Comparison of views on the need for continuing education on oral cancer between general dentists and oral medicine experts: A Delphi survey

The influence of subject learning on the skills of decoding autofluorescent images of the oral mucosa

Background. Despite the ease of implementation, harmlessness, painlessness and speed of the study, the method of autofluorescence does not belong to the routine and often used because of the dependence on the skill of the dentist in interpretation of the resulting visualization. Foreign and domestic researchers speak about the need for thematic training of dentists for the widespread introduction of the autofluorescence method into practice. There is no data proving the influence of training on the skill of interpretation autofluorescence images and showing the dependence of the skill on the duration of training and its frequency.

The aim of the study was to conduct a comparative analysis of the results of interpreting autofluorescence images of the oral mucosa by dentists before and after thematic training.

Methods. 308 dentists interpreted 20 images of autofluorescence of the oral mucosa before and after the thematic training, 10 of them were of potentially malignant diseases of the oral mucosa, 10 – of benign lesions and paraphysiological anomalies. Correctly identified mucosal changes presented in the autofluorescence image were considered positive results of decoding. The results were evaluated relative to the duration of training and its frequency, taking into account the duration of breaks, according to the average number of positive results.

Results. Before the thematic training, dentists on average decoded 8.41 ± 4.89 images, after training – 12.11 ± 3.12 images. The difference before and after the thematic training between the number of positive results of interpretation autofluorescence images is statistically significant (t = –14.1, p˂ 0.001). There was no significant difference in the results of interpretation potentially malignant oral diseases (F = 1.67; p = 0.190) and benign lesions and conditions (F = 0.647; p = 0.524) between the three groups that studied for 6, 12 and 18 hours. There is a correlation to the duration of the interruption of training with positive results of decoding (r = –0.3376; p˂ 0.001). The positive results of interpretation of autofluorescence with regular monthly 6-hour training had significant increasing trends (12.11 ± 3.12 and 13.22 ± 1.76, t = –3.41, p = 0.001; 13.22 ± 1.76 and 14.40 ± 1.81, t = –4.74, p˂ 0.001).

Conclusion. Thematic training improves the skill of interpretation autofluorescence images in dentists. The regularity of short-term training is more important for maintaining the interpretation skill than the duration of training.

The readiness of dentists to use the autofluorescence method

Background. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma are the sixth most common cancer in prevalence rate. Early diagnosis significantly reduces morbidity and mortality. Autofluorescence facilitates diagnosis the disease at the early stages, but it depends on the doctor’s skill in interpreting images. The aim of the study: to analyze the results of reading autofluorescence images of the oral mucosa by dentists.Materials and methods. The results of reading 10 autofluorescence images of potentially malignant diseases of the oral mucosa and 10 images of benign lesions and conditions were evaluated. The study involved 308 dentists. The assessment of the ability to recognize autofluorescence images was carried out with respect to gender, age, length of service, qualification category, academic degree, position of the head of the department.Results. On the average, dentists correctly differentiated the results of visualization of potentially malignant diseases of the oral mucosa in 3.85 ± 2.47 cases, benign lesions together with other benign conditions – in 4.56 ± 2.47 cases. Images of benign lesions and conditions were identified by dentists better than images of potentially malignant diseases of the oral mucosa (t = –17.0; p < 0.001). There is a direct correlation between the correct differentiation of visualization of potentially malignant diseases of the oral mucosa with the correct interpretation of benign lesions and conditions (r = 0.956; p < 0.001). The interpretation of potentially malignant diseases of the oral mucosa is not related to gender (t = –1.62; p = 0.306), work experience (r = –0.002; p = 0.977), department head (t = –0.11; p = 0.910), qualification category (t = –0.50; p = 0.574), academic degree (t = –0.34; p = 0.731).Conclusion. Dentists cannot recognize diseases of the oral mucosa well in autofluorescence images. The recognition skill is not related to general professional development.

