Posterolateral lumbar fusion: Relationship between computed tomography Hounsfield units and symptomatic pseudoarthrosis

Association of Poor Bone Quality with Pseudarthrosis and Poor Clinical Outcomes in Single-Level Instrumented Lumbar Arthrodesis Using Local Autologous Bone Graft

INTRODUCTION

Although osteoporosis and low bone mineral density is thought to lead to poor fusion outcomes, few studies have adequately addressed the correlation, and they were limited by small sample size at a single institution.

METHODS

We completed a secondary analysis of 182 patients enrolled at 26 spine centers across the United States in the EXO-SPINE FDA-approved clinical trial with 12-month CT-based fusion status determined by two independent, blinded radiologists. Using previously described CT-based techniques, we measured local and global Hounsfield units (HU) and examined the relationship with radiographic and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

CT scans were available for review from 95 patients, with a mean age of 56.2 years and mean global density of 153.0 HU. No relationship was observed between HU and radiographic fusion status or clinical outcomes. Although 12% of patients had lumbar vertebral body HU measurements consistent with osteoporosis, this classification had no relation with fusion or clinical outcomes. Patients with pseudarthrosis had higher Oswestry Disability Index (22.2 vs. 16.6, P = 0.037) and back pain visual analog scale (7.0 vs. 4.9, P = 0.014) scores than patients with at least unilateral fusion at the 12-month follow-up.

DISCUSSION

In this large, multicenter study, lower vertebral body HU was not associated with worse fusion status after single-level instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion using only local autologous bone graft. However, there was an association between radiographic fusion status and clinical outcomes, validating the importance of determining predictors of successful fusion. Assessment of fusion status with CT scans yielded a much lower fusion success rate with local bone graft than previously reported and may warrant additional investigation.

Analysis of risk factors for non-fusion of bone graft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A clinical retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Bone graft fusion is a major concern among surgeons after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) surgery as non-fusion may lead to further physical and drug therapies.

METHODS

The related risk elements of non-fusion of bone graft in ACDF surgery were retrospectively assessed. Patients receiving ACDF operation in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the criteria, 107 study subjects were recruited with a total of 164 surgical segments. The general information of patients, bone graft materials, imaging parameters, and clinical efficacy was recorded. T-test, chi-square test and binary logistic regression evaluation were employed to explore the risk factors of bone graft nonunion.

RESULTS

Low housefield unit (HU) value, diabetes, allogeneic bone, and hydroxyapatite (HA) artificial bone could be risk factors for bone graft fusion in ACDF surgery. Further multivariate analysis was performed and confirmed those related factors of bone graft non-fusion including low HU value (non-fusion rate: 32.53% [27/83], OR = 5.024, p = 0.025), diabetes (non-fusion rate: 53.33% [8/15], OR = 4.776, p = 0.031), allogeneic bone (18.57% [13/70], OR = 3.964, p = 0.046), and artificial bone (68.29% [28/41], OR = 50.550, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

By looking at bone graft fusion, selecting autologous iliac bone is an ideal selection to avoid non-fusion of bone graft in ACDF. Diabetes was more important predictor of bone graft nonunion than low HU value. Larger sample size and longer follow-up are required to further confirm these findings in the future.

The influence of osteoporosis on mechanical complications in lumbar fusion surgery: a systematic review

Background

Adults undergoing spine surgery often have underlying osteoporosis, which may be a risk factor for postoperative complications. Although these associations have been described, osteoporosis remains profoundly underdiagnosed and undertreated in the spine surgery population. A thorough, comprehensive systematic review summarizing the relationships between bone mineral density (BMD) and specific complications of lumbar fusion surgery could be a valuable resource for raising awareness and supporting clinical practice changes.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched for original clinical research articles reporting on BMD, or surrogate measure, as a predictor of complications in adults undergoing elective lumbar fusion for degenerative disease or deformity. Endpoints included cage subsidence, screw loosening, pseudarthrosis, vertebral fracture, junctional complications, and reoperation.

