Shape modifications of porous hydroxyapatite prostheses to improve rigid implant fixation: Experience in 12 cases

Management of infected hydroxyapatite cranioplasty: Is salvage feasible?

Introduction

The use of hydroxyapatite cranioplasties has grown progressively over the past few decades. The peculiar biological properties of this material make it particularly suitable for patients with decompressive craniectomy where bone reintegration is a primary objective. However, hydroxyapatite infection rates are similar to those of other reconstructive materials.

Research question

We investigated if infected hydroxyapatite implants could be saved or not.

Materials and methods

We present a consecutive series over a 10-year period of nine patients treated for hydroxyapatite cranioplasty infection. Clinical and radiological data from admission and follow-up, photo and video material documenting the different phases of infection assessment and treatment, and final outcomes were retrospectively reviewed in an attempt to identify the best options and possible pitfalls in a case-by-case decision-making process.

Results

Five unilateral and four bifrontal implants became infected. Wound rupture with cranioplasty exposure was the most common presentation. At revision, all implants were ossified, requiring a new craniotomy to clean the purulent epidural collections. The cranioplasty was fully saved in one hemispheric and 2 bifrontal implants and partially saved in the remaining 2 bifrontal implants. A complete cranioplasty removal was needed in the other 4 cases, but immediate cranial reconstruction was possible in 2. Skin defects were covered by free flaps in 3 cases. Four patients underwent adjunctive hyperbaric therapy, which was effective in one case.

Discussion and conclusion

In our experience, infected hydroxyapatite cranioplasty management is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Salvage of a hydroxyapatite implant is possible under specific circumstances.

•

We present a series of 9 patients treated for hydroxyapatite cranioplasty infection.

•

One hemispheric and 2 bifrontal implants were fully saved, 2 bifrontal only partially.

•

A complete removal was needed in 4 cases, but immediate cranial reconstruction was possible in 2.

•

Infected hydroxyapatite cranioplasties salvage is complex, but possible under specific circumstances.

Hydroxyapatite cranioplasty: a retrospective evaluation of osteointegration in 17 cases

BACKGROUND

Cranial reconstruction with autologous bone is still the gold standard although several biomaterials are available to re-establish the integrity of the cranial vault. Due to their biological and morphological characteristics, hydroxyapatite implants show promising results in small clinical cohort studies, especially within the paediatric population. Its biocompatibility and osteoconductivity should allow the formation of osseous bridging at the skull-prosthesis interface.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the possible occurrence of osteointegration and to quantify it.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients with a hydroxyapatite implant from 2010 to 2014 at our neurosurgical department was conducted. Demographic, surgical and radiological data were studied. A senior neuroradiologist, a staff member neurosurgeon and a resident neurosurgeon independently performed the radiological evaluation. A new software analysis technique was developed to objectively quantify the degree of osteointegration.

RESULTS

Seventeen implants were evaluated with an average patient age of 39 years and a mean follow-up of 155 weeks. Through radiologic evaluation, osseous bridging was deemed higher than 50% in six prostheses and higher than 75% in three. In five patients, no osteointegration could be seen. The remaining patients exhibited sparse signs of osteointegration, estimated between 10 and 50%. Software analysis showed an average osteointegration ratio of 37.4% with a 400-HU filter and 27.3% with a 700-HU filter.

CONCLUSION

In this small retrospective study of cranial hydroxyapatite implants, osteointegration did occur and to a degree of more than 50% in 1/3 of the patients.

Hydroxyapatite ceramic implants for cranioplasty in children: a single-center experience

PURPOSE

The use of hydroxyapatite ceramic (HAC) implants for the treatment of skull defects in pediatric patients started 2010 at our institution. Ceramic implants facilitate osteoblast migration and therefore optimize osteointegration with the host bone. The purpose of this study is to report a single-center experience with this treatment modality.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients from July 2010 through June 2014 undergoing a cranioplasty using hydroxyapatite ceramic implant and managed at a single institution was performed. Indication for cranioplasty, the hospital course, and follow-up were reviewed. Bone density was measured in Hounsfield Units (HU) and osteointegration was calculated using Mimics Software® (Mimics Innovation Suite v17.0 Medical, Materialize, Leuven, Belgium).

RESULTS

Over the 4-year period, six patients met criteria for the study. Five patients had an osteointegration of nearly 100%. One patient had an incomplete osteointegration with a total bone-implant contact area of 69%. The mean bone density was 2800 HU (2300-3000 HU). Bone density alone is estimated to have a Hounsfield value between 400 and 2000 HU depending on the body region and bone quality. There were no major complications, and the patients were highly satisfied with the esthetical result.

CONCLUSION

Hydroxyapatite ceramic implants for cranioplasty in pediatric patients are a good choice for different indications. The implants show excellent osteointegration and esthetical results.

Paradoxical Brain Herniation After Decompressive Craniectomy Provoked by Drainage of Subdural Hygroma

BACKGROUND

Paradoxical brain herniation (PBH) is a rare and potentially life-threatening complication of decompressive craniectomy (DC) and results from the combined effects of brain gravity, atmospheric pressure and intracranial hypotension causing herniation in the direction opposite to the site of the DC with subsequent brainstem compression. To date, the cases of PBH reported in literature are spontaneous or provoked by a lumbar puncture, a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt, or ventriculostomy.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We present an uncommon case of PBH provoked by percutaneous drainage of a huge subdural hygroma (SH) ipsilateral to the decompressive craniectomy causing mass effect and neurologic deterioration. After percutaneous evacuation of SH, the patient became unresponsive with dilated and fixed left pupil. A brain computed tomography scan showed marked midline shift in the direction opposite to the craniectomy site with subfalcine herniation and effacement of the peripontine cisterns. Paradoxical brain herniation (PBH) was diagnosed. Conservative treatment failed, and the patient required an emergency cranioplasty for reverse PBH.

CONCLUSIONS

The present case highlights the possibility that all forms of CSF depletion, including percutaneous drainage of subdural CSF collection and not only CSF shunting and/or lumbar puncture, can be dangerous for patients with large craniotomies and result in PBH. Moreover, an emergency cranioplasty could represent a safe and effective procedure in patients not responding to conservative treatment.