1
|
Tajima T, Mukai M, Yokoyama D, Higami S, Uda S, Hasegawa S, Nomura E, Sadahiro S, Yasuda S, Makuuchi H. Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) and conventional laparotomy in patients with colorectal cancer: Final results from a single center. Oncol Lett 2017; 13:4953-4958. [PMID: 28588735 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.6035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2016] [Accepted: 03/31/2017] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, the use of laparoscopic surgery has been expanded to include radical curative resection. In a previous study, 212 patients with primary colorectal cancer (stages I-III) underwent radical curative resection by hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) (n=98) or conventional laparotomy (CL) (n=114) and were compared with respect to 3-year relapse-free survival (3Y-RFS) and 3-year overall survival (3Y-OS). The study included 210/212 patients who were followed up to 5 years, including 96 patients who underwent HALS and 114 treated with CL. The two groups were matched for stage, clinical background, and postoperative management. Patient characteristics were compared and the 5Y-RFS and 5Y-OS were determined. The 5-year follow-up rate was 97.6%. In stage I-III patients, 5Y-RFS and 5Y-OS showed no significant differences between HALS and CL. The patients with stage I disease accounted for 41.7% (40/96) of the patients undergoing HALS, while stage I patients only accounted for 23.7% (27/114) of the patients undergoing CL, and the difference was significant (P=0.005). Stage II patients undergoing CL were older than those treated with HALS (P=0.017). However, there were no differences in the characteristics of stage III patients undergoing HALS or CL. In conclusion, HALS achieved a similar survival to CL in patients with stage I to III colorectal cancer. Compared with CL, HALS was performed more safely and achieved superior cosmetic results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takayuki Tajima
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan
| | - Masaya Mukai
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0032, Japan
| | - Daiki Yokoyama
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0032, Japan
| | - Shigeo Higami
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0032, Japan
| | - Shuji Uda
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0032, Japan
| | - Sayuri Hasegawa
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan
| | - Eiji Nomura
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0032, Japan
| | - Sotaro Sadahiro
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan
| | - Seiei Yasuda
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan
| | - Hiroyasu Makuuchi
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0032, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Pigazzi A, Nguyen NT, Stamos MJ. Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Approach in Colon Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2015. [PMID: 26302878 DOI: 10.1007/s11605015-2924-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study sought to compare outcomes of patients who underwent hand-assisted laparoscopic (HAL) colectomy with open and laparoscopic colectomy (LP). STUDY DESIGN The NSQIP databases were used to examine the clinical data of patients who underwent elective colectomy during 2012-2013. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to compare the three surgical approaches. RESULTS We sampled a total of 21,090 patients who underwent colectomy. Of these, 7480 (35.5 %) had open colectomy (OC), 8751 (41.5 %) had a laparoscopic colectomy, 2860 (13.6 %) had a HAL colectomy, and 1999 (9.5 %) had an open procedure converted from LC or HAL. Multivariate regression analysis revealed HAL colectomy had a similar mortality (AOR 0.53, P = 0.07) and a lower morbidity (AOR 0.37, P < 0.01) compared to OC. LC had lower mortality (AOR 0.58, P = 0.02) and morbidity (AOR 0.43, P < 0.01) compared to OC. Mortality of patients who underwent HAL was not significantly different from LC (AOR 0.90, P = 0.79); however, morbidity of such patients was significantly higher than for patients who underwent LC (AOR 1.29, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS HAL colectomy is a safe approach with significant advantages compared to open colectomy. Although the morbidity of patients who underwent HAL is higher than patients who underwent LC, the morbidity rate is still lower than OC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhobin Moghadamyeghaneh
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, 333 City Blvd. West Suite 1600, Orange, CA, 92868, USA
| | - Joseph C Carmichael
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, 333 City Blvd. West Suite 1600, Orange, CA, 92868, USA
| | - Steven Mills
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, 333 City Blvd. West Suite 1600, Orange, CA, 92868, USA
| | - Alessio Pigazzi
