Patterns of Nerve Injury and Recovery Rates of Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Lesions Following Anterior Shoulder Dislocation

PURPOSE

We reviewed our cases of infraclavicular brachial plexus injuries associated with anterior shoulder dislocation to determine patterns of injury, recovery rates, and factors associated with a poor motor outcome.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of patients who had sustained a concomitant nerve injury following dislocation of the glenohumeral joint treated with closed manipulation. The data collected included patient demographics, injury factors, and patterns of neurological deficits. The Medical Research Council (MRC) grade for motor power was the primary outcome measure, where a grade of 4 or 5 was regarded as achieving good motor recovery. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to identify factors associated with persistent motor weakness (MRC grades 0-3) at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

Between 2015 and 2019, 61 patients were assessed. There were 36 males and 25 females, with a median age of 64 years (interquartile range [IQR], 53-73 years). Four patterns of injury were identified: (1) isolated axillary nerve lesions; (2) single cord lesions; (3) combined lesions involving the medial and posterior cords; and (4) diffuse lesions affecting all 3 cords. Of 28 patients with isolated axillary nerve injuries, 22 recovered. All lateral cord injuries (11/11) and 20 of 24 posterior cord injuries recovered spontaneously. Recovery of hand intrinsic function from medial cord injuries had the worst outcome, with 14 of 27 patients not recovering beyond MRC grades 0 to 3. The median duration of dislocation before reduction was 6 hours (IQR, 3-12 hours). A multivariate analysis showed an association between the duration of shoulder dislocation and the likelihood of persistent motor weakness.

CONCLUSIONS

Shoulder dislocations with motor deficits should be regarded as orthopedic emergencies and reduced expediently. Persistent motor weakness may be associated with a prolonged duration of dislocation prior to glenohumeral relocation.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic IV.

Role of positioning posterior cord on coracoid approach brachial plexus block guided by nerve stimulator: Compared with guided by ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Coracoid approach is efficient and safe for brachial plexus block, and is guided by nerve stimulator or ultrasound in general. Many trials have proved that ultrasonic guidance was more efficacious than nerve stimulator guidance. We hypothesized that positioning posterior cord could enhance the anesthesia effect of coracoid approach brachial plexus block (CABPB) guided by nerve stimulator.

METHODS

Eighty patients were randomized into 2 groups to receive CABPB with positioning posterior cord guided by nerve stimulator (group A) or CABPB guided by ultrasound (group B). Success rate, procedure time, and onset time of sensory or motor block were recorded.

RESULTS

Success rate was similar in 2 groups (89.7% in group A vs 87.5% in group B, P > .05). Procedure time was longer in group A (8 minutes), as compared with group B (4 minutes; P < .05). The difference of onset time of sensory and motor block was not significant between the 2 groups. The onset time of sensory and motor block for musculocutaneous nerve was significantly shorter in group A, as compared with group B (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

The 2 technologies are equivalent regarding success rate, safety, and onset time of sensory or motor block. Positioning posterior cord in CABPB guided by nerve stimulator is efficacious for upper extremity surgery.(URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn/listbycreater.aspx ID: ChiCTR-INR-16009091 DATE: 25/8/2016).