Visual, Keratometric and Corneal Biomechanical Changes after Intacs SK Implantation for Moderate to Severe Keratoconus

Effects and safety of combined corneal collagen crosslinking and intrastromal corneal ring segment treatment in patients with keratoconus: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of different time-point combinations of intrastromal corneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation using femtosecond technology) and corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe keratoconus (KCC).

METHODS

This study included 69 eyes of 69 patients with keratoconus who underwent ICRS and CXL treatment at an Eye Hospital between March 2020 and March 2023. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (n = 33 eyes of 33 patients), which received ICRS and CXL treatment in one session, and Group 2 (n = 36 eyes of 36 patients), which included treatment with ICRS for at least 6 months following CXL application. Preoperative and postoperative evaluations included visual acuity, autorefractometer refraction, corneal tomographic measurements using the Sirius (CSO) Scheimpflug camera and the TONOREF™ III device, and documentation of observed complications. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best-corrected spectacle visual acuity (BCVA) were measured in each eye individually, and visual acuity was assessed using the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR).

RESULTS

In Group 1, mean UCVA improved from 0.81 ± 0.34 to 0.45 ± 0.25 (p < 0.01), and mean BCVA improved from 0.76 ± 0.35 to 0.38 ± 0.20 (p < 0.01). In Group 2, mean UCVA improved from 0.71 ± 0.32 to 0.43 ± 0.30 (p < 0.01), and mean BCVA improved from 0.65 ± 0.25 to 0.31 ± 0.23 (p < 0.01). Both groups showed significant reductions in manifest spherical and cylindrical refraction (p < 0.01). Group 1 exhibited greater reductions in maximum keratometry (Kmax), flat keratometry (K1), steep keratometry (K2) (p < 0.05), and astigmatic aberration compared with group 2 (p < 0.01). The use of simultaneous or separate CXL and ICRS does not significantly increase the incidence of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Both combined and separate CXL and ICRS treatments resulted in significant improvement in UCVA and BCVA and reduced manifest refraction. Although improvements were observed in groups 1 and 2 in terms of K1, K2, and Kmax at 6 months, the improvements were more pronounced in Group 1. These results highlight the potential benefits of simultaneous ICRS + CXL treatment and underscore the importance of optimising the timing of CXL treatment to achieve the best visual outcomes.

Comparing the Postoperative Outcomes of Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments in Three Different Topographic Patterns of Eccentric Keratoconus

PURPOSE

To compare the postoperative outcomes following implantation of KERATACx ring segments (Imperial Medical Technologies Europe GmbH) in patients having eccentric keratoconus with three different topographic patterns.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Maadi Eye Subspeciality Center, Cairo, Egypt. The study included patients with keratoconus who had implantation of KERATACx ring segments. Three groups were segregated based on topographic keratoconus patterns using the Sirius CSO Topographer (CSO Italia): type I ectasia where the cone coincides with the corneal flat axis, type II ectasia in which the cone coincides with neither the steep nor the flat axis and lies between the two axes, and type II ectasia for cones coinciding with the corneal steep axis. The visual and topographic outcomes were compared preoperatively and postoperatively for the three enrolled groups.

RESULTS

This study enrolled 92 eyes of 92 patients and had a mean ± standard deviation follow-up of 16.9 ± 9.2 months. The patients' medical records revealed that night vision complaints and halos around the light were experienced the most by the type III ectasia group (31.25%). For the type III ectasia group, four topographic indices and one visual parameter did not show statistically significant differences between the preoperative and postoperative data (inferior-superior difference at 2- and 4-mm diameter, coma aberration, higher order aberrations, and uncorrected distance visual acuity), contrary to the type I and II ectasia groups, which showed significant improvements in all evaluated parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

The type III morphological pattern of ectasia is the least likely to benefit from KERATACx ring segments implantation. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(9):e625-e634.].

Evaluation of dynamic corneal response parameters and the biomechanical E-staging after Intacs® SK implantation in keratoconus

PURPOSE

This retrospective longitudinal study evaluated the biomechanical E-staging in KC corneas before and after intracorneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation (Intacs® SK, Addition Technology, Illinois, United States).

METHODS

Biomechanical E-staging for ectatic corneal diseases was applied retrospectively on 49 KC corneas of 41 patients who underwent ICRS implantation. The main outcome parameters included the Corvis Biomechanical Factor (CBiF, the linearized Corvis Biomechanical Index and the biomechanical parameters included), the resulting biomechanical E-staging, the stress-strain index, thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), maximal anterior keratometry (Kmax), and the anterior radius of curvature (ARC). They were evaluated at 1.9 ± 1.1 months preoperatively and postoperatively after 2.8 ± 0.7, 5.8 ± 1.0, and 10.6 ± 2.3 months.