Results

A total of 71 studies comprising 12,278 patients were included. Overall, considerable heterogeneity in study populations, methods of bone health assessment, and definition and evaluation of clinical endpoints precluded meta-analysis. Nevertheless, low BMD was associated with higher rates of implant failures like cage subsidence and screw loosening, which were often diagnosed with concomitant pseudarthrosis. Osteoporosis was also a significant risk factor for proximal junctional kyphosis, particularly due to fracture. Many studies found surgical site-specific BMD to best predict focal complications. Functional outcomes were inconsistently addressed.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest osteoporosis is a significant risk factor for mechanical complications of lumbar fusion. These results emphasize the importance of preoperative osteoporosis screening, which allows for medical and surgical optimization of high-risk patients. This review also highlights current practical challenges facing bone health evaluation in patients undergoing elective surgery. Future prospective studies using standardized methods are necessary to strengthen existing evidence, identify optimal predictive thresholds, and establish specialty-specific practice guidelines. In the meantime, an awareness of the surgical implications of osteoporosis and utility of preoperative screening can provide for more informed, effective patient care.

Low hounsfield unit values at sagittal section on computed tomography predicts vertebral fracture following short spinal fusion

BACKGROUND

Preoperative identification of osteoporosis during spine surgery is of critical importance. Additionally, the Hounsfield units (HU) measured using computed tomography (CT) have gained considerable attention. This study aimed to propose a more accurate and convenient screening method for predicting vertebral fractures after spinal fusion in elderly patients by analyzing the HU value of different range of interests of thoracolumbar spine.

METHODS

Our sample pool for analysis consisted of 137 elderly female patients aged >70 years who underwent one- or two-level spinal fusion surgery with a diagnosis of adult degenerative lumbar disease. The HU values of the anterior 1/3 of the vertebral bodies based on sagittal plane and those of vertebral bodies based on axial plane at T11-L5 were measured using the perioperative CT. The incidence of postoperative vertebral fractures with respect to the HU value was investigated.

RESULTS

Vertebral fractures were identified in 16 patients during the mean follow-up period of 3.8 years. While no significant association was found between HU value of L1 vertebral body or minimum HU value from axial plane and the incidence of the postoperative vertebral fracture, the minimum vertebral HU value of the anterior 1/3 of vertebral body from sagittal plane was associated with the incidence of the postoperative vertebral fracture. Patients with a minimum anterior 1/3 vertebral HU value of <80 had a higher incidence of postoperative vertebral fractures. The adjacent vertebral fractures occurred at the level of the vertebra with the lowest HU value, with a high probability. The existence of the vertebra with a minimum HU value of <80 within two levels of upper instrumented vertebrae was a risk factor for adjacent vertebral fracture.

CONCLUSION

HU measurement of the anterior 1/3 of vertebral body predicts the risk of vertebral fracture after short spinal fusion surgery.

Sagittal Section Hounsfield Units of the Upper Instrumented Vertebrae as a Predictor of Proximal Junctional Vertebral Fractures Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective observational study.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine an accurate and convenient screening method for predicting proximal junctional fractures (PJFr) following surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) using computed tomography (CT)-based measurement of Hounsfield units (HUs).

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

CT-based measurement of HUs is an alternative tool for assessing bone mineral density. However, the optimal method for predicting adjacent vertebral fractures following spinal fusion using HUs remains unclear.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included 42 patients who underwent reconstructive surgery for ASD. Elliptical regions of interest (ROIs) on the axial section and rectangular ROIs on the sagittal section were placed at the upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV), UIV+1, and UIV+2. In addition, the HU value of the L2 vertebra was used as the representative.

RESULTS

PJFr occurred in 28.6% of patients within 2 years following surgery. The HU values obtained from the axial sections of L2, UIV, UIV+1, and UIV+2 were not significantly associated with the incidence of PJFr within 2 years, except for the ROI set in the lower region of the L2 vertebra. However, the HU value of the anterior third of the UIV in the sagittal section was significantly lower in the PJFr group than in the nonPJFr group (87.0 vs. 160.3, p =0.001). A UIV HU value of <100 was associated with a higher incidence of PJFr than an HU vaue of >100 (p <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Measurements of HU in the anterior one-third of the UIV in the sagittal section demonstrated predictive ability for PJFr following ASD surgery. A UIV HU value of <100 emerged as a risk factor for PJFr.

