Endoscopic ultrasound of isolated gastric corrosive stricture mimicking linitis plastica

The value of oral contrast-enhanced gastric ultrasonography in the diagnosis and staging of benign peptic ulcer

We evaluate the value of oral contrast-enhanced gastric ultrasonography (OCUS) by comparing it with conventional gastroscopy in diagnosing and staging benign peptic ulcer. From July 2018 to December 2020, 44 patients with gastroscopy-confirmed benign peptic ulcers (a total of 45 ulcers were detected), who also received OCUS, were retrospectively reviewed. Each patient's ultrasound images were compared with gastroscopy and pathology findings. The characteristics of ultrasonic images of different stages of ulcer were analysed. A total of 43 ulcers were detected by OCUS in 44 patients with benign peptic ulcers. There were no false positive results among the OCUS exams, but two ulcers were misdiagnosed. OCUS for benign peptic ulcer staging also shows acceptable clinical practice results. OCUS is useful for detecting and staging benign peptic ulcer, and may be considered an alternative method for conventional gastroscopy. OCUS is especially useful in the follow-up of BPU treatment, but futher study is needed to improve the diagnostic accuracy of benign and malignant ulcers.

Gastric linitis plastica due to signet-ring cell carcinoma with Krukenberg tumors diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration

Gastric linitis plastica is a rare condition characterized by the stiffening and thickening of the gastric wall, presenting a "leather bottle" appearance. It is generally associated with infiltration of poorly differentiated gastric cancer cells, but similar findings can arise due to metastases from other cancers and benign inflammatory processes. Despite advances in imaging modalities, pathological evaluation is required for diagnosis. As endoscopic mucosal biopsies may not be diagnostic, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of the thickened stomach wall presents a potential diagnostic option. We report a case which presented with bilateral ovarian tumors and was ultimately diagnosed as gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma with Krukenberg tumors by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of the stomach wall. The preoperative diagnosis allowed the patient to avoid surgery and to start chemotherapy for gastric cancer. We also review the existing literature on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the context of gastric linitis plastica.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided retrieval of a toothpick embedded in the stomach wall

Patients with the complaint of ingested foreign body commonly present in the emergency department. Radiographic imaging is always done for the purpose of localization. However, radiolucent materials like wood are not easily picked up on CT scan. We report the case of a 33-year-old male patient who presented with the complaint of progressive abdominal pain and history of ingestion of a toothpick. It was removed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided localization-assisted targeted endoscopic dissection. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided localization reduced the length and depth of the required incision and helped to minimize the risk of damage to the surrounding tissue. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 45:603-604, 2017.

Evaluation of Transabdominal Ultrasound with Oral Cellulose-Based Contrast Agent in the Detection and Surveillance of Gastric Ulcer

The aim of this study was to assess the role of transabdominal ultrasound with cellulose-based oral contrast agent (TUS-OCCA) in the detection and surveillance of gastric ulcer. The study was approved by the institutional review board at Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University. A total of 124 consecutive patients with benign gastric ulcer diagnosed by gastroscopy and biopsy were enrolled. Serial TUS-OCCA (approximately 1 exam every 2 wk) was performed to monitor the effects of treatment, and additional interventions were planned according to the results. TUS-OCCA detected gastric ulcer in 76% of patients (94 of 124). The detection rates for lesions of ≤5 mm, lesions of 5-10 mm, lesions of 10-15 mm and lesions >15 mm were 32% (10 of 31), 77% (27 of 35), 96% (25 of 26) and 100% (32 of 32), respectively. The detection rates for lesions located in the antrum, angle and body were 70%, 84% and 85%, respectively. Among 30 undetected lesions, which ranged 2-13 mm in size, 11 were at the antrum, 9 at the angle, 3 in the body, 6 at the cardia and 1 at the fundus. During the follow-up period, patients underwent a mean of 3.8 TUS-OCCA examinations (range 2-7), and ulcers were healed after 8 wk (range 2-12 wk) of standard therapy in 76 patients. Eighteen patients who did not show improvement after standard therapy underwent repeat gastroscopy with biopsy. Repeat biopsy was positive for gastric cancer in 4 of these: 2 of the remaining 14 were diagnosed with gastric cancer at gastrectomy, and 12 were diagnosed with chronic benign ulcer. These results indicate that serial TUS-OCCA can be used for close monitoring during routine treatment of gastric ulcers that are detectable by TUS-OCCA and that monitoring by TUS-OCCA can guide additional interventions. A non-invasive follow-up program based on TUS-OCCA can also help to detect gastric cancers that have been misdiagnosed as benign ulcers at the initial endoscopic biopsy.

Role of endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic resection for the treatment of gastric schwannoma

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic resection play an important role in gastric submucosal tumor. However, there were few articles regarding EUS and endoscopic resection of gastric schwannomas. Our aim was to evaluate the role of EUS and endoscopic resection in treating gastric schwannomas.We retrospectively reviewed 14 patients between March 2012 and April 2016 with gastric schwannomas and who received EUS and endoscopic resection. EUS characteristics, endoscopic resection, tumor features, and follow-up were evaluated in all the patients.Fourteen patients were enrolled in the present study. The patients' ages ranged from 25 to 72 years (mean age, 52.6 years). On EUS, all tumors were originating from muscularis propria and hypoechoic. Ten tumors have the extraluminal growth patterns and 4 tumors have the intraluminal growth patterns. Marginal halos were observed in 7 lesions. No cystic change and calcification were found inside the lesions. Complete endoscopic resection was performed in all the patients with no complications occurring in any patients. No recurrence or metastases was found in all patients during the follow-up period.Gastric schwannoma has some characteristics on EUS, but it is difficult to differentiate gastric schwannoma from gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Endoscopic resection is an effective and safe treatment for gastric schwannoma with an excellent follow-up outcome.

Effects of premedication with Pronase for endoscopic ultrasound of the stomach: A randomized controlled trial

AIM

To analyze the effects of premedication with Pronase for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) examination of the stomach.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized and controlled clinical study. All patients were randomly assigned to either the Pronase group or placebo group. The pretreatment solution was a mixed solution of 20000 U of Pronase and 60 mL sodium bicarbonate solution in the Pronase group, while an equal amount of sodium bicarbonate solution was administered to the placebo group. All operators, image evaluators and experimental recorders in EUS did not participate in the preparation and allocation of pretreatment solution. Two blinded investigators assessed the obscurity scores for the EUS images according to the size of artifacts (including ultrasound images of the gastric cavity and the gastric wall). Differences in imaging quality, the duration of examination and the usage of physiological saline during the examination process between the Pronase group and the control group were compared.

RESULTS

No differences existed in patient demographics between the two groups. For the gastric cavity, the Pronase group had significantly lower mean obscurity scores than the placebo group (1.0476 ± 0.77 vs 1.6129 ± 0.96, respectively, P = 0.000). The mean obscurity scores for the gastric mucosal surface were significantly lower in the Pronase group than the placebo group (1.2063 ± 0.90 vs 1.7581 ± 0.84, respectively, P = 0.001). The average EUS procedure duration for the Pronase group was 11.60 ± 3.32 min, which was significantly shorter than that of the placebo group (13.13 ± 3.81 min, P = 0.007). Less saline was used in the Pronase group than the placebo group, and the difference was significant (417.94 ± 121.38 mL vs 467.42 ± 104.52 mL, respectively, P = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

The group that had Pronase premedication prior to the EUS examination had clearer images than the placebo group. With Pronase premedication, the examination time was shorter, and the amount of saline used during the EUS examination was less.