RESULTS

The CBiF decreased (4.9 ± 0.5 | 4.7 ± 0.5, P = 0.0013), and the E-staging increased significantly (2.8 ± 0.8 | 3.1 ± 0.9, P = 0.0012, paired t-test) from preoperatively to the first postoperative follow-up. The difference remained significant after 6 months; however, there was no more difference after 11 months. TCT was stable, whereas Kmax and ARC significantly decreased after ICRS implantation (TCT: 464 ± 49, 470 ± 51, 467 ± 38, 461 ± 48; Kmax: 56.3 ± 4.5, 54.7 ± 4.5, 54.2 ± 4.8, 54.1 ± 4.3; ARC: 51.5 ± 3.4, 48.3 ± 3.8, 48.6 ± 3.0, 48.6 ± 3.2 preoperatively and 3, 6, and 11 months postoperatively, respectively). Besides Kmax and ARC, Ambrósio's relational thickness to the horizontal profile (ARTh) was the only parameter that was significantly lower than preoperatively at any follow-up (P ≤ 0.0024, Wilcoxon matched-pairs test).

CONCLUSION

Intacs® SK implantation results in an increasing biomechanical E-staging in the first postoperative months with stabilization near preoperative values after 1 year. Significantly lower ARTh values at any follow-up document the ICRS effect and contribute to a slightly higher postoperative biomechanical E-staging value.

The Biomechanical E-Staging: In Vivo Biomechanics in Keratoconus

Belin's ABCD keratoconus classification system allows keratoconus staging based on the criteria of anterior (A) and posterior (B) corneal curvature, thinnest corneal thickness (C), and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (D). These parameters also provide a progression assessment, but do not take corneal biomechanics into account. The analysis of corneal biomechanics by the Corvis ST (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) allows for separation of healthy and keratoconus corneas, based on the Corvis Biomechanical Index (CBI) and the Tomographic Biomechanical Index (TBI). As Corvis ST measurements are highly reliable and are independent of keratoconus severity, a biomechanical parameter was developed for keratoconus corneas based on the linear term of the CBI. This provides biomechanical keratoconus staging. The Corvis Biomechanical Factor (CBiF) is the basis for the introduction of the biomechanical E-staging, which augments the ABCD classification to the ABCDE classification, thus including the cornerstone of corneal biomechanics. This article highlights strengths and limitations of the ABCDE classification. "Unilateral keratoconus" supposedly turns out to be mostly a snapshot of a highly asymmetric keratectasia. Regular astigmatism is sometimes an important differential diagnosis to keratectasia and may be difficult to differentiate from it. Furthermore, the use of the biomechanical E-staging in daily practice for progression assessment of keratoconus and after its treatment by corneal cross-linking or implantation of intracorneal ring segments will be demonstrated and discussed.

Anterior pituitary, sex hormones, and keratoconus: Beyond traditional targets

"The Diseases of the Horny-coat of The Eye", known today as keratoconus, is a progressive, multifactorial, non-inflammatory ectatic corneal disorder that is characterized by steepening (bulging) and thinning of the cornea, irregular astigmatism, myopia, and scarring that can cause devastating vision loss. The significant socioeconomic impact of the disease is immeasurable, as patients with keratoconus can have difficulties securing certain jobs or even joining the military. Despite the introduction of corneal crosslinking and improvements in scleral contact lens designs, corneal transplants remain the main surgical intervention for treating keratoconus refractory to medical therapy and visual rehabilitation. To-date, the etiology and pathogenesis of keratoconus remains unclear. Research studies have increased exponentially over the years, highlighting the clinical significance and international interest in this disease. Hormonal imbalances have been linked to keratoconus, both clinically and experimentally, with both sexes affected. However, it is unclear how (molecular/cellular signaling) or when (age/disease stage(s)) those hormones affect the keratoconic cornea. Previous studies have categorized the human cornea as an extragonadal tissue, showing modulation of the gonadotropins, specifically luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). Studies herein provide new data (both in vitro and in vivo) to further delineate the role of hormones/gonadotropins in the keratoconus pathobiology, and propose the existence of a new axis named the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal-Corneal (HPAC) axis.