Percutaneous reduction of thoracolumbar fractures using monoaxial screws: Comparison of two instruments based on initial reduction and loss of reduction

Introduction

Percutaneous techniques for the surgical treatment of vertebral fractures are constantly progressing. There are different biomechanics involved.

Research question

Two percutaneous, monoaxial fixation systems with different reduction tools were analyzed in relation to their reduction capacity. Additionally, the impact of anterior fusion, fracture severity and bone quality on reduction and loss of reduction were examined.

Material and methods

117 cases were retrospectively included in the monocentric study. The subsample (N = 53) with complete data at follow-up times was used to analyze the influence of anterior fusion. The dependencies on fracture severity and bone quality were determined using Spearman and Pearson correlation.

Results

Both systems achieved equally good reduction (9° mean, 95%-CI: 8°-11°, p < 0.001). Anterior fused patients showed not significant (p = 0.057) less loss of reduction over time. Fracture severity had neither an influence on reduction or loss of reduction. Bone quality was positively correlated with greater amount of reduction and less loss of reduction. Early reduction within two days correlated with a greater amount of reduction (p = 0.006). Screw diameters and the patient's weight had no influence on loss of reduction. Complications occurred only in "V2" group.

Discussion and conclusion

Both systems are equivalent in reduction ability. The additional anterior fusion did not result in significantly lower reduction losses. The subsample being small, is a limitation. Good bone quality correlates with better initial reduction and less reduction loss. A preoperative bone density measurement can lead to optimization of surgical techniques.

Correlations among Cervical, Thoracic, and lumbar Hounsfield Unit measurements for assessment of bone mineral density

OBJECTIVE

Bone mineral density assessment using Hounsfield Unit (HU) currently depends upon the availability of computed tomography (CT) of the lumbar spine. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the associations among HU measurements of the cervical (CHU), thoracic (THU), and lumbar (LHU) spine. The secondary aim of this study was to analyze the influence of patient demographic and anthropometric characteristics on HU measurements.

METHODS

Radiographic records of 165 patients who underwent CT of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine were retrieved. The CHU, THU, and LHU were calculated by obtaining the mean signal intensity from the medullary portions of C3-C7, T8-T12, and L1-L4 vertebral bodies.

RESULTS

Mean CHU, THU, and LHU values were 266.26 ± 88.69, 165.57 ± 55.06, and 166.45 ± 51.38. Significant differences of 100.69, 99.81, and 0.88 were observed between CHU and THU (p <.001), CHU and LHU (p <.001), and THU and LHU (p =.023). Correlations of 0.574, 0.488, and 0.686 were observed between CHU and THU (p <.001), CHU and LHU (p <.001), and THU and LHU (p <.001). No differences in HU based on sex, age, height, weight, or ethnicity were observed. Multivariate regression models demonstrated R2 values of 0.770 - 0.790 (p <.001) in prediction of LHU.

CONCLUSIONS

Hounsfield Unit measurements derived from the cervical and thoracic spine correlate with the validated lumbar Hounsfield Unit. Hounsfield Unit measurements do not vary based on sex, ethnicity, age, height, or weight.

The Use of Intraoperative CT Hounsfield Unit Values for the Assessment of Bone Quality in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Interbody Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy of intraoperatively measured computed tomography (CT) Hounsfield unit (HU) values by comparison with preoperative CT HU values and to compare the radiation exposure between preoperative and intraoperative CT scans.

METHODS

HU values of lumbar vertebrae were measured and compared between preoperative and intraoperative CT scans in patients undergoing lumbar interbody fusion. In patient group one, Canon CT scanners were used preoperatively and the AIRO CT scanner was used intraoperatively. In patient group two, Canon CT scanners were used preoperatively and the O-arm Cone Beam CT (CBCT) scanner was used intraoperatively. In a subgroup analysis of patient group one, radiation by means of CT Dose Index (CTDI) was compared between Canon and AIRO CT scanners.

RESULTS

In the first patient group, a total of 250 vertebrae were analysed in 74 patients showing a strong Pearson correlation of >.94 between pre- and intraoperative HU values. Bland-Altman analysis indicated consistency and equivalence with a bias of 3.9 and 95% limits of agreement from -27.17 to 34.97 when comparing all pre- and intraoperative HU values of L1-5. In the second patient group, a total of 27 vertebrae were analysed in 10 patients showing weak Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis indicated no equivalence. CTDI did not differ between Canon and AIRO CT scanners.

