Infraclavicular brachial plexus block: Comparison of posterior cord stimulation with lateral or medial cord stimulation, a prospective double blinded study

Infraclavicular block in children: Is blocking lateral or posterior cord equally successful?

Background and Aims

The most effective approach for infraclavicular brachial plexus block in adults is to target the posterior cord, usually situated posterior to axillary artery. However, we do not know if this can be extrapolated in children. Our primary objective was to compare the clinical success rate of ultrasound guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block in children with local anesthetic injection aimed at two targets. These were posterior to axillary artery (posterior cord) and lateral to axillary artery (lateral cord). The secondary objectives involved need for intraoperative rescue analgesia, evaluation of duration of analgesia, incidence of complications such as pneumothorax and arterial puncture, comparison of postoperative pain scores and fluoroscopic dye spread pattern was also observed.

Material and Methods

It was a randomized, prospective pilot study. Forty children undergoing forearm and hand surgeries were randomized to two groups, in accordance with the target site of the block. Target sites of Group P (20 patients) and Group L (20 patients) were posterior and lateral to the axillary artery, i.e., posterior and lateral cord respectively. Aforesaid objectives were assessed. SPSS (Version 15.0) statistical package was used. Comparison between Group L and P was by using student's unpaired t test for age and weight. Fisher's exact probability test was applied to compare percentages between groups.

Results

Blocks of both groups were equally successful. No patient required intraoperative rescue analgesia. Duration of analgesia was comparable. Both groups had no major complications and similar postoperative pain scores.

Conclusions

The success rate of infraclavicular brachial plexus block by aiming at the lateral and posterior cord was similar.

Role of positioning posterior cord on coracoid approach brachial plexus block guided by nerve stimulator: Compared with guided by ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Coracoid approach is efficient and safe for brachial plexus block, and is guided by nerve stimulator or ultrasound in general. Many trials have proved that ultrasonic guidance was more efficacious than nerve stimulator guidance. We hypothesized that positioning posterior cord could enhance the anesthesia effect of coracoid approach brachial plexus block (CABPB) guided by nerve stimulator.

METHODS

Eighty patients were randomized into 2 groups to receive CABPB with positioning posterior cord guided by nerve stimulator (group A) or CABPB guided by ultrasound (group B). Success rate, procedure time, and onset time of sensory or motor block were recorded.

RESULTS

Success rate was similar in 2 groups (89.7% in group A vs 87.5% in group B, P > .05). Procedure time was longer in group A (8 minutes), as compared with group B (4 minutes; P < .05). The difference of onset time of sensory and motor block was not significant between the 2 groups. The onset time of sensory and motor block for musculocutaneous nerve was significantly shorter in group A, as compared with group B (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

The 2 technologies are equivalent regarding success rate, safety, and onset time of sensory or motor block. Positioning posterior cord in CABPB guided by nerve stimulator is efficacious for upper extremity surgery.(URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn/listbycreater.aspx ID: ChiCTR-INR-16009091 DATE: 25/8/2016).