on changes in clinical scores of symptoms and signs between baseline and after treatment, stratified on treatment classes, were computed. Meta-regressions were searched for potential influencing parameters.

RESULTS

Included were 45 studies (27 randomized controlled trials and 18 prospective cohort studies), 1749 patients (78% were men; mean age, 11.2 years), and 12 different treatment classes. Mast cell stabilizers (MCSs; usually considered as first-line therapy), cyclosporine, and tacrolimus were the most studied drugs (in three-quarters of studies). Overall, all clinical scores improved. Total symptom and sign score decreased for MCSs (effect size, -3.19; 95% CI, -4.26 to -2.13), cyclosporine (effect size, -2.06; 95% CI, -2.72 to -1.40), and tacrolimus (effect size, -2.39; 95% CI, -3.36 to -1.43). No significant differences were shown depending on treatment classes, concentration, age, sex, baseline activity scores, and atopy. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the efficacy of MCSs in the treatment of VKC. Efficacy of cyclosporine and tacrolimus did not differ, suggesting that tacrolimus is a good alternative to cyclosporine for severe cases of VKC. Further studies are needed to compare other drugs and their precise place in treatment strategy.

Experience With 0.1% Tacrolimus Eye Drop for Noninfectious, Non-necrotizing Anterior Scleritis

OBJECTIVES

To report experience with 0.1% tacrolimus eye drops in the treatment of noninfectious, non-necrotizing anterior scleritis.

METHODS

This prospective, single-arm study included nine patients (4 men and 5 women; mean age=59.4 years, SD=10.5) with anterior scleritis. All patients were first treated with steroids for 1 month and then switched to tacrolimus eye drops alone. We defined baseline as the initiation of tacrolimus eye drops. Hyperemia and pain were scored before each treatment, at 1 and 2 weeks, and at 1 month after initiation of each treatment using 5 grades (0=none; 1+=mild; 2+=moderate; 3+=severe; 4+=extremely severe). Intraocular pressure (IOP) was also measured during treatment with each drug. Safety was assessed based on the severity and the incidence of adverse events.

RESULTS

The scores of hyperemia and pain had significantly decreased from baseline by 1 week after initiating tacrolimus eye drops (both P<0.05). No significant reduction was observed with steroid treatment throughout the 1-month period in both scores. Tacrolimus eye drops elicited statistically significant differences in mean IOP over the course of treatment (P=0.02). No additional medications were required to provide relief in any of the patients receiving tacrolimus treatment. No patient demonstrated infectious adverse events after initiation of tacrolimus treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical tacrolimus may effectively and immediately reduce clinical signs and symptoms of noninfectious, non-necrotizing anterior scleritis in cases unresponsive to a course of topical steroid.

Long-term outcomes of 0.1% tacrolimus eye drops in eyes with severe allergic conjunctival diseases

Background

Because atopic dermatitis does not heal completely, associated severe atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC) and vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) often require long-term treatment. This study aims to evaluate the long-term outcomes of using 0.1% tacrolimus eye drops to treat these severe allergic conjunctival diseases.

Methods

Two-hundred-and-seventy eyes of 135 patients diagnosed with AKC or VKC from April 2004 to April 2014 were screened retrospectively. Patient demographics and objective signs were extracted from the electronic medical records. The severity of 10 objective signs, related to the palpebral and bulbar conjunctiva, limbus, and cornea, and intraocular pressure (IOP) were observed at baseline, at 2 weeks, 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months after starting treatment, and every 1 year thereafter (average use period: 8.4 ± 2.9 years). Safety was evaluated based on the incidence and severity of adverse events.

Results

12 patients (AKC; 7 cases, VKC; 5 cases) who were treated with 0.1% tacrolimus eye drops were enrolled in this study. The total score of clinical signs significantly decreased after 2 weeks and remained effective thereafter. Tacrolimus eye drops elicited a statistically significant difference in the mean total clinical scores and IOP over the course of treatment (P < 0.001). Elevated IOP was observed in 2 cases and corneal infection in 1 case; these effects were completely controlled with medication.

Conclusions

Topical tacrolimus may provide effective and long-term improvement in clinical signs of severe AKC and VKC cases that refractory to standard conventional treatment.

Trial registration: University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) 000034460.

Monotherapy of topical tacrolimus 0.03% in the treatment of vernal keratoconjunctivitis in the pediatric population

PURPOSE

To report the results of treating children with vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) using a monotherapy of topical tacrolimus 0.03%.