CONCLUSION

Correct and reliable CT HU measurement as mandatory key factor for the intraoperative assessment of bone quality and robotic-assisted surgery is feasible with intraoperative AIRO CT imaging without increase of radiation exposure.

Importance of computed tomography Hounsfield units in predicting S1 screw loosening after lumbosacral fusion

We investigated whether computed tomography (CT) Hounsfield unit (HU) values of the S1 screw trajectory can predict screw loosening after lumbosacral fixation. We analysed 102 patients (58 men and 44 women) who underwent L5-S1 interbody fusion between April 2018 and October 2019. We reviewed the characteristics of patients including body mass index, smoking, comorbidity with diabetes mellitus, and interbody fusion types. Bone mineral density (BMD) was obtained from the lumbar spine and total hip using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Additionally, we reviewed the S1 screw lengths and diameters. HU values of both L1 vertebral bodies and bilateral S1 screw trajectories were measured on preoperative CT. At six months postoperatively, S1 screws on CT were assessed. Screws with a 1 mm or more radiolucent zone were defined as "loosening". Seventeen patients had loosened screws, and 85 patients did not. The patient characteristics did not significantly differ between the two groups. Both total hip BMD and L1 HU values were low in the loosening patient group (both p = 0.03). Of the 204 total S1 screws, 25 screws were loosened, and 179 screws were not. The screw length was short (p = 0.01), and the HU value of the S1 screw trajectory was low (p < 0.001) in the loosening screw group. Based on receiver operating characteristic analyses of these factors, the area under the curve of HU value of the S1 screw trajectory was the highest (0.79). Measuring the HU value of both the L1 vertebral body and S1 screw trajectory aids in predicting screw loosening.

Junctional Kyphosis after Correction with Long Instrumentation for Late Posttraumatic Thoracolumbar Kyphosis: Characteristics and Risk Factors

OBJECTIVE

Junctional kyphosis is a common complication after corrective long spinal fusion for adult spinal deformity. Whereas there is still a paucity of data on junctional kyphosis, specifically among late posttraumatic thoracolumbar kyphosis (LPTK) patients. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics and risk factors of junctional kyphosis in LPTK patients receiving long segmental instrumented fusion.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of LPTK patients who had received long segmental instrumented fusion (>4 segments) in our center between January 2012 and January 2019. Radiographic assessments included the sagittal alignment, pelvic parameters, bone quality on CT images, and measurements of the cross-sectional area (CSA, cross-sectional area of muscle-vertebral body ratio × 100) and fat saturation fraction (FSF, cross-sectional area of fat-muscle body ratio × 100) of paraspinal muscles. Patients in this study were divided into those with junctional kyphosis or failure (Group J) and those without (Group NJ) during follow-up. Group J included patients with junctional kyphosis (Group JK) and patients with junctional failure (Group JF).

RESULTS

A total of 65 patients (16 males and 49 females, average age 56.5 ± 23.4 years) were enrolled in this study. After (32.7 ± 8.5) months follow-up, 15 patients (23.1%) experienced junctional kyphosis, and four of them deteriorated into junctional failure. Eighty percent (12/15) of junctional kyphosis was identified within 6 months after surgery. In comparison with Group NJ, Group J were older (P = 0.026), longer fusion levels (P < 0.001), greater thoracic kyphosis (P = 0.01), greater global kyphosis (P = 0.023), lower bone quality (P < 0.001), less CSA (P = 0.005) and higher FSF (P <0.001) of paraspinal muscles. Preoperative global kyphosis more than 48.5° (P = 0.001, odds ratio 1.793) and FSF more than 48.4 (P = 0.010, odds ratio 2.916) were identified as independent risk factors of junctional kyphosis. Based on the statistical differences among Group NJ, Group JK and Group JF (P < 0.001), Group JF had lower bone quality than Group NJ (P < 0.001) and Group JK (P = 0.015). In terms of patient-reported outcomes, patients in Group JF had worse outcomes in ODI and VAS scores, and PCS and MCS of SF-36 than Group NJ and group JK CONCLUSION: The prevalence of junctional kyphosis was 23.1% in LPTK patients after long segmental instrumented fusion. Preoperative hyperkyphosis and advanced fatty degeneration of paraspinal muscles were independent risk factors of junctional kyphosis. Patients with lower bone quality were more likely to develop junctional failure.