Current Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice among Health Care Providers in OSCC Awareness: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OSCC remain a global health problem. Lack of awareness leads to inadequate watchfulness regarding early signs/symptoms despite the ease of visual oral inspection. What clinicians know and feel, and how they behave on OSCC is crucial to understand the feasibility and effectiveness of screening programs. The aim of this systematic review was to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practice (KAP) regarding OSCC among health care providers (HCPs). Therefore, a systematic review was conducted with SPIDER and PICO as major tools. A meta-analysis was structured through common items in two comparison groups of medical and dental practitioners. Descriptive statistics and a Mantel–Haenszel test were used to validate data. Sixty-six studies were selected for systematic review, eight of which are useful for meta-analysis. A statistically significant difference was recorded between dentists and medical practitioners for questions regarding: Alcohol (p < 0.001); Elderly (p < 0.012); Sun exposure (p < 0.0001); Erythroplakia (p < 0.019); Red patch (p < 0.010); White patch (p < 0.020); Tobacco consultation (p < 0.0001); Intraoral examination (p < 0.0001) and Up-to-date knowledge (p < 0.002). Overall, the incidence of OSCC screening is low. Most HCPs feel the need to increase KAP. Data confirmed gaps in KAP, highlighting the need for a more efficient pre- and post-graduation training, necessary to increase competence worldwide.

May VelScope Be Deemed an Opportunistic Oral Cancer Screening by General Dentists? A Pilot Study

Early diagnosis of oral cancer through visual inspection followed by histopathological confirmation is a pivotal step for reducing rates of morbidity and mortality. There are several auxiliary devices used to improve oral examination. The purpose of this cross-sectional pilot study is to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the Visually Enhance Lesion Scope (VelScope) system when it is used by the general dentist after a yearly oral medicine training. Thirty-five patients with oral lesions were evaluated with clinical and VelScope examination by two general dentists, one of which trained with a specific course. A comparison of the histopathological results, clinical examination, and VelScope made by both dentists was performed through statistical analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for detecting oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) are 53.3%, 65%, 53.3%, 76.5% for unskilled dentist, 73.3%, 65%, 61.1%, 76.5% for skilled clinician. When both examiners use VelScope the values are 53.3%, 70%, 57.1%, 66.7% for unskilled general dentist (u-GD), 86.7%, 90%, 86.7%, 90% for skilled general dentist (s-GD). Improvement of a skilled general dentist for detecting malignancies is higher than inexperienced examiner when using VelScope. VelScope alone is unable to improve the general dentist’s ability to detect malignancies, but it could be a useful adjunctive device for clinicians when a focused training program is performed.

Atención odontológica de pacientes oncológicos desde la perspectiva de actores institucionales en Cali, Colombia, 2019

Objetivo: caracterizar la atención odontológica de los pacientes oncológicos desde la perspectiva de diferentes actores institucionales en Cali – Colombia, durante el año 2019. Métodos: estudio cualitativo, descriptivo. Se empleó la entrevista semiestructurada como técnica de investigación, dirigida a quince actores institucionales relacionados con la atención del paciente con cáncer en Cali y la revisión documental en las Instituciones Prestadoras de Servicios de Salud. Las preguntas incluyeron las siguientes categorías: atención, acceso, integralidad, limitaciones, fortalezas y recomendaciones. Para la codificación y categorización de los datos se utilizó el software ATLAS.ti. versión 8.4.0. Resultados: no hay guías de atención odontológica para los pacientes con cáncer. El acceso al servicio tiene barreras personales, económicas, organizacionales, sociales y culturales. Las rutas de atención de cáncer del Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social no incluyen al odontólogo. Fueron limitaciones el fraccionamiento del servicio y la priorización de la patología de base. La fortaleza fue la capacidad instalada. Las recomendaciones principales fueron establecer Guías de atención, mayor articulación entre entidades y visibilización de la problemática. Conclusión: Aunque la ciudad tiene suficiente capacidad instalada, los entrevistados manifestaron que no cuentan con una directriz desde el ente rector, por lo tanto, se evidencian barreras en la atención odontológica a los pacientes con cáncer. Hay falta de articulación entre las diferentes instituciones que impide el cumplimiento de la atención integral y equitativa. Los entrevistados hicieron recomendaciones a los diferentes sectores para mejorar la atención.

