1
|
Mittal S, Alsbrook D, Okwechime RT, Iqbal F, Nobleza COS. The landscape of disparities in obstetric neurocritical care and a path forward. Front Neurol 2023; 13:1008544. [PMID: 36686512 PMCID: PMC9853894 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1008544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Health disparities in the obstetric population affect maternal morbidity and mortality. In the past years, there has been no significant improvement in disparities in care in the obstetric population. Patients who are pregnant are known to have a higher risk of pregnancy-associated neurologic conditions such as stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage. They can also experience concomitant neurocritical care disease states such as status epilepticus and traumatic brain injury. Studies exploring the disparities of care among pregnant patients who are neurotically ill are lacking. We aim to provide the landscape of disparities of care among the obstetric neurocritically-ill population and provide potential actionable opportunities to address these disparities in care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shilipi Mittal
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Diana Alsbrook
- Department of Neurology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States
| | - Remi T. Okwechime
- NeuroMedicine ICU, Critical Care Program University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Farhana Iqbal
- Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, United States
| | - Christa O'Hana S. Nobleza
- Department of Neurology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States,Baptist Memorial Hospital/Baptist Medical Group, Memphis, TN, United States,*Correspondence: Christa O'Hana S. Nobleza ✉
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Karbhari N, Thomas AA. Clinical management of brain tumors in pregnancy. Curr Opin Oncol 2022; 34:691-697. [PMID: 36170169 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW We review the diagnostic tools, treatment options, and clinical management for brain tumors diagnosed in pregnancy with consideration for management approaches that are best suited to preserve maternal and fetal health. RECENT FINDINGS Women of child-bearing age are at risk of developing brain tumors and are at increased risk compared with male counterparts for tumors that are hormonally driven. Brain tumors are rare neoplasms, and diagnosis of brain tumors in pregnancy is uncommon, such that management guidelines and treatment recommendations are lacking for most tumor types. We discuss the standard treatment options for brain tumors and the relative risks and safety when these treatments are considered during pregnancy. We review the neoplasms most commonly affecting pregnant women and the existing literature and guidelines. SUMMARY Pregnancy is a unique phase of life in which hormonal, immunologic, and vascular changes may impact tumor growth and presentation. Treatment decisions should consider the symptoms and stability of the pregnant patients, the gestational age and health of the fetus, and the location and behavior of the neoplasm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nishika Karbhari
- Department of Neurology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Hanover, NH
| | - Alissa A Thomas
- Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over than one third (28-58%) of pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) cases are characterized by positive epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2) expression. Trastuzumab anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody is still the benchmark treatment of HER2-positive breast tumors. However, FDA has categorized Trastuzumab as a category D drug for pregnant patients with breast cancer. This systemic review aims to synthesize all currently available data of trastuzumab administration during pregnancy and provide an updated view of the effect of trastuzumab on fetal and maternal outcome. METHODS Eligible articles were identified by a search of MEDLINE bibliographic database and ClinicalTrials.gov for the period up to 01/09/2020; The algorithm consisted of a predefined combination of the words "breast", "cancer", "trastuzumab" and "pregnancy". This study was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS A total of 28 eligible studies were identified (30 patients, 32 fetuses). In more than half of cases, trastuzumab was administered in the metastatic setting. The mean duration of trastuzumab administration during gestation was 15.7 weeks (SD: 10.8; median: 17.5; range: 1-32). Oligohydramnios or anhydramnios was the most common (58.1%) adverse event reported in all cases. There was a statistically significant decrease in oligohydramnios/anhydramnios incidence in patients receiving trastuzumab only during the first trimester (P = 0.026, Fisher's exact test). In 43.3% of cases a completely healthy neonate was born. 41.7% of fetuses exposed to trastuzumab during the second and/or third trimester were born completely healthy versus 75.0% of fetuses exposed exclusively in the first trimester. All mothers were alive at a median follow-up of 47.0 months (ranging between 9 and 100 months). Of note, there were three cases (10%) of cardiotoxicity and decreased ejection fraction during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS Overall, treatment with trastuzumab should be postponed until after delivery, otherwise pregnancy should be closely monitored.
Collapse
|
4
|
A Review of the Neurosurgical Management of Brain Metastases During Pregnancy. Can J Neurol Sci 2020; 48:698-707. [PMID: 33213549 PMCID: PMC8527832 DOI: 10.1017/cjn.2020.254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with pregnancy-associated secondary brain tumors (PASBT) are challenging to manage. Because no guidelines for the management of such patients currently exist, we performed a systematic review of the literature using PRISMA guidelines with a discussion of management from a neurosurgeon's perspective. METHOD Systematic review of the literature using PRISMA guidelines from 1999 to 2018. RESULTS We identified 301 studies of which 16 publications (22 patients reporting 25 pregnancies, 20 deliveries, 5 early terminations) were suitable for final analysis. The most frequent primary cancers were breast (8/22, 36.36%), skin (6/22, 27.27%), and lung (5/22, 22.73%). Four patients (18.18%) had neurosurgical procedures during their pregnancies. Five patients (22.73%) received neurosurgical resection after their pregnancies. Nine patients (40.91%) received radiation therapy and seven patients (31.82%) received chemotherapy during pregnancy while seven patients (31.82%) received chemotherapy and radiation after pregnancy. There was 1 fetal death (5%) out of 20 healthy deliveries. Five pregnancies (20%) were terminated in the first trimester due to a need for urgent neurosurgical intervention. CONCLUSION Management of PASBT remains a challenging issue. Maternal and fetal risks associated with surgical resection and teratogenicity due to adjuvant therapy should be discussed in the context of a multidisciplinary team. Timing of surgery and the use of systemic chemoradiation depends on the gestational age (GA) of the fetus, extent, and control of the mother's primary and metastatic disease. Guidelines need to be established to help neuro-oncology teams safely and effectively manage this group of patients.
