Ghrelin and its Association with Nutritional and Inflammatory Status of Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis in a South Indian Tertiary Care Hospital

Leptin Levels and Appetite Score in Patients on Hemodialysis Using High Flux or Medium Cutoff Membranes

OBJECTIVES

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients on hemodialysis may have a modified appetite due to several factors including a lack of uremic toxins elimination. The use of medium cutoff (MCO) dialysis membranes has been suggested as an alternative to improve the removal of toxins, especially those of medium and high molecular weight. This study aimed to compare the effect of hemodialysis using MCO and high-flux membranes on the appetite and leptin levels of CKD patients.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This is a predefined exploratory analysis of a randomized, open study, with a crossover design of 28 weeks of follow-up, which compared the effects of MCO and high-flux membranes in 32 CKD patients on hemodialysis. Appetite assessments were performed using the Appetite and Food Satisfaction Questionnaire.

RESULTS

The MCO group had an appetite score of 3.00 (1.00-5.50) and 3.00 (1.00-5.00) at the beginning and at the end of the treatment period, respectively, while the high-flux group had 1.00 (0.25-6.00) and 2.00 (0.75-3.25). There were no effects of treatment (P = .573), time (P = .376), and interaction (P = .770) between the MCO and high-flux groups. Leptin levels, at the beginning and at the end of the treatment period, were 2,342.30 (1,156.50-4,091.50) and 2,571.50 (1,619.40-4,036.47) pg/mL in the MCO group, respectively, and 2,183.15 (1,550.67-3,656.50) and 2,685.65 (1,458.20-3,981.08) pg/mL in the high-flux group. There was a time effect (P = .014), showing an increase in leptin levels in both groups, while treatment (P = .771) or interaction (P = .218) effects were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no difference between the effects of MCO or high-flux membranes on leptin levels or appetite of CKD patients on hemodialysis.

Treatment of COVID-19 in Hemodialysis Patients Using Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study

Background: To explore the effect of combining traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and Western medicine in hemodialysis patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Methods: This study was conducted from 27 January 2020 to 17 March 2020 in Wuhan Third Hospital Guanggu Branch, Wuhan, China. Fifty-three patients were included and divided into a control group (CG), which received Western medicine and a combined treatment group, which received TCM and Western medicine (TG). Clinical and laboratory data, TCM symptom scores, and chest computed tomography results were extracted and compared between the two groups.

Results: The TG included 21 (67.7%) men and 10 (32.3%) women with a mean age of 61.02 (standard deviation [SD] 15.07, range 26–89) years. The mean dialysis duration in the TG was 49 (SD 31) months. Of all patients in the TG, 27 (87.1%) had fatigue, 18 (58.1%) had dry cough, 16 (51.6%) had anorexia, 11 (35.5%) had dyspnea, and 11 (35.5%) had fever. The CG included 14 (63.6%) men and 8 (36.4%) women with a mean age of 61.45 (SD 13.78, range 36–84) years. The mean dialysis duration in the CG was 63 (SD 46) months. Of all patients in the CG, 21 (95.5%) had fatigue, 12 (54.5%) had dry cough, 17 (77.3%) had anorexia, 12 (54.5%) had dyspnea, and 7 (31.8%) had fever. After treatment, the TCM symptom scores of the two groups decreased; the anorexia scores were lower in the TG than in the CG (p < 0.05). After treatment, albumin increased and D-dimer, C-reactive protein, and lactate dehydrogenase levels decreased in the TG. The d-dimer levels were lower and the albumin level was higher in the TG than in the CG after treatment (p < 0.05). The cure rate was higher, and the mortality rate was lower in the TG than in the CG (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: A combination of TCM and Western medicine in hemodialysis patients with COVID-19 could relieve symptoms and help recovery. Further evidence from larger randomized controlled trials is needed to confirm our results.