Case Reports in Pediatric Dentistry Journals: A Systematic Review about Their Effect on Impact Factor and Future Investigations

Background: The effects of publishing case reports on journal impact factor and their impact on future research in pediatric dentistry has not been clearly evaluated yet. Aim. To assess the relevance and role of case reports in pediatric dentistry. Methods: A systematic review (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018108621) of all case reports published between 2011 and 2012 in the three major pediatric dentistry journals was performed manually. Data regarding citations of each report were acquired from the Institute for Scientific Information database available online. The authors analyzed information regarding citations (number, percentage, and mean) received by each case report and considered their relation with the 2013 journal impact factor. Results: Case reports accounted for almost sixteen per cent of all articles published between 2011 and 2012. The citation rate of case reports was generally low and the highest mean citation was 0.5. This review revealed that 6 (9.52%) case reports had at least 5 citations and that the majority of the citing articles were also case reports (27.78%) or narrative reviews (25%). Conclusions: The publication of case reports affected the journal impact factor in a negative way, this influence is closely related to the percentage of the published case reports. Case reports about innovative topics, describing rare diseases, syndromes, and pathologies were more frequently cited.

Evidence of past dental visits and incidence of head and neck cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Regular/frequent dental visits, at least annually, can aid in reducing the public health burden of head and neck cancers (HNCs) by facilitating earlier detection of the disease. The aim of this study was to conduct a quantitative assessment of any independent association between past dental visits/check-ups and incidence of cancers of HN/upper aerodigestive tract (UADT) and oral cavity worldwide.

METHODS

PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were searched for all observational studies published until August 2017 in any language that assessed an association of past dental visits/dental check-ups among the incident cases of HNC/UADT cancers. Screening and quality assessment of the articles was performed by two independent reviewers. Three different meta-analyses were conducted: two based on the incident cancer reported in the studies (HNCs/cancers of UADT and oral cavity); another included all studies irrespective of the type of cancer reported with the frequency of past dental visits as subgroups.

RESULTS

Searches retrieved 3164 titles: after removing duplicates, 1377 remained. Of these, 62 were reviewed in full, but only 38 were eligible for inclusion. Under the random effects model, odds of past never/irregular/not frequent dental visits were greater in HNC cases and oral cancer cases as compared to the hospital-based/population-based controls [HNCs-unadjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.24; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.89 to 2.65) and (oral cancers-OR 1.93; 95% CI 1.47 to 2.52]. Similar results were observed for all cancers with frequency of past dental visits as subgroup analysis (OR 2.01; 95% CI 1.76 to 2.30). Meta-regression findings indicate that none of the subgroup influenced the effect estimates for incidence of cancers. There was no publication bias in our study.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis indicates that individuals with never/irregular/not frequent dental visits are more likely to be incident cases of HNCs/UADT cancers.

Screening Projects for Oral Carcinoma in Relation to Health Education and Patients' Compliance: Study on 600 Participants

Aims and Objectives:

The lack of information among the population regarding the existence of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and the lack of attention and expertise in examining the oral cavity of dentists and clinicians still remain very worrying and could explain the high incidence of OSCC. The aim of this study is to evaluate the level of awareness of OSCC among 600 participants from Southern Italy.

Materials and Methods:

A 13-question survey was prepared and distributed to 600 participants divided into two subgroups, the first one of 300 patients referring to the Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive, and Odontostomatological Sciences, University Federico II of Naples, for the treatment of dental pathologies, and the second one of 300 patients referring to the Department of Internal Medicine of the Second University of Naples for the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Statistical analysis consisted in the calculation of percentages related to the answers given by patients. Comparison of percentages was after performed between the two subgroups.

Result:

Only 175 participants (29.1%) knew about the existence of pathologies which can affect the oral mucosa, and only 46 (7.6%) were aware that carcinoma can arise in the oral cavity; 345 (57,5%) stated that they had periodical dental visits, at least once a year but none of them stated they had a visit for the identification of oral carcinomas.

Conclusion:

The data acquired must be taken into consideration to outline essential socio-healthcare educational projects on carcinoma and its risk factors, training programs to increase dentists and clinicians’ competences, and to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of oral carcinoma screening programs.