Collapse
|
5
|
Eckenstein M, Thomas AA. Benign and malignant tumors of the central nervous system and pregnancy. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2020; 172:241-258. [PMID: 32768091 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-64240-0.00014-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) are rare entities, typically affecting the very young or the very old, but span a spectrum of disease that may present in any age group. Women of reproductive age are more likely to be affected by benign tumors, including pituitary adenomas and meningiomas, and aggressive intracranial malignancies, such as brain metastases and glioblastoma, rarely present in pregnancy. Definitive management of CNS tumors may involve multimodal therapy, including surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, and each of these treatments carries risk to the mother and developing fetus. CNS tumors often present with challenging and morbid symptoms such as headache and seizure, which need to be managed throughout a pregnancy. Decisions about timing treatment during pregnancy or delaying until after delivery, continuing or electively terminating a pregnancy, and future family planning and fertility are complex and require a multidisciplinary care team to evaluate the implications to both mother and baby. There are no guidelines or consensus recommendations regarding brain tumor management in pregnancy, and thus, individual treatment decisions are made by the care team based on experiential evidence, extrapolation of guidelines for nonpregnant patients, and patient values and preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Midori Eckenstein
- Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, United States
| | - Alissa A Thomas
- Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lambertini M, Martel S, Campbell C, Guillaume S, Hilbers FS, Schuehly U, Korde L, Azim HA, Di Cosimo S, Tenglin RC, Huober J, Baselga J, Moreno-Aspitia A, Piccart-Gebhart M, Gelber RD, de Azambuja E, Ignatiadis M. Pregnancies during and after trastuzumab and/or lapatinib in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive early breast cancer: Analysis from the NeoALTTO (BIG 1-06) and ALTTO (BIG 2-06) trials. Cancer 2018; 125:307-316. [PMID: 30335191 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2018] [Revised: 06/08/2018] [Accepted: 06/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limited data exist on the safety of using anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) targeted agents during pregnancy. To date, only retrospective studies have assessed the prognosis of patients with a pregnancy after prior early breast cancer, with no data in HER2-positive patients. METHODS The Neoadjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimization (NeoALTTO) trial and the Adjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimization (ALTTO) trial were randomized phase 3 trials for patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer. In both trials, pregnancy information was prospectively collected. Pregnancy outcomes were compared between patients unintentionally exposed to trastuzumab and/or lapatinib during gestation (the exposed group) and those who became pregnant after trastuzumab and/or lapatinib completion (the unexposed group). In the ALTTO trial, disease-free survival (DFS) was compared between pregnant patients and those aged 40 years or younger without a subsequent pregnancy via an extended Cox model with time-varying covariates to account for a guarantee-time bias. RESULTS Ninety-two patients (12 in the exposed group and 80 in the unexposed group) had a pregnancy: 7 in the NeoALTTO trial and 85 in the ALTTO trial. Seven patients (58.3%) in the exposed group and 10 patients (12.5%) in the unexposed group opted for an induced abortion; in the unexposed group, 10 patients (12.5%) had a spontaneous abortion. No pregnancy/delivery complications were reported for the remaining cases, who successfully completed their pregnancy, with the exception of 1 fetus with trisomy 21 (Down syndrome). No significant difference in DFS (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-2.42) was observed between young patients with a pregnancy (n = 85) and young patients without a pregnancy (n = 1307). CONCLUSIONS For patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer, having a pregnancy after treatment completion appears to be safe without compromising fetal outcome or maternal prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Samuel Martel
- Department of Hemato-Oncology, CISSS Montérégie-Centre/Hôpital Charles-Le Moyne, Université de Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Sébastien Guillaume
- Department of Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Hatem A Azim
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | | | | | - Jens Huober
- Breast Center, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - José Baselga
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Martine Piccart-Gebhart
- Department of Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Richard D Gelber
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.,Frontier Science and Technology Research Foundation, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Evandro de Azambuja
- Department of Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Michail Ignatiadis
- Department of Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Does Chemotherapy for Gynecological Malignancies during Pregnancy Cause Fetal Growth Restriction? BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2017. [PMID: 28626764 PMCID: PMC5463150 DOI: 10.1155/2017/7543421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Cancer and pregnancy rarely coincide. Gynecological cancers are among the most common malignancies to occur during pregnancy, and chemotherapy with or without surgery is the primary treatment option. The main concern of administering chemotherapy during pregnancy is congenital malformation, although it can be avoided by delaying treatment until after organogenesis. The dose, frequency, choice of chemotherapeutic agents, time of treatment commencement, and method of administration can be adjusted to obtain the best maternal treatment outcomes while simultaneously minimizing fetal toxicity. Use of chemotherapy after the first trimester, while seemingly safe, can cause fetal growth restriction. However, the exact effect of chemotherapy on such fetal growth restriction has not been fully established; information is scarce owing to the rarity of malignancy occurring during pregnancy, the lack of uniform treatment protocols, different terminologies for defining certain fetal growth abnormalities, the influence of mothers' preferred options, and ethical issues. Herein, we present up-to-date findings from the literature regarding the impact of chemotherapy on fetal growth.
Collapse
|