Understanding Development of Malnutrition in Hemodialysis Patients: A Narrative Review

Hemodialysis (HD) majorly represents the global treatment option for patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5, and, despite advances in dialysis technology, these patients face a high risk of morbidity and mortality from malnutrition. We aimed to provide a novel view that malnutrition susceptibility in the global HD community is either or both of iatrogenic and of non-iatrogenic origins. This categorization of malnutrition origin clearly describes the role of each factor in contributing to malnutrition. Low dialysis adequacy resulting in uremia and metabolic acidosis and dialysis membranes and techniques, which incur greater amino-acid losses, are identified modifiable iatrogenic factors of malnutrition. Dietary inadequacy as per suboptimal energy and protein intakes due to poor appetite status, low diet quality, high diet monotony index, and/or psychosocial and financial barriers are modifiable non-iatrogenic factors implicated in malnutrition in these patients. These factors should be included in a comprehensive nutritional assessment for malnutrition risk. Leveraging the point of origin of malnutrition in dialysis patients is crucial for healthcare practitioners to enable personalized patient care, as well as determine country-specific malnutrition treatment strategies.

Ghrelin and acyl ghrelin levels are associated with inflammatory and nutritional markers and with cardiac and vascular dysfunction parameters in hemodialysis patients

PURPOSE

Exogenous ghrelin is associated with cardiovascular protection in experimental and human studies. Nevertheless ESRD patients have increased ghrelin levels and severe cardiovascular comorbidities. This study aims to elucidate the metabolic factors influencing endogenous ghrelin/acyl ghrelin levels and to analyze the relation between endogenous ghrelin/acyl ghrelin levels and cardiac and vascular function markers in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

The cross-sectional study was conducted in hemodialysis patients (n = 88); 50 of them were men, mean age 61.1 ± 13.5 years, 17% had diabetes. We assessed nutritional and inflammatory status and analyzed the determinants of ghrelin/acyl ghrelin and their relation with cardiac and vascular function.

RESULTS

Ghrelin is correlated with IL-1β (r = 0.88, p < 0.0001), triglycerides, total cholesterol (TC), and Kt/V. IL-1β is the strongest predictor of ghrelin levels (p < 0.0001). Acyl ghrelin is correlated with TC (r = 0.36, p = 0.001), LDL-cholesterol, serum bicarbonate, body mass index. TC is the strongest predictor for acyl ghrelin levels (p = 0.038). Patients with high ghrelin levels had significantly decreased nitroglycerin-mediated dilation (p = 0.05) and higher IL-1β levels (p < 0.001); increased NT-proBNP is associated with lower levels of acyl ghrelin (r = - 0.33, p = 0.02) in male patients.

CONCLUSION

The inflammatory marker IL-1β is in our study the strongest predictor of ghrelin levels while the nutritional marker-total cholesterol is the strongest predictor for acyl ghrelin levels in HD patients. High endogenous ghrelin level is associated with high IL-1β and with vascular smooth muscle cell dysfunction. Low acyl ghrelin level is associated with high NT-proBNP (a cardiac dysfunction marker) in male HD patients. There is a direct correlation between endogenous ghrelin level and inflammatory markers, which is not related with cardiovascular protection.

Serum ghrelin levels: Is there any association with malnutrition and depression in peritoneal dialysis patients?

BACKGROUND

Ghrelin is a physiologic regulatory hormone of appetite and body weight, and its concentrations increase in chronic kidney disease. This study aimed to analyze the effects of malnutrition and depression on the plasma ghrelin levels in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients.

METHODS/PATIENTS

The relationship between fasting serum ghrelin concentration, type of dialysate solution, malnutrition-inflammation score (MIS), and depressive symptoms of 87 PD patients were analyzed. Depressive symptoms were evaluated using the Beck Depression Inventory.

RESULTS

No significant relationship between ghrelin concentration and body mass index (BMI), MIS or depression scores was detected. The mean serum ghrelin concentration in patients using amino acid-based solutions was higher than in non-users (p <0.001). The mean serum ghrelin concentration of the patients using icodextrin-based solutions was found to be significantly higher than non-users (8.69 ± 5.04 vs 6.61 ± 2.8 ng/ml respectively, p =0.02). There was no significant difference in MIS between the patients in terms of amino-acid and/or icodextrin usage.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no association between BMI, MIS, and depression with ghrelin concentrations in PD patients. Icodextrin and/or amino acid-based solutions usage may increase the serum ghrelin concentration without a significant effect on BMI and measures of malnutrition. HIPPOKRATIA 2018, 22(1): 43-48.