Etiology and management of esophageal impaction in children: A review of 11 years

Follow-up and symptom persistence after esophageal food impaction

Esophageal food impactions (EFI) are associated with esophageal pathology, most commonly eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Obtaining biopsies provides opportunity for diagnosis, which is important since treatment of EoE decreases the risk for future EFI. Outpatient follow-up rates remain suboptimal and outcomes of patients without timely follow-up are unknown. We aimed to identify the factors associated with pediatric subspecialty follow-up post-EFI and to determine the symptom burden in patients without follow-up. We performed a retrospective review of patients presenting with EFI at a tertiary children's hospital between 2010 and 2018. Patients without subspecialty follow-up within 1 year of EFI were included in a prospective telephone survey investigating the barriers to care, outcomes, and symptoms. Clinical characteristics were compared between groups. Multivariate analysis was used to control for multiple variables. There were 127 EFI identified in 123 individuals (73% male, mean age: 12.2 years). Esophageal biopsies were collected in 76% of cases, and 49% of patients had follow-up. Individuals with follow-up were more likely (P ≤ 0.05) to have had biopsies. In a multivariate analysis, written recommendation for follow-up (Odds Ratio: 6.9 [2.4-19.5], P = 0.001) as well as atopic history and identified stricture were associated with a higher likelihood of follow-up. Those without follow-up had subsequent stricture (35%), dilation (44%), or EFI (39%), and 55% (12/22) described ongoing esophageal symptoms. Identification of treatable findings at time of EFI and ongoing symptom burden after EFI support an imperative for follow-up after EFI. Clear recommendations are a modifiable factor that may improve follow-up in this population.

Medical Disimpaction for Children With Organic Esophageal Foreign Body in the Era of Eosinophilic Esophagitis

OBJECTIVE

Esophageal foreign body impaction (EFBI) is a common presentation in pediatric emergency medicine. Interventions (medical or endoscopic) are often required because of the severity of symptoms and risk of complications. Use of medical disimpaction (MD) such as glucagon injections and effervescent agents (eg, carbonated beverages) has been well described in adults; however, there are limited data in the pediatric literature. Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a relatively "new" clinicopathological entity that may present with EFBI mostly due to food with histological findings of EoE. Our study aim was to determine the efficacy of MD for organic EFBI in the pediatric population especially in children with EoE.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed using the International Classification of Diseases codes and the emergency department database of patients presenting with EFBI from January 2010 to December 2014. Response to MD was defined as symptomatic relief of obstruction. Age, object ingested, medical agent used, EoE status, complications, and outcome were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 317 presentations of EFBI were identified during the study period, of which organic EFBI accounted for 101 impactions (31.9%). Medical disimpaction was attempted for 42 (41.6%) with organic EFBI, resulting in resolution of symptoms for 16 (38.1%). One child with EoE responded to MD compared with 15 without EoE (4.8% vs 71.4%, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Medical disimpaction was ineffective in children with EoE but may be of help with symptom resolution in approximately 70% of children without EoE.

Long-term Follow-up for Missed Cases of Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Children With Previous Foreign Body in the Esophagus

OBJECTIVES

A foreign body impacted in the esophagus could be a sign of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Our aim was to investigate if children previously diagnosed with a foreign body in the esophagus had a missed diagnosis of EoE.

METHODS

In this population-based longitudinal study, all children (0-18 years) diagnosed with a foreign body in the esophagus in Stockholm, Sweden 2006 to 2016, were identified. In addition to a review of medical files, each family was contacted (n = 325) and asked standardized questions. Children with symptoms indicating EoE were offered esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD).

RESULTS

We found 325 pediatric cases of foreign body. Two hundred and seven (64%) underwent an endoscopy at the event, 3 of these had biopsies taken, whereby 2 were diagnosed with EoE. Six additional patients were diagnosed with EoE between the initial event and the study follow-up. Children with persisting symptoms suggestive of EoE at the follow-up (n = 21), were offered EGD whereof 7 accepted. Four new cases of EoE were found. Hence, 12 (3.7%) of the children with a previous foreign body, either spontaneously released or endoscopically removed, were diagnosed with EoE. In the structured interview, dysphagia, food impactions and drinking excessively with meals, as well as food allergies, were significantly more common in EoE patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with a foreign body in the esophagus are at risk of having EoE. Biopsies should be taken during foreign body removal and questions about swallowing problems and allergic diseases should be carefully explored also in children who do not need EGD because of spontaneous release.