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, 333 City Blvd. West Suite 1600, Orange, CA, 92868, USA
| | - Ninh T Nguyen
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, 333 City Blvd. West Suite 1600, Orange, CA, 92868, USA
| | - Michael J Stamos
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, 333 City Blvd. West Suite 1600, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Pigazzi A, Nguyen NT, Stamos MJ. Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Approach in Colon Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2015; 19:2045-53. [PMID: 26302878 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-015-2924-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2015] [Accepted: 08/11/2015] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study sought to compare outcomes of patients who underwent hand-assisted laparoscopic (HAL) colectomy with open and laparoscopic colectomy (LP). STUDY DESIGN The NSQIP databases were used to examine the clinical data of patients who underwent elective colectomy during 2012-2013. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to compare the three surgical approaches. RESULTS We sampled a total of 21,090 patients who underwent colectomy. Of these, 7480 (35.5 %) had open colectomy (OC), 8751 (41.5 %) had a laparoscopic colectomy, 2860 (13.6 %) had a HAL colectomy, and 1999 (9.5 %) had an open procedure converted from LC or HAL. Multivariate regression analysis revealed HAL colectomy had a similar mortality (AOR 0.53, P = 0.07) and a lower morbidity (AOR 0.37, P < 0.01) compared to OC. LC had lower mortality (AOR 0.58, P = 0.02) and morbidity (AOR 0.43, P < 0.01) compared to OC. Mortality of patients who underwent HAL was not significantly different from LC (AOR 0.90, P = 0.79); however, morbidity of such patients was significantly higher than for patients who underwent LC (AOR 1.29, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS HAL colectomy is a safe approach with significant advantages compared to open colectomy. Although the morbidity of patients who underwent HAL is higher than patients who underwent LC, the morbidity rate is still lower than OC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhobin Moghadamyeghaneh
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, 333 City Blvd. West Suite 1600, Orange, CA, 92868, USA
| | - Joseph C Carmichael
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, 333 City Blvd. West Suite 1600, Orange, CA, 92868, USA
| | - Steven Mills
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, 333 City Blvd. West Suite 1600, Orange, CA, 92868, USA
| | - Alessio Pigazzi
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, 333 City Blvd. West Suite 1600, Orange, CA, 92868, USA
| | - Ninh T Nguyen
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, 333 City Blvd. West Suite 1600, Orange, CA, 92868, USA
| | - Michael J Stamos
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, 333 City Blvd. West Suite 1600, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pyo DH, Huh JW, Park YA, Cho YB, Yun SH, Kim HC, Lee WY, Chun HK. A comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer: a propensity score analysis. Surg Endosc 2015; 30:2449-56. [PMID: 26304103 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4496-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2015] [Accepted: 08/03/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to compare oncologic outcomes and perioperative variables following conventional laparoscopic surgery (LAP) versus hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) for rectal cancer. METHODS Between January 2008 and December 2012, 2680 consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for rectal cancer were analyzed. We used 1:1 propensity score matching to adjust for potential baseline confounders between groups including age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, tumor distance from the anal verge, clinical T and N categories, pathologic T and N categories, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level, and the status of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy. After matching, we analyzed 278 patients in each group (n = 556). RESULTS The median follow-up period was 36.2 and 37.4 months in the HALS group and the conventional LAP group, respectively. Postoperative complications were not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.531). The 5-year overall survival rate was 88.8 % in the HALS group and 91.2 % in the conventional LAP group (P = 0.329). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 77.0 % in the HALS group and 79.7 % in the conventional LAP group (P = 0.591). CONCLUSIONS HALS is considered a safe and feasible approach for rectal cancer treatment that enables the preservation of the advantages of conventional laparoscopic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dae Hee Pyo
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-710, Korea
| | - Jung Wook Huh
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-710, Korea.