[Intracorneal ring segments in keratoconus management]

Intracorneal ring segments (ICRS), used in the management of keratoconus since the 2000s, have enjoyed significant technological development. Various types of ICRS exist, whose arc length, thickness, and diameter can be chosen according to the desired effect on the spherical equivalent, keratometry and asphericity. Individualized implantation strategies, based on each patient's topographic and tomographic pattern, are constantly evolving. The surgical procedure is standardized, and complications remain very rare. Combined procedures (corneal collagen cross-linking and refractive photokeratectomy±topo-guided, phakic and pseudophakic intraocular lenses) are increasingly used and require a good knowledge of the effect of ICRS alone on the keratoconic cornea. The objective of this review is to summarize clinical practices used in the visual rehabilitation of keratoconic patients using the ICRS+- combined procedures.

Intracorneal Stromal Ring Can Affect the Biomechanics of Ectatic Cornea

Purpose

The biomechanical properties of ecstatic cornea undergo changes. This study evaluates the biomechanical changes of ecstatic cornea after implantation of two types of intracorneal stromal ring (ICR).

Methods

For doing this prospective cross-sectional study, 32 patients with keratoconus (KCN) were randomly divided into two 16-member groups (group I: MyoRing, group II: KeraRing). The main inclusion criteria were transparent cornea with no scar in the central part, corneal thickness >450 µ in the incision region, keratometry within 48–52 diopters, and progressive course of corneal thinning. Biomechanics of the cornea was evaluated by “ORA” and “Corvis” devices. All of the data were recorded and analyzed before implantation of the rings and 6 months thereafter.

Results

The mean ages of patients of groups I and II were 26 ± 6.55 and 33.86 ± 8.5, respectively. The postoperative change of sphere refraction was significant in both groups. However, reduction in the astigmatism was significant only in group I. In addition, the change of flat meridian keratometry (Kf) was significant before and after ring implantation in group I, unlike group II. The changes in CH and CRF parameters (ORA) were not significant in either group before and after the operation. Besides, only HRC parameter (Corvis) decreased significantly in both groups before and after the operation.

Conclusion

Both MyoRing and KeraRings have positive effects on the biomechanics of cornea at least during the first year after implantation. Comparison of these two types of ICR did not show significant differences in Corvis and ORA parameters.

Effectiveness of intracorneal ring segments for keratoconus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the efficacy of intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) for keratoconus and with other interventions such as contacts lens, keratoplasty, and corneal collagen cross-linking.

RECENT FINDINGS

Changes in ICRS thickness and size, combination of procedures, and the adaptation of a more sophisticated classification system have broadened our application of ICRS. Recent studies have shown the long-term efficacy of ICRS in visual acuity, keratometry, and astigmatism.

SUMMARY

Studies have demonstrated the short-term and long-term efficacy of ICRS implantation in patients with keratoconus.

One-Year Efficacy and Safety of Combined Photorefractive Keratectomy and Accelerated Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking after Intacs SK Intracorneal Ring Segment Implantation in Moderate Keratoconus

PURPOSE

To report one-year outcomes of a modified version of two-stage multimodal surgical protocol for moderate keratoconus which has been suggesting promising preliminary results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

30 eyes of 25 patients with moderate keratoconus who exhibited visual complaints and/or disease progression were included for this retrospective case study. Approximately 3 months after implantation of intracorneal ring segment (Intacs SK™), a combination of corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (CWG-transPRK, Schwind Amaris® 1050, and Schwind Sirius) and accelerated collagen cross-linking (accCXL, Avedro KXL™) was performed. Patients were examined for uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA; CDVA), keratometric power (K), corneal thickness, and corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) preoperatively and at postoperative 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

The median UDVA and mean CDVA were enhanced from 6/38 to 6/12 and from 6/19 to 6/7.5, respectively, through 12 months after CWG-transPRK/accCXL. The 12-month CDVA of all patients was better than 6/12 Snellen, and no subject lost one or more lines of CDVA. The magnitudes of both myopia and corneal steepness were decreased in turn by Intacs SK implantation and also by CWG-transPRK/accCXL, but the reduction in HOA was largely the result of CWG-transPRK/accCXL. The magnitude of corneal thinning stabilized within 3 months after CWG-transPRK/accCXL.

CONCLUSION

This approach may allow patients with moderate keratoconus to obtain satisfactory vision without the need for contact lens wear. This surgery appeared to be effective and safe through 1 year of follow-up.

Efficacy of Different Procedures of Intra-Corneal Ring Segment Implantation in Keratoconus: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of the functional, keratometric, and refractive postoperative parameters of intracorneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation in keratoconus and its association with collagen cross-linking (CXL), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), and intraocular lenses (IOLs).

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on case series published between 2007 and 2017.