Safety and Efficacy of the Push Endoscopic Technique in the Management of Esophageal Food Bolus Impactions in Children

OBJECTIVES

Adult-based guidelines support the use of the pull (extraction) endoscopic technique in managing esophageal food bolus impactions (FBIs) but allow the consideration of the push (advancement) technique with caution based on available published literature. The North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition guidelines mention the use of gentle endoscopic pushing for disimpaction but elaborate that this technique has not been studied in children. Our study aimed at assessing the safety and efficacy of the push technique in managing pediatric esophageal FBIs.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of all pediatric patients presenting with esophageal FBIs to a pediatric tertiary care center from 2003 to 2016.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty-two procedures for esophageal foreign body removal were reviewed. Thirty-nine procedures for managing esophageal FBIs were included in a total of 23 patients (1-4 procedures per patient). The most common underlying diagnoses were eosinophilic esophagitis and repaired tracheoesophageal fistula. The cohort had a median age of 8 years and median weight of 34.4 kg. Initial endoscopic disimpaction methods included 20 push and 19 pull technique attempts with success rates of 65% and 68%, respectively (P = 1.0). Unsuccessful attempts using 1 technique were successfully accomplished using the other technique. Patients initially managed by either of the 2 disimpaction techniques did not differ in age, weight, sex, or underlying diagnoses. No procedure-related complications were reported at our center.

CONCLUSION

The present study shows that the push technique is as safe and effective as the pull technique in managing esophageal FBIs in pediatric patients.

The role of endoscopy in eosinophilic esophagitis: from diagnosis to therapy

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has arisen as a common disorder in current clinical and endoscopic gastroenterology practice. Areas covered: A comprehensive review of the literature to summarize and update different aspects related with the use of endoscopy in the diagnostic workout and treatment of pediatric and adult EoE patients is conducted. Expert commentary: Endoscopic features in EoE are frequently subtle, so were inadverted in some initial reports of the disease. Literature has described a wide number of EoE-associated features, systematized in the EREFS classification, which standardized the grade and severity of exudates, rings, edema, furrows, and strictures. The insufficient reliability of these features to predict eosinophilic inflammation still makes biopsies essential in diagnosing or monitoring EoE. EoE causes half of the food impactions requiring endoscopy; food impaction leads to EoE diagnosis in up to half of cases. Long term consequences of EoE include esophageal remodeling leading to strictures and narrowing, thus impairing symptoms and needs dilation. Recognizing the risks from dilation in EoE required carrying out a safe technique to avoid the high complication rate reported in the early literature. Endoscopic dilation should be considered in patients with esophageal narrowing and dysphagia/food impaction unresponsive to diet or drugs-based anti-inflammatory treatment.

Long Standing Esophageal Perforation due to Foreign Body Impaction in Children: A Therapeutic Challenge in a Resource Limited Setting

Late presentation of foreign body impaction in the esophagus, complicated by perforation in children, has rarely been reported in the literature. Esophageal surgery is very difficult and challenging in Cameroon (a resource limited setting). We are reporting herein 2 cases of esophageal perforation in children seen very late (12 days and 40 days) after foreign body impaction, complicated with severe sepsis, who were successfully operated upon with very good results.

Review of esophageal injuries and stenosis: Lessons learn and current concepts of management

Aim:

To review the patients with esophageal injuries and stenosis with respect to their etiology, clinical course, management, and the lessons learnt from these.

Materials and Methods:

Retrospective descriptive observation review of children with esophageal injuries and stenosis admitted between January 2009 and April 2015.