| | - Yoon Ah Park
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-710, Korea
| | - Yong Beom Cho
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-710, Korea
| | - Seong Hyeon Yun
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-710, Korea
| | - Hee Cheol Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-710, Korea
| | - Woo Yong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-710, Korea
| | - Ho-Kyung Chun
- Department of Surgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tajima T, Mukai M, Noguchi W, Higami S, Uda S, Yamamoto S, Hasegawa S, Nomura E, Sadahiro S, Yasuda S, Makuuchi H. Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparotomy for rectal cancer: Interim results from a single center. Mol Clin Oncol 2015; 3:533-538. [PMID: 26137262 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2015.508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2014] [Accepted: 01/27/2015] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery has become widespread and the indications for such surgery have recently been extended to various conditions, including rectal cancer. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) and conventional laparotomy (CL) in patients with rectal cancer. Patients who underwent radical resection of stage I-III primary rectal cancer (n=111) were classified into those receiving HALS (n=57) and those receiving CL (n=54); the two groups were matched for stage and postoperative treatment. The 3-year relapse-free survival (3Y-RFS) and 3-year overall survival (3Y-OS) were calculated and compared between the two groups. Intraoperative blood loss, operating time, postoperative hospital stay and complications were also compared between the two groups. There were no significant differenceS in 3Y-RFS or 3Y-OS between the HALS and CL groups for patients with all-stage (I, II and III) rectal cancer. The mean (median) intraoperative blood loss was 344.0 (247.0) ML in the HALS group vs. 807.5 (555.5) ML in the CL group (P<0.001). The mean (median) postoperative hospital stay was 19.8 (17) and 25.5 (18.3) days, respectively (P=0.039). There were no significant differences in the operating time or the incidence of complications between the two groups. Based on these results, HALS was found to be comparable to CL regarding survival, while achieving less blood loss and a superior cosmetic outcome. However, longer follow-up is required to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takayuki Tajima
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan
| | - Masaya Mukai
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0032, Japan
| | - Wataru Noguchi
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0032, Japan
| | - Shigeo Higami
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0032, Japan
| | - Shuuji Uda
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0032, Japan
| | - Souichirou Yamamoto
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0032, Japan
| | - Sayuri Hasegawa
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0032, Japan
| | - Eiji Nomura
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0032, Japan
| | - Sotaro Sadahiro
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan
| | - Seiei Yasuda
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan
| | - Hiroyasu Makuuchi
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan ; Department of Surgery, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0032, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gong JQ, Cao YK, Wang YH, Zhang GH, Wang PH, Luo GD. Learning curve for hand-assisted laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21:1606-1613. [PMID: 25663780 PMCID: PMC4316103 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i5.1606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2014] [Revised: 08/22/2014] [Accepted: 10/15/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To describe the learning curves of hand-assisted laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy (HALG) for the treatment of gastric cancer.
METHODS: The HALG surgical procedure consists of three stages: surgery under direct vision via the port for hand assistance, hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery, and gastrointestinal tract reconstruction. According to the order of the date of surgery, patients were divided into 6 groups (A-F) with 20 cases in each group. All surgeries were performed by the same group of surgeons. We performed a comprehensive and in-depth retrospective comparative analysis of the clinical data of all patients, with the clinical data including general patient information and intraoperative and postoperative observation indicators.
RESULTS: There were no differences in the basic information among the patient groups (P > 0.05). The operative time of the hand-assisted surgery stage in group A was 8-10 min longer than the other groups, with the difference being statistically significant (P = 0.01). There were no differences in total operative time between the groups (P = 0.30). Postoperative intestinal function recovery time in group A was longer than that of other groups (P = 0.02). Lengths of hospital stay and surgical quality indicators (such as intraoperative blood loss, numbers of detected lymph nodes, intraoperative side injury, postoperative complications, reoperation rate, and readmission rate 30 d after surgery) were not significantly different among the groups.
CONCLUSION: HALG is a surgical procedure that can be easily mastered, with a learning curve closely related to the operative time of the hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery stage.