METHODS

This was a prospective, nonrandomized observational study of children newly diagnosed with VKC. The severity of the disease was graded on a 4-point scale of symptoms and signs. Patients were treated with tacrolimus 0.03% ointment and were followed for 8 months according to a schedule based on the severity of the disease. The primary measure of treatment efficacy was the change in the score of objective signs. The incidence and severity of adverse events, if any, were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 45 children aged 5-15 years were enrolled. The mean composite symptom score was 6.84 ± 2.26 at baseline and 0.71 ± 1.62 at 8 months, a statistically significant reduction (P < 0.001). The mean composite sign score was 9.6 ± 3.14 at baseline and 1.16 ± 1.28 at 8 months, also a statistically significant reduction (P < 0.001). Four patients had to be started on steroids within the first month of treatment and were considered treatment failures. Thus, 89% of patients showed significant improvement. No participant experienced adverse effects, although some reported a transient stinging sensation.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study cohort topical tacrolimus ointment 0.03% as a monotherapy for VKC was successful in the majority of subjects, and there was no adverse effect.

The efficacy of 0.1% tacrolimus ophthalmic suspension in the treatment of severe atopic keratoconjunctivitis

BACKGROUND

Severe atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC) is a relatively rare disease, and some cases are refractory to conventional steroid treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the efficacy of 0.1% tacrolimus ophthalmic suspension in treating severe AKC during a 1-year follow-up.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective clinical study. Sixty eyes from 30 patients with severe AKC who were treated with 0.1% tacrolimus ophthalmic suspension 4 times per day, were included. The mean age of the patients was 21.5 ± 13.7 years. The severity of objective signs was observed at baseline (before treatment), at 2 weeks, and at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment initiation. Ten objective signs of palpebral conjunctiva, bulbar conjunctiva, limbus, and cornea were assessed using 4 grades (0 = normal; 1+ = mild; 2+ = moderate; 3+ = severe). Safety was assessed based on the incidence and the severity of adverse events.

RESULTS

The total score of the 10 clinical signs significantly decreased from baseline 2 weeks after initiating tacrolimus eye drop treatment, except at 2 months. The mean total score of clinical signs was 13.6 ± 6.6 at the beginning of treatment, and decreased to 5.4 ± 4.8 12 months after initiation. Treatment was gradually tapered, with increasing intervals between applications. Additional medications were required to provide relief in 18 patients during follow-up. No patient discontinued treatment due to adverse drug effects. Herpes keratitis was observed in 3 cases during follow-up. However, these cases were completely controlled.

CONCLUSION

The 0.1% tacrolimus ophthalmic suspension is effective for the treatment of severe AKC refractory to standard conventional treatments throughout a full year.

Preclinical characterization and clinical evaluation of tacrolimus eye drops

Severe allergic ocular diseases as atopic keratoconjunctivitis can induce corneal damage due to inflammatory substances released from giant papillae. Tacrolimus eye drops are one of the current therapeutic alternatives for its treatment. This work is aimed at developing and characterizing a 0.03% tacrolimus ophthalmic formulation, which was introduced in three types of vehicles (BBS, PVA and Hyaluronic Acid). For this, we have performed in vitro (stability studies) and in vivo assays (corneal permanence time measured directly by Positron Emission Tomography) of three potential formulations. Next, the best formulation was selected, and its toxicological profile and clinical effectiveness have been evaluated. The biopermanence studies (direct measurements and PET/CT) showed that the formulations with PVA and Hyaluronic Acid present more retention time on the ocular surface of rats than PBS. From the stability study, we have determined that tacrolimus with PVA in cold storage is the best option. Tacrolimus with PVA has shown lower cytotoxicity than cyclosporine at early times. On the other hand, the pilot study performed has shown significant improvements in patients, with no noticeable adverse reactions. Based on stability, biopermanence, safety and clinical effectiveness studies, we concluded that tacrolimus-PVA eye drops are a suitable candidate for its clinical application in inflammatory ophthalmology diseases.

Clinical implications of mast cell involvement in allergic conjunctivitis

The conjunctiva is a common site for the allergic inflammatory response due to it being highly vascularized, having constant exposure to environmental pollutants and allergenic pollens and having a unique conjunctival associated lymphoid tissue. The primary morbidity of anterior surface conjunctival disorders that include allergic conjunctivitis and tear film disorders is associated with its high frequency of involvement rather than its severity, although the more chronic forms can involve the cornea and lead to sight-threatening conditions. Ocular allergy is associated with IgE-mediated mast cell activation in conjunctival tissue leading to the release of preformed mediators including histamine and proteases and subsequent de novo formation of lipid-derived mediators and cytokines that trigger a cascade of cellular and molecular events leading to extensive migration and infiltration of inflammatory cells to the ocular surface. The trafficking of neutrophils, eosinophils, and lymphocytes to the ocular surface is due to establishing various chemokine gradients (mainly CCL11, CCL24, CCL5, MCP-3, and MCP-4), cell surface expression of adhesion molecules (such as VCAM-1 the ligand for VLA-4), and leukocyte adhesion to vascular endothelium. The release of preformed mediators underlies the acute ocular surface response while the secondary influx of inflammatory cells leading to the recruitment and activation of eosinophils and the subsequent activation of Th2 and Th1 lymphocytes at the level of the conjunctiva reflects the late-phase reaction.