Results:

Eighteen children with esophageal injuries of varied etiology were managed and included, seven with corrosive injury, five with perforation due to various causes, three with mucosal erosion, two with trachea esophageal fistula (TEF), and one wall erosion. The five children who had perforation were due to poststricture dilatation in a child with esophageal atresia and secondary to foreign body impaction or its attempted retrieval in four. Alkaline button cell had caused TEF in two. Three congenital esophageal stenosis (CES) had presented with dysphagia and respiratory tract infection. Six corrosive stricture and two CES responded to dilatation alone and one each of them required surgery. Four of the children with esophageal perforation were detected early and required drainage procedure (1), diversion (1), and medical management (2). Pseudo diverticulum was managed expectantly. Among TEF, one had spontaneous closure and other one was lost to follow-up. All the remaining nineteen children have recovered well except one CES had mortality.

Conclusion:

Esophageal injuries though rare can be potentially devastating and life-threatening.

Role of Endoscopy in Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic allergic (immune-mediated) disease that leads to esophageal dysfunction and feeding disorders in children. Foods, and possibly environmental triggers, cause an inflammatory response in the esophagus, leading to esophageal inflammation, eosinophilic infiltration, and esophageal dysmotility, which may progress to dysphagia, food impaction, and esophageal stricture. Endoscopy with biopsy and histologic evaluation is currently the only method to diagnose EoE. Once diagnosed with EoE, children undergo follow-up endoscopy after therapy initiation and adjustments to ensure remission. Furthermore, children with food impactions or strictures may require endoscopic intervention such as foreign body removal and/or esophageal dilation.

Ingested and Aspirated Foreign Bodies

Esophageal and aspirated foreign bodies have important clinical significance, and both should be considered carefully when the history or physical examination findings raise sufficient suspicion. The published evidence regarding the diagnosis and management of foreign body ingestion or aspiration is weighted disproportionately with observational studies, case controls, expert opinion, and systematic reviews. Most of the publications would receive a categorization of C (observational studies including case-control and cohort design) and D (expert opinion, case reports, and clinical reasoning). One of the few prospective studies examining the diagnostic evaluation of foreign body aspiration in children could be considered level B evidence (randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, or diagnostic studies with minor limitations). This study found that the medical history is the most important predictive part of the evaluation. There is evidence for considering bronchoscopy if there is significant history suggestive of foreign body aspiration, even in the setting of normal physical examination findings. (28). Most ingested foreign bodies spontaneously pass without incident. However, special attention should be paid to objects in the esophagus as well as to batteries and magnets. Based on a systematic review of the literature (level B evidence) and the potential for rapid and life-threatening damage, batteries in the esophagus should be removed immediately. (10) Other objects, such as coins, may be observed for passage in an asymptomatic patient. In addition, given the high risk of significant complications, ingestion of high-powered magnets should be quickly and carefully evaluated. Although single magnets are likely to pass without complication, multiple magnets or magnets ingested with other metal objects can cause significant damage and should be removed if there is any concern for mural entrapment, bowel perforation, or failure to progress. (10)(16)(17)(18)(19). Lastly, another systematic review of the literature (level B evidence) about the aspiration of food objects in children suggests that this is a significant public health concern with potentially devastating consequences. Despite clear legislation and regulation by the Consumer Product Safety Commission regarding toys, there is no similar regulation of high-risk foods. The data suggest that there is opportunity for improvement in legislation about the production and packaging of high-risk items as well as in the education of caregivers. (22)

An ingested foreign body: two sides of the same coin?

A 2-year-old child presented to the emergency department with an acute onset of dysphagia and stertor. A plain anteroposterior chest X-ray revealed a single circular opacity in the middle third of the oesophagus consistent with an ingested coin. The child was taken to the theatre for rigid pharyngo-oesophagoscopy and removal of the coin. After the first coin was removed subsequent endoscopic examination revealed a second coin at the same location. This extremely rare case of two ingested coins becoming impacted with perfect radiological alignment emphasises the importance of thorough examination on endoscopy and the potential limitations of an X-ray in initial assessment of an ingested foreign body.