Collapse
|
7
|
Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery using tissue fusion devices and open resection for treatment of rectosigmoid carcinoma. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2014; 24:e157-61. [PMID: 25090290 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0b013e3182a2b03e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Modern tissue fusion devices used in hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS), a method of combining endoscopic surgery with tactile sensation, can minimize surgical trauma and hospitalization times beyond both conventional laparoscopy and open surgery. The outcomes of HALS using tissue fusion devices and conventional open surgery for curative resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma were compared. A total of 78 (45 males, 33 females; mean age, 57.2±11.7 y) rectosigmoid carcinoma patients underwent HALS surgery (HALS group) and 78 age-matched, sex-matched, and tumor status-matched rectosigmoid carcinoma patients (control group) underwent open resection between June 2008 and June 2010. In the HALS and control groups, abdominal incision length, intraoperative blood loss, procedure time, postoperative abdominal drainage, time to first flatus (bowel function return), length of hospital stay, morbidity, mortality, and pathology were assessed. Procedure times were similar in both groups (142.37±42.09 vs. 137.56±36.24 min). However, length of abdominal incision (5.14±0.47 vs. 13.17±2.41 cm), intraoperative blood loss (125.96±75.58 vs. 142.56±65.37 mL), need for postoperative analgesia, bowel function return (68.01±22.64 vs. 79.77±19.94 h), and postoperative hospital stay (6.47±1.73 vs. 7.73±1.71 d) were all significantly improved in the HALS group. At a median follow-up of 26 months, no significant differences in anastomotic recurrence were observed between groups (1 case/each group). Thus, the HALS approach for curative resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma was found to be similarly safe and effective compared with open resection. Furthermore, HALS may improve postoperative recovery and reduce hospitalization times.
Collapse
|
8
|
Tajima T, Mukai M, Yamazaki M, Higami S, Yamamoto S, Hasegawa S, Nomura E, Sadahiro S, Yasuda S, Makuuchi H. Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparotomy for colorectal cancer: Interim results from a single institution. Oncol Lett 2014; 8:627-632. [PMID: 25013477 PMCID: PMC4081301 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2014.2182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2013] [Accepted: 03/20/2014] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The present study aimed to compare the results of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) and conventional laparotomy (CL) at a single institution in Japan. Of the 212 patients with stage I/II/III colorectal cancer who received a curative resection, 98 patients underwent HALS and 114 patients underwent CL. The clinical background and post-operative management did not differ between the two groups. There were no significant differences in the 3-year relapse-free and 3-year overall survival rates between the HALS and CL groups for the patients in any stage. Blood loss during surgery was 250.1 and 135.5 ml (mean and median; the same hereafter) in stage I patients receiving HALS versus 608.2 and 315.5 ml in stage I CL patients (P=0.006), while it was 277.6 and 146 ml in stage II patients receiving HALS versus 548.6 and 347 ml in stage II CL patients (P=0.004). Post-operative hospital stay was recorded at 16.8 and 15 days in stage III patients receiving HALS versus 23.1 and 21 days in stage III CL patients (P=0.001). There were no significant differences in the operating time or complications between the two groups. These results indicate that the survival rate was comparable for HALS and CL, while HALS caused less surgical stress and achieved a better cosmetic outcome. The results of the final analysis of this cohort are awaited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takayuki Tajima
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Bohseidai, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan
| | - Masaya Mukai
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0032, Japan
| | - Masashi Yamazaki
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0032, Japan
| | - Shigeo Higami
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0032, Japan
| | - Souichirou Yamamoto
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0032, Japan
| | - Sayuri Hasegawa
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Bohseidai, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan
| | - Eiji Nomura
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0032, Japan
| | - Sotaro Sadahiro
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Bohseidai, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan
| | - Seiei Yasuda
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Bohseidai, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan
| | - Hiroyasu Makuuchi
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Bohseidai, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan ; Department of Surgery, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0032, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
HandPort Laparoscopic Surgery-Review and Current Status. Indian J Surg 2013; 77:213-6. [PMID: 26246704 DOI: 10.1007/s12262-013-1018-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2013] [Accepted: 11/27/2013] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
HandPort laparoscopic surgery is a hybrid operation that allows the surgeon to introduce his nondominant hand into abdominal cavity through the port while maintaining pneumoperitoneum. It also helps to gain experience and expertise to learn advanced laparoscopic procedures. The common surgeries where HandPort is useful are laparoscopic splenectomy, colectomies, and donor nephrectomies. HandPort facilitates dissection and extraction of specimens. Hand in abdomen restores tactile sensation which is lacking in laparoscopic procedures. It reduces operative time, increases technical expertise of surgeon, and decreases blood loss. This article reviews the current status of HandPort laparoscopic surgery, the various HandPort devices, and their use.
