Reasons for not performing surface ablation refractive surgery in Saudi population

Reasons for declining corneal refractive laser correction for refractive candidates in Southern India

PURPOSE

To analyze the reasons for declining corneal refractive laser correction procedures in patients presenting to tertiary eye care centers in Tamil Nadu, Southern India, and review the literature.

METHODS

Retrospective case records of subjects presenting from January 2019 to December 2021 for refractive surgery workup were analyzed. Demographic details and refractive parameters of patients rejected for corneal refractive laser corrections (CRLC) were documented and reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 2358 patients presented for refractive surgery evaluation during the study period, and out of them, 395 patients (16.8%) were not considered ideal candidates for undergoing CRLC. The common reasons for rejecting the patients were unfit topography (n = 110, 27.8%), unstable refraction over a one-year duration (n = 9, 2.27%), low corneal thickness (n = 85, 21.5%), keratoconus (n = 5, 12.9%), and other ocular and systemic disorders (n = 48, 12.1%).

CONCLUSION

There was a marked change in magnitude and rationalization for not performing either laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy in our study. The reasons are unfit topography, keratoconus, and systemic disorders, which were diagnosed during pre-LASIK screening workup, being the most common cause for rejecting patients for corneal refractive corrections.

Causes for Rejection of Keratorefractive Surgery in a Central Indian Population

Aim

To identify the reasons for refusing refractive surgery in patients visiting for spectacle-free vision.

Methodology

Medical records of 296 patients who presented for keratorefractive surgery (KRS) from June 2017 to April 2020 at a tertiary eye care center in central India (Government Medical College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India) were reviewed. Demographic details of all the patients and parameters obtained during workup of a case presented for KRSs were captured in an Excel^® sheet and analyzed statistically.

Results

Of the 296 patients who presented for KRS during the study period, 86 (29.1%) patients were denied KRS. The mean pachymetry in the right eye was 505 μm ± 10 μm (range 520-485 μm) and 502 μm ± 7 μm (511-490 μm) in the left eye. Suboptimal corneal thickness (n = 28, 32.6%) was the most common reason for rejection. Other reasons for not recommending the procedure were high myopia (n = 20, 23.3%), spectacle not stable (n = 16, 18.6%), and keratoconus (n = 11, 12.8%). Collagen vascular diseases (n = 3, 3.5%) and anxiety about the procedure (n = 2, 2.3%) were causes unrelated to the procedure. No correlation was observed between corneal thickness and degree of myopia (r = 0.014, p = 0.66).

Conclusion

Patients presenting for KRS exhibit various problems. Meticulous preoperative evaluation is most important for long-term visual outcome. Suboptimal corneal thickness, high myopia, unstable spectacle correction, and keratoconus were the common reasons for not performing KRS in the study population.