Chest Ultrasound as a New Tool for Assessment of Volume Status in Hemodialysis Patients

The use of lung ultrasound in evaluation of extravascular lung water in hemodialysis patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Determining dry weight is crucial for optimizing hemodialysis, influencing efficacy, cardiovascular outcomes, and overall survival. Traditional clinical assessment methods for dry weight, relying on factors such as blood pressure and edema, frequently lack reliability. Lung ultrasound stands out as a promising tool for assessing volume status, given its non-invasiveness and reproducibility. This study aims to explore the role of Lung ultrasound in evaluating the impact of hemodialysis and ultrafiltration on extravascular lung water, with a specific focus on changes in B-lines post-hemodialysis compared to pre-hemodialysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The research encompassed searches across PubMed, WOS, and Scopus databases for studies related to lung ultrasound and hemodialysis. A meta-analysis was then performed to determine the mean differences in various parameters before compared to after, hemodialysis, including the number of B-lines, indexed end-inspiratory and end-expiratory inferior vena cava diameters, inferior vena cava collapsibility index, weight, blood pressure, and serum levels of NT-pro-BNP.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis, included 33 studies with 2301 hemodialysis patients, revealed a significant decrease in the number of B-lines post-hemodialysis (mean difference = 8.30, 95% CI [3.55 to 13.05]). Furthermore, there was a noteworthy reduction in inspiratory and expiratory inferior vena cava diameters post-hemodialysis (mean difference = 2.32, 95% CI [0.31 to 4.33]; mean difference = 4.05, 95% CI [2.44 to 5.65], respectively). Additionally, a significant positive correlation was observed between B-lines and the maximum inferior vena cava diameter both pre- and post-hemodialysis (correlation coefficient = 0.39; correlation coefficient = 0.32, respectively).

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate the effectiveness of lung ultrasound in detection of volume overload and assessment of response to ultrafiltration in hemodialysis patients.

Volume Status Assessment by Lung Ultrasound in End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review

Purpose of review

Lung ultrasound is a noninvasive bedside technique that can accurately assess pulmonary congestion by evaluating extravascular lung water. This technique is expanding and is easily available. Our primary outcome was to compare the efficacy of volume status assessment by lung ultrasound with clinical evaluation, echocardiography, bioimpedance, or biomarkers. The secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events.

Sources of information

We conducted a MEDLINE literature search for observational and randomized studies with lung ultrasound in patients on maintenance dialysis.

Methods

From a total of 2363 articles, we included 28 studies (25 observational and 3 randomized). The correlation coefficients were pooled for each variable of interest using the generic inverse variance method with a random effects model. Among the clinical parameters, New York Heart Association Functional Classification of Heart Failure status and lung auscultation showed the highest correlation with the number of B-lines on ultrasound, with a pooled r correlation coefficient of .57 and .36, respectively. Among echocardiographic parameters, left ventricular ejection fraction and inferior vena cava index had the strongest correlation with the number of B-lines, with a pooled r coefficient of .35 and .31, respectively. Three randomized studies compared a lung ultrasound-guided approach with standard of care on hard clinical endpoints. Although patients in the lung ultrasound group achieved better decongestion and blood pressure control, there was no difference between the 2 management strategies with respect to death from any cause or major adverse cardiovascular events.

Key findings

Lung ultrasound may be considered for the identification of patients with subclinical volume overload. Trials did not show differences in clinically important outcomes. The number of studies was small and many were of suboptimal quality.

Limitations

The included studies were heterogeneous and of relatively limited quality.

Lung Ultrasound and Caval Indices to Assess Volume Status in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients

Background: Volume overload is common in end stage kidney disease (ESKD) and dialysis patients. Hence, the need for objective tools to detect such volume excess. Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is a goal-directed, bedside examination to answer such a specific diagnostic question. Methods: One hundred Iraqi adult hemodialysis patients were recruited from February 1 to May 31, 2022. Primary clinical, dialysis data, and prescriptions were recorded. A nephrologist performed a POCUS examination after the last dialysis session of the week. In addition, an ultrasound examination of the chest was performed to detect B-lines and pleural effusion. Caval parameters included inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter and collapsibility index. Results: The mean age of the study group was 51.48 ± 14.6 years, with 53% males. The mean interdialytic weight gain was 2.74 ± 1.15 Kg. Lower limb edema and pleural effusion were present in 33% and 27%, respectively. Forty-seven percent of patients had >3 B-lines on lung ultrasound with a range of 12. Forty-three percent of patients had an IVC diameter of >2 cm, and 93% had <50% IVC collapsibility. In total, 97% of patients had evidence of excess volume by ultrasound criteria. IVC collapsibility index was the most prevalent sign of excess volume (93%). Patients without lower limb edema and pleural effusion had positive B-lines in 38.8% and 38.3%, an IVC diameter >2 cm in 46.2% and 38.3%, and IVC collapsibility <50% in 89.5% and 95.8% respectively. Conclusion: Iraqi maintenance hemodialysis patients are volume overloaded, which warrants proper intervention for detection and dialysis management. POCUS is a useful and easily performed technique to assess the volume status.

The Conundrum of Volume Status Assessment: Revisiting Current and Future Tools Available for Physicians at the Bedside

Assessment of patients’ volume status at the bedside is a very important clinical skill that physicians need in many clinical scenarios. Hypovolemia with hypotension and tissue under-perfusion are usually more alarming to physicians, but hypervolemia is also associated with poor outcomes, making euvolemia a crucial goal in clinical practice. Nevertheless, the assessment of volume status can be challenging, especially in the absence of a gold standard test that is reliable and easily accessible to assist with clinical decision-making. Physicians need to have a broad knowledge of the individual non-invasive clinical tools available for them at the bedside to evaluate volume status. In this review, we will discuss the strengths and limitations of the traditional tools, which include careful history taking, physical examination, and basic laboratory tests, and also include the relatively new tool of point-of-care ultrasound.