Results

We included 95 case series with a total of 4560 patients. We included 64 studies of the ICRS procedure, 20 studies of ICRS+CXL, 9 studies of ICRS+CXL+PRK, and 5 studies of ICRS+IOL. We demonstrated an overall improvement of all parameters in all procedures. Cylinder was decreased with an overall effect size (ES) of −1.15 (−1.36 to −0.95; I² = 93.7%). Corrected distance visual acuity was improved with an overall ES of 0.89 (0.78 to 1.00; I² = 81.9%). Maximal keratometry was decreased with an overall ES of 0.98 (0.85 to 1.11; I² = 78.9%). ICRS+IOL is the best procedure to improve spherical equivalent and uncorrected distance visual acuity (P < 0.05) compared with other procedures. ICRSs versus ICRS+CXL are similar in all parameters except for corrected distance visual acuity. ICRS+CXL+PRK is better than ICRS alone in all parameters except for the correction of spherical equivalent.

Conclusions

Although the quality and strength of the data are questionable, ICRS implantation is an effective strategy to preserve visual function in keratoconic patients. Particularly, ICRS+CXL+PRK could be a low invasive procedure to propose to young keratoconic patients.

Translational Relevance

To propose an overview of postoperative parameters on each ICRS procedure on keratoconus.

Long-term outcome of intrastromal corneal ring segments in keratoconus: Five-year follow up

To evaluate the effectiveness of intrastromal corneal ring segment (ICRS) use in keratoconus after five years. ICRS has been widely used to correct astigmatism and improve visual acuity in keratoconus. Although the short-term outcome is well known to be effective, long-term outcome has rarely been reported. A retrospective chart review was done. A total of 30 eyes diagnosed with keratoconus and treated with INTACS (Addition Technology, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) were included. Visual acuity, refraction, indices of corneal irregularity, and higher-order aberration were evaluated at preoperative, two months, one year, three years, and five years postoperatively. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and spherical and spherical equivalent were improved (p < 0.05) for three years. However, they worsened (p < 0.05) at five years to preoperative values. On the other hand, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was improved for five years (p < 0.05). Topographic keratometry was flattened, and corneal irregularity indices were improved at five years (all p < 0.05). Coma RMS was improved (p < 0.05) continuously for five years. ICRS has advantages in improving CDVA with topographic stabilization and decreasing coma in keratoconus for five years.

Obesity and Density of the Crystalline Lens: Revisiting a Growing Dilemma

Background/Aims

Obesity is believed to accelerate age-related cataractogenesis through various biomechanisms. On the contrary, there are also studies advocating the protective role of obesity against the cataract formation process. We investigate the correlation of body mass index (BMI) as a measure for obesity with crystalline optical lens density and opacity in a healthy adult population.

Methods

In a cross-sectional setting, 93 consecutive disease-free adult individuals who were working staff of a university-based hospital were assessed for the association between crystalline lens density and opalescence [measured by the objective Pentacam HR lens densitometry and subjective Lens Opacity Classification System III (LOCS III), respectively] with the degree of obesity as defined by BMI.

Results

LOCS III and crystalline lens density readings were positively correlated [Spearman rho CC (p value) = 0.224 (0.034)]. However, we found neither LOCS III nor crystalline lens density to be correlated with BMI [Spearman rho CC = -0.008 (p = 0.943) and -0.062 (p = 0.560), respectively].

Conclusions

Results from the present study indicate a lack of association between obesity and densitometry of the crystalline in the adult population group. Further studies are required to confirm the order of causality and pathogenesis of this finding.

Biomechanical properties of early keratoconus: Suppressed deformation signal wave

PURPOSE

To examine the diagnostic validity of different corneal biomechanical parameters for the detection of early keratoconus METHODS: Sixty-one eyes with a diagnosis of early keratoconus and 61 topographically normal eyes were enrolled in the study. All participants underwent testing with the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA), and 40 indices from each cornea were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

The mean (standard deviation: SD) of keratometry and central corneal thickness in keratoconic corneas was 46.9 (2.5) diopter (D) and 473 (31) μm, respectively. Of the 40 evaluated indices, 32 showed a significant difference between the two groups using t-test (p<0.05). According to the results of logistic regression, the indices of height from the lowest to the highest point in peak 2 (H2¹) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) with R²=0.79 were the best predictors of early keratoconus (p<0.001). H2¹ ≤190 with a sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 91.8%, respectively, and CRF≤8.6 with sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 85.3%, respectively, yielded an overall diagnostic accuracy of 97.3%.

CONCLUSION

This study results point to the important role of novel waveform-derived indices measured by ORA, along with conventional biomechanical indices, for the early diagnosis of keratoconus. The best predictors of keratoconus in its early stages are H2¹ and CRF which showed very high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of early keratoconus.