Clinical Effect of Transverse Process Hook with K-Means Clustering-Based Stratification of Computed Tomography Hounsfield Unit at Upper Instrumented Vertebra Level in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of transverse process (TP) hook system at the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) for preventing screw pullout in adult spinal deformity surgery using the pedicle Hounsfield unit (HU) stratification based on K-means clustering.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 74 patients who underwent deformity correction surgery between 2011 and 2020 and were followed up for >12 months. Pre- and post-operative data were used to determine the incidence of screw pullout, UIV TP hook implementation, vertebral body HU, pedicle HU, and patient outcomes. Data was then statistically analyzed for assessment of efficacy and risk prediction using stratified HU at UIV level alongside the effect of the TP hook system.

RESULTS

The screw pullout rate was 36.4% (27/74). Perioperative radiographic parameters were not significantly different between the pullout and non-pullout groups. The vertebral body HU and pedicle HU were significantly lower in the pullout group. K-means clustering stratified the vertebral body HU ≥205.3, <137.2, and pedicle HU ≥243.43, <156.03. The pullout rate significantly decreases in patients receiving the hook system when the pedicle HU was from ≥156.03 to < 243.43 (p<0.05), but the difference was not statistically significant in the vertebra HU stratified groups and when pedicle HU was ≥243.43 or <156.03. The postoperative clinical outcomes improved significantly with the implementation of the hook system.

CONCLUSION

The UIV hook provides better clinical outcomes and can be considered a preventative strategy for screw-pullout in the certain pedicle HU range.

The value of Hounsfield units in predicting cage subsidence after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

BACKGROUND

Cage subsidence may occur following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and lead to nonunion, foraminal height loss and other complications. Low bone quality may be a risk factor for cage subsidence. Assessing bone quality through Hounsfield units (HU) from computed tomography has been proposed in recent years. However, there is a lack of literature evaluating the correlation between HU and cage subsidence after TLIF.

METHODS

Two hundred and seventy-nine patients suffering from lumbar degenerative diseases from April, 2016 to August, 2018 were enrolled. All underwent one-level TLIF with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Cage subsidence was defined as > 2 mm loss of disc height at the fusion level. The participants were divided into 2 groups: cage subsidence group (CS) and non-cage subsidence group (non-CS). Bone quality was determined by HU, bone mineral density of lumbar (BMD-l) and femoral (BMD-f) from dual-emission X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). HU of each vertebra from L1 to L4 (e.g., HU1 for HU of L1) and mean value of the four vertebrae (HUm) were calculated. Visual analog scale (VAS) of back/leg pain and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were used to report clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Cage subsidence occurred in 82 (29.4%) cases at follow-ups. Mean age was 50.8 ± 9.0 years with a median follow-up of 18 months (range from 12 to 40 months). A total of 90.3% patients presented fusion with similar fusion rate between the two groups. ODI and VAS in leg were better in non-CS group at last follow-ups. Using receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) to predict cage subsidence, HUm provided a larger area under the curve (AUC) than BMD-l (Z = 3.83, P <  0.01) and BMD-f (Z = 2.01, P = 0.02). AUC for HU4 was larger than BMD-f and close to HUm (Z = 0.22, P = 0.481).

CONCLUSIONS

Cage subsidence may indicate worse clinical outcomes. HU value could be a more effective predictor of lumbar cage subsidence compared with T-score of DXA after TLIF.

