Screening and dotting virtual slides: A new challenge for cytotechnologists

Prediction of tumor origin in cancers of unknown primary origin with cytology-based deep learning

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) site poses diagnostic challenges due to its elusive nature. Many cases of CUP manifest as pleural and peritoneal serous effusions. Leveraging cytological images from 57,220 cases at four tertiary hospitals, we developed a deep-learning method for tumor origin differentiation using cytological histology (TORCH) that can identify malignancy and predict tumor origin in both hydrothorax and ascites. We examined its performance on three internal (n = 12,799) and two external (n = 14,538) testing sets. In both internal and external testing sets, TORCH achieved area under the receiver operating curve values ranging from 0.953 to 0.991 for cancer diagnosis and 0.953 to 0.979 for tumor origin localization. TORCH accurately predicted primary tumor origins, with a top-1 accuracy of 82.6% and top-3 accuracy of 98.9%. Compared with results derived from pathologists, TORCH showed better prediction efficacy (1.677 versus 1.265, P < 0.001), enhancing junior pathologists' diagnostic scores significantly (1.326 versus 1.101, P < 0.001). Patients with CUP whose initial treatment protocol was concordant with TORCH-predicted origins had better overall survival than those who were administrated discordant treatment (27 versus 17 months, P = 0.006). Our study underscores the potential of TORCH as a valuable ancillary tool in clinical practice, although further validation in randomized trials is warranted.

Experience Reviewing Digital Pap Tests using a Gallery of Images

Introduction:

Hologic is developing a digital cytology platform. An educational website was launched for users to review these digitized Pap test cases. The aim of this study was to analyze data captured from this website.

Materials and Methods:

ThinPrep^® Pap test slides were scanned at ×40 using a volumetric (14 focal plane) technique. Website cases consisted of an image gallery and whole slide image (WSI). Over a 13 month period data were recorded including diagnoses, time participants spent online, and number of clicks on the gallery and WSI.

Results:

51,289 cases were reviewed by 918 reviewers. Cytotechnologists spent less time (M [Median] = 65.0 s) than pathologists (M = 82.2 s) reviewing cases (P < 0.001). Longer times were associated with incorrect diagnoses and cases with organisms. Cytotechnologists matched the reference diagnoses in 85% of cases compared to pathologists who matched in 79.8%. While in 62% of cases reviewers only examined the gallery, they attained the correct diagnosis 92.7% of the time. Pathologists made more clicks on the gallery and WSI than cytotechnologists (P < 0.001). Diagnostic accuracy decreased with increasing clicks.

Conclusions:

Website participation provided feedback about how cytologists interact with a digital platform when reviewing cases. These data suggest that digital Pap test review when comprised of an image gallery displaying diagnostically relevant objects is quick and easy to interpret. The high diagnostic concordance of digital Pap tests with reference diagnoses can be attributed to high image quality with volumetric scanning, image gallery format, and ability for users to freely navigate the entire digital slide.

Current state of whole slide imaging use in cytopathology: Pros and pitfalls

Whole slide imaging (WSI) allows generation of large whole slide images and their navigation with zoom in and out like a true virtual microscope. It has become widely used in surgical pathology for many purposes, such as education and training, research activity, teleconsultation, and primary diagnosis. However, in cytopathology, the use of WSI has been lagging behind histology, mainly due to the cytological specimen's characteristics, as groups of cells of different thickness are distributed throughout the slide. To allow the same focusing capability of light microscope, slides have to be scanned at multiple focal planes, at the cost of longer scan times and larger file size. These are the main technical pitfalls of WSI for cytopathology, partly overcome by solutions like liquid-based preparations. Validation studies for the use in primary diagnosis are less numerous and more heterogeneous than in surgical pathology. WSI has been proved effective for training students and successfully used in proficiency testing, allowing the creation of digital cytology atlases. Longer scan times are also a barrier for use in rapid on-site evaluation, but WSI retains its advantages of easy sharing of images for consultation, multiple simultaneous viewing in different locations, the possibility of unlimited annotations and easy integration with medical records. Moreover, digital slides set the laboratory free from reliance on a physical glass slide, with no more concern of fading of stain or slide breakage. Costs are still a problem for small institutions, but WSI can also represent the beginning of a more efficient way of working.