Collapse
|
10
|
Meshikhes AW. Small bowel obstruction after hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for cancer. BMJ Case Rep 2013; 2013:bcr-2013-200519. [PMID: 24081594 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2013-200519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) was introduced as a bridge towards totally laparoscopic procedures. Some concerns are raised regarding its long-term complications such as incisional hernia and adhesive small bowel obstruction. A woman was admitted with colicky central abdominal pain, distension and vomiting. She had a hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for cancer 6 years earlier. Clinical examination revealed a well-healed periumbilical scar with no evidence of incisional hernia. The abdomen was distended with exaggerated bowel sounds. A CT scan showed dilated loops of small bowel with a transitional zone and distally collapsed bowel. A diagnostic laparoscopy revealed a twisted segment of small bowel that was adherent to the anterior abdominal wall at the hand-port closure site. This segment was released laparoscopically without the need for a resection. Adhesive small bowel obstruction to the hand-port site closure may occur years after HALS and can simply be relieved by laparoscopic exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdul-Wahed Meshikhes
- Department of Surgery, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nam SE, Jung EJ, Ryu CG, Paik JH, Hwang DY. Feasibility of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery as compared to open surgery for sigmoid colon cancer: a case-controlled study. Ann Coloproctol 2013; 29:17-21. [PMID: 23586010 PMCID: PMC3624981 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2013.29.1.17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2013] [Accepted: 02/15/2013] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate short-term clinical outcomes by comparing hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) with open surgery for sigmoid colon cancer. METHODS Twenty-six patients who underwent a hand-assisted laparoscopic anterior resection (HAL-AR group) and 52 patients who underwent a conventional open anterior resection during the same period were enrolled (open group) in this study with a case-controlled design. RESULTS Pathologic parameters were similar between the two groups. The incidences of immediate postoperative leukocytosis were 38.5% in the HAL-AR group and 69.2% in the open group (P = 0.009). There were no significant differences between the two groups as to leukocyte count, hemoglobin, and hematocrits (P = 0.758, P = 0.383, and P = 0.285, respectively). Of the postoperative recovery indicators, first flatus, sips of water and soft diet started on postoperative days 3, 5, 7 in the HALS group and on days 4, 5, 6 in the open group showed statistical significance (P = 0.021, P = 0.259, and P = 0.174, respectively). Administration of additional pain killers was needed for 1.2 days in the HAL-AR group and 2.4 days in the open group (P = 0.002). No significant differences in the durations of hospital stay and the rates of postoperative complications were noted, and no postoperative mortality was encountered in either group. CONCLUSION The patients with sigmoid colon cancer who underwent a HAL-AR had a lower incidence of postoperative leukocytosis, less administration of pain killers, and faster first flatus than those who underwent open surgery. Clinical outcomes for patients' recovery and pathology status were similar between the two groups. Therefore, a HAL-AR for sigmoid colon cancer is feasible and has the same benefit as minimally invasive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Eun Nam
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Cancer Center, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo M. Targarona
- Director of the Unit of Gastrointestinal and Hematologic Surgery, Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Professor of Surgery, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain,Address for correspondence: Dr. Eduardo M. Targarona, Service of Surgery, Hospital de Santpau, P Claret 167, 08025 Barcelona, Spain. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|