Dual-Energy CT-Based Bone Mineral Density Has Practical Value for Osteoporosis Screening around the Knee

Introduction: Adequate bone quality is essential for long term biologic fixation of cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Recently, vertebral bone quality evaluation using dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has been introduced. However, the DECT bone mineral density (BMD) in peripheral skeleton has not been correlated with Hounsfield units (HU) or central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and the accuracy remains unclear. Materials and methods: Medical records of 117 patients who underwent TKA were reviewed. DXA was completed within three months before surgery. DECT was performed with third-generation dual source CT in dual-energy mode. Correlations between DXA, DECT BMD and HU for central and periarticular regions were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted and area under the curve (AUC), optimal threshold, and sensitivity and specificity of each region of interest (ROI) were calculated. Results: Central DXA BMD was correlated with DECT BMD and HU in ROIs both centrally and around the knee (all p < 0.01). The diagnostic accuracy of DECT BMD was higher than that of DECT HU and was also higher when the T-score for second lumbar vertebra (L2), rather than for the femur neck, was used as the reference standard (all AUC values: L2 > femur neck; DECT BMD > DECT HU, respectively). Using the DXA T-score at L2 as the reference standard, the optimal DECT BMD cut-off values for osteoporosis were 89.2 mg/cm3 in the distal femur and 78.3 mg/cm3 in the proximal tibia. Conclusion: Opportunistic volumetric BMD assessment using DECT is accurate and relatively simple, and does not require extra equipment. DECT BMD and HU are useful for osteoporosis screening before cementless TKA.

A phantom study comparing low-dose CT physical image quality from five different CT scanners

BACKGROUND

To systematically evaluate the physical image quality of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) on CT scanners from 5 different manufacturers using a phantom model.

METHODS

CT images derived from a Catphan 500 phantom were acquired using manufacturer-specific iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms and deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) on CT scanners from 5 different manufacturers and compared using filtered back projection with 2 radiation doses of 0.25 and 0.75 mGy. Image high-contrast spatial resolution and image noise were objectively characterized by modulation transfer function (MTF) and noise power spectrum (NPS). Image high-contrast spatial resolution and image low-contrast detectability were compared directly by visual evaluation. CT number linearity and image uniformity were compared with intergroup differences using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

RESULTS

The CT number linearity of 4 insert materials were as follows: acrylic (95% CI: 120.35 to 121.27; P=0.134), low-density polyethylene (95% CI: -98.43 to -97.43; P=0.070), air (95% CI: -996.16 to -994.51; P=0.018), and Teflon (95% CI: 984.40 to 986.87; P=0.883). The image uniformity values of GE Healthcare (95% CI: 3.24 to 3.83; P=0.138), Philips (95% CI: 2.62 to 3.70; P=0.299), Siemens (95% CI: 2.10 to 3.59; P=0.054), Minfound (95% CI: 2.35 to 3.65; P=0.589), and Neusoft (95% CI: 2.63 to 3.37; P=0.900) were evaluated and found to be within ±4 Hounsfield units (HU), with a range of 0.99-2.76 HU for standard deviations. There was no statistically significant difference in CT number linearity and image uniformity across the 5 CT scanners under different radiation doses with IR and DLIR algorithms (P>0.05). The resolution level at 10% MTF was 6.98 line-pairs-per-centimeter (lp/cm) on average, which was similar to the subjective evaluation results (mostly up to 7 lp/cm). DLIR at all 3 levels had the highest 50% MTF values among all reconstruction algorithms. For image low-contrast detectability, the minimum diameter of distinguishable contrast holes reached 4 mm at a 0.5% resolution. Increasing the radiation dose and IR strength reduced the image noise and NPS curve peak frequency while improving image low-contrast detectability.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that the image quality of CT scanners from 5 different manufacturers in LDCT is comparable and that the CT number linearity is unbiased and can contribute to accurate bone mineral density quantification.

Opportunistic Osteoporosis Screening Reveals Low Bone Density in Patients With Screw Loosening After Lumbar Semi-Rigid Instrumentation: A Case-Control Study

Objective

Decreased bone mineral density (BMD) impairs screw purchase in trabecular bone and can cause screw loosening following spinal instrumentation. Existing computed tomography (CT) scans could be used for opportunistic osteoporosis screening for decreased BMD. Purpose of this case-control study was to investigate the association of opportunistically assessed BMD with the outcome after spinal surgery with semi-rigid instrumentation for lumbar degenerative instability.

Methods

We reviewed consecutive patients that had primary surgery with semi-rigid instrumentation in our hospital. Patients that showed screw loosening in follow-up imaging qualified as cases. Patients that did not show screw loosening or-if no follow-up imaging was available (n = 8)-reported benefit from surgery ≥ 6 months after primary surgery qualified as controls. Matching criteria were sex, age, and surgical construct. Opportunistic BMD screening was performed at L1 to L4 in perioperative CT scans by automatic spine segmentation and using asynchronous calibration. Processing steps of this deep learning-driven approach can be reproduced using the freely available online-tool Anduin (https://anduin.bonescreen.de). Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for BMD as a predictor of screw loosening.

Results

Forty-six elderly patients (69.9 ± 9.1 years)-23 cases and 23 controls-were included. The majority of surgeries involved three spinal motion segments (n = 34). Twenty patients had low bone mass and 13 had osteoporotic BMD. Cases had significantly lower mean BMD (86.5 ± 29.5 mg/cm³) compared to controls (118.2 ± 32.9 mg/cm³, p = 0.001), i.e. patients with screw loosening showed reduced BMD. Screw loosening was best predicted by a BMD < 81.8 mg/cm³ (sensitivity = 91.3%, specificity = 56.5%, AUC = 0.769, p = 0.002).

Conclusion

Prevalence of osteoporosis or low bone mass (BMD ≤ 120 mg/cm³) was relatively high in this group of elderly patients undergoing spinal surgery. Screw loosening was associated with BMD close to the threshold for osteoporosis (< 80 mg/cm³). Opportunistic BMD screening is feasible using the presented approach and can guide the surgeon to take measures to prevent screw loosening and to increase favorable outcomes.

Hounsfield Unit for Assessing Vertebral Bone Quality and Asymmetrical Vertebral Degeneration in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to demonstrate the correlation between degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) and osteoporosis based on Hounsfield unit (HU) measurement from computed tomography (CT) scans, and to investigate the asymmetrical vertebral degeneration in DLS.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The correlation between DLS and osteoporosis measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is debated, since T-scores measured by DEXA scan can be overestimated due to abdominal vessel wall calcification, degenerative bony spurs, and facet hypertrophy. The reliability and accuracy of HU to determine osteoporosis are shown in many reports, but it has never been used to assess the vertebral bone quality for DLS patients.

METHODS

Nighty-five DLS patients were retrospectively reviewed. Regions of interest for HU were measured on three coronal images of the lumbar vertebrae. HU measurement of the whole vertebrae from L1 to L5 was obtained, then HU measurement within concave and convex sides were obtained separately in L5, upper and lower end vertebrae, apex vertebrae, neutral vertebrae, stable vertebrae.

RESULTS

HU value presented a gradually increasing trend from L1 to L5. No correlation was detected between Cobb angle and mean HU value of the 5 lumbar vertebrae, or between Cobb angle and HU value of every lumbar vertebrae separately. HU value was higher within concavity than that within convexity of the same vertebrae both in major and compensatory curve. Asymmetric HU ratio in apex vertebrae positively correlated with Cobb angle. Stable vertebrae were the first proximal vertebrae that present opposite orientation of asymmetric HU ratio from the other lumbar vertebrae.

CONCLUSION

Progression of degenerative scoliosis presents no correlation with osteoporosis based on HU measurement but could increase the asymmetrical vertebral degeneration, especially in apex vertebrae. Distraction of the pedicle screws at concave side, instead of compression of pedicle screws at convex side, should be a priority to correct lumbosacral curve.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Radiological diagnostic accuracy study comparing Lenke, Bridwell, BSF, and CT-HU fusion grading scales for minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion spine surgery and its correlation to clinical outcome

Prospective randomized double-blinded diagnostic accuracy study about radiological grading of fusion after minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion procedures (MI-LIFP).To determinate the intra and the inter-observer correlation between different radiological lumbar interbody fusion grading scales (RLIFGS) in patients undergoing MI-LIFP and their correlation to clinical outcome.Besides technological improvements in medical diagnosis and the many existing RLIFGS, surgical exploration continues to be the gold-standard to assess fusion in patients with radiological pseudarthrosis, with little if any research on the relationship between RLIFGS and clinical outcome.We collected data from patients undergoing MI-LIFP procedures operated by a single surgeon from 2009 to 2017, which had follow-up and CT-scan control greater than 12 months, whose clinical registers specified lumbar and radicular visual analogue scale (L and R-VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score preoperatively and at the end of follow-up. Interbody fusion levels were coded for blinded evaluation by three different minimally invasive spine (MIS) surgeons, using Lenke, Bridwell, BSF (Brantigan, Steffe, Fraser), and CT-HU RLIFGS. We established fusion criteria, as described in their original papers. Another independent spine surgeon blindly evaluated successful clinical outcome (SCO), defined as a significant improvement in 2 of 3 of the following issues: L-VAS, R-VAS, or ODI score at follow-up; otherwise, rated as clinical pseudarthrosis. Radiological and clinical data was coded and statistically analyzed using Student T-Test, Pearson P-Test, and ANOVA with statistical package for the social sciences 21 by another blinded researcher, positive and negative predictive values were also calculated for each RLFGS.We found a significant clinical improvement with a moderate intra-observer correlation between scales and no inter-observer or clinical correlation, with no sub-group statistically significant differences.This paper represents the first study about the diagnostic accuracy of RLFGS, we concluded that their diagnostic accuracy is pretty low to determine fusion or pseudoarthrosis based on its low correlation to clinical outcome, we recommend surgeons rely on clinical findings to decide whether a patient has clinical fusion or pseudoarthrosis based on successful clinical outcome.

Lower Bone Density on Preoperative Computed Tomography Predicts Periprosthetic Fracture Risk in Total Ankle Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND:

The effect of bone mineral density (BMD) on outcomes from total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has not been studied. BMD can be estimated by measuring Hounsfield units (HU) on standard computed tomography (CT), which is frequently performed prior to TAA. We aimed to identify whether tibial and talar HU measured from preoperative CT scans were associated with periprosthetic fracture or revision risk in patients undergoing TAA.

METHODS:

A prospectively collected database was used to retrospectively screen all patients undergoing primary TAA. Only patients with a preoperative CT within 1 year of surgery were included. Primary outcomes were periprosthetic fracture and prosthetic revision. HU were measured on axial CT cuts in the distal tibia and talus. Additional patient factors analyzed included age, sex, weight, body mass index (BMI), tobacco use, presence of rheumatoid arthritis, and preoperative deformity. A total of 198 ankles were included, with a mean 2.4 years of follow-up.

RESULTS:

There were 7 intraoperative and 9 postoperative periprosthetic fractures (3.5% and 4.5%, respectively). Seven patients (3.5%) underwent prosthetic removal or revision. Lower tibial and talar HU, lower weight, and lower BMI were associated with periprosthetic fractures ( P < .05). After controlling for age, sex, and weight, only tibial HU was significantly associated with periprosthetic fracture ( P = .018). All intraoperative fractures occurred in patients with tibial HU less than 200. None of the patient factors analyzed were associated with revision.

CONCLUSIONS:

Lower tibial HU on preoperative CT was strongly associated with periprosthetic fracture risk with TAA. In patients with tibial HU less than 200, surgeons may consider prophylactic internal fixation of the medial malleolus.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Opportunistic Use of CT Imaging for Osteoporosis Screening and Bone Density Assessment: A Qualitative Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical opportunities for the use of computed tomography (CT) imaging for inferring bone quality and to critically analyze the correlation between dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and diagnostic CT as reported in the literature.

METHODS

A systematic review of the MEDLINE database was performed in February 2016 using the PubMed interface. The inclusion criteria were English language, studies performed using living human subjects, studies pertaining to orthopaedics, use of conventional diagnostic CT scans, studies that measured cancellous bone, and studies that reported Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements directly rather than a computed bone mineral density.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven studies that reported on a total of 9,109 patients were included. Of these, 10 studies correlated HU measurements of trabecular bone with DXA-based bone assessment. Reported correlation coefficients ranged between 0.399 and 0.891, and 5 of the studies reported appropriate threshold HU levels for diagnosing osteoporosis or osteopenia.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct HU measurement from diagnostic CT scans has the potential to be used opportunistically for osteoporosis screening, but in its current state it is not ready for clinical implementation. There is a lack of exchangeability among different machines that limits its broad applicability. Future research efforts should focus on identifying thresholds at specific anatomic regions in high-risk patients in order to have the greatest impact on patients. However, using diagnostic CT to infer region-specific osteoporosis could be extraordinarily valuable to orthopaedic surgeons and primary care physicians, and merits further research.